Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 20.0x · EV/EBITDA 13.3x · ROE 7.0%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.9B | $4.0B | $3.7B | $2.2B | $2.3B | $2.4B | $2.0B | $2.2B | $1.8B | $2.0B | $2.1B |
| Enterprise Value | $6.6B | $6.7B | $5.9B | $4.7B | $4.8B | $5.2B | $4.3B | $4.5B | $3.8B | $3.7B | $3.9B |
| P/E Ratio → | 20.01 | 20.99 | 13.15 | 5.40 | 6.36 | 6.26 | 5.13 | 6.68 | 6.52 | 7.14 | 33.12 |
| P/S Ratio | 2.07 | 2.14 | 2.10 | 1.24 | 1.34 | 0.69 | 0.36 | 0.42 | 0.39 | 0.45 | 0.52 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.38 | 1.45 | 1.37 | 0.77 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.65 | 0.79 | 0.69 | 0.82 | 0.92 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | 34.73 | 224.00 | 9.54 | — | — | 18.74 | 28.88 |
| P/OCF | 8.22 | 8.47 | 7.34 | 6.72 | 4.60 | 4.78 | 2.61 | 4.14 | 3.56 | 4.46 | 4.63 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.58 | 3.37 | 2.59 | 2.74 | 1.50 | 0.78 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.83 | 0.94 |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.28 | 13.52 | 12.73 | 11.26 | 12.29 | 9.79 | 5.22 | 6.15 | 6.16 | 5.78 | 6.21 |
| EV / EBIT | 22.73 | 21.08 | 19.32 | 10.51 | 23.45 | 14.53 | 7.58 | 9.12 | 9.55 | 8.50 | 9.37 |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | 70.94 | 489.82 | 20.59 | — | — | 34.50 | 52.44 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 21.6% | 21.6% | 32.5% | 28.8% | 28.0% | 19.9% | 18.9% | 17.5% | 17.4% | 18.1% | 18.8% |
| Operating Margin | 15.5% | 15.5% | 15.1% | 12.5% | 11.5% | 9.6% | 9.8% | 9.0% | 8.9% | 9.6% | 9.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | 10.2% | 10.2% | 16.0% | 23.0% | 21.0% | 10.9% | 7.1% | 6.3% | 6.0% | 6.3% | 1.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 7.0% | 7.0% | 10.0% | 12.8% | 10.5% | 11.7% | 13.2% | 12.4% | 10.9% | 11.8% | 2.6% |
| ROA | 2.6% | 2.6% | 3.8% | 4.7% | 4.0% | 4.5% | 5.0% | 4.6% | 4.1% | 4.5% | 1.0% |
| ROIC | 4.2% | 4.2% | 3.9% | 3.0% | 2.5% | 4.3% | 7.8% | 7.4% | 6.9% | 7.9% | 7.2% |
| ROCE | 4.3% | 4.3% | 4.1% | 3.0% | 2.5% | 4.4% | 7.8% | 7.5% | 7.0% | 7.7% | 7.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.85 | 0.86 | 0.69 | 0.85 | 0.77 | 0.83 | 0.82 | 0.71 | 0.77 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 5.51 | 5.51 | 4.92 | 6.00 | 6.36 | 5.42 | 2.87 | 3.20 | 3.39 | 2.70 | 2.86 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.98 | 0.83 | 0.84 | 0.68 | 0.83 | 0.75 | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.69 | 0.75 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 5.46 | 5.46 | 4.81 | 5.88 | 6.27 | 5.31 | 2.80 | 3.11 | 3.30 | 2.64 | 2.79 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | 36.21 | 265.82 | 11.05 | — | — | 15.76 | 23.56 |
| Interest Coverage | 2.96 | 2.96 | 2.83 | 3.89 | 2.53 | 5.05 | 5.92 | 5.04 | 4.75 | 5.23 | 4.71 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.98 | 1.27 | 1.36 | 1.42 | 1.39 | 1.50 | 1.20 | 1.32 | 1.46 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.92 | 1.19 | 1.32 | 1.11 | 1.09 | 1.18 | 0.91 | 1.04 | 1.10 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.07 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.24 | 0.25 | 0.23 | 0.18 | 0.39 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.66 |
| Inventory Turnover | 37.65 | 37.65 | 26.39 | 14.70 | 19.57 | 8.25 | 15.41 | 15.82 | 13.02 | 16.07 | 14.07 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 50.34 | 56.95 | 190.82 | 222.33 | 100.03 | 57.66 | 57.22 | 58.23 | 59.72 | 55.72 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.8% | 2.7% | 2.8% | 7.2% | 7.5% | 7.2% | 8.3% | 7.1% | 8.7% | 7.5% | 6.9% |
| Payout Ratio | 56.9% | 56.9% | 36.6% | 38.9% | 48.1% | 45.3% | 42.6% | 47.8% | 56.8% | 53.6% | 228.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 5.0% | 4.8% | 7.6% | 18.5% | 15.7% | 16.0% | 19.5% | 15.0% | 15.3% | 14.0% | 3.0% |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | 2.9% | 0.4% | 10.5% | — | — | 5.3% | 3.5% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 2.8% | 2.7% | 2.8% | 7.4% | 7.9% | 7.5% | 8.3% | 7.1% | 9.0% | 8.4% | 6.9% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $205M | $205M | $204M | $203M | $202M | $201M | $199M | $196M | $196M | $196M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying MDU stock.
MDU Resources Group, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 20.0x. The historical average is 8.1x. This places it at the 93th percentile of its historical range.
MDU Resources Group, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 13.3x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 6.3x.
MDU Resources Group, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 7.0%. The historical average is 9.6%.
Based on historical data, MDU Resources Group, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 20.0x. This is at the 93th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
MDU Resources Group, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 2.83% with a payout ratio of 56.9%.
MDU Resources Group, Inc. has 21.6% gross margin and 15.5% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
MDU Resources Group, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 5.5x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Regulatory lag and rate case timing
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Seasonal Margins Mask Underlying Stability
MDU's operating margin swings from 19.1% in 2026Q1 to 12.8% in 2026Q2, reflecting seasonal heating demand. According to quarterly data, net margin averaged 10.15% over the last year, indicating stable utility economics.
The wide quarterly swings in gross margin—from 100% in 2026Q2 to 25% in 2026Q1—are largely attributable to regulatory pass-through mechanisms and timing of cost recoveries, not operational deterioration. Operating margin in the winter quarters (Q1 and Q4) consistently exceeds 16%, while summer quarters compress to 8-13%, highlighting the high fixed-cost structure typical of gas utilities. The reported net margin of 10.15% is in line with the peer group, suggesting that MDU's profitability is structurally capped by allowed returns on equity, and any expansion would likely come from rate case approvals rather than organic efficiency gains.
ROIC Trapped by Seasonal Earnings
ROIC averaged 1.0% over the last four quarters, with 2026Q1 at 1.6% and 2026Q2 at 0.7%. As reported in financial statements, this is below the 4-5% range of peers like NWE and BKH, suggesting capital efficiency is constrained by seasonal earnings.
The low ROIC relative to peers (NWE 4.0%, BKH 4.9%) appears driven by the timing of rate base investments and the seasonal nature of earnings, not necessarily a structural deficiency. The 2026Q1 ROIC of 1.6% is the highest in the trailing year, indicating that the winter heating season is when the company generates most of its returns. Investors should monitor whether the post-spin pure-play utility can achieve a more consistent ROIC trajectory as rate base grows, but the current data suggests the company is still in a transition phase where capital deployment has not yet translated into sustained returns.
Working Capital Efficiency Improves Post-Spin
Cash conversion cycle improved to 14 days in 2026Q1 from 106 days in 2024Q3, driven by a sharp reduction in DSO to 36 days. Based on quarterly data, this suggests the spin-off has streamlined working capital management.
The dramatic improvement in CCC from 106 days in 2024Q3 to 14 days in 2026Q1 reflects the removal of the construction segments, which likely carried higher receivables and inventory. DSO has normalized to 36-45 days, in line with utility billing cycles, while DPO remains around 25-27 days, indicating limited supplier leverage. The negative FCF margins in 2025Q4 and 2025Q3 (-67% and -38.7%) are largely due to lumpy capex, not working capital deterioration, as operating cash flow remained positive throughout. This suggests that MDU's efficiency metrics are now more representative of a pure-play utility, though the seasonal swings in DSO and DPO warrant monitoring.
Leverage Creeps Higher but Coverage Adequate
Debt-to-equity rose to 0.88 in 2026Q2 from 0.83 in 2024Q1, while interest coverage improved to 3.62x in 2026Q1 from 1.72x in 2026Q2. According to recent filings, leverage remains below peers like NiSource (1.39) but is trending upward.
The increase in D/E from 0.83 to 0.88 over the past two years reflects continued capex funding, but the absolute level remains conservative relative to the peer group. Interest coverage of 3.62x in 2026Q1 is comfortable, though the 1.72x in 2026Q2 highlights the seasonal earnings pattern that can compress coverage in off-peak quarters. The reported D/EBITDA of 47.63 in 2026Q2 appears anomalous, likely due to depressed EBITDA in that quarter, and should be viewed with caution. Overall, the balance sheet appears adequately positioned to support the capital program, but investors should monitor whether rising debt levels outpace rate base growth.
Thin Cash Buffer but Ratios Stabilize
Current ratio improved to 0.99 in 2026Q2 from 0.74 in 2025Q2, while cash dropped to $46.3M. As reported in balance sheet data, the quick ratio of 0.95 indicates limited inventory dependence, but the thin cash buffer warrants monitoring.
The current ratio has hovered near 1.0 for the past two quarters, indicating that current assets are just sufficient to cover current liabilities, which is typical for utilities with stable cash flows. The quick ratio of 0.95 in 2026Q2 suggests that even without inventory, the company can meet near-term obligations, but the low cash balance of $46.3M provides little cushion for unexpected outflows. Given the seasonal nature of cash flows, with negative FCF in winter quarters, the liquidity position appears adequate but not robust. Investors should watch whether the company maintains access to credit markets to bridge seasonal gaps.
Misapplied Metric: Gross Margin
Gross margin is commonly misapplied to MDU because regulatory pass-through mechanisms distort it, as seen in the 100% gross margin in 2026Q2. According to financial statements, operating margin or net margin better reflect true earning power.
For a regulated gas utility, gross margin is heavily influenced by the timing of cost-of-gas adjustments and regulatory deferrals, making it an unreliable indicator of operational performance. The 100% gross margin in 2026Q2 is a clear example of this distortion, as it likely reflects a one-time regulatory adjustment rather than a sustainable improvement. Analysts should instead focus on operating margin, which excludes purchased gas costs and better captures the company's ability to earn a return on its rate base. Additionally, net margin, which averaged 10.15% over the last year, provides a more consistent measure of profitability across seasons. Using gross margin to compare MDU to peers would lead to erroneous conclusions about its cost structure and competitive position.