Software - Application
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
NVNI vs MNDY vs HUBS vs CRM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Application
Software - Application
NVNI vs MNDY vs HUBS vs CRM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $2M | $3.94B | $12.58B | $179.19B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $1.23B | $3.30B | $41.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6M | $119M | $100M | $7.46B |
| Gross Margin | 65.0% | 89.2% | 83.7% | 77.7% |
| Operating Margin | -13.8% | -0.1% | 1.9% | 21.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 19.0x | 19.6x | 15.8x |
| Total Debt | $64M | $312M | $485M | $6.74B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $13M | $1.50B | $882M | $7.33B |
NVNI vs MNDY vs HUBS vs CRM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nvni Group Limited … (NVNI) | 100 | 4.8 | -95.2% |
| monday.com Ltd. (MNDY) | 100 | 58.8 | -41.2% |
| HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) | 100 | 57.7 | -42.3% |
| Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) | 100 | 92.7 | -7.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NVNI vs MNDY vs HUBS vs CRM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NVNI plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
MNDY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 26.7%, EPS growth 261.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 33.4%
- 26.7% revenue growth vs NVNI's 1.8%
HUBS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 469.1% 10Y total return vs CRM's 154.6%
CRM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.82, yield 0.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.82, Low D/E 11.4%, current ratio 0.76x
- Beta 0.82, yield 0.9%, current ratio 0.76x
- Lower P/E (15.8x vs 19.6x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.7% revenue growth vs NVNI's 1.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.8x vs 19.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.0% margin vs NVNI's -57.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs NVNI's 1.58 | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -32.4% vs NVNI's -74.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.6% ROA vs NVNI's 1.1% |
NVNI vs MNDY vs HUBS vs CRM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
NVNI vs MNDY vs HUBS vs CRM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CRM leads in 4 of 6 categories
NVNI leads 0 • MNDY leads 0 • HUBS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CRM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CRM and NVNI operate at a comparable scale, with $41.5B and $0 in trailing revenue. CRM is the more profitable business, keeping 18.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NVNI's -57.4%. On growth, MNDY holds the edge at +24.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $1.2B | $3.3B | $41.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$26M | $12M | $166M | $11.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $6M | $119M | $100M | $7.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$11M | $321M | $712M | $14.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +65.0% | +89.2% | +83.7% | +77.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -13.8% | -0.1% | +1.9% | +21.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -57.4% | +9.6% | +3.0% | +18.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.5% | +26.0% | +21.6% | +34.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +24.6% | +23.4% | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -92.9% | +2.3% | +2.5% | +18.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — NVNI and CRM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.9x trailing earnings, CRM trades at a 92% valuation discount to HUBS's 284.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CRM's 20.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MNDY's 227.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2M | $3.9B | $12.6B | $179.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12M | $2.7B | $12.2B | $178.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.16x | 34.10x | 284.08x | 23.88x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 19.01x | 19.61x | 15.82x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.95x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 227.80x | 69.24x | 20.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.04x | 3.20x | 4.02x | 4.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 3.25x | 6.29x | 3.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.54x | 12.57x | 17.77x | 12.44x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CRM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CRM delivers a 12.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $2 for NVNI. CRM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MNDY's 0.25x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CRM scores 8/9 vs MNDY's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.5% | +9.5% | +5.0% | +12.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +5.6% | +2.7% | +6.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -2.4% | +0.4% | +10.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -0.1% | +0.5% | +11.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.25x | 0.23x | 0.11x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $50M | -$1.2B | -$397M | -$590M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $13M | $1.5B | $882M | $7.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $64M | $312M | $485M | $6.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.61x | — | 4753.07x | 44.14x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CRM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CRM five years ago would be worth $8,775 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $189 for NVNI. Over the past 12 months, CRM leads with a -32.4% total return vs NVNI's -74.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CRM at -1.4% vs NVNI's -73.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -56.2% | -46.7% | -36.1% | -26.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -74.1% | -72.3% | -62.0% | -32.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.1% | -38.6% | -45.1% | -4.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.1% | -57.3% | -52.1% | -12.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.1% | -57.3% | +469.1% | +154.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -73.4% | -15.0% | -18.1% | -1.4% |
Risk & Volatility
CRM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CRM is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVNI's 1.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CRM currently trades 62.9% from its 52-week high vs NVNI's 7.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.58x | 1.19x | 1.18x | 0.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.40 | $316.98 | $682.57 | $296.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.96 | $57.50 | $187.45 | $163.52 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +7.3% | +24.1% | +35.8% | +62.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.4 | 56.5 | 51.1 | 48.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 407K | 1.5M | 1.5M | 12.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MNDY as "Buy", HUBS as "Buy", CRM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 74.1% upside for MNDY (target: $133) vs 47.7% for HUBS (target: $361). CRM is the only dividend payer here at 0.89% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $133.00 | $360.89 | $287.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 25 | 47 | 97 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $1.66 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.4% | +4.0% | +7.0% |
CRM leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.
NVNI vs MNDY vs HUBS vs CRM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NVNI or MNDY or HUBS or CRM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, monday.
com Ltd. (MNDY) is the stronger pick with 26. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 8% for Nvni Group Limited Ordinary Shares (NVNI). Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) offers the better valuation at 23. 9x trailing P/E (15. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate monday. com Ltd. (MNDY) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NVNI or MNDY or HUBS or CRM?
On trailing P/E, Salesforce, Inc.
(CRM) is the cheapest at 23. 9x versus HubSpot, Inc. at 284. 1x. On forward P/E, Salesforce, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NVNI or MNDY or HUBS or CRM?
Over the past 5 years, Salesforce, Inc.
(CRM) delivered a total return of -12. 3%, compared to -98. 1% for Nvni Group Limited Ordinary Shares (NVNI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HUBS returned +469. 1% versus NVNI's -98. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NVNI or MNDY or HUBS or CRM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Salesforce, Inc.
(CRM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus Nvni Group Limited Ordinary Shares's 1. 58β — meaning NVNI is approximately 94% more volatile than CRM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 25% for monday. com Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NVNI or MNDY or HUBS or CRM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), monday.
com Ltd. (MNDY) is pulling ahead at 26. 7% versus 1. 8% for Nvni Group Limited Ordinary Shares (NVNI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HubSpot, Inc. grew EPS 863. 0% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for Nvni Group Limited Ordinary Shares. Over a 3-year CAGR, MNDY leads at 33. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NVNI or MNDY or HUBS or CRM?
Salesforce, Inc.
(CRM) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 0% net margin versus -57. 4% for Nvni Group Limited Ordinary Shares — meaning it keeps 18. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CRM leads at 21. 5% versus -13. 8% for NVNI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MNDY leads at 89. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NVNI or MNDY or HUBS or CRM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Salesforce, Inc.
(CRM) trades at 15. 8x forward P/E versus 19. 6x for HubSpot, Inc. — 3. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MNDY: 74. 1% to $133. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NVNI or MNDY or HUBS or CRM?
In this comparison, CRM (0.
9% yield) pays a dividend. NVNI, MNDY, HUBS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NVNI or MNDY or HUBS or CRM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Salesforce, Inc.
(CRM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82), 0. 9% yield, +154. 6% 10Y return). Nvni Group Limited Ordinary Shares (NVNI) carries a higher beta of 1. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CRM: +154. 6%, NVNI: -98. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NVNI and MNDY and HUBS and CRM?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NVNI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MNDY is a small-cap high-growth stock; HUBS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CRM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. CRM pays a dividend while NVNI, MNDY, HUBS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.