Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PRPL vs HNI vs MLKN vs LOVE vs RH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Business Equipment & Supplies
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Specialty Retail
PRPL vs HNI vs MLKN vs LOVE vs RH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Business Equipment & Supplies | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $56M | $1.70B | $1.11B | $228M | $2.50B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $505M | $3.59B | $3.75B | $690M | $3.41B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-35M | $-15M | $-25M | $13M | $110M |
| Gross Margin | 40.9% | 39.9% | 38.7% | 57.7% | 44.5% |
| Operating Margin | -6.1% | 4.6% | 2.0% | 6.3% | 10.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 8.6x | 9.0x | 25.7x | 19.3x |
| Total Debt | $204M | $1.63B | $1.81B | $183M | $3.94B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $24M | $209M | $194M | $84M | $30M |
PRPL vs HNI vs MLKN vs LOVE vs RH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Purple Innovation, … (PRPL) | 100 | 3.6 | -96.4% |
| HNI Corporation (HNI) | 100 | 136.2 | +36.2% |
| MillerKnoll, Inc. (MLKN) | 100 | 71.2 | -28.8% |
| The Lovesac Company (LOVE) | 100 | 85.3 | -14.7% |
| Rh (RH) | 100 | 61.7 | -38.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PRPL vs HNI vs MLKN vs LOVE vs RH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, PRPL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
HNI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.07, yield 3.7%
- Rev growth 12.4%, EPS growth -61.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.3%
- 9.3% 10Y total return vs RH's 257.5%
- 12.4% revenue growth vs PRPL's -3.9%
MLKN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.
- Beta 1.69, yield 4.6%, current ratio 1.58x
- 4.6% yield, vs HNI's 3.7%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
- +6.9% vs PRPL's -37.3%
LOVE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.33, Low D/E 84.6%, current ratio 1.59x
- 2.6% ROA vs PRPL's -12.1%, ROIC 3.3% vs -15.8%
RH is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 3.2% margin vs PRPL's -7.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.4% revenue growth vs PRPL's -3.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.6x vs 19.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.2% margin vs PRPL's -7.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.07 vs RH's 2.36 | |
| Dividends | 4.6% yield, vs HNI's 3.7%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.9% vs PRPL's -37.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.6% ROA vs PRPL's -12.1%, ROIC 3.3% vs -15.8% |
PRPL vs HNI vs MLKN vs LOVE vs RH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PRPL vs HNI vs MLKN vs LOVE vs RH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HNI leads in 2 of 6 categories
RH leads 1 • LOVE leads 1 • MLKN leads 1 • PRPL leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MLKN is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.7B annually — 7.4x PRPL's $505M. RH is the more profitable business, keeping 3.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRPL's -7.0%. On growth, HNI holds the edge at +124.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $505M | $3.6B | $3.7B | $690M | $3.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$12M | $323M | $145M | $58M | $465M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$35M | -$15M | -$25M | $13M | $110M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$15M | $8M | $70M | -$11M | $128M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.9% | +39.9% | +38.7% | +57.7% | +44.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.1% | +4.6% | +2.0% | +6.3% | +10.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.0% | -0.4% | -0.7% | +1.9% | +3.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.0% | +0.2% | +1.9% | -1.5% | +3.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +35.1% | +124.7% | -1.6% | +2.5% | +8.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -55.6% | -100.0% | -75.5% | -18.4% | +10.2% |
Valuation Metrics
HNI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.6x trailing earnings, LOVE trades at a 39% valuation discount to RH's 36.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HNI's 9.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MLKN's 14.3x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $56M | $1.7B | $1.1B | $228M | $2.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $236M | $3.1B | $2.7B | $327M | $6.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.07x | 31.26x | -30.91x | 22.64x | 36.94x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 8.57x | 9.00x | 25.68x | 19.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 12.39x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.01x | 14.29x | 11.54x | 14.16x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.12x | 0.60x | 0.30x | 0.34x | 0.79x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.92x | 0.85x | 1.21x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.06x | 10.92x | 13.06x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
LOVE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RH delivers a 32.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-2 for MLKN. LOVE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.85x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MLKN's 1.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HNI scores 5/9 vs PRPL's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -1.2% | -1.8% | +6.5% | +32.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -12.1% | -0.5% | -0.6% | +2.6% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -15.8% | +7.8% | +1.3% | +3.3% | +6.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -15.8% | +9.3% | +1.5% | +3.6% | +9.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.89x | 1.36x | 0.85x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $180M | $1.4B | $1.6B | $99M | $3.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $24M | $209M | $194M | $84M | $30M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $204M | $1.6B | $1.8B | $183M | $3.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.32x | 2.01x | 0.66x | — | 1.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HNI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HNI five years ago would be worth $9,273 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $169 for PRPL. Over the past 12 months, MLKN leads with a +6.9% total return vs PRPL's -37.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HNI at 12.5% vs PRPL's -44.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -28.6% | -17.7% | -9.3% | +8.2% | -30.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -37.3% | -17.7% | +6.9% | -23.5% | -29.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -82.8% | +42.6% | +11.1% | -40.1% | -48.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.3% | -7.3% | -53.9% | -78.4% | -80.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.8% | +9.3% | -23.2% | -34.9% | +257.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -44.4% | +12.5% | +3.6% | -15.7% | -19.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HNI and LOVE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HNI is the less volatile stock with a 1.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RH's 2.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LOVE currently trades 71.3% from its 52-week high vs PRPL's 40.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.08x | 1.07x | 1.69x | 1.33x | 2.36x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.26 | $53.29 | $23.18 | $21.90 | $257.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.47 | $31.41 | $13.77 | $10.33 | $106.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +40.8% | +65.1% | +70.7% | +71.3% | +52.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.7 | 34.4 | 44.2 | 53.7 | 48.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 322K | 743K | 845K | 299K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
MLKN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HNI as "Buy", MLKN as "Hold", LOVE as "Buy", RH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 173.8% upside for HNI (target: $95) vs 44.0% for LOVE (target: $23). For income investors, MLKN offers the higher dividend yield at 4.58% vs HNI's 3.72%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $95.00 | — | $22.50 | $208.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 3 | 6 | 11 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.7% | +4.6% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.29 | $0.75 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.9% | +7.6% | +8.7% | +0.5% |
HNI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). RH leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
PRPL vs HNI vs MLKN vs LOVE vs RH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PRPL or HNI or MLKN or LOVE or RH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, HNI Corporation (HNI) is the stronger pick with 12.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 9% for Purple Innovation, Inc. (PRPL). The Lovesac Company (LOVE) offers the better valuation at 22. 6x trailing P/E (25. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate HNI Corporation (HNI) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PRPL or HNI or MLKN or LOVE or RH?
On trailing P/E, The Lovesac Company (LOVE) is the cheapest at 22.
6x versus Rh at 36. 9x. On forward P/E, HNI Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PRPL or HNI or MLKN or LOVE or RH?
Over the past 5 years, HNI Corporation (HNI) delivered a total return of -7.
3%, compared to -98. 3% for Purple Innovation, Inc. (PRPL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RH returned +257. 5% versus PRPL's -94. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PRPL or HNI or MLKN or LOVE or RH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), HNI Corporation (HNI) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
07β versus Rh's 2. 36β — meaning RH is approximately 120% more volatile than HNI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Lovesac Company (LOVE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 85% versus 136% for MillerKnoll, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PRPL or HNI or MLKN or LOVE or RH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), HNI Corporation (HNI) is pulling ahead at 12.
4% versus -3. 9% for Purple Innovation, Inc. (PRPL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Purple Innovation, Inc. grew EPS 47. 3% year-over-year, compared to -147. 7% for MillerKnoll, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LOVE leads at 11. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PRPL or HNI or MLKN or LOVE or RH?
Rh (RH) is the more profitable company, earning 2.
3% net margin versus -11. 0% for Purple Innovation, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RH leads at 10. 1% versus -6. 8% for PRPL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LOVE leads at 58. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PRPL or HNI or MLKN or LOVE or RH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, HNI Corporation (HNI) trades at 8.
6x forward P/E versus 25. 7x for The Lovesac Company — 17. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HNI: 173. 8% to $95. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PRPL or HNI or MLKN or LOVE or RH?
In this comparison, MLKN (4.
6% yield), HNI (3. 7% yield) pay a dividend. PRPL, LOVE, RH do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PRPL or HNI or MLKN or LOVE or RH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, HNI Corporation (HNI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
07), 3. 7% yield). Rh (RH) carries a higher beta of 2. 36 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HNI: +9. 3%, RH: +257. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PRPL and HNI and MLKN and LOVE and RH?
These companies operate in different sectors (PRPL (Consumer Cyclical) and HNI (Industrials) and MLKN (Consumer Cyclical) and LOVE (Consumer Cyclical) and RH (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PRPL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HNI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MLKN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; LOVE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RH is a small-cap quality compounder stock. HNI, MLKN pay a dividend while PRPL, LOVE, RH do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.