Integrated Freight & Logistics
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BTOC vs LFVN vs EDTK vs XPO vs FWRD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaged Foods
Education & Training Services
Integrated Freight & Logistics
Integrated Freight & Logistics
BTOC vs LFVN vs EDTK vs XPO vs FWRD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Packaged Foods | Education & Training Services | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Integrated Freight & Logistics |
| Market Cap | $13M | $64M | $16M | $24.28B | $547M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $197M | $195M | $6M | $8.30B | $2.46B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-17M | $6M | $-26M | $348M | $-91M |
| Gross Margin | -1.0% | 78.1% | -42.0% | 12.2% | 23.1% |
| Operating Margin | -8.7% | 3.4% | -323.1% | 9.1% | 2.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 6.6x | — | 43.9x | — |
| Total Debt | $134M | $12M | $701K | $4.70B | $2.16B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9M | $20M | $1M | $310M | $106M |
BTOC vs LFVN vs EDTK vs XPO vs FWRD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Armlogi Holding Cor… (BTOC) | 100 | 5.7 | -94.3% |
| LifeVantage Corpora… (LFVN) | 100 | 66.0 | -34.0% |
| Skillful Craftsman … (EDTK) | 100 | 97.1 | -2.9% |
| XPO Logistics, Inc. (XPO) | 100 | 193.3 | +93.3% |
| Forward Air Corpora… (FWRD) | 100 | 103.2 | +3.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BTOC vs LFVN vs EDTK vs XPO vs FWRD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BTOC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.
- Beta 1.09 vs FWRD's 2.28, lower leverage
LFVN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 14.2%, EPS growth 230.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.12, Low D/E 33.7%, current ratio 1.87x
- Beta 1.12, yield 3.2%, current ratio 1.87x
- 14.2% revenue growth vs EDTK's -55.3%
EDTK lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
XPO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 21.5% 10Y total return vs LFVN's -42.0%
- 4.2% margin vs EDTK's -416.2%
- +88.9% vs BTOC's -74.8%
FWRD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 2.28
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.2% revenue growth vs EDTK's -55.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.2% margin vs EDTK's -416.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.09 vs FWRD's 2.28, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +88.9% vs BTOC's -74.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.1% ROA vs EDTK's -73.7%, ROIC 37.5% vs -5.2% |
BTOC vs LFVN vs EDTK vs XPO vs FWRD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BTOC vs LFVN vs EDTK vs XPO vs FWRD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
XPO leads in 2 of 6 categories
LFVN leads 1 • FWRD leads 1 • BTOC leads 0 • EDTK leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XPO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XPO is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.3B annually — 1349.9x EDTK's $6M. XPO is the more profitable business, keeping 4.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EDTK's -4.2%. On growth, BTOC holds the edge at +16.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $197M | $195M | $6M | $8.3B | $2.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$14M | $9M | -$15M | $1.3B | $206M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$17M | $6M | -$26M | $348M | -$91M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2M | $4M | -$6M | $457M | $38M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -1.0% | +78.1% | -42.0% | +12.2% | +23.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -8.7% | +3.4% | -3.2% | +9.1% | +2.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -8.7% | +2.9% | -4.2% | +4.2% | -3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.8% | +1.9% | -104.4% | +5.5% | +1.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.5% | -25.2% | -92.0% | +7.3% | -5.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -36.4% | -57.7% | -7.0% | +49.1% | +35.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BTOC and LFVN each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.6x trailing earnings, LFVN trades at a 92% valuation discount to XPO's 78.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LFVN's 3.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than XPO's 22.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $13M | $64M | $16M | $24.3B | $547M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $138M | $56M | $15M | $28.7B | $2.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.78x | 6.61x | -5.26x | 78.34x | -4.98x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 43.91x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 2.84x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 3.63x | — | 22.94x | 13.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.07x | 0.28x | 17.82x | 2.98x | 0.22x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.48x | 1.88x | 1.15x | 13.22x | 3.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 6.12x | — | 73.80x | 35.82x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LFVN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
XPO delivers a 19.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-133 for EDTK. EDTK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FWRD's 13.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LFVN scores 7/9 vs BTOC's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -76.9% | +17.8% | -133.3% | +19.0% | -52.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -11.0% | +9.1% | -73.7% | +4.3% | -3.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -8.9% | +37.5% | -5.2% | +9.3% | +1.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -13.7% | +29.5% | -4.3% | +11.3% | +1.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 5.35x | 0.34x | 0.05x | 2.53x | 13.36x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $125M | -$9M | -$517,347 | $4.4B | $2.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | $20M | $1M | $310M | $106M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $134M | $12M | $700,621 | $4.7B | $2.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -12.83x | — | -6.78x | 3.21x | 0.32x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
XPO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in XPO five years ago would be worth $40,679 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $622 for BTOC. Over the past 12 months, XPO leads with a +88.9% total return vs BTOC's -74.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors XPO at 62.2% vs BTOC's -60.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -47.6% | -16.0% | +11.1% | +49.0% | -31.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -74.8% | -53.5% | +18.0% | +88.9% | +0.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.8% | +53.2% | -41.0% | +326.9% | -81.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.8% | -19.4% | -53.7% | +306.8% | -80.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.8% | -42.0% | -78.9% | +2145.5% | -47.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -60.4% | +15.3% | -16.1% | +62.2% | -42.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EDTK and XPO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EDTK is the less volatile stock with a -0.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FWRD's 2.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. XPO currently trades 89.4% from its 52-week high vs BTOC's 15.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.09x | 1.12x | -0.19x | 1.73x | 2.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.91 | $15.00 | $1.18 | $231.46 | $32.47 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.23 | $3.90 | $0.80 | $108.58 | $14.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +15.1% | +33.5% | +84.7% | +89.4% | +53.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.1 | 68.9 | 50.7 | 50.2 | 42.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 162K | 3K | 1.4M | 733K |
Analyst Outlook
FWRD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: XPO as "Buy", FWRD as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 113.5% upside for FWRD (target: $37) vs 1.1% for XPO (target: $209). LFVN is the only dividend payer here at 3.17% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | $209.07 | $37.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — | 32 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.2% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 2 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.16 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +9.0% | 0.0% | +0.5% | +0.2% |
XPO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). LFVN leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
BTOC vs LFVN vs EDTK vs XPO vs FWRD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BTOC or LFVN or EDTK or XPO or FWRD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN) is the stronger pick with 14.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -55. 3% for Skillful Craftsman Education Technology Limited (EDTK). LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN) offers the better valuation at 6. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate XPO Logistics, Inc. (XPO) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BTOC or LFVN or EDTK or XPO or FWRD?
On trailing P/E, LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN) is the cheapest at 6.
6x versus XPO Logistics, Inc. at 78. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BTOC or LFVN or EDTK or XPO or FWRD?
Over the past 5 years, XPO Logistics, Inc.
(XPO) delivered a total return of +306. 8%, compared to -93. 8% for Armlogi Holding Corp. common stock (BTOC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: XPO returned +21. 5% versus BTOC's -93. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BTOC or LFVN or EDTK or XPO or FWRD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Skillful Craftsman Education Technology Limited (EDTK) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
19β versus Forward Air Corporation's 2. 28β — meaning FWRD is approximately -1311% more volatile than EDTK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Skillful Craftsman Education Technology Limited (EDTK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 13% for Forward Air Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BTOC or LFVN or EDTK or XPO or FWRD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN) is pulling ahead at 14.
2% versus -55. 3% for Skillful Craftsman Education Technology Limited (EDTK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LifeVantage Corporation grew EPS 230. 4% year-over-year, compared to -294. 7% for Armlogi Holding Corp. common stock. Over a 3-year CAGR, BTOC leads at 50. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BTOC or LFVN or EDTK or XPO or FWRD?
LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN) is the more profitable company, earning 4.
3% net margin versus -333. 3% for Skillful Craftsman Education Technology Limited — meaning it keeps 4. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: XPO leads at 8. 9% versus -116. 4% for EDTK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LFVN leads at 80. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BTOC or LFVN or EDTK or XPO or FWRD more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FWRD: 113.
5% to $37. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BTOC or LFVN or EDTK or XPO or FWRD?
In this comparison, LFVN (3.
2% yield) pays a dividend. BTOC, EDTK, XPO, FWRD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BTOC or LFVN or EDTK or XPO or FWRD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Skillful Craftsman Education Technology Limited (EDTK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
19)). Forward Air Corporation (FWRD) carries a higher beta of 2. 28 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EDTK: -78. 9%, FWRD: -47. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BTOC and LFVN and EDTK and XPO and FWRD?
These companies operate in different sectors (BTOC (Industrials) and LFVN (Consumer Defensive) and EDTK (Consumer Defensive) and XPO (Industrials) and FWRD (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BTOC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LFVN is a small-cap deep-value stock; EDTK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; XPO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FWRD is a small-cap quality compounder stock. LFVN pays a dividend while BTOC, EDTK, XPO, FWRD do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.