Staffing & Employment Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NSP vs NOW vs WDAY vs CRM vs SAP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Application
Software - Application
Software - Application
NSP vs NOW vs WDAY vs CRM vs SAP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Staffing & Employment Services | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $1.25B | $96.96B | $34.48B | $179.19B | $203.58B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.81B | $13.96B | $9.55B | $41.52B | $36.80B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $1.76B | $693M | $7.46B | $7.04B |
| Gross Margin | 13.2% | 76.6% | 75.7% | 77.7% | 73.8% |
| Operating Margin | -0.1% | 13.4% | 8.9% | 21.5% | 26.7% |
| Forward P/E | 15.3x | 22.5x | 12.5x | 15.8x | 23.8x |
| Total Debt | $435M | $3.20B | $834M | $6.74B | $8.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $642M | $3.73B | $1.50B | $7.33B | $8.22B |
NSP vs NOW vs WDAY vs CRM vs SAP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Insperity, Inc. (NSP) | 100 | 63.1 | -36.9% |
| ServiceNow, Inc. (NOW) | 100 | 24.1 | -75.9% |
| Workday, Inc. (WDAY) | 100 | 71.4 | -28.6% |
| Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) | 100 | 106.6 | +6.6% |
| SAP SE (SAP) | 100 | 136.4 | +36.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NSP vs NOW vs WDAY vs CRM vs SAP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NSP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.06, yield 7.2%
- 7.2% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs CRM's 0.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
NOW is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 20.9%, EPS growth 21.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.4%
- PEG 0.32 vs SAP's 3.60
- 20.9% revenue growth vs NSP's 3.5%
WDAY has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.71, Low D/E 10.7%, current ratio 1.32x
- Beta 0.71, current ratio 1.32x
- Lower P/E (12.5x vs 23.8x)
- Beta 0.71 vs NOW's 1.46, lower leverage
CRM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 154.6% 10Y total return vs SAP's 151.1%
- -32.4% vs NOW's -90.5%
SAP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 19.1% margin vs NSP's -0.1%
- 9.7% ROA vs NSP's -0.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.9% revenue growth vs NSP's 3.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.5x vs 23.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.1% margin vs NSP's -0.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.71 vs NOW's 1.46, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 7.2% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs CRM's 0.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -32.4% vs NOW's -90.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.7% ROA vs NSP's -0.3% |
NSP vs NOW vs WDAY vs CRM vs SAP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NSP vs NOW vs WDAY vs CRM vs SAP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SAP leads in 2 of 6 categories
NSP leads 1 • NOW leads 0 • WDAY leads 0 • CRM leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CRM and SAP each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CRM is the larger business by revenue, generating $41.5B annually — 6.1x NSP's $6.8B. SAP is the more profitable business, keeping 19.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NSP's -0.1%. On growth, NOW holds the edge at +22.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.8B | $14.0B | $9.6B | $41.5B | $36.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $35M | $2.7B | $1.2B | $11.4B | $11.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | $1.8B | $693M | $7.5B | $7.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$309M | $4.6B | $2.8B | $14.4B | $8.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | +76.6% | +75.7% | +77.7% | +73.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.1% | +13.4% | +8.9% | +21.5% | +26.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.1% | +12.6% | +7.3% | +18.0% | +19.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.5% | +33.2% | +29.1% | +34.7% | +22.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.4% | +22.1% | +14.5% | +12.1% | +3.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.0% | +2.3% | +57.1% | +18.3% | +15.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — NSP and WDAY each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.9x trailing earnings, CRM trades at a 57% valuation discount to NOW's 56.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NOW offers better value at 0.81x vs SAP's 3.76x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $97.0B | $34.5B | $179.2B | $203.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.0B | $96.4B | $33.8B | $178.6B | $203.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -181.61x | 56.04x | 50.73x | 23.88x | 24.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.27x | 22.51x | 12.48x | 15.82x | 23.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.81x | — | 1.95x | 3.76x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 29.74x | 37.64x | 24.66x | 20.03x | 15.54x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.18x | 7.30x | 3.61x | 4.32x | 4.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 27.00x | 7.56x | 4.42x | 3.01x | 3.86x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 21.19x | 12.41x | 12.44x | 21.83x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SAP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SAP delivers a 15.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-8 for NSP. WDAY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NSP's 9.46x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SAP scores 9/9 vs NSP's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -7.7% | +15.0% | +8.9% | +12.6% | +15.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.3% | +7.5% | +3.8% | +6.6% | +9.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +12.4% | +8.5% | +10.9% | +16.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.6% | +13.2% | +8.5% | +11.9% | +18.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 8 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 9.46x | 0.25x | 0.11x | 0.11x | 0.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$207M | -$523M | -$667M | -$590M | -$149M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $642M | $3.7B | $1.5B | $7.3B | $8.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $435M | $3.2B | $834M | $6.7B | $8.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.29x | 185.08x | 12.60x | 44.14x | 8.49x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SAP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SAP five years ago would be worth $13,326 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,935 for NOW. Over the past 12 months, CRM leads with a -32.4% total return vs NOW's -90.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SAP at 10.7% vs NOW's -40.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.8% | -36.5% | -36.4% | -26.4% | -25.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -46.2% | -90.5% | -47.8% | -32.4% | -39.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -65.6% | -78.7% | -27.1% | -4.0% | +35.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -48.6% | -80.6% | -44.7% | -12.3% | +33.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +59.4% | +38.8% | +86.4% | +154.6% | +151.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -29.9% | -40.3% | -10.0% | -1.4% | +10.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WDAY and CRM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WDAY is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NOW's 1.46 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CRM currently trades 62.9% from its 52-week high vs NOW's 8.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.06x | 1.46x | 0.71x | 0.82x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $72.23 | $1057.39 | $276.00 | $296.05 | $313.28 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $18.57 | $81.24 | $110.39 | $163.52 | $160.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +45.3% | +8.9% | +47.4% | +62.9% | +55.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.6 | 41.5 | 46.4 | 48.3 | 48.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 972K | 21.2M | 5.0M | 12.4M | 3.3M |
Analyst Outlook
NSP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NSP as "Hold", NOW as "Buy", WDAY as "Buy", CRM as "Buy", SAP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 124.2% upside for SAP (target: $392) vs 48.7% for NSP (target: $49). For income investors, NSP offers the higher dividend yield at 7.25% vs CRM's 0.89%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $48.60 | $151.52 | $197.90 | $287.00 | $391.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 68 | 80 | 97 | 43 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +7.2% | — | — | +0.9% | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | — | — | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.37 | — | — | $1.66 | $2.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.5% | +1.9% | +8.4% | +7.0% | +1.1% |
SAP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). NSP leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 3 tied.
NSP vs NOW vs WDAY vs CRM vs SAP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NSP or NOW or WDAY or CRM or SAP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ServiceNow, Inc.
(NOW) is the stronger pick with 20. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 5% for Insperity, Inc. (NSP). Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) offers the better valuation at 23. 9x trailing P/E (15. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ServiceNow, Inc. (NOW) a "Buy" — based on 68 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NSP or NOW or WDAY or CRM or SAP?
On trailing P/E, Salesforce, Inc.
(CRM) is the cheapest at 23. 9x versus ServiceNow, Inc. at 56. 0x. On forward P/E, Workday, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: ServiceNow, Inc. wins at 0. 32x versus SAP SE's 3. 60x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NSP or NOW or WDAY or CRM or SAP?
Over the past 5 years, SAP SE (SAP) delivered a total return of +33.
3%, compared to -80. 6% for ServiceNow, Inc. (NOW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CRM returned +154. 6% versus NOW's +38. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NSP or NOW or WDAY or CRM or SAP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Workday, Inc.
(WDAY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 71β versus ServiceNow, Inc. 's 1. 46β — meaning NOW is approximately 107% more volatile than WDAY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Workday, Inc. (WDAY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 9% for Insperity, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NSP or NOW or WDAY or CRM or SAP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ServiceNow, Inc.
(NOW) is pulling ahead at 20. 9% versus 3. 5% for Insperity, Inc. (NSP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SAP SE grew EPS 126. 0% year-over-year, compared to -107. 5% for Insperity, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NOW leads at 22. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NSP or NOW or WDAY or CRM or SAP?
SAP SE (SAP) is the more profitable company, earning 19.
1% net margin versus -0. 1% for Insperity, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SAP leads at 26. 7% versus -0. 1% for NSP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CRM leads at 77. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NSP or NOW or WDAY or CRM or SAP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, ServiceNow, Inc. (NOW) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 32x versus SAP SE's 3. 60x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Workday, Inc. (WDAY) trades at 12. 5x forward P/E versus 23. 8x for SAP SE — 11. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SAP: 124. 2% to $391. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — NSP or NOW or WDAY or CRM or SAP?
In this comparison, NSP (7.
2% yield), SAP (1. 5% yield), CRM (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. NOW, WDAY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NSP or NOW or WDAY or CRM or SAP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Salesforce, Inc.
(CRM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82), 0. 9% yield, +154. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CRM: +154. 6%, NOW: +38. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NSP and NOW and WDAY and CRM and SAP?
These companies operate in different sectors (NSP (Industrials) and NOW (Technology) and WDAY (Technology) and CRM (Technology) and SAP (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NSP is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NOW is a mid-cap high-growth stock; WDAY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CRM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SAP is a large-cap quality compounder stock. NSP, CRM, SAP pay a dividend while NOW, WDAY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.