Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BTOC vs LFVN vs EDTK vs XPO vs FWRD

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BTOC
Armlogi Holding Corp. common stock

Integrated Freight & Logistics

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$13M
5Y Perf.-94.3%
LFVN
LifeVantage Corporation

Packaged Foods

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$64M
5Y Perf.-34.0%
EDTK
Skillful Craftsman Education Technology Limited

Education & Training Services

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$16M
5Y Perf.-2.9%
XPO
XPO Logistics, Inc.

Integrated Freight & Logistics

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$24.28B
5Y Perf.+93.3%
FWRD
Forward Air Corporation

Integrated Freight & Logistics

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$547M
5Y Perf.+3.2%

BTOC vs LFVN vs EDTK vs XPO vs FWRD — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BTOC logoBTOC
LFVN logoLFVN
EDTK logoEDTK
XPO logoXPO
FWRD logoFWRD
IndustryIntegrated Freight & LogisticsPackaged FoodsEducation & Training ServicesIntegrated Freight & LogisticsIntegrated Freight & Logistics
Market Cap$13M$64M$16M$24.28B$547M
Revenue (TTM)$197M$195M$6M$8.30B$2.46B
Net Income (TTM)$-17M$6M$-26M$348M$-91M
Gross Margin-1.0%78.1%-42.0%12.2%23.1%
Operating Margin-8.7%3.4%-323.1%9.1%2.1%
Forward P/E6.6x43.9x
Total Debt$134M$12M$701K$4.70B$2.16B
Cash & Equiv.$9M$20M$1M$310M$106M

BTOC vs LFVN vs EDTK vs XPO vs FWRDLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BTOC
LFVN
EDTK
XPO
FWRD
StockMay 24May 26Return
Armlogi Holding Cor… (BTOC)1005.7-94.3%
LifeVantage Corpora… (LFVN)10066.0-34.0%
Skillful Craftsman … (EDTK)10097.1-2.9%
XPO Logistics, Inc. (XPO)100193.3+93.3%
Forward Air Corpora… (FWRD)100103.2+3.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BTOC vs LFVN vs EDTK vs XPO vs FWRD

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: LFVN leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. XPO Logistics, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. BTOC also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
BTOC
Armlogi Holding Corp. common stock
The Defensive Choice

BTOC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.

  • Beta 1.09 vs FWRD's 2.28, lower leverage
Best for: stability
LFVN
LifeVantage Corporation
The Growth Play

LFVN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 14.2%, EPS growth 230.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.5%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.12, Low D/E 33.7%, current ratio 1.87x
  • Beta 1.12, yield 3.2%, current ratio 1.87x
  • 14.2% revenue growth vs EDTK's -55.3%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
EDTK
Skillful Craftsman Education Technology Limited
The Lower-Volatility Pick

EDTK lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: consumer defensive exposure
XPO
XPO Logistics, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

XPO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.

  • 21.5% 10Y total return vs LFVN's -42.0%
  • 4.2% margin vs EDTK's -416.2%
  • +88.9% vs BTOC's -74.8%
Best for: long-term compounding
FWRD
Forward Air Corporation
The Income Pick

FWRD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 2.28
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthLFVN logoLFVN14.2% revenue growth vs EDTK's -55.3%
ValueLFVN logoLFVNBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsXPO logoXPO4.2% margin vs EDTK's -416.2%
Stability / SafetyBTOC logoBTOCBeta 1.09 vs FWRD's 2.28, lower leverage
DividendsLFVN logoLFVN3.2% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)XPO logoXPO+88.9% vs BTOC's -74.8%
Efficiency (ROA)LFVN logoLFVN9.1% ROA vs EDTK's -73.7%, ROIC 37.5% vs -5.2%

BTOC vs LFVN vs EDTK vs XPO vs FWRD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BTOCArmlogi Holding Corp. common stock
FY 2025
Other Services Member
100.0%$109,758
LFVNLifeVantage Corporation
FY 2025
Protandim
60.6%$95M
LifeVantage TrueScience Skin Care Regimen
35.7%$56M
Product and Service, Other
3.6%$6M
EDTKSkillful Craftsman Education Technology Limited
FY 2025
Online VIP Membership Revenue
96.5%$117,074
Online SVIP Membership Revenue
3.5%$4,286
XPOXPO Logistics, Inc.
FY 2023
Transportation
100.0%$4.7B
FWRDForward Air Corporation
FY 2025
Expedited Freight Segment
81.5%$1.0B
Intermodal Segment
18.5%$231M

BTOC vs LFVN vs EDTK vs XPO vs FWRD — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLXPOLAGGINGEDTK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

XPO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

XPO is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.3B annually — 1349.9x EDTK's $6M. XPO is the more profitable business, keeping 4.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EDTK's -4.2%. On growth, BTOC holds the edge at +16.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricBTOC logoBTOCArmlogi Holding C…LFVN logoLFVNLifeVantage Corpo…EDTK logoEDTKSkillful Craftsma…XPO logoXPOXPO Logistics, In…FWRD logoFWRDForward Air Corpo…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$197M$195M$6M$8.3B$2.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$14M$9M-$15M$1.3B$206M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$17M$6M-$26M$348M-$91M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$2M$4M-$6M$457M$38M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-1.0%+78.1%-42.0%+12.2%+23.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-8.7%+3.4%-3.2%+9.1%+2.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-8.7%+2.9%-4.2%+4.2%-3.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+0.8%+1.9%-104.4%+5.5%+1.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+16.5%-25.2%-92.0%+7.3%-5.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-36.4%-57.7%-7.0%+49.1%+35.1%
XPO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — BTOC and LFVN each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 6.6x trailing earnings, LFVN trades at a 92% valuation discount to XPO's 78.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LFVN's 3.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than XPO's 22.9x.

MetricBTOC logoBTOCArmlogi Holding C…LFVN logoLFVNLifeVantage Corpo…EDTK logoEDTKSkillful Craftsma…XPO logoXPOXPO Logistics, In…FWRD logoFWRDForward Air Corpo…
Market CapShares × price$13M$64M$16M$24.3B$547M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$138M$56M$15M$28.7B$2.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.78x6.61x-5.26x78.34x-4.98x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.43.91x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.84x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple3.63x22.94x13.75x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.07x0.28x17.82x2.98x0.22x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.48x1.88x1.15x13.22x3.32x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF6.12x73.80x35.82x
Evenly matched — BTOC and LFVN each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

LFVN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

XPO delivers a 19.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-133 for EDTK. EDTK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FWRD's 13.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LFVN scores 7/9 vs BTOC's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricBTOC logoBTOCArmlogi Holding C…LFVN logoLFVNLifeVantage Corpo…EDTK logoEDTKSkillful Craftsma…XPO logoXPOXPO Logistics, In…FWRD logoFWRDForward Air Corpo…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-76.9%+17.8%-133.3%+19.0%-52.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-11.0%+9.1%-73.7%+4.3%-3.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-8.9%+37.5%-5.2%+9.3%+1.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-13.7%+29.5%-4.3%+11.3%+1.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–937455
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage5.35x0.34x0.05x2.53x13.36x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$125M-$9M-$517,347$4.4B$2.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$9M$20M$1M$310M$106M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$134M$12M$700,621$4.7B$2.2B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-12.83x-6.78x3.21x0.32x
LFVN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

XPO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in XPO five years ago would be worth $40,679 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $622 for BTOC. Over the past 12 months, XPO leads with a +88.9% total return vs BTOC's -74.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors XPO at 62.2% vs BTOC's -60.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBTOC logoBTOCArmlogi Holding C…LFVN logoLFVNLifeVantage Corpo…EDTK logoEDTKSkillful Craftsma…XPO logoXPOXPO Logistics, In…FWRD logoFWRDForward Air Corpo…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-47.6%-16.0%+11.1%+49.0%-31.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-74.8%-53.5%+18.0%+88.9%+0.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-93.8%+53.2%-41.0%+326.9%-81.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-93.8%-19.4%-53.7%+306.8%-80.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-93.8%-42.0%-78.9%+2145.5%-47.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-60.4%+15.3%-16.1%+62.2%-42.8%
XPO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — EDTK and XPO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

EDTK is the less volatile stock with a -0.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FWRD's 2.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. XPO currently trades 89.4% from its 52-week high vs BTOC's 15.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBTOC logoBTOCArmlogi Holding C…LFVN logoLFVNLifeVantage Corpo…EDTK logoEDTKSkillful Craftsma…XPO logoXPOXPO Logistics, In…FWRD logoFWRDForward Air Corpo…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.09x1.12x-0.19x1.73x2.28x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$1.91$15.00$1.18$231.46$32.47
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.23$3.90$0.80$108.58$14.81
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+15.1%+33.5%+84.7%+89.4%+53.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10050.168.950.750.242.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.1M162K3K1.4M733K
Evenly matched — EDTK and XPO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

FWRD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: XPO as "Buy", FWRD as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 113.5% upside for FWRD (target: $37) vs 1.1% for XPO (target: $209). LFVN is the only dividend payer here at 3.17% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricBTOC logoBTOCArmlogi Holding C…LFVN logoLFVNLifeVantage Corpo…EDTK logoEDTKSkillful Craftsma…XPO logoXPOXPO Logistics, In…FWRD logoFWRDForward Air Corpo…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$209.07$37.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts3221
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises028
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.16
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+9.0%0.0%+0.5%+0.2%
FWRD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

XPO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). LFVN leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.

Best OverallXPO Logistics, Inc. (XPO)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BTOC vs LFVN vs EDTK vs XPO vs FWRD: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BTOC or LFVN or EDTK or XPO or FWRD a better buy right now?

For growth investors, LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN) is the stronger pick with 14.

2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -55. 3% for Skillful Craftsman Education Technology Limited (EDTK). LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN) offers the better valuation at 6. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate XPO Logistics, Inc. (XPO) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BTOC or LFVN or EDTK or XPO or FWRD?

On trailing P/E, LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN) is the cheapest at 6.

6x versus XPO Logistics, Inc. at 78. 3x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BTOC or LFVN or EDTK or XPO or FWRD?

Over the past 5 years, XPO Logistics, Inc.

(XPO) delivered a total return of +306. 8%, compared to -93. 8% for Armlogi Holding Corp. common stock (BTOC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: XPO returned +21. 5% versus BTOC's -93. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BTOC or LFVN or EDTK or XPO or FWRD?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Skillful Craftsman Education Technology Limited (EDTK) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

19β versus Forward Air Corporation's 2. 28β — meaning FWRD is approximately -1311% more volatile than EDTK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Skillful Craftsman Education Technology Limited (EDTK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 13% for Forward Air Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BTOC or LFVN or EDTK or XPO or FWRD?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN) is pulling ahead at 14.

2% versus -55. 3% for Skillful Craftsman Education Technology Limited (EDTK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LifeVantage Corporation grew EPS 230. 4% year-over-year, compared to -294. 7% for Armlogi Holding Corp. common stock. Over a 3-year CAGR, BTOC leads at 50. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BTOC or LFVN or EDTK or XPO or FWRD?

LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN) is the more profitable company, earning 4.

3% net margin versus -333. 3% for Skillful Craftsman Education Technology Limited — meaning it keeps 4. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: XPO leads at 8. 9% versus -116. 4% for EDTK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LFVN leads at 80. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BTOC or LFVN or EDTK or XPO or FWRD more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FWRD: 113.

5% to $37. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BTOC or LFVN or EDTK or XPO or FWRD?

In this comparison, LFVN (3.

2% yield) pays a dividend. BTOC, EDTK, XPO, FWRD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is BTOC or LFVN or EDTK or XPO or FWRD better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Skillful Craftsman Education Technology Limited (EDTK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

19)). Forward Air Corporation (FWRD) carries a higher beta of 2. 28 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EDTK: -78. 9%, FWRD: -47. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BTOC and LFVN and EDTK and XPO and FWRD?

These companies operate in different sectors (BTOC (Industrials) and LFVN (Consumer Defensive) and EDTK (Consumer Defensive) and XPO (Industrials) and FWRD (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: BTOC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LFVN is a small-cap deep-value stock; EDTK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; XPO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FWRD is a small-cap quality compounder stock. LFVN pays a dividend while BTOC, EDTK, XPO, FWRD do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

BTOC

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LFVN

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 46%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.2%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

EDTK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

XPO

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FWRD

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform BTOC and LFVN and EDTK and XPO and FWRD on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(BTOC: 16.5% · LFVN: -25.2%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.