Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 50.2x · EV/EBITDA 29.2x · ROE N/A. (2011–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $69.1B | $68.4B | $61.2B | $48.1B | $35.0B | $43.8B | $31.0B | $32.2B | $21.9B | $26.1B | $18.4B |
| Enterprise Value | $83.8B | $83.1B | $71.9B | $57.4B | $43.5B | $52.2B | $39.5B | $40.8B | $28.8B | $32.1B | $24.0B |
| P/E Ratio → | 50.20 | 46.94 | 40.25 | 42.15 | 27.89 | 106.84 | — | 36.48 | 28.72 | 24.05 | 53.15 |
| P/S Ratio | 5.74 | 5.68 | 5.47 | 4.70 | 3.99 | 7.57 | 7.21 | 3.40 | 2.46 | 7.67 | 2.80 |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 39.25 | 12.59 | 3.15 |
| P/FCF | 35.57 | 35.17 | 33.70 | 28.29 | 22.17 | 1461.11 | 50.39 | 27.28 | 19.98 | 36.47 | 20.53 |
| P/OCF | 32.48 | 32.11 | 30.39 | 24.70 | 20.82 | 402.14 | 43.84 | 23.24 | 17.45 | 28.26 | 13.64 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 6.90 | 6.43 | 5.61 | 4.96 | 9.02 | 9.16 | 4.32 | 3.23 | 9.44 | 3.65 |
| EV / EBITDA | 29.21 | 28.94 | 28.57 | 24.20 | 19.27 | 43.56 | — | 20.36 | 16.38 | 21.90 | 15.56 |
| EV / EBIT | 31.13 | 30.86 | 30.56 | 26.62 | 20.23 | 54.53 | — | 24.60 | 19.86 | 29.12 | 27.43 |
| EV / FCF | — | 42.73 | 39.60 | 33.78 | 27.54 | 1739.41 | 64.04 | 34.60 | 26.26 | 44.90 | 26.73 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 41.1% | 41.1% | 27.4% | 28.6% | 30.8% | 28.6% | 13.5% | 25.8% | 25.3% | 57.7% | 25.7% |
| Operating Margin | 22.4% | 22.4% | 21.2% | 21.7% | 23.9% | 17.4% | -9.7% | 17.5% | 16.1% | 33.3% | 13.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | 12.1% | 12.1% | 13.7% | 11.1% | 14.3% | 7.1% | -16.6% | 9.3% | 8.6% | 31.8% | 5.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2048.8% | 58.0% | 27.4% | 5.7% |
| ROA | 8.8% | 8.8% | 9.6% | 7.4% | 8.1% | 2.5% | -4.5% | 6.1% | 5.4% | 5.4% | 1.3% |
| ROIC | 24.7% | 24.7% | 25.4% | 23.2% | 21.1% | 10.5% | -4.2% | 15.9% | 13.8% | 8.7% | 4.8% |
| ROCE | 19.0% | 19.0% | 20.2% | 18.7% | 17.1% | 7.6% | -3.2% | 14.1% | 12.3% | 6.4% | 3.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 13.05 | 3.18 | 1.13 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 5.46 | 5.46 | 4.77 | 4.27 | 4.30 | 8.16 | — | 4.57 | 4.14 | 4.50 | 4.29 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 12.33 | 2.91 | 0.95 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 5.12 | 5.12 | 4.25 | 3.93 | 3.76 | 6.97 | — | 4.31 | 3.92 | 4.11 | 3.60 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 7.56 | 5.90 | 5.49 | 5.37 | 278.30 | 13.65 | 7.32 | 6.28 | 8.42 | 6.19 |
| Interest Coverage | 4.34 | 4.34 | 4.13 | 4.65 | 5.18 | 2.41 | -1.15 | 4.00 | 3.91 | 3.15 | 2.62 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 10.81 | 10.81 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.85 | 0.95 | 1.73 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.82 | 1.33 |
| Quick Ratio | 10.81 | 10.81 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.85 | 0.95 | 1.73 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.82 | 1.12 |
| Cash Ratio | 3.94 | 3.94 | 0.28 | 0.21 | 0.36 | 0.47 | 1.32 | 0.19 | 0.15 | 0.23 | 0.40 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.57 | 0.37 | 0.26 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.24 | 0.25 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 9.04 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 51.24 | 51.71 | 53.03 | 55.21 | 67.35 | 65.34 | 48.70 | 47.13 | 111.62 | 42.63 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.4% | — | 0.1% | 0.5% | 0.8% | 0.7% | 1.5% |
| Payout Ratio | 9.8% | 9.8% | 9.8% | 13.8% | 9.8% | — | — | 19.5% | 23.7% | 18.0% | 82.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.0% | 2.1% | 2.5% | 2.4% | 3.6% | 0.9% | — | 2.7% | 3.5% | 4.2% | 1.9% |
| FCF Yield | 2.8% | 2.8% | 3.0% | 3.5% | 4.5% | 0.1% | 2.0% | 3.7% | 5.0% | 2.7% | 4.9% |
| Buyback Yield | 4.7% | 4.8% | 4.7% | 4.9% | 4.5% | 0.0% | 1.0% | 4.8% | 7.9% | 3.4% | 0.1% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 4.9% | 5.0% | 5.0% | 5.2% | 4.9% | 0.0% | 1.1% | 5.3% | 8.7% | 4.2% | 1.6% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $238M | $248M | $264M | $277M | $281M | $279M | $290M | $305M | $327M | $330M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 15 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying HLT stock.
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 50.2x. The historical average is 39.7x. This places it at the 83th percentile of its historical range.
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 29.2x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 21.8x.
Based on historical data, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. is trading at a P/E of 50.2x. This is at the 83th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.'s current dividend yield is 0.20% with a payout ratio of 9.8%.
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. has 41.1% gross margin and 22.4% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 5.5x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
China RevPAR deceleration and pipeline conversion
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Multiple Justified by Fee-Based Growth
According to recent market data, HLT trades at 30.7x EV/EBITDA versus MAR's 24.7x and IHG's 20.2x, implying the market expects sustained organic unit growth and fee expansion.
The premium to peers appears to reflect Hilton's superior net unit growth trajectory and streamlined brand architecture, as noted in industry analyses. However, the forward P/E of 36.5x implies a significant earnings ramp that may already price in the 'broad-based momentum' cited by management. Investors should monitor whether the Q2 2026 EPS miss signals a deceleration that could compress the multiple.
Fee-Based Margins Masked by Pass-Through Revenue
As reported in financial statements, HLT's gross margin swung from 30.5% in Q2 2026 to 76.4% in Q4 2025, reflecting reimbursable expenses; operating margin averaged 22.5% over the last four quarters, indicating stable fee-based profitability.
The volatility in gross margin is a function of the pass-through accounting for managed properties, not a change in underlying economics. The consistent operating margin, despite revenue fluctuations, suggests that the asset-light fee stream provides a stable profit base. However, the Q2 2026 EPS miss implies that owner-level cost pressures may be eroding the ability to extract fees, a risk that warrants monitoring.
ROIC Volatility Reflects Timing, Not Structural Decay
Based on quarterly data, HLT's ROIC ranged from 5.3% in Q4 2024 to 9.7% in Q2 2026, with a trailing average near 7%, indicating moderate returns that are sensitive to seasonal and timing effects.
The fluctuation in ROIC is partly due to the lumpy recognition of initial franchise fees and the amortization of key money, which can distort quarterly comparisons. The asset-light model should theoretically generate higher returns on invested capital, but the negative equity base complicates the calculation. Investors should focus on the trend in fee-based income relative to the capital employed in the Ownership segment, which appears to be the primary driver of ROIC variability.
Working Capital Efficiency Hides in Payables Timing
Per the latest quarterly data, HLT's DSO has remained stable around 47-53 days, while DPO swung from 18 days in Q4 2024 to 122 days in Q1 2026, indicating significant timing effects in payables.
The wide swings in DPO are likely due to the timing of reimbursable expense payments, which are offset by corresponding revenue. The stable DSO suggests consistent collection from franchisees and managed properties. The absence of inventory data is consistent with the asset-light model, but the negative CCC (when calculable) indicates that Hilton is effectively using supplier financing to fund its operations, a favorable dynamic if sustained.
Leverage Elevated but Interest Coverage Stable
According to recent filings, HLT's D/EBITDA rose to 15.5x in Q2 2026 from 14.4x a year earlier, while interest coverage improved to 4.7x from 5.2x, indicating a comfortable but leveraged position.
The high D/EBITDA ratio is partly a function of the low EBITDA base relative to the debt load, which has been used to fund aggressive buybacks. Interest coverage above 4x suggests that debt service remains manageable, but the negative equity and rising debt levels indicate a strained balance sheet. The maintained guidance implies management expects stable cash flows, but a prolonged downturn could pressure coverage ratios.
Thin Liquidity Buffer Relies on Cash Generation
As of Q2 2026, HLT's current ratio stood at 0.65, with cash of $1.0B against $14.0B debt, suggesting a tight liquidity position that is offset by robust operating cash flow.
The current ratio below 1.0 indicates that current liabilities exceed current assets, a common feature for asset-light companies with negative working capital. However, the $5.2B cumulative operating cash flow over ten quarters provides a cushion. The deferred revenue growth to $3.9B signals strong advance bookings, which supports near-term liquidity, but the reliance on continuous cash generation makes the company vulnerable to a demand shock.
Misapplied Metric: EV/EBITDA Overstates Leverage
The most commonly misapplied ratio for HLT is EV/EBITDA, which is distorted by the pass-through revenue and the negative equity base, obscuring the true cash-generating power of the fee-based model.
EV/EBITDA is often used to compare asset-light hotel companies, but for Hilton, the EBITDA figure includes reimbursable expenses that inflate both revenue and costs, making the multiple appear higher than the underlying economics. A more appropriate metric is EV/Adjusted EBITDA, which strips out pass-through items and adds back key money amortization. Alternatively, EV/FCF provides a cleaner picture, as FCF margins have averaged 16.6% over the past year, indicating strong cash conversion that the EV/EBITDA multiple fails to capture.