Financial - Mortgages
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ONIT vs VALN vs PFSI vs NVAX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Financial - Mortgages
Biotechnology
ONIT vs VALN vs PFSI vs NVAX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Mortgages | Biotechnology | Financial - Mortgages | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $323M | $483M | $4.62B | $1.50B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.07B | $180M | $4.36B | $596M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $175M | $-102M | $507M | $-88M |
| Gross Margin | 94.5% | 45.4% | 91.4% | 84.6% |
| Operating Margin | 55.3% | -41.6% | 34.6% | -11.2% |
| Forward P/E | 3.8x | — | 7.2x | 3.6x |
| Total Debt | $15.18B | $216M | $23.06B | $249M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $181M | $168M | $302M | $241M |
ONIT vs VALN vs PFSI vs NVAX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Onity Group Inc. (ONIT) | 100 | 159.8 | +59.8% |
| Valneva SE (VALN) | 100 | 79.3 | -20.7% |
| PennyMac Financial … (PFSI) | 100 | 93.7 | -6.3% |
| Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) | 100 | 72.9 | -27.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ONIT vs VALN vs PFSI vs NVAX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ONIT is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 17.8% margin vs VALN's -56.8%
VALN is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.99, current ratio 2.61x
PFSI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.93, yield 1.3%
- 6.0% 10Y total return vs ONIT's 55.4%
- Beta 0.93, yield 1.3%, current ratio 0.04x
- 173.8% NII/revenue growth vs ONIT's -0.2%
NVAX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 64.7%, EPS growth 306.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -11.1%
- Lower P/E (3.6x vs 7.2x)
- +55.1% vs VALN's -15.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 173.8% NII/revenue growth vs ONIT's -0.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (3.6x vs 7.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.8% margin vs VALN's -56.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.93 vs NVAX's 2.11 | |
| Dividends | 1.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs ONIT's 1.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +55.1% vs VALN's -15.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.8% ROA vs VALN's -21.5%, ROIC 4.4% vs 4.5% |
ONIT vs VALN vs PFSI vs NVAX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ONIT vs VALN vs PFSI vs NVAX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ONIT leads in 2 of 6 categories
PFSI leads 2 • VALN leads 1 • NVAX leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ONIT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PFSI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.4B annually — 24.3x VALN's $180M. ONIT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VALN's -56.8%. On growth, VALN holds the edge at -35.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $180M | $4.4B | $596M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $324M | -$66M | $1.0B | -$47M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $175M | -$102M | $507M | -$88M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$502M | -$26M | -$3.8B | -$96M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +94.5% | +45.4% | +91.4% | +84.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +55.3% | -41.6% | +34.6% | -11.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.8% | -56.8% | +11.5% | -14.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -105.4% | -14.5% | -32.4% | -16.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -35.8% | — | -79.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -70.4% | -3.0% | +7.7% | -102.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ONIT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.8x trailing earnings, ONIT trades at a 81% valuation discount to PFSI's 9.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NVAX's 2.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ONIT's 25.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $323M | $483M | $4.6B | $1.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $15.3B | $539M | $27.4B | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 1.79x | -27.83x | 9.53x | 3.63x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 3.84x | — | 7.17x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 25.75x | 13.95x | 18.11x | 2.56x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.30x | 2.42x | 1.06x | 1.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.53x | 1.83x | 1.11x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
VALN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ONIT delivers a 29.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $30 in annual profit, vs $-59 for VALN. VALN carries lower financial leverage with a 1.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ONIT's 24.17x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VALN scores 5/9 vs PFSI's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +29.9% | -58.9% | +12.0% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | -21.5% | +1.8% | -7.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.9% | +4.5% | +4.4% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.7% | +3.9% | +10.4% | +100.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 24.17x | 1.19x | 5.35x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $15.0B | $48M | $22.8B | $8M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $181M | $168M | $302M | $241M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $15.2B | $216M | $23.1B | $249M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.75x | -3.05x | 1.35x | -5.10x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PFSI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PFSI five years ago would be worth $16,366 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $524 for NVAX. Over the past 12 months, NVAX leads with a +55.1% total return vs VALN's -15.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PFSI at 16.8% vs VALN's -23.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.2% | -37.9% | -32.4% | +29.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3.3% | -15.6% | -8.0% | +55.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +55.4% | -54.6% | +59.2% | +23.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +55.4% | -81.2% | +63.7% | -94.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +55.4% | -78.9% | +603.4% | -90.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.8% | -23.1% | +16.8% | +7.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PFSI and NVAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PFSI is the less volatile stock with a 0.93 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVAX's 2.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVAX currently trades 77.1% from its 52-week high vs VALN's 45.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.12x | 0.99x | 0.93x | 2.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $54.10 | $12.25 | $160.36 | $11.97 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $35.47 | $5.06 | $82.67 | $5.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.8% | +45.4% | +55.3% | +77.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.1 | 33.6 | 40.4 | 64.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 67K | 102K | 604K | 4.4M |
Analyst Outlook
PFSI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ONIT as "Buy", VALN as "Buy", PFSI as "Buy", NVAX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 97.8% upside for VALN (target: $11) vs 56.6% for ONIT (target: $60). For income investors, PFSI offers the higher dividend yield at 1.31% vs ONIT's 1.27%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $60.00 | $11.00 | $143.00 | $18.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 2 | 20 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.3% | — | +1.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.49 | — | $1.16 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +0.3% |
ONIT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). PFSI leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
ONIT vs VALN vs PFSI vs NVAX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ONIT or VALN or PFSI or NVAX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
(PFSI) is the stronger pick with 173. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 2% for Onity Group Inc. (ONIT). Onity Group Inc. (ONIT) offers the better valuation at 1. 8x trailing P/E (3. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Onity Group Inc. (ONIT) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ONIT or VALN or PFSI or NVAX?
On trailing P/E, Onity Group Inc.
(ONIT) is the cheapest at 1. 8x versus PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. at 9. 5x. On forward P/E, Onity Group Inc. is actually cheaper at 3. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ONIT or VALN or PFSI or NVAX?
Over the past 5 years, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
(PFSI) delivered a total return of +63. 7%, compared to -94. 8% for Novavax, Inc. (NVAX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PFSI returned +603. 4% versus NVAX's -90. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ONIT or VALN or PFSI or NVAX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
(PFSI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 93β versus Novavax, Inc. 's 2. 11β — meaning NVAX is approximately 127% more volatile than PFSI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Valneva SE (VALN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 119% versus 24% for Onity Group Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ONIT or VALN or PFSI or NVAX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
(PFSI) is pulling ahead at 173. 8% versus -0. 2% for Onity Group Inc. (ONIT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Onity Group Inc. grew EPS 419. 6% year-over-year, compared to 59. 2% for PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVAX leads at -11. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ONIT or VALN or PFSI or NVAX?
Novavax, Inc.
(NVAX) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 2% net margin versus -7. 2% for Valneva SE — meaning it keeps 39. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ONIT leads at 55. 3% versus 7. 9% for VALN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ONIT leads at 94. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ONIT or VALN or PFSI or NVAX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Onity Group Inc.
(ONIT) trades at 3. 8x forward P/E versus 7. 2x for PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. — 3. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VALN: 97. 8% to $11. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ONIT or VALN or PFSI or NVAX?
In this comparison, PFSI (1.
3% yield), ONIT (1. 3% yield) pay a dividend. VALN, NVAX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ONIT or VALN or PFSI or NVAX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
(PFSI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 93), 1. 3% yield, +603. 4% 10Y return). Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) carries a higher beta of 2. 11 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PFSI: +603. 4%, NVAX: -90. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ONIT and VALN and PFSI and NVAX?
These companies operate in different sectors (ONIT (Financial Services) and VALN (Healthcare) and PFSI (Financial Services) and NVAX (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ONIT is a small-cap deep-value stock; VALN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PFSI is a small-cap high-growth stock; NVAX is a small-cap high-growth stock. ONIT, PFSI pay a dividend while VALN, NVAX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.