Advertising Agencies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BAOS vs JMIA vs GOTU vs BIDU vs DOYU
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Education & Training Services
Internet Content & Information
Internet Content & Information
BAOS vs JMIA vs GOTU vs BIDU vs DOYU — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Advertising Agencies | Specialty Retail | Education & Training Services | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $4M | $539M | $760M | $48.92B | $142M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $359K | $189M | $5.85B | $130.46B | $4.20B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-33M | $-62M | $-374M | $9.00B | $-202M |
| Gross Margin | -89.3% | 52.8% | 67.5% | 44.7% | 9.2% |
| Operating Margin | -91.5% | -33.9% | -9.1% | -2.6% | -7.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 2.6x | 4.3x |
| Total Debt | $685K | $12M | $492M | $79.32B | $16M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $77M | $1.32B | $24.83B | $1.02B |
BAOS vs JMIA vs GOTU vs BIDU vs DOYU — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baosheng Media Grou… (BAOS) | 100 | 8.0 | -92.0% |
| Jumia Technologies … (JMIA) | 100 | 19.6 | -80.4% |
| Gaotu Techedu Inc. (GOTU) | 100 | 1.9 | -98.1% |
| Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) | 100 | 49.3 | -50.7% |
| DouYu International… (DOYU) | 100 | 3.3 | -96.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BAOS vs JMIA vs GOTU vs BIDU vs DOYU
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, BAOS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
JMIA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 12.8%, EPS growth 37.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -2.4%
- +262.5% vs GOTU's -39.4%
GOTU is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and stability is your priority.
- 56.0% revenue growth vs BAOS's -32.3%
- Beta 0.99 vs JMIA's 2.89, lower leverage
BIDU carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.41
- -17.5% 10Y total return vs JMIA's -65.8%
- Lower P/E (2.6x vs 4.3x)
- 6.9% margin vs BAOS's -91.7%
DOYU is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.10, Low D/E 0.4%, current ratio 3.63x
- Beta 1.10, yield 100.0%, current ratio 3.63x
- 100.0% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 56.0% revenue growth vs BAOS's -32.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.6x vs 4.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.9% margin vs BAOS's -91.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.99 vs JMIA's 2.89, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +262.5% vs GOTU's -39.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.0% ROA vs BAOS's -163.4%, ROIC 4.8% vs -72.5% |
BAOS vs JMIA vs GOTU vs BIDU vs DOYU — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BAOS vs JMIA vs GOTU vs BIDU vs DOYU — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BIDU leads in 2 of 6 categories
JMIA leads 1 • BAOS leads 0 • GOTU leads 0 • DOYU leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — GOTU and BIDU each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BIDU is the larger business by revenue, generating $130.5B annually — 363893.2x BAOS's $358,520. BIDU is the more profitable business, keeping 6.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BAOS's -91.7%. On growth, BAOS holds the edge at +5.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $358,520 | $189M | $5.8B | $130.5B | $4.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$32M | -$56M | -$378M | $4.9B | -$275M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$33M | -$62M | -$374M | $9.0B | -$202M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | -$53M | $0 | -$15.7B | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -89.3% | +52.8% | +67.5% | +44.7% | +9.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -91.5% | -33.9% | -9.1% | -2.6% | -7.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -91.7% | -32.6% | -6.4% | +6.9% | -4.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.2% | -27.8% | +1.7% | -12.0% | -5.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.1% | +34.3% | +32.9% | -7.1% | +2.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -140.7% | +46.9% | +66.7% | -2.6% | +179.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BIDU and DOYU each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4M | $539M | $760M | $48.9B | $142M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3M | $474M | $638M | $56.9B | -$5M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.16x | -8.53x | -4.86x | 14.44x | -3.31x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 2.58x | 4.28x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.24x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 10.79x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.81x | 2.85x | 1.12x | 2.50x | 0.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.29x | 20.70x | 2.67x | 1.17x | 0.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 64.81x | 25.41x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BIDU leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BIDU delivers a 3.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-3 for BAOS. DOYU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JMIA's 0.46x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BIDU scores 5/9 vs DOYU's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.0% | -135.2% | -21.8% | +3.1% | -6.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -163.4% | -40.1% | -6.8% | +2.0% | -4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -72.5% | -33.0% | -47.8% | +4.8% | -15.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -93.5% | -97.8% | -39.9% | +6.3% | -10.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.46x | 0.25x | 0.28x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$795,531 | -$65M | -$829M | $54.5B | -$1.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $77M | $1.3B | $24.8B | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $684,997 | $12M | $492M | $79.3B | $16M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -180.82x | -8.73x | — | 9.71x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JMIA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BIDU five years ago would be worth $7,302 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $762 for GOTU. Over the past 12 months, JMIA leads with a +262.5% total return vs GOTU's -39.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JMIA at 44.1% vs BAOS's -29.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.9% | -32.2% | -19.3% | -6.9% | -31.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +45.0% | +262.5% | -39.4% | +61.3% | -34.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -65.0% | +199.0% | -32.3% | +14.2% | +125.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.1% | -67.4% | -92.4% | -27.0% | -71.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.8% | -65.8% | -81.2% | -17.5% | -78.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -29.5% | +44.1% | -12.2% | +4.5% | +31.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GOTU and BIDU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GOTU is the less volatile stock with a 0.99 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JMIA's 2.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BIDU currently trades 84.6% from its 52-week high vs BAOS's 33.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.73x | 2.89x | 0.99x | 1.41x | 1.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.30 | $14.72 | $4.56 | $165.30 | $9.34 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.91 | $2.13 | $1.84 | $81.17 | $4.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +33.4% | +59.1% | +43.2% | +84.6% | +50.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.0 | 54.0 | 52.7 | 69.1 | 47.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 16K | 2.0M | 395K | 2.0M | 26K |
Analyst Outlook
BIDU leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: JMIA as "Buy", GOTU as "Hold", BIDU as "Buy", DOYU as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 99.2% upside for JMIA (target: $17) vs 10.6% for BIDU (target: $155). DOYU is the only dividend payer here at 100.00% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $17.33 | $2.94 | $154.70 | $9.03 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 7 | 10 | 53 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +100.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | 3 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $68.16 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.0% | +1.9% | +10.9% |
BIDU leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). JMIA leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
BAOS vs JMIA vs GOTU vs BIDU vs DOYU: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BAOS or JMIA or GOTU or BIDU or DOYU a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Gaotu Techedu Inc.
(GOTU) is the stronger pick with 56. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -32. 3% for Baosheng Media Group Holdings Limited (BAOS). Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) offers the better valuation at 14. 4x trailing P/E (2. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Jumia Technologies AG (JMIA) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BAOS or JMIA or GOTU or BIDU or DOYU?
On forward P/E, Baidu, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 2. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BAOS or JMIA or GOTU or BIDU or DOYU?
Over the past 5 years, Baidu, Inc.
(BIDU) delivered a total return of -27. 0%, compared to -92. 4% for Gaotu Techedu Inc. (GOTU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BIDU returned -17. 5% versus BAOS's -94. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BAOS or JMIA or GOTU or BIDU or DOYU?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gaotu Techedu Inc.
(GOTU) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 99β versus Jumia Technologies AG's 2. 89β — meaning JMIA is approximately 192% more volatile than GOTU relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DouYu International Holdings Limited (DOYU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 46% for Jumia Technologies AG — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BAOS or JMIA or GOTU or BIDU or DOYU?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gaotu Techedu Inc.
(GOTU) is pulling ahead at 56. 0% versus -32. 3% for Baosheng Media Group Holdings Limited (BAOS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Jumia Technologies AG grew EPS 37. 0% year-over-year, compared to -145. 0% for Gaotu Techedu Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BIDU leads at 2. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BAOS or JMIA or GOTU or BIDU or DOYU?
Baidu, Inc.
(BIDU) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 8% net margin versus -43. 1% for Baosheng Media Group Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 17. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BIDU leads at 16. 0% versus -42. 9% for BAOS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GOTU leads at 68. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BAOS or JMIA or GOTU or BIDU or DOYU more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Baidu, Inc.
(BIDU) trades at 2. 6x forward P/E versus 4. 3x for DouYu International Holdings Limited — 1. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JMIA: 99. 2% to $17. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — BAOS or JMIA or GOTU or BIDU or DOYU?
In this comparison, DOYU (100.
0% yield) pays a dividend. BAOS, JMIA, GOTU, BIDU do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BAOS or JMIA or GOTU or BIDU or DOYU better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, DouYu International Holdings Limited (DOYU) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
10), 100. 0% yield). Jumia Technologies AG (JMIA) carries a higher beta of 2. 89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DOYU: -78. 8%, JMIA: -65. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BAOS and JMIA and GOTU and BIDU and DOYU?
These companies operate in different sectors (BAOS (Communication Services) and JMIA (Consumer Cyclical) and GOTU (Consumer Defensive) and BIDU (Communication Services) and DOYU (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BAOS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JMIA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GOTU is a small-cap high-growth stock; BIDU is a mid-cap deep-value stock; DOYU is a small-cap income-oriented stock. DOYU pays a dividend while BAOS, JMIA, GOTU, BIDU do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.