Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NIC vs IBCP vs FFIN vs BANF vs OTTR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Diversified Utilities
NIC vs IBCP vs FFIN vs BANF vs OTTR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Diversified Utilities |
| Market Cap | $2.31B | $699M | $4.61B | $3.76B | $3.69B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $553M | $315M | $739M | $909M | $1.31B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $151M | $69M | $243M | $238M | $280M |
| Gross Margin | 69.5% | 69.6% | 70.8% | 68.5% | 34.9% |
| Operating Margin | 33.8% | 25.8% | 36.8% | 30.3% | 26.4% |
| Forward P/E | 12.7x | 9.6x | 15.9x | 15.5x | 15.9x |
| Total Debt | $135M | $117M | $197M | $86M | $1.10B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $660M | $52M | $763M | $3.55B | $386M |
NIC vs IBCP vs FFIN vs BANF vs OTTR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolet Bankshares,… (NIC) | 100 | 262.4 | +162.4% |
| Independent Bank Co… (IBCP) | 100 | 245.7 | +145.7% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 105.7 | +5.7% |
| BancFirst Corporati… (BANF) | 100 | 297.1 | +197.1% |
| Otter Tail Corporat… (OTTR) | 100 | 204.7 | +104.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NIC vs IBCP vs FFIN vs BANF vs OTTR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NIC is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and bank quality.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.93, Low D/E 10.7%, current ratio 5079.45x
- NIM 3.3% vs FFIN's 3.1%
- +23.4% vs BANF's -4.8%
IBCP has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 3.0%
- Beta 0.83, yield 3.0%, current ratio 370.62x
- Lower P/E (9.6x vs 15.5x)
- 3.0% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs FFIN's 2.2%
FFIN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 18.8%, EPS growth 12.2%
- 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs OTTR's -2.0%
- 30.2% margin vs OTTR's 21.3%
Among these 5 stocks, BANF doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
OTTR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 241.8% 10Y total return vs BANF's 323.2%
- PEG 0.69 vs FFIN's 3.05
- Beta 0.42 vs FFIN's 0.95
- 7.1% ROA vs IBCP's 1.3%, ROIC 10.4% vs 10.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs OTTR's -2.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.6x vs 15.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.2% margin vs OTTR's 21.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.42 vs FFIN's 0.95 | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs FFIN's 2.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +23.4% vs BANF's -4.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.1% ROA vs IBCP's 1.3%, ROIC 10.4% vs 10.2% |
NIC vs IBCP vs FFIN vs BANF vs OTTR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NIC vs IBCP vs FFIN vs BANF vs OTTR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IBCP leads in 2 of 6 categories
FFIN leads 1 • BANF leads 1 • NIC leads 1 • OTTR leads 1
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FFIN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OTTR is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.3B annually — 4.2x IBCP's $315M. FFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 30.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OTTR's 21.3%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $553M | $315M | $739M | $909M | $1.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $196M | $89M | $310M | $324M | $466M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $151M | $69M | $243M | $238M | $280M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $149M | $70M | $290M | $196M | $2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +69.5% | +69.6% | +70.8% | +68.5% | +34.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +33.8% | +25.8% | +36.8% | +30.3% | +26.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +27.3% | +21.7% | +30.2% | +23.8% | +21.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +27.0% | +22.2% | +39.6% | +24.7% | +0.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | +2.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.0% | +2.3% | -7.7% | +5.7% | +6.8% |
Valuation Metrics
IBCP leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.4x trailing earnings, IBCP trades at a 50% valuation discount to FFIN's 20.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), OTTR offers better value at 0.59x vs FFIN's 3.98x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.3B | $699M | $4.6B | $3.8B | $3.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $764M | $4.0B | $294M | $4.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.00x | 10.38x | 20.76x | 17.58x | 13.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.75x | 9.56x | 15.92x | 15.48x | 15.88x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.32x | 1.97x | 3.98x | 1.81x | 0.59x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.53x | 9.39x | 14.17x | 0.99x | 9.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.17x | 2.22x | 6.23x | 4.14x | 2.83x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.80x | 1.41x | 2.89x | 2.35x | 1.99x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.43x | 9.96x | 15.73x | 16.75x | 37.64x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BANF leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OTTR delivers a 15.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $12 for NIC. BANF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OTTR's 0.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NIC scores 9/9 vs OTTR's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.4% | +14.2% | +13.3% | +13.3% | +15.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | +1.3% | +1.6% | +1.7% | +7.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.3% | +10.2% | +11.0% | +12.8% | +10.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.5% | +2.6% | +16.0% | +15.7% | +9.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.11x | 0.23x | 0.12x | 0.05x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$525M | $65M | -$566M | -$3.5B | $718M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $660M | $52M | $763M | $3.6B | $386M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $135M | $117M | $197M | $86M | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.91x | 0.91x | 1.48x | 1.11x | 7.32x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NIC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OTTR five years ago would be worth $19,807 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,178 for FFIN. Over the past 12 months, NIC leads with a +23.4% total return vs BANF's -4.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NIC at 38.9% vs OTTR's 6.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +22.0% | +7.2% | +8.5% | +6.8% | +8.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +23.4% | +12.6% | -3.2% | -4.8% | +17.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +167.9% | +130.6% | +29.1% | +64.4% | +19.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +85.3% | +63.7% | -28.2% | +65.3% | +98.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +234.6% | +184.6% | +145.4% | +323.2% | +241.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +38.9% | +32.1% | +8.9% | +18.0% | +6.1% |
Risk & Volatility
OTTR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OTTR is the less volatile stock with a 0.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FFIN's 0.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OTTR currently trades 95.2% from its 52-week high vs BANF's 81.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.93x | 0.83x | 0.95x | 0.93x | 0.42x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $163.11 | $37.39 | $38.74 | $138.77 | $92.24 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $114.12 | $29.63 | $28.11 | $101.48 | $74.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.9% | +90.8% | +83.6% | +81.6% | +95.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.2 | 50.6 | 58.2 | 55.5 | 51.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 175K | 176K | 740K | 135K | 277K |
Analyst Outlook
IBCP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NIC as "Buy", IBCP as "Hold", FFIN as "Hold", BANF as "Hold", OTTR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 24.5% upside for NIC (target: $183) vs -16.1% for BANF (target: $95). For income investors, IBCP offers the higher dividend yield at 3.05% vs NIC's 0.83%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $182.67 | $38.00 | $39.25 | $95.00 | $81.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 7 | 15 | 3 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.8% | +3.0% | +2.2% | +1.5% | +2.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.21 | $1.03 | $0.72 | $1.72 | $2.09 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.9% | +1.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
IBCP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). FFIN leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow).
NIC vs IBCP vs FFIN vs BANF vs OTTR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NIC or IBCP or FFIN or BANF or OTTR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the stronger pick with 18. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 0% for Otter Tail Corporation (OTTR). Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the better valuation at 10. 4x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nicolet Bankshares, Inc. (NIC) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NIC or IBCP or FFIN or BANF or OTTR?
On trailing P/E, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the cheapest at 10.
4x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. at 20. 8x. On forward P/E, Independent Bank Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Otter Tail Corporation wins at 0. 69x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 05x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NIC or IBCP or FFIN or BANF or OTTR?
Over the past 5 years, Otter Tail Corporation (OTTR) delivered a total return of +98.
1%, compared to -28. 2% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BANF returned +323. 2% versus FFIN's +145. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NIC or IBCP or FFIN or BANF or OTTR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Otter Tail Corporation (OTTR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
42β versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 0. 95β — meaning FFIN is approximately 125% more volatile than OTTR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BancFirst Corporation (BANF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 59% for Otter Tail Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NIC or IBCP or FFIN or BANF or OTTR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is pulling ahead at 18. 8% versus -2. 0% for Otter Tail Corporation (OTTR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Nicolet Bankshares, Inc. grew EPS 21. 5% year-over-year, compared to -8. 6% for Otter Tail Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NIC or IBCP or FFIN or BANF or OTTR?
First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 2% net margin versus 21. 2% for Otter Tail Corporation — meaning it keeps 30. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FFIN leads at 36. 8% versus 25. 8% for IBCP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FFIN leads at 70. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NIC or IBCP or FFIN or BANF or OTTR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Otter Tail Corporation (OTTR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 69x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 05x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) trades at 9. 6x forward P/E versus 15. 9x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 6. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NIC: 24. 5% to $182. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — NIC or IBCP or FFIN or BANF or OTTR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the highest yield at 3. 0%, versus 0. 8% for Nicolet Bankshares, Inc. (NIC).
09Is NIC or IBCP or FFIN or BANF or OTTR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Otter Tail Corporation (OTTR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
42), 2. 4% yield, +241. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (OTTR: +241. 8%, FFIN: +145. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NIC and IBCP and FFIN and BANF and OTTR?
These companies operate in different sectors (NIC (Financial Services) and IBCP (Financial Services) and FFIN (Financial Services) and BANF (Financial Services) and OTTR (Utilities)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NIC is a small-cap deep-value stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock; FFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; BANF is a small-cap deep-value stock; OTTR is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.