Software - Application
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
UPLD vs MANH vs HUBS vs NCNO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Application
Software - Application
UPLD vs MANH vs HUBS vs NCNO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $29M | $8.50B | $12.58B | $2.11B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $202M | $1.10B | $3.30B | $586M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-14M | $217M | $100M | $-22M |
| Gross Margin | 75.9% | 55.6% | 83.7% | 60.1% |
| Operating Margin | 5.2% | 25.6% | 1.9% | -0.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 26.8x | 19.6x | 19.6x |
| Total Debt | $235M | $112M | $485M | $237M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $29M | $329M | $882M | $121M |
UPLD vs MANH vs HUBS vs NCNO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Upland Software, In… (UPLD) | 100 | 2.8 | -97.2% |
| Manhattan Associate… (MANH) | 100 | 149.9 | +49.9% |
| HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) | 100 | 104.1 | +4.1% |
| nCino, Inc. (NCNO) | 100 | 22.5 | -77.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UPLD vs MANH vs HUBS vs NCNO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UPLD plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
MANH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.10
- Lower volatility, beta 1.10, Low D/E 35.7%, current ratio 1.28x
- Beta 1.10, current ratio 1.28x
- 19.7% margin vs UPLD's -7.1%
HUBS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 19.2%, EPS growth 8.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 21.8%
- 469.1% 10Y total return vs MANH's 145.1%
- 19.2% revenue growth vs UPLD's -21.1%
- Lower P/E (19.6x vs 19.6x)
NCNO lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.2% revenue growth vs UPLD's -21.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (19.6x vs 19.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.7% margin vs UPLD's -7.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.10 vs UPLD's 1.88, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -21.9% vs HUBS's -62.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 28.0% ROA vs UPLD's -3.4%, ROIC 236.8% vs 4.0% |
UPLD vs MANH vs HUBS vs NCNO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
UPLD vs MANH vs HUBS vs NCNO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MANH leads in 3 of 6 categories
UPLD leads 1 • HUBS leads 0 • NCNO leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MANH and HUBS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HUBS is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.3B annually — 16.3x UPLD's $202M. MANH is the more profitable business, keeping 19.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UPLD's -7.1%. On growth, HUBS holds the edge at +23.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $202M | $1.1B | $3.3B | $586M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $33M | $288M | $166M | $27M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$14M | $217M | $100M | -$22M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $22M | $380M | $712M | $60M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +75.9% | +55.6% | +83.7% | +60.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.2% | +25.6% | +1.9% | -0.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.1% | +19.7% | +3.0% | -3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.9% | +34.5% | +21.6% | +10.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -23.5% | +7.4% | +23.4% | +9.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +90.7% | -3.5% | +2.5% | +2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
UPLD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 39.9x trailing earnings, MANH trades at a 86% valuation discount to HUBS's 284.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, UPLD's 4.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NCNO's 122.0x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $29M | $8.5B | $12.6B | $2.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $234M | $8.3B | $12.2B | $2.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.62x | 39.88x | 284.08x | -53.88x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 26.79x | 19.61x | 19.64x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.86x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.81x | 28.67x | 69.24x | 121.97x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.13x | 7.86x | 4.02x | 3.89x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.34x | 27.85x | 6.29x | 1.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.17x | 22.74x | 17.77x | 39.45x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MANH leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MANH delivers a 78.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $78 in annual profit, vs $-29 for UPLD. NCNO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UPLD's 2.91x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MANH scores 6/9 vs UPLD's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -29.2% | +78.2% | +5.0% | -2.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.4% | +28.0% | +2.7% | -1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.0% | +2.4% | +0.4% | -1.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.6% | +76.3% | +0.5% | -1.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.91x | 0.36x | 0.23x | 0.22x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $206M | -$216M | -$397M | $116M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $29M | $329M | $882M | $121M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $235M | $112M | $485M | $237M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.41x | — | 4753.07x | -0.51x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MANH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MANH five years ago would be worth $10,805 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $220 for UPLD. Over the past 12 months, MANH leads with a -21.9% total return vs HUBS's -62.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MANH at -5.4% vs UPLD's -34.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -35.2% | -14.2% | -36.1% | -27.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -58.5% | -21.9% | -62.0% | -22.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.6% | -15.3% | -45.1% | -21.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.8% | +8.1% | -52.1% | -68.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.1% | +145.1% | +469.1% | -80.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -34.3% | -5.4% | -18.1% | -7.6% |
Risk & Volatility
MANH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MANH is the less volatile stock with a 1.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UPLD's 1.88 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MANH currently trades 58.1% from its 52-week high vs UPLD's 24.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.88x | 1.10x | 1.18x | 1.18x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.91 | $247.22 | $682.57 | $33.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.50 | $119.06 | $187.45 | $13.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +24.9% | +58.1% | +35.8% | +52.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.5 | 50.6 | 51.1 | 50.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 393K | 678K | 1.5M | 2.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MANH as "Buy", HUBS as "Buy", NCNO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 81.8% upside for NCNO (target: $32) vs 37.4% for MANH (target: $197).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $197.25 | $360.89 | $32.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 | 47 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | +3.7% | +4.0% | 0.0% |
MANH leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). UPLD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
UPLD vs MANH vs HUBS vs NCNO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UPLD or MANH or HUBS or NCNO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, HubSpot, Inc.
(HUBS) is the stronger pick with 19. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -21. 1% for Upland Software, Inc. (UPLD). Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH) offers the better valuation at 39. 9x trailing P/E (26. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — UPLD or MANH or HUBS or NCNO?
On trailing P/E, Manhattan Associates, Inc.
(MANH) is the cheapest at 39. 9x versus HubSpot, Inc. at 284. 1x. On forward P/E, HubSpot, Inc. is actually cheaper at 19. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — UPLD or MANH or HUBS or NCNO?
Over the past 5 years, Manhattan Associates, Inc.
(MANH) delivered a total return of +8. 1%, compared to -97. 8% for Upland Software, Inc. (UPLD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HUBS returned +469. 1% versus UPLD's -86. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — UPLD or MANH or HUBS or NCNO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Manhattan Associates, Inc.
(MANH) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 10β versus Upland Software, Inc. 's 1. 88β — meaning UPLD is approximately 71% more volatile than MANH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, nCino, Inc. (NCNO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 3% for Upland Software, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — UPLD or MANH or HUBS or NCNO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), HubSpot, Inc.
(HUBS) is pulling ahead at 19. 2% versus -21. 1% for Upland Software, Inc. (UPLD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HubSpot, Inc. grew EPS 863. 0% year-over-year, compared to 2. 6% for Manhattan Associates, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NCNO leads at 25. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — UPLD or MANH or HUBS or NCNO?
Manhattan Associates, Inc.
(MANH) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 3% net margin versus -17. 9% for Upland Software, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MANH leads at 26. 1% versus -3. 4% for NCNO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HUBS leads at 83. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is UPLD or MANH or HUBS or NCNO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, HubSpot, Inc.
(HUBS) trades at 19. 6x forward P/E versus 26. 8x for Manhattan Associates, Inc. — 7. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NCNO: 81. 8% to $32. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — UPLD or MANH or HUBS or NCNO?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is UPLD or MANH or HUBS or NCNO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, HubSpot, Inc.
(HUBS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 18), +469. 1% 10Y return). Upland Software, Inc. (UPLD) carries a higher beta of 1. 88 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HUBS: +469. 1%, UPLD: -86. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between UPLD and MANH and HUBS and NCNO?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: UPLD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MANH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HUBS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; NCNO is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.