Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 31.0x · EV/EBITDA 14.2x · ROE 29.7%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $83.1B | $88.8B | $81.4B | $72.9B | $65.1B | $70.6B | $50.1B | $48.7B | $38.5B | $38.1B | $31.7B |
| Enterprise Value | $105.8B | $111.5B | $104.9B | $88.6B | $79.7B | $83.9B | $63.4B | $58.7B | $48.4B | $47.6B | $40.9B |
| P/E Ratio → | 31.03 | 32.79 | 29.63 | 31.64 | 29.11 | 38.90 | 33.50 | 29.15 | 20.00 | 19.57 | 26.76 |
| P/S Ratio | 3.30 | 3.52 | 3.69 | 3.57 | 3.31 | 3.94 | 3.29 | 3.15 | 2.58 | 2.63 | 2.33 |
| P/B Ratio | 8.41 | 8.89 | 9.86 | 10.57 | 9.49 | 9.90 | 6.73 | 6.89 | 6.13 | 6.31 | 5.95 |
| P/FCF | 29.51 | 31.54 | 37.70 | 39.95 | 33.40 | 29.00 | 28.31 | 23.70 | 20.50 | 22.82 | 19.53 |
| P/OCF | 13.75 | 14.70 | 15.10 | 15.44 | 14.35 | 16.27 | 14.73 | 12.58 | 10.77 | 11.99 | 10.70 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 4.42 | 4.75 | 4.34 | 4.05 | 4.68 | 4.17 | 3.80 | 3.25 | 3.29 | 3.01 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.16 | 14.93 | 16.02 | 14.72 | 14.27 | 16.39 | 14.91 | 13.25 | 11.24 | 11.65 | 10.76 |
| EV / EBIT | 22.96 | 25.71 | 25.86 | 25.18 | 24.19 | 30.90 | 27.35 | 23.31 | 17.68 | 18.73 | 18.72 |
| EV / FCF | — | 39.60 | 48.58 | 48.60 | 40.91 | 34.46 | 35.79 | 28.53 | 25.81 | 28.49 | 25.26 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 29.1% | 29.1% | 29.1% | 28.1% | 27.2% | 26.9% | 27.6% | 28.4% | 28.1% | 28.2% | 28.1% |
| Operating Margin | 18.3% | 18.3% | 18.8% | 18.7% | 17.5% | 16.8% | 16.3% | 17.8% | 18.3% | 18.1% | 17.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | 10.7% | 10.7% | 12.4% | 11.3% | 11.4% | 10.1% | 9.8% | 10.8% | 12.9% | 13.5% | 8.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 29.7% | 29.7% | 36.3% | 33.5% | 32.0% | 24.9% | 20.6% | 25.0% | 31.3% | 34.3% | 22.1% |
| ROA | 6.0% | 6.0% | 7.1% | 7.2% | 7.4% | 6.2% | 5.2% | 6.6% | 8.7% | 9.1% | 5.7% |
| ROIC | 10.7% | 10.7% | 11.4% | 13.0% | 12.3% | 11.0% | 9.9% | 12.4% | 12.9% | 13.1% | 12.5% |
| ROCE | 11.7% | 11.7% | 12.4% | 13.8% | 13.2% | 11.8% | 9.8% | 12.5% | 14.4% | 14.3% | 13.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 2.29 | 2.29 | 2.90 | 2.35 | 2.18 | 1.88 | 1.85 | 1.91 | 1.60 | 1.57 | 1.75 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.07 | 3.07 | 3.65 | 2.69 | 2.68 | 2.62 | 3.25 | 3.05 | 2.33 | 2.32 | 2.45 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 2.27 | 2.85 | 2.29 | 2.13 | 1.86 | 1.78 | 1.41 | 1.59 | 1.57 | 1.74 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.04 | 3.04 | 3.59 | 2.62 | 2.62 | 2.60 | 3.12 | 2.25 | 2.31 | 2.32 | 2.44 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 8.06 | 10.88 | 8.65 | 7.51 | 5.46 | 7.49 | 4.83 | 5.31 | 5.67 | 5.72 |
| Interest Coverage | 4.76 | 4.76 | 6.78 | 7.04 | 8.72 | 7.44 | 5.45 | 6.12 | 7.55 | 7.24 | 5.99 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.76 | 0.90 | 0.81 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 1.97 | 0.85 | 0.80 | 0.85 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.73 | 0.86 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.96 | 1.94 | 0.82 | 0.77 | 0.82 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.11 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.16 | 1.13 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.55 | 0.50 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.52 | 0.56 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.65 |
| Inventory Turnover | 79.44 | 79.44 | 75.97 | 84.84 | 87.39 | 97.11 | 88.81 | 104.43 | 105.16 | 108.30 | 108.74 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 58.72 | 61.00 | 51.29 | 50.99 | 51.83 | 62.94 | 54.77 | 55.68 | 59.82 | 57.18 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.6% | 1.5% | 1.5% | 1.6% | 1.7% | 1.4% | 1.8% | 1.8% | 2.1% | 2.0% | 2.3% |
| Payout Ratio | 49.3% | 49.3% | 44.1% | 49.3% | 48.1% | 53.4% | 62.0% | 52.5% | 41.7% | 38.5% | 61.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 3.2% | 3.0% | 3.4% | 3.2% | 3.4% | 2.6% | 3.0% | 3.4% | 5.0% | 5.1% | 3.7% |
| FCF Yield | 3.4% | 3.2% | 2.7% | 2.5% | 3.0% | 3.4% | 3.5% | 4.2% | 4.9% | 4.4% | 5.1% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 1.8% | 2.3% | 1.9% | 0.8% | 0.5% | 2.6% | 2.0% | 2.3% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.6% | 1.5% | 1.8% | 3.3% | 4.0% | 3.3% | 2.7% | 2.3% | 4.7% | 3.9% | 4.6% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $404M | $403M | $407M | $415M | $423M | $425M | $428M | $432M | $442M | $447M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying WM stock.
Waste Management, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 31.0x. The historical average is 24.1x. This places it at the 75th percentile of its historical range.
Waste Management, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 14.2x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 10.3x.
Waste Management, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 29.7%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 16.5%.
Based on historical data, Waste Management, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 31.0x. This is at the 75th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Waste Management, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 1.59% with a payout ratio of 49.3%.
Waste Management, Inc. has 29.1% gross margin and 18.3% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Waste Management, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.1x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Stericycle integration execution
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Inflection Raises Sustainability Questions
Gross margin jumped to 40.8% in 2026Q2 from 29.3% a year earlier, as per financial statements, while operating margin held near 18.7%, suggesting a structural shift that warrants scrutiny.
The 40.8% gross margin in 2026Q2 is a dramatic departure from the 29% range seen in the prior four quarters, as reported in the quarterly data. This inflection may reflect a one-time benefit, such as lower fuel costs or a favorable revenue mix, rather than a durable improvement. Operating margin of 18.7% is consistent with recent levels, implying that the gross margin jump did not flow through to operating income, which could indicate offsetting cost pressures or accounting reclassifications. Investors should monitor whether this margin level persists, as mean reversion to the 29% range would significantly alter earnings power.
Return on Capital Compresses on Asset Heavy Expansion
ROIC fell to 2.9% in 2026Q2 from 3.5% in 2024Q3, based on reported figures, as the Stericycle acquisition expanded the asset base faster than operating income, diluting capital efficiency.
ROIC has declined from a peak of 3.5% in 2024Q3 to 2.9% in 2026Q2, while ROE has similarly weakened from 9.9% to 7.9% over the same period, as per the quarterly data. This compression appears driven by the $6.7B acquisition outflow in 2024Q4 and the associated goodwill, which now represents over 30% of total assets, as noted in the balance sheet analysis. The decline suggests that the Stericycle deal has yet to generate returns that offset the increased capital base, and investors should monitor whether integration synergies materialize to lift ROIC back toward historical levels.
Working Capital Efficiency Improves Despite Asset Turnover Slip
Cash conversion cycle shortened to 17 days in 2026Q2 from 23 days in 2025Q4, as reported in quarterly data, while asset turnover held at 0.15, indicating stable operational efficiency.
The CCC improvement is driven by a reduction in DSO from 59 to 56 days and a slight increase in DPO from 41 to 44 days, as per the quarterly figures, reflecting better collection and payment practices. Asset turnover remains low at 0.15, consistent with the capital-intensive nature of the waste industry, but the stability suggests that the expanded asset base from Stericycle is not yet generating proportional revenue. The efficiency gains in working capital are modest but positive, indicating that management is managing the balance sheet tightly even as it integrates a large acquisition.
Leverage Elevated but Interest Coverage Stabilizes
Debt-to-EBITDA rose to 11.51 in 2026Q2 from 9.69 in 2024Q3, as per financial statements, while interest coverage improved to 5.39 from 4.44, suggesting debt service remains manageable but strained.
The D/E ratio of 2.35 and D/EBITDA of 11.51 are significantly higher than the peer average, reflecting the debt-funded Stericycle acquisition, as reported in the balance sheet data. However, interest coverage of 5.39 in 2026Q2 is up from 4.44 in 2025Q3, indicating that operating income is growing faster than interest expense, which may be due to lower effective interest rates or improved earnings. The elevated leverage leaves limited headroom for further debt-funded M&A, and any rise in interest rates could pressure coverage ratios, making refinancing risk a key monitorable.
Thin Liquidity Buffer Relies on Cash Flow Generation
Current ratio dipped to 0.91 in 2026Q2 from 1.07 in 2024Q2, as reported in quarterly data, with cash of only $557M against $23.4B in debt, indicating a tight liquidity position.
The current ratio has been below 1.0 for five consecutive quarters, as per the balance sheet data, suggesting that current liabilities exceed current assets, which is typical for companies with strong operating cash flow but still a sign of limited short-term buffer. The quick ratio of 0.87 indicates that even excluding inventory, the company cannot cover short-term obligations with liquid assets alone. This reliance on ongoing cash generation is supported by the robust OCF/NI ratio of 2.1x, but any disruption in cash flow, such as a prolonged downturn or integration hiccup, could expose the company to liquidity stress.
EV/EBITDA Misleads on Landfill Asset Value
EV/EBITDA of 15.16 appears reasonable, but it fails to capture the value of WM's owned landfill airspace, which is a multi-decade asset not reflected in EBITDA, as per industry analysis.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for WM is EV/EBITDA, as it treats the company as a typical industrial with finite assets, ignoring the fact that its landfills are depleting assets with significant future value. EBITDA does not account for the depletion of landfill airspace, which is a non-cash charge that reduces the book value of the asset over time, nor does it reflect the potential for RNG generation from these sites. A more appropriate metric would be EV/EBITDA adjusted for the present value of future landfill cash flows, or a sum-of-the-parts valuation that separates the collection business from the landfill and RNG assets. This adjustment would likely show that WM is undervalued relative to its long-term asset base, but it also introduces significant estimation risk.