Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SLNO vs RARE vs ACAD vs RYTM vs MDGL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
SLNO vs RARE vs ACAD vs RYTM vs MDGL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $2.76B | $2.57B | $3.86B | $6.59B | $12.27B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $190M | $669M | $1.10B | $217M | $1.13B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $21M | $-609M | $376M | $-204M | $-309M |
| Gross Margin | 98.6% | 83.6% | 91.5% | 89.4% | 93.1% |
| Operating Margin | 5.4% | -83.9% | 7.4% | -90.9% | -27.7% |
| Forward P/E | 13.4x | — | 50.9x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $3M | $1.28B | $52M | $246M | $354M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $70M | $434M | $178M | $54M | $199M |
SLNO vs RARE vs ACAD vs RYTM vs MDGL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Soleno Therapeutics… (SLNO) | 100 | 21.0 | -79.0% |
| Ultragenyx Pharmace… (RARE) | 100 | 38.2 | -61.8% |
| ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD) | 100 | 45.4 | -54.6% |
| Rhythm Pharmaceutic… (RYTM) | 100 | 496.3 | +396.3% |
| Madrigal Pharmaceut… (MDGL) | 100 | 461.0 | +361.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SLNO vs RARE vs ACAD vs RYTM vs MDGL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SLNO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.92, Low D/E 0.6%, current ratio 5.80x
- Beta 0.92, current ratio 5.80x
- Better valuation composite
RARE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ACAD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 34.3% margin vs RYTM's -93.8%
- 26.2% ROA vs RARE's -45.8%, ROIC 10.0% vs -89.4%
RYTM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 45.8%, EPS growth 28.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 100.2%
MDGL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.57
- 39.2% 10Y total return vs RYTM's 220.8%
- 432.1% revenue growth vs ACAD's 11.9%
- Beta 0.57 vs RARE's 1.42
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 432.1% revenue growth vs ACAD's 11.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 34.3% margin vs RYTM's -93.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.57 vs RARE's 1.42 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +79.0% vs SLNO's -29.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 26.2% ROA vs RARE's -45.8%, ROIC 10.0% vs -89.4% |
SLNO vs RARE vs ACAD vs RYTM vs MDGL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SLNO vs RARE vs ACAD vs RYTM vs MDGL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ACAD leads in 2 of 6 categories
SLNO leads 1 • RYTM leads 1 • MDGL leads 1 • RARE leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SLNO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MDGL is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.1B annually — 5.9x SLNO's $190M. ACAD is the more profitable business, keeping 34.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RYTM's -93.8%. On growth, MDGL holds the edge at +126.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $190M | $669M | $1.1B | $217M | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $12M | -$536M | $96M | -$196M | -$312M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $21M | -$609M | $376M | -$204M | -$309M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $47M | -$487M | $212M | -$76M | -$272M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +98.6% | +83.6% | +91.5% | +89.4% | +93.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.4% | -83.9% | +7.4% | -90.9% | -27.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.0% | -91.0% | +34.3% | -93.8% | -27.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +24.6% | -72.8% | +19.4% | -35.1% | -24.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -2.4% | +9.7% | +83.8% | +126.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +163.0% | -17.2% | -81.8% | -2.5% | +2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
ACAD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.9x trailing earnings, ACAD trades at a 93% valuation discount to SLNO's 135.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ACAD's 26.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SLNO's 158.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.8B | $2.6B | $3.9B | $6.6B | $12.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.7B | $3.4B | $3.7B | $6.8B | $12.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 135.77x | -4.48x | 9.85x | -30.94x | -41.62x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.41x | — | 50.91x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 158.68x | — | 26.91x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 14.49x | 3.82x | 3.61x | 34.75x | 12.80x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.39x | — | 3.15x | 44.97x | 19.91x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 59.06x | — | 36.74x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ACAD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACAD delivers a 35.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-6 for RARE. SLNO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RYTM's 1.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SLNO scores 7/9 vs MDGL's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.9% | -6.1% | +35.6% | -2.0% | -50.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.6% | -45.8% | +26.2% | -45.2% | -25.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.8% | -89.4% | +10.0% | -70.1% | -29.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.7% | -46.4% | +10.1% | -58.9% | -32.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | — | 0.04x | 1.77x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$67M | $842M | -$126M | $192M | $156M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $70M | $434M | $178M | $54M | $199M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $1.3B | $52M | $246M | $354M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.81x | -14.49x | — | -12.41x | -17.51x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RYTM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RYTM five years ago would be worth $43,504 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,281 for RARE. Over the past 12 months, MDGL leads with a +79.0% total return vs SLNO's -29.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RYTM at 79.4% vs RARE's -17.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.3% | +10.7% | -13.7% | -8.4% | -9.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -29.1% | -21.8% | +52.4% | +48.9% | +79.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +152.1% | -44.5% | +4.7% | +477.3% | +73.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.4% | -77.2% | +7.1% | +335.0% | +310.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.8% | -59.4% | -22.9% | +220.8% | +3921.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +36.1% | -17.8% | +1.5% | +79.4% | +20.1% |
Risk & Volatility
MDGL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MDGL is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RARE's 1.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MDGL currently trades 87.0% from its 52-week high vs SLNO's 58.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.92x | 1.42x | 1.26x | 1.04x | 0.57x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $90.32 | $42.37 | $27.81 | $122.20 | $615.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $29.47 | $18.29 | $14.45 | $55.31 | $265.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +58.6% | +61.7% | +81.1% | +78.7% | +87.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 77.5 | 66.6 | 44.2 | 67.9 | 61.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.8M | 1.8M | 1.8M | 853K | 310K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SLNO as "Buy", RARE as "Buy", ACAD as "Buy", RYTM as "Buy", MDGL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 97.1% upside for RARE (target: $52) vs 31.9% for MDGL (target: $706).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $80.00 | $51.50 | $34.78 | $140.00 | $705.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 33 | 37 | 20 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ACAD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). SLNO leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow).
SLNO vs RARE vs ACAD vs RYTM vs MDGL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SLNO or RARE or ACAD or RYTM or MDGL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(MDGL) is the stronger pick with 432. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 11. 9% for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD). ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) offers the better valuation at 9. 9x trailing P/E (50. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Soleno Therapeutics, Inc. (SLNO) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SLNO or RARE or ACAD or RYTM or MDGL?
On trailing P/E, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the cheapest at 9. 9x versus Soleno Therapeutics, Inc. at 135. 8x. On forward P/E, Soleno Therapeutics, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SLNO or RARE or ACAD or RYTM or MDGL?
Over the past 5 years, Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(RYTM) delivered a total return of +335. 0%, compared to -77. 2% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (RARE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MDGL returned +39. 2% versus SLNO's -87. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SLNO or RARE or ACAD or RYTM or MDGL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(MDGL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 57β versus Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. 's 1. 42β — meaning RARE is approximately 150% more volatile than MDGL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Soleno Therapeutics, Inc. (SLNO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 177% for Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SLNO or RARE or ACAD or RYTM or MDGL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(MDGL) is pulling ahead at 432. 1% versus 11. 9% for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Soleno Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 108. 9% year-over-year, compared to 7. 3% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RYTM leads at 100. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SLNO or RARE or ACAD or RYTM or MDGL?
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 5% net margin versus -103. 6% for Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACAD leads at 9. 8% versus -101. 2% for RYTM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SLNO leads at 98. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SLNO or RARE or ACAD or RYTM or MDGL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Soleno Therapeutics, Inc.
(SLNO) trades at 13. 4x forward P/E versus 50. 9x for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. — 37. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RARE: 97. 1% to $51. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — SLNO or RARE or ACAD or RYTM or MDGL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is SLNO or RARE or ACAD or RYTM or MDGL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(MDGL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 57)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MDGL: +39. 2%, RARE: -59. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SLNO and RARE and ACAD and RYTM and MDGL?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SLNO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RARE is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock; RYTM is a small-cap high-growth stock; MDGL is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.