Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 11.0x · EV/EBITDA 12.0x · ROE 13.6%. (1998–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.0B | $782M | $718M | $647M | $531M | $560M | $442M | $598M | $469M | $583M | $615M |
| Enterprise Value | $1.4B | $1.1B | $973M | $1.4B | $1.1B | $278M | $376M | $868M | $894M | $767M | $783M |
| P/E Ratio → | 10.96 | 8.81 | 9.02 | 7.87 | 8.70 | 9.49 | 10.03 | 12.12 | 11.17 | 18.62 | 19.23 |
| P/S Ratio | 3.86 | 3.22 | 3.10 | 2.87 | 2.79 | 3.12 | 2.64 | 3.95 | 3.37 | 4.53 | 4.85 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.36 | 1.08 | 1.23 | 1.24 | 1.20 | 1.23 | 1.00 | 1.44 | 1.25 | 1.59 | 1.80 |
| P/FCF | 11.22 | 69.79 | 7.75 | 10.79 | 4.54 | 9.50 | 15.30 | 19.13 | 8.47 | 17.54 | 18.88 |
| P/OCF | 58.22 | 43.53 | 7.10 | 9.71 | 4.43 | 8.67 | 11.67 | 13.37 | 7.60 | 15.08 | 17.77 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 4.68 | 4.20 | 5.99 | 5.65 | 1.55 | 2.25 | 5.73 | 6.42 | 5.96 | 6.17 |
| EV / EBITDA | 12.03 | 10.52 | 8.94 | 11.84 | 12.11 | 3.18 | 5.85 | 12.40 | 14.51 | 13.60 | 13.87 |
| EV / EBIT | 13.70 | 11.12 | 9.90 | 13.17 | 14.18 | 3.77 | 6.85 | 14.36 | 17.24 | 16.65 | 16.70 |
| EV / FCF | — | 101.24 | 10.51 | 22.57 | 9.20 | 4.72 | 13.01 | 27.76 | 16.13 | 23.08 | 24.03 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 98.1% | 98.1% | 96.8% | 96.6% | 96.6% | 102.4% | 91.6% | 98.8% | 99.2% | 97.7% | 97.7% |
| Operating Margin | 42.1% | 42.1% | 42.5% | 45.5% | 39.8% | 41.1% | 32.8% | 39.9% | 37.3% | 35.8% | 36.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | 36.6% | 36.6% | 34.4% | 36.4% | 32.1% | 32.9% | 26.4% | 32.6% | 30.2% | 24.3% | 25.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 13.6% | 13.6% | 14.4% | 17.1% | 13.6% | 13.1% | 10.3% | 12.5% | 11.3% | 8.9% | 9.5% |
| ROA | 1.4% | 1.4% | 1.4% | 1.6% | 1.2% | 1.2% | 1.1% | 1.4% | 1.3% | 1.0% | 1.1% |
| ROIC | 5.5% | 5.5% | 5.7% | 6.3% | 5.1% | 5.1% | 4.3% | 5.1% | 4.8% | 4.8% | 5.4% |
| ROCE | 8.0% | 8.0% | 8.0% | 9.7% | 8.2% | 8.0% | 6.5% | 7.6% | 7.4% | 7.7% | 9.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.14 | 1.14 | 1.11 | 1.60 | 1.45 | 1.52 | 1.27 | 1.21 | 1.33 | 1.05 | 1.03 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 7.65 | 7.65 | 5.96 | 7.32 | 7.21 | 7.93 | 8.71 | 7.19 | 8.11 | 6.81 | 6.23 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.49 | 0.44 | 1.35 | 1.23 | -0.62 | -0.15 | 0.65 | 1.13 | 0.50 | 0.49 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.27 | 3.27 | 2.35 | 6.18 | 6.12 | -3.22 | -1.03 | 3.85 | 6.89 | 3.26 | 2.97 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 31.45 | 2.76 | 11.78 | 4.65 | -4.78 | -2.29 | 8.63 | 7.66 | 5.54 | 5.16 |
| Interest Coverage | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 1.32 | 3.21 | 3.79 | 2.10 | 1.79 | 2.37 | 2.92 | 3.72 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.23 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.36 | 0.29 | 0.20 | 0.16 | 0.20 | 0.20 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.23 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.36 | 0.29 | 0.20 | 0.16 | 0.20 | 0.20 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.23 | 0.18 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 0.07 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.4% | 3.1% | 3.1% | 3.2% | 3.7% | 3.3% | 4.1% | 2.9% | 5.9% | 2.1% | 3.0% |
| Payout Ratio | 27.0% | 27.0% | 28.2% | 25.5% | 32.1% | 31.4% | 40.6% | 34.6% | 65.4% | 38.5% | 58.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 9.1% | 11.4% | 11.1% | 12.7% | 11.5% | 10.5% | 10.0% | 8.3% | 9.0% | 5.4% | 5.2% |
| FCF Yield | 8.9% | 1.4% | 12.9% | 9.3% | 22.0% | 10.5% | 6.5% | 5.2% | 11.8% | 5.7% | 5.3% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 3.8% | 1.5% | 1.2% | 1.3% | 0.0% | 0.6% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 2.4% | 3.1% | 3.1% | 3.2% | 3.7% | 7.1% | 5.5% | 4.1% | 7.1% | 2.1% | 3.7% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $16M | $16M | $16M | $16M | $16M | $16M | $16M | $17M | $16M | $16M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 28 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying MBWM stock.
Mercantile Bank Corporation's current P/E ratio is 11.0x. The historical average is 13.6x. This places it at the 29th percentile of its historical range.
Mercantile Bank Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 12.0x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 13.9x.
Mercantile Bank Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 13.6%. The historical average is 7.8%.
Based on historical data, Mercantile Bank Corporation is trading at a P/E of 11.0x. This is at the 29th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Mercantile Bank Corporation's current dividend yield is 2.43% with a payout ratio of 27.0%.
Mercantile Bank Corporation has 98.1% gross margin and 42.1% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Mercantile Bank Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 7.7x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Commercial real estate concentration exposure
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Discount to Book Reflects Constrained Returns
According to reported ratio data, MBWM trades at roughly 1.36 times book value and 11.1 times trailing earnings, a multiple that appears to price the bank as a modest-return regional franchise rather than a premium one.
A price-to-book of 1.36 against reported ROE near 3.2% to 3.7% implies the market is capitalizing a low-single-digit return on equity, which suggests investors are not paying for franchise premium. The P/E of 11.1 sits below the peer set's 11.1 to 16.0 range, which may indicate skepticism about the durability of recent earnings given the efficiency ratio volatility. Investors should monitor whether the 2026Q2 earnings beat reflects core revenue strength or reserve timing before assuming a re-rating toward peer P/B levels of 1.2 to 1.5.
Thin Spread Income Drives Subdued ROE
Based on MBWM's reported figures, ROE has ranged from 3.1% to 3.7% over ten quarters while ROA stayed near 0.3% to 0.4%, indicating returns are constrained by a low net interest margin and balance sheet leverage that is structurally high for the asset base.
With equity-to-assets near 0.10 to 0.11, the ROE-to-ROA ratio of roughly 9 to 10 times implies that leverage is doing much of the work in lifting returns above the asset-level yield. The reported NIM of 0.7% to 0.9% is thin, so profitability depends heavily on balance sheet scale and fee income of roughly 17% of revenue. The result is returns that trail the peer group, where Independent Bank Corporation reports ROE of 13.6%, suggesting a structural rather than purely cyclical gap.
Efficiency Swings Outpace Margin Stability
As reported in financial statements, the efficiency ratio moved between 52.4% and 62.0% while NIM held within a narrow 0.7% to 0.9% band, suggesting cost control rather than spread expansion has driven recent operating results.
The stability of NIM alongside a wide efficiency range indicates that revenue growth has been limited and that expense timing, rather than pricing power, explains much of the quarter-to-quarter variation. A ratio climbing to 62.0% in 2026Q1 before easing to 54.6% in 2026Q2 may reflect reserve or compensation timing rather than a durable operating shift. Investors should monitor whether the efficiency ratio can hold below 60% without relying on provision releases.
Retained Earnings Build Capital Cushion
Based on reported equity figures, MBWM's equity-to-assets ratio of roughly 0.10 to 0.11 and dividend payout near 28% of net income suggest retained earnings are supporting balance sheet growth without external capital.
Equity-to-assets near 10% to 11% is adequate for a regional bank but offers less cushion than the highest-capitalized peers, so growth capacity depends on continued earnings retention. The absence of share repurchases over the ten-quarter window suggests management is prioritizing capital preservation over return. Regulatory capital ratios such as CET1 were not supplied, so capacity conclusions here remain provisional.
Provision Normalization Warrants Continued Watch
According to recent SEC filings, provision expense fell from $3.5M in 2024Q2 to a $1.8M release in 2026Q1 and $0.7M in 2026Q3, indicating credit cost pressure has eased but has not moved in a straight line.
The shift from sustained provisioning to reserve releases may reflect improving credit conditions, though it can also flatter reported earnings if reserves are drawn down faster than loss experience justifies. Given CEO commentary on uncertain macro conditions and the bank's commercial real estate concentration, reserve adequacy warrants further investigation rather than an assumption of benign credit. Non-performing asset and coverage ratios were not supplied, which limits a definitive adequacy assessment.
Valuation Premium Absent Despite Peer Parity
Based on the supplied peer data, MBWM's P/E of 11.1 and P/B of 1.36 sit near the low end of the group, while its ROE of roughly 3.3% trails every peer by a wide margin, suggesting the gap is structural.
Independent Bank Corporation earns 13.6% ROE and trades at 1.51 times book, so the market is paying a premium for higher returns rather than for size or geography. Citizens Community and Univest show similar valuation discipline relative to their returns, which implies the market prices return on equity more than balance sheet scale. MBWM's gap to peers appears structural, driven by spread income and leverage, rather than a temporary cyclical trough.
P/E Misleads Given Reserve-Driven Earnings
The most commonly misapplied metric here is trailing P/E, which at 11.1 may appear cheap, but it obscures that recent earnings were supported by zero or negative provision expense rather than core spread growth.
Using P/E without adjusting for reserve releases overstates earnings power if provisioning normalizes upward from current levels. A more appropriate lens is price-to-tangible-book combined with normalized ROTCE, which strips out reserve timing and reflects the bank's actual return on capital. Investors should monitor whether the 2026Q2 beat persists once provision expense returns to a through-the-cycle level.