Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 50.8x · EV/EBITDA 25.7x · ROE 5.5%. (2012–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $998M | $1.6B | $2.0B | $1.3B | $1.9B | $5.3B | $4.3B | $1.3B | $814M | $866M | $443M |
| Enterprise Value | $972M | $1.6B | $2.0B | $1.2B | $1.9B | $5.2B | $4.2B | $1.3B | $800M | $850M | $424M |
| P/E Ratio → | 50.84 | 83.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.69 | 1.13 | 1.58 | 1.14 | 2.14 | 7.58 | 8.55 | 3.38 | 2.68 | 3.57 | 2.35 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.60 | 4.24 | 6.29 | 4.16 | 6.35 | 15.95 | 12.63 | 9.49 | 6.30 | 17.88 | 9.90 |
| P/FCF | 13.24 | 21.60 | 52.68 | 3531.39 | — | — | 304.60 | 120.35 | — | 132.52 | 144.45 |
| P/OCF | 11.15 | 18.19 | 42.08 | 67.83 | — | 710.56 | 199.25 | 80.33 | 64.17 | 89.60 | 88.44 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.11 | 1.56 | 1.12 | 2.14 | 7.46 | 8.27 | 3.37 | 2.63 | 3.50 | 2.25 |
| EV / EBITDA | 25.69 | 42.33 | 287.78 | — | — | — | 1936.93 | 348.80 | 230.76 | 534.38 | — |
| EV / EBIT | 44.18 | 44.79 | 411.66 | — | — | — | — | — | 3030.46 | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 21.25 | 51.87 | 3479.52 | — | — | 294.67 | 120.06 | — | 130.02 | 138.30 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 28.5% | 28.5% | 13.9% | 11.8% | 13.5% | 14.9% | 16.3% | 16.9% | 16.9% | 17.7% | 17.7% |
| Operating Margin | 1.5% | 1.5% | -0.7% | -3.7% | -4.8% | -5.0% | -1.0% | -0.5% | -0.3% | -1.1% | -3.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | 1.4% | 1.4% | -0.7% | -4.0% | -4.9% | -5.1% | -1.2% | -0.5% | -0.3% | -0.6% | -3.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 5.5% | 5.5% | -3.1% | -14.7% | -14.0% | -10.6% | -2.5% | -1.4% | -1.0% | -3.2% | -15.3% |
| ROA | 2.3% | 2.3% | -1.2% | -6.1% | -7.2% | -6.7% | -1.5% | -0.8% | -0.6% | -1.6% | -9.0% |
| ROIC | 5.1% | 5.1% | -2.5% | -10.3% | -11.6% | -11.9% | -2.2% | -1.2% | -1.1% | -6.8% | -18.9% |
| ROCE | 4.6% | 4.6% | -2.1% | -9.9% | -11.9% | -10.3% | -1.9% | -1.2% | -1.0% | -4.7% | -13.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.40 | 0.42 | 0.23 | — | — | 0.19 | 0.10 | 0.19 | 0.11 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.95 | 2.95 | 18.54 | — | — | — | — | 7.03 | 3.71 | 5.86 | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.07 | -0.10 | -0.06 | 0.01 | -0.26 | -0.41 | -0.02 | -0.11 | -0.34 | -0.42 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.69 | -0.69 | -4.52 | — | — | — | -65.24 | -0.83 | -3.95 | -10.30 | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | -0.35 | -0.81 | -51.87 | — | — | -9.93 | -0.29 | — | -2.51 | -6.16 |
| Interest Coverage | 2.60 | 2.60 | 0.34 | -2.73 | -9.36 | -3521.00 | -3.15 | -0.22 | 0.22 | -2.62 | -30.46 |
Net cash position: cash ($138M) exceeds total debt ($112M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.07 | 1.07 | 1.71 | 1.63 | 1.62 | 1.75 | 2.24 | 1.73 | 1.87 | 1.89 | 2.13 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.07 | 1.07 | 1.71 | 1.63 | 1.62 | 1.75 | 2.24 | 1.73 | 1.87 | 1.89 | 2.13 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.90 | 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 0.95 | 1.53 | 1.08 | 1.28 | 1.38 | 1.74 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.57 | 1.59 | 1.42 | 1.35 | 1.24 | 1.01 | 1.49 | 1.46 | 2.29 | 2.29 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.0% | 1.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 7.6% | 4.6% | 1.9% | 0.0% | — | — | 0.3% | 0.8% | — | 0.8% | 0.7% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $44M | $42M | $41M | $41M | $40M | $36M | $35M | $32M | $30M | $29M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 14 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying TRUP stock.
Trupanion, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 50.8x. The historical average is 83.0x.
Trupanion, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 25.7x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 42.3x.
Trupanion, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 5.5%. The historical average is -21.2%.
Based on historical data, Trupanion, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 50.8x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Trupanion, Inc. has 28.5% gross margin and 1.5% operating margin.
Trupanion, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.0x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Underwriting margin volatility
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Combined Ratio Stabilizes Above Break-Even
Trupanion's combined ratio improved from 102.0% in 2024Q1 to 98.4% in 2026Q2, as per quarterly filings, indicating sustained underwriting profitability but with volatile loss ratios.
The combined ratio has hovered near 98-99% for the last five quarters, a marked improvement from the 101-102% range in early 2024. However, the loss ratio swings between 69.7% and 83.6% in recent quarters, suggesting that favorable reserve development may be smoothing reported results. Investors should monitor whether the underlying loss trend remains stable, as the expense ratio has been volatile, ranging from 14.8% to 28.6%, which could indicate inconsistent expense allocation.
ROE Recovery Driven by Underwriting
ROE turned positive from -2.3% in 2024Q1 to 1.7% in 2026Q2, as reported in financial statements, with underwriting margins contributing 1.6% in the latest quarter.
The improvement in ROE is almost entirely attributable to underwriting gains, as investment income appears immaterial given the minimal investment portfolio. The underwriting margin of 1.6% in 2026Q2 is thin, and ROE remains well below the cost of equity, suggesting that the current valuation implies expectations of significant margin expansion. The volatility in quarterly ROE, including a negative quarter in 2025Q1, underscores the sensitivity to loss ratio fluctuations.
Underwriting Leverage Declines as Capital Grows
Premium-to-surplus ratio likely improved as equity grew 35% to $409.7M while liabilities rose only 7%, per balance sheet data, indicating reduced underwriting leverage.
With equity expanding faster than liabilities, the capital base is strengthening, which may support higher premium growth or provide a buffer against adverse loss development. The D/E ratio has declined from 0.42 in 2024Q1 to 0.26 in 2026Q2, reflecting a more conservative capital structure. However, the absence of a disclosed premium-to-surplus ratio in the data limits direct comparison to rating agency guidelines, but the trend suggests ample capacity for expansion.
Relative Valuation Premium vs. Specialty Peers
Trupanion trades at a P/B of 3.48 versus Lemonade's 6.83 and Hingham's 1.38, as per market data, implying a premium justified by its underwriting profitability.
Trupanion's P/B is higher than traditional insurers but lower than high-growth insurtech Lemonade, reflecting its profitable underwriting versus Lemonade's losses. The market appears to price in Trupanion's ability to maintain combined ratios below 100%, a feat few specialty insurers achieve. However, the P/E of 68x suggests expectations of substantial earnings growth, which may be optimistic given the modest ROE of 1.7%.
Combined Ratio May Mask Reserve Risk
The combined ratio, while below 100%, may be flattered by reserve releases, as claims paid grew 19% versus 11% premium growth, per cash flow data, warranting scrutiny.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for insurers is the combined ratio, which can be distorted by reserve development. Trupanion's loss ratio improvements coincide with a faster increase in claims paid relative to premiums, suggesting that current underwriting profitability may not be sustainable. Analysts should adjust for reserve releases by examining the underlying loss ratio trend and cash-based metrics like claims paid to premiums earned to assess true underwriting performance.