Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PSIX vs PESI vs GNRC vs CWST vs CMI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Waste Management
Industrial - Machinery
Waste Management
Industrial - Machinery
PSIX vs PESI vs GNRC vs CWST vs CMI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Waste Management | Industrial - Machinery | Waste Management | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $1.66B | $207M | $15.65B | $5.35B | $94.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $531M | $59M | $4.33B | $1.88B | $33.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $114M | $-18M | $189M | $7M | $2.67B |
| Gross Margin | 34.8% | 4.1% | 38.1% | 17.4% | 25.4% |
| Operating Margin | 20.7% | -26.3% | 7.5% | 4.5% | 11.2% |
| Forward P/E | 15.1x | — | 30.9x | 63.9x | 25.9x |
| Total Debt | $152M | $4M | $1.33B | $1.24B | $8.11B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $41M | $12M | $341M | $124M | $2.85B |
PSIX vs PESI vs GNRC vs CWST vs CMI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power Solutions Int… (PSIX) | 100 | 1499.8 | +1399.8% |
| Perma-Fix Environme… (PESI) | 100 | 199.8 | +99.8% |
| Generac Holdings In… (GNRC) | 100 | 239.8 | +139.8% |
| Casella Waste Syste… (CWST) | 100 | 167.7 | +67.7% |
| Cummins Inc. (CMI) | 100 | 402.4 | +302.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PSIX vs PESI vs GNRC vs CWST vs CMI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PSIX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 5.6% 10Y total return vs CWST's 10.6%
- Lower P/E (15.1x vs 63.9x)
- 21.5% margin vs PESI's -30.1%
- +178.6% vs CWST's -28.9%
PESI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
GNRC is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.69, Low D/E 50.5%, current ratio 2.03x
CWST is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 18.0%, EPS growth -47.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.2%
- 18.0% revenue growth vs PSIX's -100.0%
- Beta 0.32 vs PSIX's 3.33, lower leverage
CMI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 1.57, yield 1.1%
- Beta 1.57, yield 1.1%, current ratio 1.76x
- 1.1% yield; 21-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.0% revenue growth vs PSIX's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.1x vs 63.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.5% margin vs PESI's -30.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.32 vs PSIX's 3.33, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; 21-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +178.6% vs CWST's -28.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 26.9% ROA vs PESI's -20.2%, ROIC 36.9% vs -21.7% |
PSIX vs PESI vs GNRC vs CWST vs CMI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PSIX vs PESI vs GNRC vs CWST vs CMI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PSIX leads in 2 of 6 categories
GNRC leads 1 • CMI leads 1 • PESI leads 0 • CWST leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GNRC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CMI is the larger business by revenue, generating $33.9B annually — 575.6x PESI's $59M. PSIX is the more profitable business, keeping 21.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PESI's -30.1%. On growth, GNRC holds the edge at +12.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $531M | $59M | $4.3B | $1.9B | $33.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $115M | -$14M | $472M | $414M | $4.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $114M | -$18M | $189M | $7M | $2.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4M | -$14M | $419M | $102M | $2.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.8% | +4.1% | +38.1% | +17.4% | +25.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.7% | -26.3% | +7.5% | +4.5% | +11.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.5% | -30.1% | +4.4% | +0.4% | +7.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.8% | -23.4% | +9.7% | +5.5% | +7.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | -20.1% | +12.4% | +9.6% | +2.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -30.7% | -110.5% | +69.9% | -18.6% | -21.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PSIX and CMI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.6x trailing earnings, PSIX trades at a 98% valuation discount to CWST's 712.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PSIX's 15.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GNRC's 34.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $207M | $15.7B | $5.4B | $94.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $200M | $16.6B | $6.5B | $99.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.57x | -14.89x | 99.17x | 712.08x | 33.29x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.11x | — | 30.91x | 63.93x | 25.92x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 2.95x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.38x | — | 34.39x | 15.74x | 20.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 3.36x | 3.72x | 2.91x | 2.80x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 9.30x | 4.11x | 5.99x | 3.46x | 7.06x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 117.31x | — | 58.38x | 63.17x | 39.52x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PSIX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PSIX delivers a 81.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $81 in annual profit, vs $-34 for PESI. PESI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PSIX's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CMI scores 7/9 vs CWST's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +81.3% | -34.5% | +7.2% | +0.5% | +20.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +26.9% | -20.2% | +3.4% | +0.2% | +7.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +36.9% | -21.7% | +5.9% | +2.6% | +16.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +50.7% | -16.7% | +6.9% | +2.9% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.85x | 0.09x | 0.51x | 0.79x | 0.61x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $111M | -$7M | $992M | $1.1B | $5.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $41M | $12M | $341M | $124M | $2.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $152M | $4M | $1.3B | $1.2B | $8.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 13.09x | -42.14x | 4.54x | 1.12x | 12.15x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PSIX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PSIX five years ago would be worth $118,016 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,149 for GNRC. Over the past 12 months, PSIX leads with a +178.6% total return vs CWST's -28.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PSIX at 190.1% vs CWST's -2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.0% | -8.8% | +89.1% | -13.4% | +31.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +178.6% | +26.2% | +129.9% | -28.9% | +131.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2340.3% | +21.7% | +141.5% | -6.3% | +214.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1080.2% | +45.6% | -18.5% | +25.7% | +168.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +559.3% | +178.6% | +666.1% | +1059.4% | +557.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +190.1% | +6.8% | +34.2% | -2.2% | +46.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GNRC and CWST each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CWST is the less volatile stock with a 0.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PSIX's 3.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GNRC currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs PSIX's 59.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.33x | 1.85x | 1.69x | 0.32x | 1.57x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $121.78 | $16.50 | $269.58 | $121.24 | $718.08 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $25.09 | $8.02 | $113.96 | $74.05 | $296.59 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +59.1% | +67.7% | +99.0% | +70.5% | +95.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.6 | 41.5 | 77.8 | 52.8 | 75.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 624K | 164K | 895K | 874K | 794K |
Analyst Outlook
CMI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PSIX as "Buy", PESI as "Hold", GNRC as "Buy", CWST as "Buy", CMI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 61.1% upside for PESI (target: $18) vs -9.0% for CMI (target: $621). CMI is the only dividend payer here at 1.11% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $104.26 | $18.00 | $271.22 | $119.00 | $621.10 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 1 | 39 | 19 | 51 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.0% | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 21 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.00 | — | $7.61 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
PSIX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). GNRC leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
PSIX vs PESI vs GNRC vs CWST vs CMI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PSIX or PESI or GNRC or CWST or CMI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) is the stronger pick with 18. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Power Solutions International, Inc. (PSIX). Power Solutions International, Inc. (PSIX) offers the better valuation at 14. 6x trailing P/E (15. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Power Solutions International, Inc. (PSIX) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PSIX or PESI or GNRC or CWST or CMI?
On trailing P/E, Power Solutions International, Inc.
(PSIX) is the cheapest at 14. 6x versus Casella Waste Systems, Inc. at 712. 1x. On forward P/E, Power Solutions International, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PSIX or PESI or GNRC or CWST or CMI?
Over the past 5 years, Power Solutions International, Inc.
(PSIX) delivered a total return of +1080%, compared to -18. 5% for Generac Holdings Inc. (GNRC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CWST returned +1059% versus PESI's +178. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PSIX or PESI or GNRC or CWST or CMI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 32β versus Power Solutions International, Inc. 's 3. 33β — meaning PSIX is approximately 933% more volatile than CWST relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (PESI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 85% for Power Solutions International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PSIX or PESI or GNRC or CWST or CMI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) is pulling ahead at 18. 0% versus -100. 0% for Power Solutions International, Inc. (PSIX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Power Solutions International, Inc. grew EPS 64. 1% year-over-year, compared to -50. 1% for Generac Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CWST leads at 19. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PSIX or PESI or GNRC or CWST or CMI?
Power Solutions International, Inc.
(PSIX) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 5% net margin versus -22. 3% for Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PSIX leads at 20. 7% versus -19. 0% for PESI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GNRC leads at 38. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PSIX or PESI or GNRC or CWST or CMI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Power Solutions International, Inc.
(PSIX) trades at 15. 1x forward P/E versus 63. 9x for Casella Waste Systems, Inc. — 48. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PESI: 61. 1% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PSIX or PESI or GNRC or CWST or CMI?
In this comparison, CMI (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. PSIX, PESI, GNRC, CWST do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PSIX or PESI or GNRC or CWST or CMI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 32), +1059% 10Y return). Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (PESI) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CWST: +1059%, PESI: +178. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PSIX and PESI and GNRC and CWST and CMI?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PSIX is a small-cap deep-value stock; PESI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GNRC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CWST is a small-cap high-growth stock; CMI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. CMI pays a dividend while PSIX, PESI, GNRC, CWST do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.