Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
WKC vs DINO vs PSX vs MPC vs VLO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing
WKC vs DINO vs PSX vs MPC vs VLO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing |
| Market Cap | $1.50B | $12.71B | $67.49B | $70.73B | $70.66B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $37.18B | $27.62B | $135.77B | $135.75B | $126.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-567M | $1.23B | $4.12B | $4.63B | $4.21B |
| Gross Margin | 1.8% | 7.3% | 7.0% | 8.8% | 7.2% |
| Operating Margin | 0.7% | 6.1% | 4.7% | 5.0% | 4.6% |
| Forward P/E | 10.5x | 12.5x | 11.4x | 10.9x | 10.0x |
| Total Debt | $697M | $3.23B | $22.88B | $34.36B | $11.70B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $194M | $978M | $1.12B | $3.67B | $4.69B |
WKC vs DINO vs PSX vs MPC vs VLO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| World Kinect Corpor… (WKC) | 100 | 105.7 | +5.7% |
| HF Sinclair Corpora… (DINO) | 100 | 224.2 | +124.2% |
| Phillips 66 (PSX) | 100 | 215.1 | +115.1% |
| Marathon Petroleum … (MPC) | 100 | 689.4 | +589.4% |
| Valero Energy Corpo… (VLO) | 100 | 354.6 | +254.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WKC vs DINO vs PSX vs MPC vs VLO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WKC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
DINO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for defensive.
- Beta 0.31, yield 2.9%, current ratio 1.94x
- 4.5% margin vs WKC's -1.5%
- 2.9% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs VLO's 1.9%
- +121.7% vs WKC's +6.6%
Among these 5 stocks, PSX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
MPC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -4.4%, EPS growth 31.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -9.2%
- 6.6% 10Y total return vs VLO's 397.5%
- -4.4% revenue growth vs WKC's -12.7%
VLO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 1.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.27, Low D/E 44.0%, current ratio 1.65x
- Lower P/E (10.0x vs 10.9x)
- Beta 0.27 vs WKC's 0.70, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -4.4% revenue growth vs WKC's -12.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.0x vs 10.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.5% margin vs WKC's -1.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.27 vs WKC's 0.70, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.9% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs VLO's 1.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +121.7% vs WKC's +6.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.1% ROA vs WKC's -9.2%, ROIC 6.1% vs 8.6% |
WKC vs DINO vs PSX vs MPC vs VLO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WKC vs DINO vs PSX vs MPC vs VLO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DINO leads in 1 of 6 categories
WKC leads 1 • VLO leads 1 • MPC leads 1 • PSX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DINO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PSX is the larger business by revenue, generating $135.8B annually — 4.9x DINO's $27.6B. DINO is the more profitable business, keeping 4.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WKC's -1.5%. On growth, DINO holds the edge at +11.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $37.2B | $27.6B | $135.8B | $135.8B | $126.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $364M | $2.6B | $9.4B | $10.1B | $9.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$567M | $1.2B | $4.1B | $4.6B | $4.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $68M | $1.2B | $119M | $5.7B | $5.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +1.8% | +7.3% | +7.0% | +8.8% | +7.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.7% | +6.1% | +4.7% | +5.0% | +4.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.5% | +4.5% | +3.0% | +3.4% | +3.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.2% | +4.3% | +0.1% | +4.2% | +4.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.6% | +11.8% | +11.7% | +9.7% | +7.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.4% | +135.3% | -56.8% | +8.2% | +3.2% |
Valuation Metrics
WKC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.6x trailing earnings, PSX trades at a 50% valuation discount to VLO's 31.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WKC's 5.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PSX's 13.1x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.5B | $12.7B | $67.5B | $70.7B | $70.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.0B | $15.0B | $89.3B | $101.4B | $77.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.44x | 22.67x | 15.60x | 18.26x | 31.22x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.49x | 12.52x | 11.44x | 10.91x | 10.02x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.68x | 8.11x | 13.09x | 11.24x | 10.40x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.04x | 0.47x | 0.51x | 0.53x | 0.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.13x | 1.42x | 2.27x | 3.07x | 2.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.58x | 14.68x | 24.73x | 14.84x | 14.05x |
Profitability & Efficiency
VLO leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MPC delivers a 19.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $-39 for WKC. DINO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MPC's 1.43x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PSX scores 7/9 vs WKC's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -39.5% | +13.0% | +14.1% | +19.6% | +15.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -9.2% | +7.1% | +5.3% | +5.5% | +7.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.6% | +6.1% | +5.3% | +8.3% | +9.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.7% | +6.7% | +6.0% | +9.3% | +9.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.53x | 0.35x | 0.76x | 1.43x | 0.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $504M | $2.3B | $21.8B | $30.7B | $7.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $194M | $978M | $1.1B | $3.7B | $4.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $697M | $3.2B | $22.9B | $34.4B | $11.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -5.18x | 7.13x | 7.65x | 6.36x | 10.63x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MPC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MPC five years ago would be worth $42,948 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,058 for WKC. Over the past 12 months, DINO leads with a +121.7% total return vs WKC's +6.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MPC at 32.5% vs WKC's 7.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.4% | +51.5% | +29.9% | +47.3% | +43.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +6.6% | +121.7% | +64.1% | +70.1% | +106.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +24.4% | +95.6% | +93.7% | +132.5% | +132.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.4% | +118.8% | +120.3% | +329.5% | +219.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.4% | +202.0% | +162.1% | +664.3% | +397.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.6% | +25.1% | +24.7% | +32.5% | +32.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DINO and VLO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VLO is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WKC's 0.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DINO currently trades 94.3% from its 52-week high vs PSX's 88.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.70x | 0.31x | 0.43x | 0.30x | 0.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.85 | $74.72 | $190.61 | $261.61 | $258.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.20 | $32.39 | $104.83 | $142.73 | $115.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.2% | +94.3% | +88.3% | +92.6% | +91.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.9 | 68.3 | 52.9 | 58.0 | 47.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 755K | 2.7M | 3.0M | 2.5M | 3.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — DINO and VLO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WKC as "Hold", DINO as "Buy", PSX as "Buy", MPC as "Buy", VLO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 9.0% upside for WKC (target: $29) vs -12.7% for DINO (target: $62). For income investors, DINO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.86% vs MPC's 1.54%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $29.33 | $61.57 | $163.38 | $214.78 | $214.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 16 | 35 | 33 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.8% | +2.9% | +2.8% | +1.5% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 7 | 4 | 13 | 4 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.75 | $2.02 | $4.71 | $3.74 | $4.55 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.7% | +2.8% | +1.8% | +4.9% | +3.7% |
DINO leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). WKC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
WKC vs DINO vs PSX vs MPC vs VLO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WKC or DINO or PSX or MPC or VLO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) is the stronger pick with -4.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 7% for World Kinect Corporation (WKC). Phillips 66 (PSX) offers the better valuation at 15. 6x trailing P/E (11. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate HF Sinclair Corporation (DINO) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WKC or DINO or PSX or MPC or VLO?
On trailing P/E, Phillips 66 (PSX) is the cheapest at 15.
6x versus Valero Energy Corporation at 31. 2x. On forward P/E, Valero Energy Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WKC or DINO or PSX or MPC or VLO?
Over the past 5 years, Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) delivered a total return of +329.
5%, compared to -9. 4% for World Kinect Corporation (WKC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MPC returned +664. 3% versus WKC's -31. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WKC or DINO or PSX or MPC or VLO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Valero Energy Corporation (VLO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
27β versus World Kinect Corporation's 0. 70β — meaning WKC is approximately 162% more volatile than VLO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, HF Sinclair Corporation (DINO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 35% versus 143% for Marathon Petroleum Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WKC or DINO or PSX or MPC or VLO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) is pulling ahead at -4.
4% versus -12. 7% for World Kinect Corporation (WKC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HF Sinclair Corporation grew EPS 241. 8% year-over-year, compared to -1076. 1% for World Kinect Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, PSX leads at -8. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WKC or DINO or PSX or MPC or VLO?
Phillips 66 (PSX) is the more profitable company, earning 3.
3% net margin versus -1. 7% for World Kinect Corporation — meaning it keeps 3. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MPC leads at 4. 3% versus 0. 7% for WKC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MPC leads at 7. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WKC or DINO or PSX or MPC or VLO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Valero Energy Corporation (VLO) trades at 10.
0x forward P/E versus 12. 5x for HF Sinclair Corporation — 2. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WKC: 9. 0% to $29. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — WKC or DINO or PSX or MPC or VLO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
HF Sinclair Corporation (DINO) offers the highest yield at 2. 9%, versus 1. 5% for Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC).
09Is WKC or DINO or PSX or MPC or VLO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
30), 1. 5% yield, +664. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MPC: +664. 3%, WKC: -31. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WKC and DINO and PSX and MPC and VLO?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: WKC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DINO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PSX is a mid-cap deep-value stock; MPC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; VLO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.