Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SEZL vs OPFI vs AFRM vs ATLC vs CACC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Infrastructure
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
SEZL vs OPFI vs AFRM vs ATLC vs CACC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $3.36B | $852M | $22.44B | $1.17B | $5.45B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $450M | $544M | $3.20B | $704M | $2.32B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $148M | $66M | $382M | $133M | $453M |
| Gross Margin | 85.4% | 96.2% | 62.6% | 56.3% | 98.7% |
| Operating Margin | 39.3% | 34.2% | 10.2% | 22.7% | 47.6% |
| Forward P/E | 21.2x | 5.5x | 62.5x | 8.7x | 11.3x |
| Total Debt | $141M | $333M | $7.85B | $6.54B | $6.35B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $64M | $49M | $1.35B | $621M | $501M |
SEZL vs OPFI vs AFRM vs ATLC vs CACC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sezzle Inc. (SEZL) | 100 | 175.1 | +75.1% |
| OppFi Inc. (OPFI) | 100 | 91.2 | -8.8% |
| Affirm Holdings, In… (AFRM) | 100 | 67.6 | -32.4% |
| Atlanticus Holdings… (ATLC) | 100 | 304.5 | +204.5% |
| Credit Acceptance C… (CACC) | 100 | 135.5 | +35.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SEZL vs OPFI vs AFRM vs ATLC vs CACC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SEZL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and quality.
- 66.1% NII/revenue growth vs CACC's 8.6%
- 29.6% margin vs AFRM's 11.9%
- +89.2% vs OPFI's -8.8%
- 37.7% ROA vs ATLC's 2.1%, ROIC 52.7% vs 2.4%
OPFI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.69, yield 24.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.69, current ratio 7.44x
- Beta 1.69, yield 24.8%, current ratio 7.44x
- 24.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs ATLC's 0.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
AFRM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 38.8%, EPS growth 109.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 33.7%
ATLC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 25.1% 10Y total return vs SEZL's 6.9%
- PEG 1.01 vs CACC's 1.15
- Lower P/E (8.7x vs 11.3x), PEG 1.01 vs 1.15
CACC is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 17.8% vs ATLC's 14.5%
- Beta 1.61 vs AFRM's 2.72
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 66.1% NII/revenue growth vs CACC's 8.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.7x vs 11.3x), PEG 1.01 vs 1.15 | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.6% margin vs AFRM's 11.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.61 vs AFRM's 2.72 | |
| Dividends | 24.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs ATLC's 0.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +89.2% vs OPFI's -8.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 37.7% ROA vs ATLC's 2.1%, ROIC 52.7% vs 2.4% |
SEZL vs OPFI vs AFRM vs ATLC vs CACC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SEZL vs OPFI vs AFRM vs ATLC vs CACC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
OPFI leads in 2 of 6 categories
SEZL leads 2 • AFRM leads 0 • ATLC leads 0 • CACC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — OPFI and CACC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AFRM is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 7.1x SEZL's $450M. SEZL is the more profitable business, keeping 29.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AFRM's 11.9%. On growth, OPFI holds the edge at -37.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $450M | $544M | $3.2B | $704M | $2.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $197M | $190M | $533M | $124M | $579M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $148M | $66M | $382M | $133M | $453M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $238M | $399M | $787M | $788M | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +85.4% | +96.2% | +62.6% | +56.3% | +98.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +39.3% | +34.2% | +10.2% | +22.7% | +47.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +29.6% | +12.1% | +11.9% | +17.3% | +18.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +46.3% | +73.2% | +24.6% | +89.8% | +45.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -37.8% | -65.8% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +47.0% | +2.2% | — | +49.7% | +43.2% |
Valuation Metrics
OPFI leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.0x trailing earnings, OPFI trades at a 98% valuation discount to AFRM's 449.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CACC offers better value at 1.41x vs ATLC's 1.53x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.4B | $852M | $22.4B | $1.2B | $5.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.4B | $1.1B | $28.9B | $7.1B | $11.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 26.83x | 9.99x | 449.07x | 13.14x | 13.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 21.25x | 5.51x | 62.49x | 8.65x | 11.33x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.53x | 1.41x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.27x | 5.72x | 209.99x | 41.80x | 9.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.45x | 1.43x | 6.96x | 1.66x | 2.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 21.01x | 0.85x | 7.48x | 2.49x | 3.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.11x | 2.23x | 37.29x | 1.85x | 5.18x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SEZL leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SEZL delivers a 90.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $91 in annual profit, vs $11 for AFRM. SEZL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.83x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ATLC's 10.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SEZL scores 9/9 vs ATLC's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +90.9% | +23.1% | +11.2% | +21.8% | +29.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +37.7% | +9.2% | +3.1% | +2.1% | +5.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +52.7% | +26.4% | -0.7% | +2.4% | +10.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +70.3% | +30.9% | -0.9% | +3.1% | +14.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.83x | 1.08x | 2.56x | 10.84x | 4.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $77M | $283M | $6.5B | $5.9B | $5.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $64M | $49M | $1.4B | $621M | $501M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $141M | $333M | $7.9B | $6.5B | $6.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 23.74x | 3.70x | 1.88x | 0.90x | 4.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SEZL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ATLC five years ago would be worth $22,886 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,128 for OPFI. Over the past 12 months, SEZL leads with a +89.2% total return vs OPFI's -8.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SEZL at 2.1% vs CACC's 5.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +53.2% | -4.0% | -9.0% | +18.1% | +15.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +89.2% | -8.8% | +30.7% | +45.6% | +7.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2962.0% | +405.4% | +464.2% | +179.3% | +17.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +117.4% | +1.3% | +24.7% | +128.9% | +23.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +687.8% | +4.2% | -30.7% | +2511.3% | +184.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.1% | +71.6% | +78.0% | +40.8% | +5.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ATLC and CACC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CACC is the less volatile stock with a 1.61 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AFRM's 2.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ATLC currently trades 97.4% from its 52-week high vs SEZL's 53.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.39x | 1.69x | 2.72x | 1.81x | 1.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $186.74 | $15.03 | $100.00 | $80.42 | $565.14 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $49.50 | $7.36 | $42.09 | $45.74 | $401.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +53.5% | +65.8% | +67.4% | +97.4% | +92.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.9 | 74.6 | 63.1 | 66.6 | 67.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 808K | 487K | 5.3M | 66K | 179K |
Analyst Outlook
OPFI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SEZL as "Buy", OPFI as "Buy", AFRM as "Buy", ATLC as "Buy", CACC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 19.9% upside for AFRM (target: $81) vs -26.7% for OPFI (target: $7). For income investors, OPFI offers the higher dividend yield at 24.76% vs ATLC's 0.83%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $85.00 | $7.25 | $80.77 | $70.00 | $540.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 5 | 33 | 6 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +24.8% | — | +0.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.45 | — | $0.65 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.9% | +1.8% | +1.1% | +6.0% | 0.0% |
OPFI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). SEZL leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.
SEZL vs OPFI vs AFRM vs ATLC vs CACC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SEZL or OPFI or AFRM or ATLC or CACC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sezzle Inc.
(SEZL) is the stronger pick with 66. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 6% for Credit Acceptance Corporation (CACC). OppFi Inc. (OPFI) offers the better valuation at 10. 0x trailing P/E (5. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sezzle Inc. (SEZL) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SEZL or OPFI or AFRM or ATLC or CACC?
On trailing P/E, OppFi Inc.
(OPFI) is the cheapest at 10. 0x versus Affirm Holdings, Inc. at 449. 1x. On forward P/E, OppFi Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Atlanticus Holdings Corporation wins at 1. 01x versus Credit Acceptance Corporation's 1. 15x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SEZL or OPFI or AFRM or ATLC or CACC?
Over the past 5 years, Atlanticus Holdings Corporation (ATLC) delivered a total return of +128.
9%, compared to +1. 3% for OppFi Inc. (OPFI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ATLC returned +25. 1% versus AFRM's -30. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SEZL or OPFI or AFRM or ATLC or CACC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Credit Acceptance Corporation (CACC) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
61β versus Affirm Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 72β — meaning AFRM is approximately 70% more volatile than CACC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sezzle Inc. (SEZL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 83% versus 11% for Atlanticus Holdings Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SEZL or OPFI or AFRM or ATLC or CACC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sezzle Inc.
(SEZL) is pulling ahead at 66. 1% versus 8. 6% for Credit Acceptance Corporation (CACC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: OppFi Inc. grew EPS 175. 0% year-over-year, compared to 24. 9% for Atlanticus Holdings Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, AFRM leads at 33. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SEZL or OPFI or AFRM or ATLC or CACC?
Sezzle Inc.
(SEZL) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 6% net margin versus 1. 6% for Affirm Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CACC leads at 47. 6% versus -2. 7% for AFRM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CACC leads at 98. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SEZL or OPFI or AFRM or ATLC or CACC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Atlanticus Holdings Corporation (ATLC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 01x versus Credit Acceptance Corporation's 1. 15x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, OppFi Inc. (OPFI) trades at 5. 5x forward P/E versus 62. 5x for Affirm Holdings, Inc. — 57. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AFRM: 19. 9% to $80. 77.
08Which pays a better dividend — SEZL or OPFI or AFRM or ATLC or CACC?
In this comparison, OPFI (24.
8% yield), ATLC (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. SEZL, AFRM, CACC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SEZL or OPFI or AFRM or ATLC or CACC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, OppFi Inc.
(OPFI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (24. 8% yield). Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM) carries a higher beta of 2. 72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (OPFI: +4. 2%, AFRM: -30. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SEZL and OPFI and AFRM and ATLC and CACC?
These companies operate in different sectors (SEZL (Financial Services) and OPFI (Technology) and AFRM (Technology) and ATLC (Financial Services) and CACC (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SEZL is a small-cap high-growth stock; OPFI is a small-cap deep-value stock; AFRM is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ATLC is a small-cap high-growth stock; CACC is a small-cap deep-value stock. OPFI, ATLC pay a dividend while SEZL, AFRM, CACC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.