Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

QNST vs TREE vs RAMP vs UPST vs SOFI

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
QNST
QuinStreet, Inc.

Advertising Agencies

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$761M
5Y Perf.-37.7%
TREE
LendingTree, Inc.

Financial - Conglomerates

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$552M
5Y Perf.-85.5%
RAMP
LiveRamp Holdings, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.90B
5Y Perf.-58.8%
UPST
Upstart Holdings, Inc.

Financial - Credit Services

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.78B
5Y Perf.-28.8%
SOFI
SoFi Technologies, Inc.

Financial - Credit Services

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$20.40B
5Y Perf.+28.6%

QNST vs TREE vs RAMP vs UPST vs SOFI — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
QNST logoQNST
TREE logoTREE
RAMP logoRAMP
UPST logoUPST
SOFI logoSOFI
IndustryAdvertising AgenciesFinancial - ConglomeratesSoftware - InfrastructureFinancial - Credit ServicesFinancial - Credit Services
Market Cap$761M$552M$1.90B$2.78B$20.40B
Revenue (TTM)$1.18B$1.12B$796M$1.08B$4.77B
Net Income (TTM)$-30M$181M$69M$49M$481M
Gross Margin10.5%94.3%70.4%95.2%75.1%
Operating Margin1.7%7.3%7.1%5.1%11.0%
Forward P/E10.5x7.1x13.1x14.7x26.5x
Total Debt$10M$435M$36M$1.85B$1.82B
Cash & Equiv.$101M$81M$413M$657M$4.93B

QNST vs TREE vs RAMP vs UPST vs SOFILong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

QNST
TREE
RAMP
UPST
SOFI
StockDec 20May 26Return
QuinStreet, Inc. (QNST)10062.3-37.7%
LendingTree, Inc. (TREE)10014.5-85.5%
LiveRamp Holdings, … (RAMP)10041.2-58.8%
Upstart Holdings, I… (UPST)10071.2-28.8%
SoFi Technologies, … (SOFI)100128.6+28.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: QNST vs TREE vs RAMP vs UPST vs SOFI

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TREE leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. QuinStreet, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. RAMP and SOFI also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
QNST
QuinStreet, Inc.
The Growth Play

QNST is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Rev growth 78.3%, EPS growth 114.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 23.4%
  • 288.4% 10Y total return vs SOFI's 52.7%
  • 78.3% revenue growth vs RAMP's 13.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
TREE
LendingTree, Inc.
The Banking Pick

TREE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.

  • Lower P/E (7.1x vs 14.7x)
  • 13.5% margin vs QNST's -2.6%
  • 21.8% ROA vs QNST's -5.9%, ROIC 9.0% vs 2.8%
Best for: value and quality
RAMP
LiveRamp Holdings, Inc.
The Income Pick

RAMP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.97
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.97, Low D/E 3.8%, current ratio 2.65x
  • Beta 0.97, current ratio 2.65x
  • Beta 0.97 vs UPST's 2.96, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
UPST
Upstart Holdings, Inc.
The Banking Pick

UPST is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.

  • NIM 5.1% vs SOFI's 4.4%
Best for: bank quality
SOFI
SoFi Technologies, Inc.
The Banking Pick

SOFI is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +23.0% vs UPST's -37.6%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthQNST logoQNST78.3% revenue growth vs RAMP's 13.0%
ValueTREE logoTREELower P/E (7.1x vs 14.7x)
Quality / MarginsTREE logoTREE13.5% margin vs QNST's -2.6%
Stability / SafetyRAMP logoRAMPBeta 0.97 vs UPST's 2.96, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)SOFI logoSOFI+23.0% vs UPST's -37.6%
Efficiency (ROA)TREE logoTREE21.8% ROA vs QNST's -5.9%, ROIC 9.0% vs 2.8%

QNST vs TREE vs RAMP vs UPST vs SOFI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

QNSTQuinStreet, Inc.
FY 2025
Financial Service
74.7%$817M
Home Services
23.9%$262M
Service, Other
1.3%$15M
TREELendingTree, Inc.
FY 2025
Other Products And Services
100.0%$310,000
RAMPLiveRamp Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
SubscriptionMember
76.3%$569M
MarketplaceAndOtherMember
23.7%$177M
UPSTUpstart Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Servicing Fees, Net
51.7%$157M
Servicing Fees
33.0%$100M
Borrower Fees
9.7%$29M
Collection Agency Fees
4.8%$14M
Other Fees
0.9%$3M
SOFISoFi Technologies, Inc.
FY 2025
Lending Segment
48.1%$1.8B
Financial Services Segment
40.1%$1.5B
Technology Platform Segment
11.7%$450M

QNST vs TREE vs RAMP vs UPST vs SOFI — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLTREELAGGINGUPST

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

RAMP leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

SOFI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.8B annually — 6.0x RAMP's $796M. TREE is the more profitable business, keeping 13.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to QNST's -2.6%. On growth, QNST holds the edge at +28.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricQNST logoQNSTQuinStreet, Inc.TREE logoTREELendingTree, Inc.RAMP logoRAMPLiveRamp Holdings…UPST logoUPSTUpstart Holdings,…SOFI logoSOFISoFi Technologies…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.2B$1.1B$796M$1.1B$4.8B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$26M$120M$71M$68M$760M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$30M$181M$69M$49M$481M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$99M$73M$169M-$146M-$2.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+10.5%+94.3%+70.4%+95.2%+75.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+1.7%+7.3%+7.1%+5.1%+11.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-2.6%+13.5%+8.6%+5.0%+10.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+8.4%+5.4%+21.3%-15.4%-83.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+28.3%+8.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+59.4%+2.3%+2.6%-169.2%-56.7%
RAMP leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TREE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 3.7x trailing earnings, TREE trades at a 98% valuation discount to QNST's 165.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TREE's 8.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RAMP's 67.5x.

MetricQNST logoQNSTQuinStreet, Inc.TREE logoTREELendingTree, Inc.RAMP logoRAMPLiveRamp Holdings…UPST logoUPSTUpstart Holdings,…SOFI logoSOFISoFi Technologies…
Market CapShares × price$761M$552M$1.9B$2.8B$20.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$671M$906M$1.5B$4.0B$17.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS165.55x3.69x-2491.74x64.44x41.03x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.47x7.11x13.14x14.69x26.45x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate4.49x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple21.84x8.73x67.50x50.13x22.75x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.70x0.49x2.55x2.58x4.28x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.19x1.95x2.14x3.90x1.91x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF9.18x9.09x12.31x
TREE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

TREE leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

TREE delivers a 86.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $86 in annual profit, vs $-11 for QNST. RAMP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UPST's 2.32x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), QNST scores 8/9 vs SOFI's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricQNST logoQNSTQuinStreet, Inc.TREE logoTREELendingTree, Inc.RAMP logoRAMPLiveRamp Holdings…UPST logoUPSTUpstart Holdings,…SOFI logoSOFISoFi Technologies…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-11.1%+86.0%+7.1%+6.6%+5.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-5.9%+21.8%+5.7%+1.7%+1.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+2.8%+9.0%+0.7%+1.7%+3.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.4%+13.2%+0.5%+2.4%+1.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–986553
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.04x1.52x0.04x2.32x0.17x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$91M$354M-$377M$1.2B-$3.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$101M$81M$413M$657M$4.9B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$10M$435M$36M$1.9B$1.8B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense4.64x4.45x31.98x1.66x0.45x
TREE leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

SOFI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in SOFI five years ago would be worth $9,691 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,126 for TREE. Over the past 12 months, SOFI leads with a +23.0% total return vs UPST's -37.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SOFI at 43.0% vs RAMP's 8.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricQNST logoQNSTQuinStreet, Inc.TREE logoTREELendingTree, Inc.RAMP logoRAMPLiveRamp Holdings…UPST logoUPSTUpstart Holdings,…SOFI logoSOFISoFi Technologies…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-5.1%-22.7%+10.0%-36.7%-41.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-26.9%+6.1%+11.8%-37.6%+23.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+81.0%+112.0%+26.8%+116.7%+192.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-28.4%-78.7%-39.2%-69.8%-3.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+288.4%-45.7%+31.6%-1.6%+52.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+21.9%+28.5%+8.2%+29.4%+43.0%
SOFI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

RAMP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

RAMP is the less volatile stock with a 0.97 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UPST's 2.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RAMP currently trades 85.7% from its 52-week high vs UPST's 33.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricQNST logoQNSTQuinStreet, Inc.TREE logoTREELendingTree, Inc.RAMP logoRAMPLiveRamp Holdings…UPST logoUPSTUpstart Holdings,…SOFI logoSOFISoFi Technologies…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.23x1.55x0.97x2.96x2.54x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$18.41$77.35$35.20$87.30$32.73
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$10.29$32.65$21.71$23.96$12.56
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+72.6%+51.5%+85.7%+33.2%+48.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10053.339.356.142.741.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded673K326K651K4.8M65.8M
RAMP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: QNST as "Buy", TREE as "Buy", RAMP as "Buy", UPST as "Buy", SOFI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 73.2% upside for TREE (target: $69) vs 12.3% for QNST (target: $15).

MetricQNST logoQNSTQuinStreet, Inc.TREE logoTREELendingTree, Inc.RAMP logoRAMPLiveRamp Holdings…UPST logoUPSTUpstart Holdings,…SOFI logoSOFISoFi Technologies…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$15.00$69.00$44.00$45.17$20.89
# AnalystsCovering analysts1323122227
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises000
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+5.3%0.0%+0.3%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

RAMP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). TREE leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).

Best OverallLendingTree, Inc. (TREE)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

QNST vs TREE vs RAMP vs UPST vs SOFI: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is QNST or TREE or RAMP or UPST or SOFI a better buy right now?

For growth investors, QuinStreet, Inc.

(QNST) is the stronger pick with 78. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 13. 0% for LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. (RAMP). LendingTree, Inc. (TREE) offers the better valuation at 3. 7x trailing P/E (7. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate QuinStreet, Inc. (QNST) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — QNST or TREE or RAMP or UPST or SOFI?

On trailing P/E, LendingTree, Inc.

(TREE) is the cheapest at 3. 7x versus QuinStreet, Inc. at 165. 6x. On forward P/E, LendingTree, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 1x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — QNST or TREE or RAMP or UPST or SOFI?

Over the past 5 years, SoFi Technologies, Inc.

(SOFI) delivered a total return of -3. 1%, compared to -78. 7% for LendingTree, Inc. (TREE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: QNST returned +288. 4% versus TREE's -45. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — QNST or TREE or RAMP or UPST or SOFI?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), LiveRamp Holdings, Inc.

(RAMP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 97β versus Upstart Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 96β — meaning UPST is approximately 206% more volatile than RAMP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. (RAMP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 2% for Upstart Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — QNST or TREE or RAMP or UPST or SOFI?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), QuinStreet, Inc.

(QNST) is pulling ahead at 78. 3% versus 13. 0% for LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. (RAMP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LendingTree, Inc. grew EPS 443. 3% year-over-year, compared to -107. 1% for LiveRamp Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, QNST leads at 23. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — QNST or TREE or RAMP or UPST or SOFI?

LendingTree, Inc.

(TREE) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 5% net margin versus -0. 1% for LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SOFI leads at 11. 0% versus 0. 6% for QNST. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UPST leads at 95. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is QNST or TREE or RAMP or UPST or SOFI more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, LendingTree, Inc.

(TREE) trades at 7. 1x forward P/E versus 26. 5x for SoFi Technologies, Inc. — 19. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TREE: 73. 2% to $69. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — QNST or TREE or RAMP or UPST or SOFI?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is QNST or TREE or RAMP or UPST or SOFI better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, LiveRamp Holdings, Inc.

(RAMP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 97)). Upstart Holdings, Inc. (UPST) carries a higher beta of 2. 96 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RAMP: +31. 6%, UPST: -1. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between QNST and TREE and RAMP and UPST and SOFI?

These companies operate in different sectors (QNST (Communication Services) and TREE (Financial Services) and RAMP (Technology) and UPST (Financial Services) and SOFI (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: QNST is a small-cap high-growth stock; TREE is a small-cap high-growth stock; RAMP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; UPST is a small-cap high-growth stock; SOFI is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

QNST

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TREE

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 12%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RAMP

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

UPST

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 29%
  • Gross Margin > 57%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SOFI

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform QNST and TREE and RAMP and UPST and SOFI on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(QNST: 28.3% · TREE: 24.1%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(QNST: 165.6x · TREE: 3.7x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.