Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 7.9x · EV/EBITDA 80.6x · ROE 83.0%. (2018–2026 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.4B | $986M | $1.7B | $2.2B | $2.6B | $2.8B | $3.9B | $1.5B | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $1.5B | $1.2B | $1.8B | $2.3B | $2.7B | $2.7B | $3.8B | $1.4B | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 7.93 | 5.67 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 2.75 | 2.00 | 3.64 | 5.08 | 7.13 | 9.92 | 18.17 | 9.19 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 5.10 | 3.64 | 11.51 | 12.22 | 10.92 | 10.45 | 10.58 | 4.96 | — | — |
| P/FCF | 12.09 | 8.81 | 15.72 | 33.94 | 310.69 | — | 739.39 | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 11.78 | 8.58 | 14.45 | 30.38 | 155.65 | — | 384.31 | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.36 | 3.90 | 5.30 | 7.20 | 9.77 | 17.75 | 8.44 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 80.61 | 61.26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 261.75 | 198.92 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 10.38 | 16.80 | 35.46 | 313.92 | — | 722.27 | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 84.9% | 84.9% | 83.0% | 81.9% | 81.0% | 82.8% | 85.6% | 85.2% | 85.4% | 84.0% |
| Operating Margin | 1.2% | 1.2% | -12.8% | -22.3% | -34.9% | -36.1% | -31.0% | -33.4% | -35.9% | -48.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | 35.3% | 35.3% | -9.1% | -19.0% | -34.9% | -38.2% | -32.3% | -30.3% | -34.6% | -47.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 83.0% | 83.0% | -26.1% | -38.8% | -50.8% | -33.9% | -20.4% | -24.4% | -170.7% | — |
| ROA | 18.1% | 18.1% | -4.6% | -9.4% | -15.9% | -13.4% | -11.2% | -15.9% | -29.2% | -46.9% |
| ROIC | 1.2% | 1.2% | -16.5% | -26.4% | -39.3% | -30.4% | -21.6% | -52.0% | — | — |
| ROCE | 0.9% | 0.9% | -9.9% | -16.2% | -23.0% | -16.9% | -14.1% | -25.9% | -60.9% | -125.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.53 | 1.53 | 3.13 | 2.58 | 1.25 | 1.15 | 0.68 | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 21.80 | 21.80 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.65 | 0.79 | 0.55 | 0.11 | -0.16 | -0.24 | -0.40 | -1.23 | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 9.28 | 9.28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | 1.57 | 1.08 | 1.52 | 3.23 | — | -17.12 | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 0.66 | 0.66 | -5.30 | -11.22 | -23.28 | -19.14 | -6.38 | — | — | -53.08 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.01 | 2.01 | 1.87 | 2.50 | 2.21 | 2.84 | 3.70 | 3.52 | 1.95 | 1.37 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.01 | 2.01 | 1.87 | 2.50 | 2.21 | 2.84 | 3.70 | 3.52 | 1.95 | 1.37 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.55 | 1.55 | 1.55 | 2.03 | 1.76 | 2.39 | 3.24 | 3.05 | 1.44 | 0.87 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.47 | 0.45 | 0.35 | 0.27 | 0.38 | 0.60 | 0.98 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 80.35 | 83.81 | 85.10 | 89.92 | 97.64 | 94.21 | 81.46 | 103.90 | 86.58 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 12.6% | 17.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 8.3% | 11.4% | 6.4% | 2.9% | 0.3% | — | 0.1% | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 10.0% | 13.7% | 5.9% | 2.3% | 1.1% | 0.8% | 0.2% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 10.0% | 13.7% | 5.9% | 2.3% | 1.1% | 0.8% | 0.2% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $93M | $92M | $92M | $89M | $85M | $80M | $66M | $74M | $60M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 9 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying PD stock.
PagerDuty, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 7.9x. The historical average is 5.7x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
PagerDuty, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 80.6x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 61.3x.
PagerDuty, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 83.0%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is -35.3%.
Based on historical data, PagerDuty, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 7.9x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
PagerDuty, Inc. has 84.9% gross margin and 1.2% operating margin.
PagerDuty, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 21.8x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Growth deceleration amid margin pressure
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Valuation Discount Reflects Growth Concerns
PagerDuty's forward EV/EBITDA of 9.49 appears to price in a significant discount relative to high-growth observability peers, suggesting the market is skeptical of its ability to re-accelerate growth from the current 5.4% YoY rate.
The current P/S ratio of 2.62 is substantially below peers like Datadog (DDOG), indicating the market is assigning a lower multiple to PagerDuty's revenue stream. This discount likely reflects the deceleration in top-line growth and the company's struggle to demonstrate consistent operating leverage, as evidenced by the recent EPS miss despite a revenue beat. The valuation implies investors are demanding a higher margin of safety for a business facing potential market saturation.
Gross Margin Strength Masked by Operating Drag
While PagerDuty maintains a robust gross margin of approximately 84%, its operating margin has only recently turned positive to 8.2% in 2027Q2, indicating that nearly all gross profit is consumed by sales and R&D expenses.
The stark divergence between the 8.2% operating margin and the 3.8% net margin in the most recent quarter suggests that non-operating items, likely a tax benefit, are distorting headline profitability. The core operational profitability remains fragile, with the business spending heavily to maintain its market position. This structure implies that any slowdown in revenue growth could quickly pressure the bottom line, as the high fixed-cost base offers limited downside protection.
Capital Returns Recovering from Deep Trough
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) has improved from a low of -5.9% in 2025Q1 to a positive 1.8% in 2027Q2, but this level remains far below the cost of capital, indicating the business is not yet creating value for shareholders.
The recovery in ROIC is driven by the swing to operating profitability rather than a significant improvement in capital efficiency, as asset turnover has remained stagnant around 0.13. The negative retained earnings balance of -$408.7M highlights the cumulative value destruction from prior periods. For ROIC to reach a sustainable, value-creating level, PagerDuty must demonstrate it can grow revenue without proportionally increasing its capital base.
Debt Load Easing but Still Elevated
The Debt-to-Equity ratio has improved from 3.59 in 2025Q3 to 1.67 in 2027Q2, yet the company still carries $412.8M in total debt against an equity base of $232.0M, which appears to constrain financial flexibility.
The improving leverage trend is a positive signal, but the absolute debt level remains significant for a company with PagerDuty's growth profile. The interest coverage ratio of 4.85x in 2027Q2 indicates debt service is manageable, but this metric is volatile and was negative just two years ago. The leverage position suggests management is prioritizing balance sheet repair, which may limit capital available for strategic acquisitions or aggressive share repurchases.
The Misleading Net Margin
The single most misapplied ratio for PagerDuty is the Net Margin, which appears artificially inflated to 35.30% in some periods by non-recurring accounting items, obscuring the true operational profitability.
Analysts focusing on the headline net margin would incorrectly assume the company is highly profitable, when in reality the operating margin is a more accurate reflection of core earning power. The historical volatility in net margin, swinging from -21.6% to 129.7%, demonstrates its unreliability as a performance metric. A more appropriate measure is the Free Cash Flow margin, which has been consistently strong at over 25%, reflecting the cash-generative nature of the subscription model despite GAAP accounting distortions.