Revenue is entirely fee-based (100% of total), but net income fell to $10.5M in 2026Q2 from $34.5M in 2025Q4, with an efficiency ratio rising to 73.2% from 40.7% in 2024Q4.
Patria Investments Ltd (PAX) annual income statement — 8-year revenue, gross profit & net income history
| Metric | TTM | Dec'25 | Dec'24 | Dec'23 | Dec'22 | Dec'21 | Dec'20 | Dec'19 | Dec'18 |
|---|
| Net Interest Income | -34.02M | -39M | -11.4M | -1.24M | -1.81M | -1.02M | -865K | 936K | -303K |
| NII Growth % | -312.3% | -242.05% | -817.3% | 31.21% | -76.81% | -18.15% | -192.41% | 408.91% | - |
| Net Interest Margin % | -1.86% | -2.61% | -0.95% | -0.12% | -0.19% | -0.13% | -0.81% | 0.81% | -0.25% |
| Interest Income | -6.01M | -39M | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4K | 936K | 26K |
| Interest Expense | 28.02M | 0 | 11.4M | 1.24M | 1.81M | 1.02M | 869K | 0 | 206K |
| Loan Loss Provision | 18.92M | 14.6M | 39.09M | 37.49M | 33.02M | 13.61M | 9.76M | 43.19M | 41.21M |
| Non-Interest Income | 436.36M | 422.8M | 374.2M | 327.62M | 258.88M | 235.51M | 115.01M | 122.55M | 105.64M |
| Non-Interest Income % | 108.46% | 110.16% | 103.14% | 100.38% | 100.7% | 100.44% | 100.76% | 99.24% | 100.29% |
| Total Net Revenue | 402.33M | 383.8M | 362.8M | 326.37M | 257.07M | 234.49M | 114.15M | 123.48M | 105.34M |
| Revenue Growth % | 6.14% | 5.79% | 11.16% | 26.96% | 9.63% | 105.43% | -7.56% | 17.22% | - |
| Non-Interest Expense | 256.99M | 237.9M | 157.81M | 125.03M | 93.64M | 83.66M | 37.18M | 15.47M | 17.72M |
| Efficiency Ratio | 63.87% | 61.99% | 43.5% | 38.31% | 36.43% | 35.67% | 32.57% | 12.53% | 16.82% |
| Operating Income | 126.42M | 131.3M | 165.9M | 163.86M | 130.41M | 137.22M | 67.21M | 64.83M | 46.54M |
| Operating Margin % | 31.42% | 34.21% | 45.73% | 50.21% | 50.73% | 58.52% | 58.88% | 52.5% | 44.18% |
| Operating Income Growth % | - | -20.86% | 1.25% | 25.65% | -4.97% | 104.18% | 3.68% | 39.29% | - |
| Pretax Income | 88.74M | 92.2M | 85.99M | 118M | 102.45M | 121.57M | 64.98M | 64.45M | 46.46M |
| Pretax Margin % | 22.06% | 24.02% | 23.7% | 36.15% | 39.85% | 51.84% | 56.92% | 52.19% | 44.1% |
| Income Tax | 9.73M | 1.7M | 10.31M | -2.82M | 8.35M | 381K | 3.14M | 3.51M | 1.99M |
| Effective Tax Rate % | 10.96% | 1.84% | 11.98% | -2.39% | 8.15% | 0.31% | 4.83% | 5.45% | 4.29% |
| Net Income | 69.99M | 85.6M | 71.88M | 118.4M | 92.96M | 122.48M | 62.21M | 58.54M | 43.67M |
| Net Margin % | 17.4% | 22.3% | 19.81% | 36.28% | 36.16% | 52.23% | 54.5% | 47.41% | 41.45% |
| Net Income Growth % | -16.91% | 19.1% | -39.29% | 27.37% | -24.1% | 96.88% | 6.27% | 34.05% | - |
| Net Income (Continuing) | 79.02M | 90.5M | 75.69M | 120.81M | 94.1M | 121.19M | 61.84M | 60.94M | 44.46M |
| EPS (Diluted) | 0.44 | 0.54 | 0.47 | 0.80 | 0.63 | 0.90 | 0.47 | 0.44 | 0.37 |
| EPS Growth % | -17.85% | 14.89% | -41.25% | 26.98% | -30% | 91.49% | 6.82% | 18.92% | - |
| EPS (Basic) | - | 0.54 | 0.47 | 0.80 | 0.63 | 0.90 | 0.47 | 0.44 | 0.37 |
| Diluted Shares Outstanding | 159.57M | 157.97M | 153.59M | 148.68M | 147.23M | 135.98M | 133.65M | 133.65M | 117M |
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying PAX stock.
For fiscal year 2025, Patria Investments Ltd (PAX) reported total revenue of $383.8M. This represents a 264.3% increase compared to $105.3M in 2018.
Patria Investments Ltd (PAX) is profitable, generating $85.6M in net income for the fiscal year ending 2025 with a net profit margin of 22.3%.
Patria Investments Ltd (PAX) reported an operating income of $131.3M, resulting in an operating profit margin of 34.2%. This margin reflects the operational efficiency of the business before interest and taxes.
Patria Investments Ltd (PAX) generated $369.2M in gross profit for the year, representing a gross profit margin of 96.2%. This demonstrates the company's core pricing power and production efficiency.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Brazilian macro and fee volatility
Negative NII Persists, Fee Income Dominates
Patria's net interest income remains negative, with 2026Q2 at -$13.0M, while non-interest income drives all revenue, per the latest quarterly report.
The persistent negative NII, though small relative to fee income, indicates a structural cost of funding or interest expense that exceeds interest income, likely due to the firm's cash management and debt structure. This is not a traditional bank's NII but rather a drag on overall revenue, which is almost entirely composed of fee income. Investors should monitor whether this negative NII widens, as it could erode the otherwise high-margin fee business.
NIM Negative but Stable, Fee Margins High
Net interest margin remains negative, around -0.7% in 2026Q2, but the overall revenue model is fee-based with gross margins above 96%, as reported in financial statements.
The negative NIM is not a primary concern given the asset-light model, but it reflects the cost of holding cash and investments. The high gross margin indicates that the core asset management business is highly profitable, with minimal cost of goods sold. However, the efficiency ratio has risen to 73.2% in 2026Q2 from 40.7% in 2024Q4, suggesting that operating expenses are growing faster than revenue, which could compress margins if not managed.
Efficiency Ratio Spikes, Operating Leverage Fades
Patria's efficiency ratio deteriorated to 73.2% in 2026Q2 from 40.7% in 2024Q4, indicating rising costs relative to revenue, based on reported quarterly figures.
The sharp increase in the efficiency ratio suggests that the firm is experiencing cost pressures, possibly from integration of recent acquisitions like Moneda and Abrdn's European PE business, or from higher compensation expenses. This is a significant shift from the earlier period where operating leverage was strong. If this trend continues, it could signal that the firm is not scaling as efficiently as expected, and investors should monitor whether management can control costs while integrating new businesses.
Provision Reversals Boost Earnings
In 2026Q2, Patria recorded a provision reversal of -$11.6M, which contributed to net income of $10.5M, as per the latest income statement data.
The negative provision expense indicates a release of reserves, which is unusual for an asset manager and may reflect recoveries or changes in the credit portfolio. This reversal artificially boosted earnings in the quarter, masking the underlying operational performance. Investors should adjust for such items to assess the true earnings power, as the core fee income only grew modestly.
Fee Income Volatile, Carry Dependent
Non-interest income, which is entirely fee-based, fluctuated from $63.8M in 2024Q1 to $157.2M in 2024Q4, highlighting the lumpiness of performance fees, as per SEC filings.
The fee income is highly volatile, with significant swings quarter to quarter, driven by performance fees that are realized upon exits. This makes earnings unpredictable and suggests that investors should focus on management fees, which are more stable, and treat performance fees as variable. The recent acquisition of Abrdn's European PE business may diversify the fee stream, but it also introduces integration risks.
2026Q2 Marks a Turning Point
The latest quarter (2026Q2) shows a sharp drop in net income to $10.5M from $34.5M in 2025Q4, with a provision reversal and rising costs, as per the income statement.
This quarter appears to be an inflection point where the firm's earnings quality is being tested. The combination of a provision reversal, negative NII, and a spike in the efficiency ratio suggests that the business is facing headwinds, possibly from integration costs and a challenging fundraising environment. The lack of forward guidance in the latest report adds uncertainty, and investors should watch whether this is a temporary blip or the start of a new trend.
What Could Invalidate the Base Case
The reliance on performance fees and the recent efficiency ratio spike may indicate that earnings quality is weaker than headline numbers suggest, based on reported figures.
The sharp increase in the efficiency ratio to 73.2% in 2026Q2 from 40.7% in 2024Q4 suggests that the firm's cost base is growing faster than revenue, potentially due to integration costs from acquisitions like Moneda and Abrdn's European PE business. If this trend persists, it could compress margins and undermine the firm's profitability. Additionally, the volatility in fee income, driven by performance fees, makes earnings unpredictable, and the negative NII, though small, adds a drag. Investors should monitor whether management can control costs and stabilize the fee stream, as the current trajectory may not be sustainable.