Asset Management
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
NTRS vs JPM vs STT vs WFC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Diversified
Asset Management
Banks - Diversified
NTRS vs JPM vs STT vs WFC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Banks - Diversified | Asset Management | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $29.66B | $825.89B | $41.99B | $244.81B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $14.30B | $270.79B | $21.97B | $125.40B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.74B | $58.03B | $2.98B | $21.06B |
| Gross Margin | 56.5% | 58.6% | 58.5% | 62.2% |
| Operating Margin | 16.3% | 27.7% | 15.5% | 18.6% |
| Forward P/E | 14.8x | 13.8x | 12.0x | 11.3x |
| Total Debt | $16.43B | $751.15B | $36.79B | $281.88B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $61.13B | $469.32B | $116.10B | $203.36B |
NTRS vs JPM vs STT vs WFC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Northern Trust Corp… (NTRS) | 100 | 202.5 | +102.5% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 314.8 | +214.8% |
| State Street Corpor… (STT) | 100 | 244.1 | +144.1% |
| Wells Fargo & Compa… (WFC) | 100 | 299.1 | +199.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NTRS vs JPM vs STT vs WFC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NTRS is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +66.6% vs WFC's +10.6%
JPM has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 461.3% 10Y total return vs STT's 186.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.00, current ratio 0.65x
- PEG 1.06 vs WFC's 2.02
- Beta 1.00, yield 1.7%, current ratio 0.65x
STT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.19, yield 2.3%
- Rev growth 19.6%, EPS growth 47.1%
- 19.6% NII/revenue growth vs NTRS's -9.9%
- 2.3% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.7%
WFC is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 2.5% vs STT's 0.8%
- Lower P/E (11.3x vs 12.0x)
- Beta 1.00 vs STT's 1.19
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.6% NII/revenue growth vs NTRS's -9.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.3x vs 12.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs WFC's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.00 vs STT's 1.19 | |
| Dividends | 2.3% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +66.6% vs WFC's +10.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs WFC's 0.4% |
NTRS vs JPM vs STT vs WFC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NTRS vs JPM vs STT vs WFC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories
WFC leads 1 • NTRS leads 1 • STT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $270.8B annually — 18.9x NTRS's $14.3B. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 21.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NTRS's 12.1%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $14.3B | $270.8B | $22.0B | $125.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.2B | $81.3B | $4.3B | $31.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.7B | $58.0B | $3.0B | $21.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4.7B | -$119.7B | -$6.1B | -$14.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +56.5% | +58.6% | +58.5% | +62.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.3% | +27.7% | +15.5% | +18.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.1% | +21.6% | +12.2% | +15.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +38.2% | -15.5% | -64.3% | +2.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.1% | +16.0% | +23.0% | +16.9% |
Valuation Metrics
WFC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.7x trailing earnings, WFC trades at a 19% valuation discount to NTRS's 18.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 1.19x vs WFC's 2.63x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $29.7B | $825.9B | $42.0B | $244.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$15.0B | $1.11T | -$37.3B | $323.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.31x | 15.51x | 18.12x | 14.74x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.80x | 13.79x | 11.99x | 11.33x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.86x | 1.19x | 2.05x | 2.63x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -4.68x | 13.34x | -9.33x | 10.46x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.07x | 3.05x | 1.91x | 1.95x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.33x | 2.56x | 1.78x | 1.52x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.43x | — | — | 80.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NTRS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 16.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $11 for STT. NTRS carries lower financial leverage with a 1.27x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NTRS scores 6/9 vs STT's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.4% | +16.1% | +10.8% | +11.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +1.3% | +0.8% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.0% | +5.4% | +4.6% | +3.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.0% | +8.2% | +4.6% | +5.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.27x | 2.18x | 1.45x | 1.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$44.7B | $281.8B | -$79.3B | $78.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $61.1B | $469.3B | $116.1B | $203.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $16.4B | $751.1B | $36.8B | $281.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.38x | 0.74x | 0.42x | 0.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $20,430 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,665 for NTRS. Over the past 12 months, NTRS leads with a +66.6% total return vs WFC's +10.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 32.9% vs WFC's 29.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.5% | -5.0% | +16.6% | -16.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +66.6% | +25.2% | +66.2% | +10.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +131.7% | +134.6% | +128.4% | +117.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +46.7% | +104.3% | +86.2% | +83.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +170.2% | +461.3% | +186.8% | +90.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +32.3% | +32.9% | +31.7% | +29.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — STT and WFC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WFC is the less volatile stock with a 1.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STT's 1.19 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. STT currently trades 95.3% from its 52-week high vs WFC's 81.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.14x | 1.00x | 1.19x | 1.00x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $173.19 | $337.25 | $156.18 | $97.76 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $97.00 | $248.83 | $90.94 | $71.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.4% | +90.8% | +95.3% | +81.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.4 | 59.4 | 63.9 | 47.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 8.3M | 2.0M | 15.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — JPM and STT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NTRS as "Hold", JPM as "Buy", STT as "Buy", WFC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 24.0% upside for WFC (target: $98) vs -3.9% for NTRS (target: $154). For income investors, STT offers the higher dividend yield at 2.30% vs JPM's 1.68%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $153.75 | $338.78 | $160.44 | $98.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 35 | 61 | 37 | 60 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +1.7% | +2.3% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 14 | 3 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.14 | $5.13 | $3.42 | $1.48 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.3% | +3.5% | +6.9% | +9.1% |
JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). WFC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
NTRS vs JPM vs STT vs WFC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NTRS or JPM or STT or WFC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, State Street Corporation (STT) is the stronger pick with 19.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 9% for Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS). Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E (11. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NTRS or JPM or STT or WFC?
On trailing P/E, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) is the cheapest at 14.
7x versus Northern Trust Corporation at 18. 3x. On forward P/E, Wells Fargo & Company is actually cheaper at 11. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 1. 06x versus Wells Fargo & Company's 2. 02x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NTRS or JPM or STT or WFC?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +104. 3%, compared to +46. 7% for Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +461. 3% versus WFC's +90. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NTRS or JPM or STT or WFC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
00β versus State Street Corporation's 1. 19β — meaning STT is approximately 18% more volatile than WFC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 127% versus 2% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NTRS or JPM or STT or WFC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), State Street Corporation (STT) is pulling ahead at 19.
6% versus -9. 9% for Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: State Street Corporation grew EPS 47. 1% year-over-year, compared to -10. 5% for Northern Trust Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NTRS or JPM or STT or WFC?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 6% net margin versus 12. 1% for Northern Trust Corporation — meaning it keeps 21. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 27. 7% versus 15. 5% for STT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WFC leads at 62. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NTRS or JPM or STT or WFC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 06x versus Wells Fargo & Company's 2. 02x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) trades at 11. 3x forward P/E versus 14. 8x for Northern Trust Corporation — 3. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WFC: 24. 0% to $98. 13.
08Which pays a better dividend — NTRS or JPM or STT or WFC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
State Street Corporation (STT) offers the highest yield at 2. 3%, versus 1. 7% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM).
09Is NTRS or JPM or STT or WFC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 00), 1. 7% yield, +461. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +461. 3%, STT: +186. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NTRS and JPM and STT and WFC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NTRS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; STT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; WFC is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.