Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
APM vs CASI vs ZLAB vs NVAX vs IMVT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
APM vs CASI vs ZLAB vs NVAX vs IMVT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $5M | $2M | $2.19B | $1.50B | $5.53B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $431K | $27M | $460M | $596M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $-49M | $-176M | $-88M | $-464M |
| Gross Margin | -318.7% | 35.8% | 58.5% | 84.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -33.5% | -168.0% | -49.9% | -11.2% | — |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 3.6x | — |
| Total Debt | $3M | $22M | $224M | $249M | $98K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $874K | $13M | $680M | $241M | $714M |
APM vs CASI vs ZLAB vs NVAX vs IMVT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aptorum Group Limit… (APM) | 100 | 2.7 | -97.3% |
| CASI Pharmaceutical… (CASI) | 100 | 0.9 | -99.1% |
| Zai Lab Limited (ZLAB) | 100 | 26.6 | -73.4% |
| Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) | 100 | 20.0 | -80.0% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 106.1 | +6.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: APM vs CASI vs ZLAB vs NVAX vs IMVT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
APM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.60
CASI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 31.1% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
ZLAB is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.21, current ratio 2.45x
- Beta 1.21 vs NVAX's 2.11
NVAX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 64.7%, EPS growth 306.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -11.1%
- 64.7% revenue growth vs APM's -100.0%
- -7.4% ROA vs CASI's -131.5%
IMVT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 173.6% 10Y total return vs ZLAB's -29.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.37, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 11.16x
- 3.2% margin vs APM's -16.4%
- +96.1% vs CASI's -91.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 64.7% revenue growth vs APM's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.2% margin vs APM's -16.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.21 vs NVAX's 2.11 | |
| Dividends | 31.1% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +96.1% vs CASI's -91.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -7.4% ROA vs CASI's -131.5% |
APM vs CASI vs ZLAB vs NVAX vs IMVT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
APM vs CASI vs ZLAB vs NVAX vs IMVT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NVAX leads in 2 of 6 categories
IMVT leads 1 • APM leads 0 • CASI leads 0 • ZLAB leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVAX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVAX and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $596M and $0 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -14.7% (NVAX) to -16.4% (APM). On growth, ZLAB holds the edge at +17.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $431,378 | $27M | $460M | $596M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$13M | -$44M | -$214M | -$47M | -$487M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | -$49M | -$176M | -$88M | -$464M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$9M | $0 | -$159M | -$96M | -$423M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -3.2% | +35.8% | +58.5% | +84.6% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -33.5% | -168.0% | -49.9% | -11.2% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -16.4% | -183.9% | -38.1% | -14.7% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -20.8% | -103.2% | -34.5% | -16.1% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -60.5% | +17.0% | -79.1% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -156.9% | -23.6% | +42.5% | -102.0% | +19.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — APM and CASI and ZLAB each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5M | $2M | $2.2B | $1.5B | $5.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7M | $11M | $1.7B | $1.5B | $4.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.08x | -0.06x | -12.35x | 3.63x | -9.97x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 2.56x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.08x | 4.75x | 1.34x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.39x | 1.25x | 3.03x | — | 5.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NVAX leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ZLAB delivers a -22.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-23 in annual profit, vs $-3 for CASI. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CASI's 11.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NVAX scores 5/9 vs APM's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -60.2% | -3.0% | -22.8% | — | -47.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -44.0% | -131.5% | -15.0% | -7.4% | -44.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -18.3% | -153.0% | -42.8% | — | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -25.0% | -104.6% | -27.9% | +100.4% | -66.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.28x | 11.96x | 0.31x | — | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $9M | -$455M | $8M | -$714M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $874,238 | $13M | $680M | $241M | $714M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $22M | $224M | $249M | $98,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -30.72x | -66.88x | -33.25x | -5.10x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IMVT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $16,241 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $94 for CASI. Over the past 12 months, IMVT leads with a +96.1% total return vs CASI's -91.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IMVT at 12.1% vs CASI's -60.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -21.5% | -81.6% | +14.1% | +29.5% | +5.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -5.6% | -91.2% | -30.3% | +55.1% | +96.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.9% | -94.0% | -46.6% | +23.9% | +40.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.6% | -99.1% | -87.5% | -94.8% | +62.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.4% | -99.0% | -29.2% | -90.4% | +173.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -38.7% | -60.8% | -18.9% | +7.4% | +12.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CASI and IMVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CASI is the less volatile stock with a -0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVAX's 2.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMVT currently trades 90.5% from its 52-week high vs CASI's 4.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.60x | -0.12x | 1.21x | 2.11x | 1.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.47 | $3.09 | $44.34 | $11.97 | $30.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.65 | $0.05 | $15.96 | $5.80 | $13.36 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +18.8% | +4.9% | +44.6% | +77.1% | +90.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.2 | 24.2 | 47.7 | 64.4 | 60.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 51K | 146K | 729K | 4.4M | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — APM and NVAX each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ZLAB as "Buy", NVAX as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 95.0% upside for NVAX (target: $18) vs 67.2% for IMVT (target: $46). CASI is the only dividend payer here at 31.10% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $35.00 | $18.00 | $45.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 11 | 23 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +31.1% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.05 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.3% | 0.0% |
NVAX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IMVT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
APM vs CASI vs ZLAB vs NVAX vs IMVT: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is APM or CASI or ZLAB or NVAX or IMVT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Novavax, Inc.
(NVAX) is the stronger pick with 64. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Aptorum Group Limited (APM). Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) offers the better valuation at 3. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Zai Lab Limited (ZLAB) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — APM or CASI or ZLAB or NVAX or IMVT?
Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.
(IMVT) delivered a total return of +62. 4%, compared to -99. 1% for CASI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (CASI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMVT returned +173. 6% versus APM's -99. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — APM or CASI or ZLAB or NVAX or IMVT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CASI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(CASI) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 12β versus Novavax, Inc. 's 2. 11β — meaning NVAX is approximately -1818% more volatile than CASI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 12% for CASI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — APM or CASI or ZLAB or NVAX or IMVT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Novavax, Inc.
(NVAX) is pulling ahead at 64. 7% versus -100. 0% for Aptorum Group Limited (APM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Novavax, Inc. grew EPS 306. 5% year-over-year, compared to -45. 2% for Immunovant, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ZLAB leads at 28. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — APM or CASI or ZLAB or NVAX or IMVT?
Novavax, Inc.
(NVAX) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 2% net margin versus -1644. 3% for Aptorum Group Limited — meaning it keeps 39. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVAX leads at 50. 1% versus -33. 5% for APM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVAX leads at 93. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — APM or CASI or ZLAB or NVAX or IMVT?
In this comparison, CASI (31.
1% yield) pays a dividend. APM, ZLAB, NVAX, IMVT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is APM or CASI or ZLAB or NVAX or IMVT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CASI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(CASI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 12), 31. 1% yield). Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) carries a higher beta of 2. 11 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CASI: -99. 0%, NVAX: -90. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between APM and CASI and ZLAB and NVAX and IMVT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: APM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CASI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ZLAB is a small-cap high-growth stock; NVAX is a small-cap high-growth stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CASI pays a dividend while APM, ZLAB, NVAX, IMVT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.