Rental & Leasing Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
R vs XPO vs ODFL vs SAIA vs UPS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Integrated Freight & Logistics
Trucking
Trucking
Integrated Freight & Logistics
R vs XPO vs ODFL vs SAIA vs UPS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Rental & Leasing Services | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Trucking | Trucking | Integrated Freight & Logistics |
| Market Cap | $9.42B | $24.00B | $41.34B | $12.00B | $85.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12.66B | $8.30B | $5.50B | $3.25B | $88.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $495M | $348M | $1.02B | $255M | $5.25B |
| Gross Margin | 26.0% | 12.2% | 32.2% | 18.4% | 18.1% |
| Operating Margin | 7.4% | 9.1% | 24.8% | 10.8% | 8.6% |
| Forward P/E | 16.4x | 41.9x | 37.1x | 40.2x | 14.2x |
| Total Debt | $8.68B | $4.70B | $141M | $418M | $32.29B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $198M | $310M | $120M | $20M | $5.89B |
R vs XPO vs ODFL vs SAIA vs UPS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ryder System, Inc. (R) | 100 | 697.3 | +597.3% |
| XPO Logistics, Inc. (XPO) | 100 | 750.0 | +650.0% |
| Old Dominion Freigh… (ODFL) | 100 | 231.8 | +131.8% |
| Saia, Inc. (SAIA) | 100 | 414.8 | +314.8% |
| United Parcel Servi… (UPS) | 100 | 101.1 | +1.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: R vs XPO vs ODFL vs SAIA vs UPS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
R lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
XPO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 1.1%, EPS growth -18.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.9%
- 21.2% 10Y total return vs SAIA's 15.7%
- 1.1% revenue growth vs ODFL's -5.5%
- +82.4% vs UPS's +10.7%
ODFL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.36, Low D/E 3.3%, current ratio 1.44x
- 18.6% margin vs R's 3.9%
- 18.5% ROA vs R's 3.9%, ROIC 23.6% vs 7.0%
Among these 5 stocks, SAIA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
UPS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.92, yield 6.3%
- PEG 0.42 vs ODFL's 3.31
- Beta 0.92, yield 6.3%, current ratio 1.22x
- Lower P/E (14.2x vs 40.2x), PEG 0.42 vs 3.12
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.1% revenue growth vs ODFL's -5.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.2x vs 40.2x), PEG 0.42 vs 3.12 | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.6% margin vs R's 3.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.92 vs SAIA's 1.90 | |
| Dividends | 6.3% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs R's 1.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +82.4% vs UPS's +10.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.5% ROA vs R's 3.9%, ROIC 23.6% vs 7.0% |
R vs XPO vs ODFL vs SAIA vs UPS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
R vs XPO vs ODFL vs SAIA vs UPS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ODFL leads in 2 of 6 categories
UPS leads 1 • XPO leads 1 • R leads 0 • SAIA leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ODFL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UPS is the larger business by revenue, generating $88.3B annually — 27.2x SAIA's $3.3B. ODFL is the more profitable business, keeping 18.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to R's 3.9%. On growth, XPO holds the edge at +7.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12.7B | $8.3B | $5.5B | $3.3B | $88.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.6B | $1.3B | $1.7B | $602M | $10.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $495M | $348M | $1.0B | $255M | $5.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $478M | $457M | $955M | $261M | $4.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +26.0% | +12.2% | +32.2% | +18.4% | +18.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.4% | +9.1% | +24.8% | +10.8% | +8.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.9% | +4.2% | +18.6% | +7.8% | +5.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.8% | +5.5% | +17.4% | +8.0% | +5.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.2% | +7.3% | -5.7% | +2.4% | -1.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.1% | +49.1% | -11.4% | 0.0% | -27.1% |
Valuation Metrics
UPS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.4x trailing earnings, UPS trades at a 80% valuation discount to XPO's 77.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), UPS offers better value at 0.46x vs SAIA's 3.67x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9.4B | $24.0B | $41.3B | $12.0B | $85.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $17.9B | $28.4B | $41.4B | $12.4B | $112.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.93x | 77.44x | 41.06x | 47.25x | 15.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.38x | 41.86x | 37.10x | 40.16x | 14.23x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.80x | 3.66x | 3.67x | 0.46x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.38x | 22.72x | 23.97x | 20.63x | 9.17x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.74x | 2.94x | 7.52x | 3.71x | 0.97x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.27x | 13.07x | 9.66x | 4.67x | 5.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.52x | 72.96x | 43.28x | 438.87x | 17.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ODFL leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
R delivers a 39.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $40 in annual profit, vs $10 for SAIA. ODFL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to R's 2.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), R scores 9/9 vs UPS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +39.5% | +19.0% | +24.0% | +10.0% | +33.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.9% | +4.3% | +18.5% | +7.3% | +7.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.0% | +9.3% | +23.6% | +9.4% | +16.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.0% | +11.3% | +27.1% | +11.5% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.84x | 2.53x | 0.03x | 0.16x | 1.99x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8.5B | $4.4B | $21M | $398M | $26.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $198M | $310M | $120M | $20M | $5.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8.7B | $4.7B | $141M | $418M | $32.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.13x | 3.21x | 4601.85x | 23.88x | 7.37x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
XPO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in XPO five years ago would be worth $39,892 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,067 for UPS. Over the past 12 months, XPO leads with a +82.4% total return vs UPS's +10.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors XPO at 61.6% vs UPS's -11.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +23.5% | +47.3% | +24.8% | +33.4% | +1.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +65.4% | +82.4% | +24.6% | +69.2% | +10.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +199.2% | +322.1% | +29.2% | +56.3% | -31.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +192.4% | +298.9% | +49.9% | +88.4% | -39.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +283.5% | +2119.8% | +843.0% | +1570.9% | +45.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +44.1% | +61.6% | +8.9% | +16.1% | -11.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SAIA and UPS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
UPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.92 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SAIA's 1.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SAIA currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs UPS's 82.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.37x | 1.72x | 1.36x | 1.90x | 0.92x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $258.49 | $231.46 | $233.79 | $457.99 | $122.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $142.39 | $109.64 | $126.01 | $248.37 | $82.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.4% | +88.3% | +84.8% | +98.2% | +82.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.1 | 46.6 | 43.4 | 60.3 | 44.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 365K | 1.3M | 2.1M | 517K | 5.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — R and UPS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: R as "Buy", XPO as "Buy", ODFL as "Hold", SAIA as "Buy", UPS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 14.3% upside for UPS (target: $115) vs -6.0% for SAIA (target: $423). For income investors, UPS offers the higher dividend yield at 6.30% vs ODFL's 0.57%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $247.33 | $211.60 | $208.19 | $422.67 | $115.23 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 35 | 32 | 36 | 32 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.5% | — | +0.6% | — | +6.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 21 | 2 | 10 | — | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.47 | — | $1.12 | — | $6.35 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.5% | +0.5% | +1.8% | +0.1% | +1.2% |
ODFL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). UPS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
R vs XPO vs ODFL vs SAIA vs UPS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is R or XPO or ODFL or SAIA or UPS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, XPO Logistics, Inc.
(XPO) is the stronger pick with 1. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 5% for Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (ODFL). United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) offers the better valuation at 15. 4x trailing P/E (14. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ryder System, Inc. (R) a "Buy" — based on 35 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — R or XPO or ODFL or SAIA or UPS?
On trailing P/E, United Parcel Service, Inc.
(UPS) is the cheapest at 15. 4x versus XPO Logistics, Inc. at 77. 4x. On forward P/E, United Parcel Service, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: United Parcel Service, Inc. wins at 0. 42x versus Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. 's 3. 31x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — R or XPO or ODFL or SAIA or UPS?
Over the past 5 years, XPO Logistics, Inc.
(XPO) delivered a total return of +298. 9%, compared to -39. 3% for United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: XPO returned +21. 2% versus UPS's +45. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — R or XPO or ODFL or SAIA or UPS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), United Parcel Service, Inc.
(UPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 92β versus Saia, Inc. 's 1. 90β — meaning SAIA is approximately 106% more volatile than UPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (ODFL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 3% for Ryder System, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — R or XPO or ODFL or SAIA or UPS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), XPO Logistics, Inc.
(XPO) is pulling ahead at 1. 1% versus -5. 5% for Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (ODFL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ryder System, Inc. grew EPS 8. 4% year-over-year, compared to -29. 6% for Saia, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SAIA leads at 5. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — R or XPO or ODFL or SAIA or UPS?
Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.
(ODFL) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 6% net margin versus 3. 9% for XPO Logistics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ODFL leads at 24. 8% versus 8. 6% for R. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ODFL leads at 32. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is R or XPO or ODFL or SAIA or UPS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 42x versus Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. 's 3. 31x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) trades at 14. 2x forward P/E versus 41. 9x for XPO Logistics, Inc. — 27. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UPS: 14. 3% to $115. 23.
08Which pays a better dividend — R or XPO or ODFL or SAIA or UPS?
In this comparison, UPS (6.
3% yield), R (1. 5% yield), ODFL (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. XPO, SAIA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is R or XPO or ODFL or SAIA or UPS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.
(ODFL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 6% yield, +843. 0% 10Y return). XPO Logistics, Inc. (XPO) carries a higher beta of 1. 72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ODFL: +843. 0%, XPO: +21. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between R and XPO and ODFL and SAIA and UPS?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: R is a small-cap quality compounder stock; XPO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ODFL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SAIA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; UPS is a mid-cap deep-value stock. R, ODFL, UPS pay a dividend while XPO, SAIA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.