Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -291.3x · EV/EBITDA 21.4x · ROE -1.4%. (2007–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $14.9B | $15.3B | $16.1B | $14.0B | $10.1B | $10.0B | $7.5B | $9.5B | $7.8B | $9.3B | $7.4B |
| Enterprise Value | $18.9B | $19.3B | $19.1B | $16.5B | $12.5B | $13.4B | $10.0B | $10.7B | $8.8B | $10.2B | $8.5B |
| P/E Ratio → | -291.26 | — | 12.41 | 63.93 | 22.11 | — | — | 12.44 | 10.12 | 23.88 | 36.12 |
| P/S Ratio | 2.09 | 2.14 | 4.88 | 3.89 | 3.08 | 6.90 | 9.65 | 3.73 | 3.12 | 3.44 | 2.92 |
| P/B Ratio | 4.11 | 4.18 | 4.20 | 3.94 | 2.72 | 2.80 | 2.34 | 2.40 | 2.12 | 2.62 | 1.89 |
| P/FCF | 93.78 | 96.29 | 34.50 | 23.45 | 21.28 | 48.88 | — | 353.17 | 176.87 | 32.15 | 26.25 |
| P/OCF | 39.34 | 40.40 | 25.28 | 17.63 | 14.93 | 31.65 | — | 24.08 | 22.82 | 15.83 | 15.01 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.70 | 5.80 | 4.58 | 3.83 | 9.25 | 12.78 | 4.18 | 3.54 | 3.79 | 3.35 |
| EV / EBITDA | 21.36 | 21.81 | 16.11 | 13.66 | 9.70 | 31.47 | 129.43 | 11.70 | 8.75 | 10.49 | 8.96 |
| EV / EBIT | 33.73 | 48.92 | 45.98 | 49.96 | 29.33 | — | — | 54.27 | 26.65 | 39.38 | 31.65 |
| EV / FCF | — | 121.53 | 41.05 | 27.61 | 26.48 | 65.55 | — | 395.94 | 201.06 | 35.43 | 30.08 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 11.2% | 11.2% | 42.5% | 38.6% | 39.7% | 33.3% | 11.3% | 39.2% | 40.2% | 37.2% | 36.3% |
| Operating Margin | 7.8% | 7.8% | 25.9% | 22.6% | 26.4% | 8.0% | -29.9% | 22.9% | 27.4% | 23.3% | 23.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | -0.7% | -0.7% | 39.3% | 6.1% | 13.9% | -15.4% | -90.1% | 29.9% | 30.8% | 9.2% | 8.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -1.4% | -1.4% | 35.1% | 6.1% | 12.5% | -6.5% | -19.6% | 20.0% | 21.3% | 6.7% | 5.2% |
| ROA | -0.4% | -0.4% | 9.9% | 1.7% | 3.7% | -2.0% | -8.0% | 9.5% | 10.0% | 3.2% | 2.7% |
| ROIC | 5.8% | 5.8% | 9.9% | 10.0% | 9.9% | 1.4% | -3.2% | 8.9% | 11.1% | 9.9% | 9.2% |
| ROCE | 4.7% | 4.7% | 8.8% | 8.9% | 8.9% | 1.2% | -3.0% | 8.4% | 10.3% | 9.3% | 9.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.31 | 1.31 | 1.06 | 0.94 | 0.93 | 1.22 | 1.14 | 0.52 | 0.44 | 0.41 | 0.40 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 5.42 | 5.42 | 3.42 | 2.78 | 2.67 | 10.26 | 47.40 | 2.24 | 1.62 | 1.49 | 1.65 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.10 | 0.80 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.95 | 0.76 | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.27 | 0.28 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 4.53 | 4.53 | 2.57 | 2.06 | 1.90 | 8.00 | 31.73 | 1.26 | 1.05 | 0.97 | 1.14 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 25.23 | 6.54 | 4.16 | 5.20 | 16.68 | — | 42.78 | 24.18 | 3.28 | 3.84 |
| Interest Coverage | 1.26 | 1.26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 58.02 | 58.02 | 0.83 | 0.60 | 0.68 | 0.92 | 2.60 | 1.57 | 1.27 | 1.37 | 1.23 |
| Quick Ratio | 58.02 | 58.02 | 0.83 | 0.59 | 0.68 | 0.92 | 2.60 | 1.56 | 1.25 | 1.36 | 1.20 |
| Cash Ratio | 19.85 | 19.85 | 0.42 | 0.25 | 0.35 | 0.53 | 1.91 | 0.88 | 0.65 | 0.57 | 0.58 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.51 | 0.25 | 0.28 | 0.27 | 0.11 | 0.09 | 0.30 | 0.33 | 0.35 | 0.33 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | 236.75 | 246.33 | 219.00 | 96.40 | 76.89 | 129.75 | 106.71 | 121.07 | 57.64 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 79.88 | 124.14 | 89.30 | 93.06 | 159.89 | 147.87 | 60.05 | 62.39 | 47.31 | 43.79 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.3% | — | — | 0.3% | 0.8% | 0.9% | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | 4.6% | 21.4% | — | — | — | 10.4% | 8.8% | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | 8.1% | 1.6% | 4.5% | — | — | 8.0% | 9.9% | 4.2% | 2.8% |
| FCF Yield | 1.1% | 1.0% | 2.9% | 4.3% | 4.7% | 2.0% | — | 0.3% | 0.6% | 3.1% | 3.8% |
| Buyback Yield | 2.1% | 2.1% | 7.4% | 3.2% | 3.7% | 0.0% | 0.9% | 4.4% | 12.2% | 8.0% | 3.7% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 2.5% | 2.5% | 7.8% | 3.6% | 3.7% | 0.0% | 1.2% | 5.3% | 13.0% | 8.0% | 3.7% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $96M | $102M | $108M | $111M | $104M | $101M | $106M | $115M | $126M | $134M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 19 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying H stock.
Hyatt Hotels Corporation's current P/E ratio is -291.3x. The historical average is 42.3x.
Hyatt Hotels Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 21.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 14.2x.
Hyatt Hotels Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is -1.4%. The historical average is 5.8%.
Based on historical data, Hyatt Hotels Corporation is trading at a P/E of -291.3x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Hyatt Hotels Corporation's current dividend yield is 0.38%.
Hyatt Hotels Corporation has 11.2% gross margin and 7.8% operating margin.
Hyatt Hotels Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 5.4x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
ALG integration margin drag
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Compression Masks Core Fee Strength
Gross margin fell from 46.5% in 2024Q4 to 21.2% in 2026Q2, a 25.3-point drop, reflecting ALG's lower-margin mix and reimbursed costs, as reported in quarterly filings.
The consolidated gross margin decline is largely attributable to the consolidation of Apple Leisure Group and the pass-through nature of reimbursed costs, which inflate revenue without corresponding margin. Operating margin, however, has stabilized around 7-8% in recent quarters, suggesting that the fee-based segments remain resilient despite the top-line mix shift. Net margin turned positive at 6.0% in 2026Q2, but this follows several quarters of losses, indicating that profitability is still recovering from integration and interest costs. Investors should monitor whether the gross margin stabilizes as ALG integration matures, as the current level may represent a new structural norm rather than a temporary trough.
ROIC Stagnates Amid Asset-Light Transition
ROIC has hovered between 1.1% and 2.9% over the past ten quarters, with 2026Q2 at 1.4%, indicating that capital efficiency remains subdued, as per financial statements.
Despite a strategic shift toward asset-light operations, ROIC has not yet improved, likely because the ALG acquisition added significant goodwill and intangibles that have yet to generate proportional returns. The decline in net PPE from $2.6B to $1.9B suggests asset recycling, but the corresponding rise in goodwill to $3.5B has offset the capital base reduction. ROE has been volatile, swinging from 14.4% in 2024Q1 to -1.5% in 2024Q4, reflecting one-time gains and losses that obscure underlying earning power. The sustainability of returns will depend on whether the fee-based segments can scale without proportional capital investment, which is the core thesis of the asset-light model.
Working Capital Efficiency Deteriorates
The current ratio fell to 0.62 in 2026Q2 from 0.98 in 2025Q1, while DSO rose to 55 days, indicating tighter liquidity and slower receivables collection, as reported in quarterly data.
The cash conversion cycle has been volatile, with DSO spiking to 128 days in 2025Q1 before normalizing to 55 days, suggesting that ALG's package revenue and seasonal patterns are distorting working capital metrics. DPO has also fluctuated, ranging from 23 to 96 days, which may reflect varying payment terms across the owned and managed segments. The negative current ratio indicates that current liabilities exceed current assets, a common feature in asset-light models where deferred revenue and payables are substantial, but it still warrants monitoring given the reduced cash balance. The efficiency of working capital management appears to be under pressure as the company integrates a more complex leisure business, and investors should watch for stabilization in DSO and DPO.
Deleveraging Progress but Coverage Thin
Debt-to-equity improved to 1.24 in 2026Q2 from 1.65 in 2025Q3, yet interest coverage of 3.84x remains modest, as per balance sheet data.
Total debt has been reduced from $6.3B to $4.5B over the past year, indicating a deliberate deleveraging effort post-ALG acquisition. However, the D/EBITDA ratio of 20.22x is elevated, though this may be distorted by the low EBITDA base during the integration period. Interest coverage of 3.84x in 2026Q2 is an improvement from 0.82x in 2025Q3, but it remains below the pre-acquisition levels of over 12x, suggesting that debt service is still a meaningful drag on earnings. The company's ability to continue deleveraging will depend on sustained EBITDA growth, and the current coverage levels leave limited room for further rate hikes or operational setbacks.
Liquidity Buffer Thins to Critical Levels
The current ratio dropped to 0.62 in 2026Q2, with cash falling to $537M from $1.7B in 2025Q1, indicating a tighter liquidity position, as reported in balance sheet data.
The quick ratio of 0.62, which equals the current ratio due to minimal inventory, suggests that Hyatt may struggle to cover short-term obligations without relying on operating cash flow or credit facilities. The decline in cash is partly attributable to debt repayment and share buybacks, which consumed significant cash in recent quarters. While the company has access to revolving credit and generates positive operating cash flow, the thin liquidity buffer increases vulnerability to a demand shock or unexpected capital needs. Investors should monitor whether management rebuilds cash reserves or continues to prioritize capital returns, as the current trajectory may strain financial flexibility.
Gross Margin Misleads in Asset-Light Model
Gross margin is often misapplied to Hyatt because reimbursed costs inflate revenue and compress margins without affecting profitability, as seen in the 21.2% figure for 2026Q2.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for Hyatt is the gross margin, which appears structurally low due to the accounting treatment of reimbursed costs from managed properties. These pass-through expenses are recorded as both revenue and expense, artificially inflating the top line and depressing gross margin, but they have no impact on operating income. A more appropriate metric is the operating margin on a fee-only basis, or EBITDA margin adjusted for reimbursed costs, which better reflects the underlying earning power of the asset-light segments. Analysts should also consider the net margin excluding one-time gains and losses from asset dispositions, as these can significantly distort reported profitability. By focusing on adjusted operating metrics, investors can gain a clearer picture of Hyatt's true operational efficiency.