Insurance - Property & Casualty
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SIGI vs ERIE vs CINF vs PGR vs TRV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Brokers
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Property & Casualty
SIGI vs ERIE vs CINF vs PGR vs TRV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Brokers | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty |
| Market Cap | $5.09B | $10.01B | $25.23B | $114.73B | $64.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.41B | $4.33B | $12.92B | $85.18B | $48.83B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $454M | $571M | $2.76B | $10.71B | $6.29B |
| Gross Margin | 40.7% | 18.1% | 50.3% | 26.3% | 36.9% |
| Operating Margin | 9.9% | 17.0% | 26.7% | 15.9% | 16.0% |
| Forward P/E | 10.9x | 17.1x | 18.7x | 12.0x | 10.7x |
| Total Debt | $898M | $0.00 | $886M | $6.89B | $9.27B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $346K | $346M | $1.43B | $143M | $842M |
SIGI vs ERIE vs CINF vs PGR vs TRV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Selective Insurance… (SIGI) | 100 | 161.5 | +61.5% |
| Erie Indemnity Comp… (ERIE) | 100 | 120.3 | +20.3% |
| Cincinnati Financia… (CINF) | 100 | 274.9 | +174.9% |
| The Progressive Cor… (PGR) | 100 | 252.0 | +152.0% |
| The Travelers Compa… (TRV) | 100 | 279.4 | +179.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SIGI vs ERIE vs CINF vs PGR vs TRV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SIGI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.30, Low D/E 24.9%, current ratio 650.38x
ERIE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.16, yield 2.2%
- Beta 0.16, yield 2.2%, current ratio 1.27x
- Beta 0.16 vs CINF's 0.43
- 2.2% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs TRV's 1.4%
CINF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and momentum is your priority.
- Combined ratio 0.8 vs SIGI's 0.9 (lower = better underwriting)
- +14.0% vs ERIE's -38.7%
PGR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 21.4%, EPS growth 118.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.5%
- 5.9% 10Y total return vs TRV's 201.4%
- 21.4% revenue growth vs TRV's 5.2%
TRV is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.51 vs ERIE's 1.26
- Lower P/E (10.7x vs 12.0x), PEG 0.51 vs 0.73
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.4% revenue growth vs TRV's 5.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.7x vs 12.0x), PEG 0.51 vs 0.73 | |
| Quality / Margins | Combined ratio 0.8 vs SIGI's 0.9 (lower = better underwriting) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.16 vs CINF's 0.43 | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs TRV's 1.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +14.0% vs ERIE's -38.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.3% ROA vs SIGI's 3.0%, ROIC 29.5% vs 10.9% |
SIGI vs ERIE vs CINF vs PGR vs TRV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SIGI vs ERIE vs CINF vs PGR vs TRV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CINF leads in 1 of 6 categories
SIGI leads 1 • ERIE leads 1 • TRV leads 1 • PGR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CINF leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PGR is the larger business by revenue, generating $85.2B annually — 19.7x ERIE's $4.3B. CINF is the more profitable business, keeping 21.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SIGI's 8.4%. On growth, PGR holds the edge at +14.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.4B | $4.3B | $12.9B | $85.2B | $48.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $817M | $786M | $3.6B | $13.8B | $8.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $454M | $571M | $2.8B | $10.7B | $6.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.1B | $537M | $3.4B | $17.0B | $7.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.7% | +18.1% | +50.3% | +26.3% | +36.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.9% | +17.0% | +26.7% | +15.9% | +16.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.4% | +13.2% | +21.3% | +12.6% | +12.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.2% | +12.4% | +26.7% | +20.0% | +16.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.7% | +2.3% | +11.6% | +14.2% | +3.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -10.2% | +7.9% | +4.0% | +12.1% | +23.4% |
Valuation Metrics
SIGI leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.7x trailing earnings, CINF trades at a 48% valuation discount to ERIE's 20.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TRV offers better value at 0.52x vs ERIE's 1.50x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.1B | $10.0B | $25.2B | $114.7B | $64.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.0B | $9.7B | $24.7B | $121.5B | $73.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.32x | 20.41x | 10.68x | 13.59x | 10.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.95x | 17.15x | 18.69x | 12.00x | 10.69x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.88x | 1.50x | 0.70x | 0.83x | 0.52x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.62x | 12.14x | 7.84x | 11.05x | 8.62x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.95x | 2.46x | 2.00x | 1.52x | 1.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.43x | 5.00x | 1.61x | 4.50x | 2.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.12x | 17.53x | 8.16x | 7.73x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ERIE leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PGR delivers a 30.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $30 in annual profit, vs $13 for SIGI. CINF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TRV's 0.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SIGI scores 7/9 vs ERIE's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.9% | +25.0% | +18.0% | +30.2% | +19.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.0% | +17.3% | +6.8% | +8.8% | +4.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.9% | +29.5% | +15.3% | +27.0% | +15.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.1% | +32.0% | +14.0% | +11.0% | +8.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.25x | — | 0.06x | 0.27x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $898M | -$346M | -$545M | $6.8B | $8.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $346,000 | $346M | $1.4B | $143M | $842M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $898M | $0 | $886M | $6.9B | $9.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.73x | — | 46.68x | 49.44x | 19.34x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TRV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PGR five years ago would be worth $20,726 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,482 for ERIE. Over the past 12 months, CINF leads with a +14.0% total return vs ERIE's -38.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRV at 19.5% vs SIGI's -5.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.9% | -20.9% | +0.9% | -1.3% | +5.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -3.8% | -38.7% | +14.0% | -26.8% | +12.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -14.1% | -0.2% | +62.2% | +60.9% | +70.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +17.9% | +14.8% | +47.4% | +107.3% | +98.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +167.3% | +171.6% | +180.5% | +593.7% | +201.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -5.0% | -0.1% | +17.5% | +17.2% | +19.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PGR and TRV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PGR is the less volatile stock with a -0.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CINF's 0.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRV currently trades 95.4% from its 52-week high vs ERIE's 56.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.30x | 0.16x | 0.43x | -0.07x | 0.22x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $91.63 | $380.67 | $174.27 | $289.96 | $313.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $71.75 | $210.06 | $143.37 | $192.02 | $249.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.4% | +56.9% | +93.0% | +67.5% | +95.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.4 | 33.6 | 43.6 | 42.3 | 50.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 534K | 231K | 684K | 2.6M | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ERIE and TRV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SIGI as "Hold", CINF as "Buy", PGR as "Hold", TRV as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 17.6% upside for PGR (target: $230) vs 4.7% for TRV (target: $313). For income investors, ERIE offers the higher dividend yield at 2.23% vs PGR's 0.59%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | — | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $90.50 | — | $173.50 | $230.27 | $313.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | — | 17 | 41 | 43 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.8% | +2.2% | +2.1% | +0.6% | +1.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 15 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 20 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.52 | $4.83 | $3.33 | $1.15 | $4.30 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.8% | 0.0% | +0.8% | +0.6% | +4.8% |
CINF leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). SIGI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
SIGI vs ERIE vs CINF vs PGR vs TRV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SIGI or ERIE or CINF or PGR or TRV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Progressive Corporation (PGR) is the stronger pick with 21.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 2% for The Travelers Companies, Inc. (TRV). Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) offers the better valuation at 10. 7x trailing P/E (18. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SIGI or ERIE or CINF or PGR or TRV?
On trailing P/E, Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) is the cheapest at 10.
7x versus Erie Indemnity Company at 20. 4x. On forward P/E, The Travelers Companies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Travelers Companies, Inc. wins at 0. 51x versus Erie Indemnity Company's 1. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SIGI or ERIE or CINF or PGR or TRV?
Over the past 5 years, The Progressive Corporation (PGR) delivered a total return of +107.
3%, compared to +14. 8% for Erie Indemnity Company (ERIE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PGR returned +593. 7% versus SIGI's +167. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SIGI or ERIE or CINF or PGR or TRV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Progressive Corporation (PGR) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
07β versus Cincinnati Financial Corporation's 0. 43β — meaning CINF is approximately -712% more volatile than PGR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 28% for The Travelers Companies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SIGI or ERIE or CINF or PGR or TRV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Progressive Corporation (PGR) is pulling ahead at 21.
4% versus 5. 2% for The Travelers Companies, Inc. (TRV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Selective Insurance Group, Inc. grew EPS 131. 6% year-over-year, compared to -7. 5% for Erie Indemnity Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, CINF leads at 24. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SIGI or ERIE or CINF or PGR or TRV?
Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) is the more profitable company, earning 18.
9% net margin versus 8. 7% for Selective Insurance Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CINF leads at 23. 6% versus 11. 0% for SIGI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CINF leads at 50. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SIGI or ERIE or CINF or PGR or TRV more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, The Travelers Companies, Inc. (TRV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 51x versus Erie Indemnity Company's 1. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, The Travelers Companies, Inc. (TRV) trades at 10. 7x forward P/E versus 18. 7x for Cincinnati Financial Corporation — 8. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PGR: 17. 6% to $230. 27.
08Which pays a better dividend — SIGI or ERIE or CINF or PGR or TRV?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Erie Indemnity Company (ERIE) offers the highest yield at 2. 2%, versus 0. 6% for The Progressive Corporation (PGR).
09Is SIGI or ERIE or CINF or PGR or TRV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Progressive Corporation (PGR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
07), 0. 6% yield, +593. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PGR: +593. 7%, CINF: +180. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SIGI and ERIE and CINF and PGR and TRV?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SIGI is a small-cap deep-value stock; ERIE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CINF is a mid-cap deep-value stock; PGR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; TRV is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.