Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 5.2x · EV/EBITDA 2.0x · ROE 49.1%. (2012–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.0B | $906M | $371M | $171M | $47M | $163M | $284M | $387M | $384M | $483M | $464M |
| Enterprise Value | $542M | $446M | $60M | $-144280821 | $-73272113 | $-43918393 | $-28274774 | $257M | $283M | $514M | $431M |
| P/E Ratio → | 5.23 | 4.63 | 6.02 | 3.77 | — | — | 30.70 | 13.52 | 14.15 | — | 13.75 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.18 | 1.07 | 0.45 | 0.23 | 0.07 | 0.26 | 0.48 | 0.76 | 0.80 | 1.19 | 1.06 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.03 | 1.79 | 1.28 | 0.78 | 0.36 | 0.48 | 0.64 | 0.86 | 0.90 | 1.27 | 1.30 |
| P/FCF | 5.75 | 5.20 | 4.70 | 2.83 | — | 2.77 | 1.67 | 3.38 | 4.12 | 67.25 | 6.32 |
| P/OCF | 5.49 | 4.97 | 4.26 | 2.43 | — | 2.72 | 1.67 | 3.24 | 4.03 | 63.83 | 6.18 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.53 | 0.07 | -0.20 | -0.11 | -0.07 | -0.05 | 0.50 | 0.59 | 1.26 | 0.98 |
| EV / EBITDA | 1.99 | 1.64 | 0.65 | -2.38 | — | — | -2.74 | 4.99 | 4.28 | 277.63 | 6.60 |
| EV / EBIT | 2.09 | 1.67 | 0.64 | -2.28 | — | — | -2.78 | 5.18 | 4.79 | 70.19 | 7.60 |
| EV / FCF | — | 2.56 | 0.76 | -2.38 | — | -0.74 | -0.17 | 2.24 | 3.04 | 71.52 | 5.87 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 63.0% | 63.0% | 21.9% | 19.3% | 0.8% | 9.2% | 15.5% | 25.4% | 32.9% | 29.8% | 26.4% |
| Operating Margin | 30.6% | 30.6% | 10.1% | 7.1% | -25.1% | -12.0% | 0.4% | 8.0% | 8.1% | -1.4% | 12.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | 23.1% | 23.1% | 7.5% | 6.2% | -23.3% | -11.8% | 1.6% | 5.6% | 5.7% | -0.3% | 7.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 49.1% | 49.1% | 24.1% | 25.8% | -65.1% | -19.0% | 2.1% | 6.6% | 6.7% | -0.3% | 9.5% |
| ROA | 8.4% | 8.4% | 2.7% | 2.0% | -7.1% | -3.7% | 0.5% | 1.5% | 1.5% | -0.1% | 3.6% |
| ROIC | 1539.6% | 1539.6% | — | — | -170.7% | -42.8% | 0.7% | 9.6% | 8.0% | -1.2% | 19.0% |
| ROCE | 58.7% | 58.7% | 27.7% | 23.8% | -53.7% | -15.8% | 0.1% | 2.2% | 2.3% | -0.4% | 6.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.49 | 0.67 | 1.22 | 0.44 | 0.29 | 0.31 | 0.35 | 0.49 | 0.20 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.37 | 0.37 | 1.53 | 2.44 | — | — | 12.52 | 2.68 | 2.25 | 99.68 | 1.12 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.91 | -1.07 | -1.43 | -0.92 | -0.60 | -0.70 | -0.29 | -0.24 | 0.08 | -0.09 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -1.69 | -1.69 | -3.38 | -5.20 | — | — | -30.23 | -2.54 | -1.53 | 16.60 | -0.50 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -2.64 | -3.95 | -5.21 | — | -3.51 | -1.84 | -1.14 | -1.09 | 4.28 | -0.45 |
| Interest Coverage | 33.87 | 33.87 | 8.56 | 5.64 | -17.86 | -8.54 | 1.28 | 5.81 | 2.95 | 0.55 | 156.81 |
Net cash position: cash ($559M) exceeds total debt ($100M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.81 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 1.07 | — | — | 6.07 | 43.88 | 7.44 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.81 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 1.07 | — | — | 8.13 | 88.16 | 11.44 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.26 | 0.30 | 0.18 | 0.66 | — | — | 3.97 | 41.00 | 7.33 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.39 | 0.33 | 0.35 | 0.28 | 0.32 | 0.28 | 0.26 | 0.27 | 0.23 | 0.42 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | 0.0% | 0.0% | 10.1% | 4.1% | 2.4% | 1.8% | 1.7% | 1.7% | 1.5% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | 0.1% | 0.0% | — | — | 73.5% | 24.3% | 23.5% | — | 20.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 19.1% | 21.6% | 16.6% | 26.5% | — | — | 3.3% | 7.4% | 7.1% | — | 7.3% |
| FCF Yield | 17.4% | 19.2% | 21.3% | 35.4% | — | 36.2% | 59.8% | 29.6% | 24.2% | 1.5% | 15.8% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 15.5% | 5.0% | 3.5% | 4.2% | 0.5% | 12.8% | 5.5% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 25.5% | 9.1% | 5.9% | 6.0% | 2.2% | 14.5% | 7.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $31M | $31M | $26M | $26M | $28M | $28M | $29M | $26M | $27M | $30M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 14 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying HRTG stock.
Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 5.2x. The historical average is 11.6x. This places it at the 22th percentile of its historical range.
Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 2.0x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 3.6x.
Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 49.1%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 10.1%.
Based on historical data, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 5.2x. This is at the 22th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. has 63.0% gross margin and 30.6% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.4x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Florida Catastrophe Concentration
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Reflects Turnaround Quality
Heritage's P/B multiple has expanded to 2.06x, or 18.88x as of Q2 2026, a dramatic premium to its 2024 trough of ~8x, suggesting the market is pricing in a structural shift in underwriting profitability and not just a cyclical upturn.
The valuation re-rating appears justified by the sustained improvement in ROE, which has risen from a low of 3.0% to 11.3% in the latest quarter. However, at a trailing P/E of 5.32x, the market seems to be discounting the durability of this earnings power, likely due to the concentration risk inherent in its Florida-focused book. The premium to historical P/B levels warrants monitoring for any signs that the underwriting cycle is peaking.
Structural Underwriting Profitability Achieved
According to the reported ratio data, Heritage's combined ratio has improved from a concerning 95.8% in Q3 2024 to a highly profitable 72.0% in Q2 2026, driven by a 23.4 percentage point decline in the loss ratio to 60.9%.
This sustained improvement below the 100% breakeven threshold suggests a fundamental enhancement in rate adequacy and claims management, moving the company from near-breakeven to generating significant underwriting income. The trajectory indicates the turnaround is operational, not merely a one-off reserve release, though the volatility in the expense ratio requires monitoring for efficiency.
ROE Surge Driven by Underwriting Core
Heritage's return on equity has expanded from 3.0% to 11.3% over the last two years, indicating that the improved combined ratio is now translating directly into shareholder returns, supplemented by investment income on float.
The profitability decomposition shows the underwriting margin has ballooned from 4.2% to 28.0% in the same period, confirming that the core insurance operation is the primary driver of ROE improvement. The consistency of this margin expansion, despite quarterly fluctuations, implies the business model is generating sustainable underwriting profit, which is the key to long-term value creation for insurers.
Leverage Receding Amid Capital Growth
As reported in financial statements, Heritage's premium-to-surplus leverage has declined significantly, with the debt-to-equity ratio compressing from 0.64x in Q1 2024 to 0.19x in Q1 2026, reflecting substantial internal capital generation.
This deleveraging appears to be driven by retained earnings bolstering policyholder surplus, which reduces underwriting leverage and enhances financial flexibility. The trend is a positive credit signal, suggesting the company is building a more resilient capital base to absorb potential catastrophe losses, though the absolute level of surplus relative to its concentrated exposure remains a key metric for rating agencies.
Misapplied Metric: The Lure of Low P/E
The most commonly misapplied ratio to Heritage is its trailing P/E of 5.32, which appears attractive but may obscure the extreme volatility in earnings due to catastrophe loss timing and potential reserve adjustments that are core to P&C insurance economics.
Investors using a standard P/E framework risk misjudging the sustainability of current earnings, as a single major hurricane could instantly erase underwriting profits and make the 'cheap' multiple appear expensive on a normalized basis. A more appropriate framework would be valuation relative to tangible book value (P/B) combined with analysis of the combined ratio cycle and reserve development trends to assess the true earnings power of the underwriting franchise.