FTHM vs HOOD vs SCHW vs EXPI vs COMP

For growth investors, Robinhood Markets, Inc.

(HOOD) is the stronger pick with 51. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 9% for Fathom Holdings Inc. (FTHM). The Charles Schwab Corporation (SCHW) offers the better valuation at 29. 9x trailing P/E (14. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, The Charles Schwab Corporation (SCHW) is the cheapest at 29.

9x versus Robinhood Markets, Inc. at 37. 2x. On forward P/E, The Charles Schwab Corporation is actually cheaper at 14. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Robinhood Markets, Inc. wins at 0. 16x versus The Charles Schwab Corporation's 6. 49x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Robinhood Markets, Inc.

(HOOD) delivered a total return of +119. 1%, compared to -97. 4% for Fathom Holdings Inc. (FTHM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EXPI returned +703. 2% versus FTHM's -91. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Charles Schwab Corporation (SCHW) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

72β versus Robinhood Markets, Inc. 's 3. 05β — meaning HOOD is approximately 322% more volatile than SCHW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fathom Holdings Inc. (FTHM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 42% versus 168% for Robinhood Markets, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Robinhood Markets, Inc.

(HOOD) is pulling ahead at 51. 6% versus -2. 9% for Fathom Holdings Inc. (FTHM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Compass, Inc. grew EPS 67. 7% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for eXp World Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, COMP leads at 5. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Robinhood Markets, Inc.

(HOOD) is the more profitable company, earning 42. 1% net margin versus -6. 4% for Fathom Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 42. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOOD leads at 46. 8% versus -7. 0% for FTHM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HOOD leads at 83. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 16x versus The Charles Schwab Corporation's 6. 49x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, The Charles Schwab Corporation (SCHW) trades at 14. 9x forward P/E versus 96. 3x for eXp World Holdings, Inc. — 81. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COMP: 63. 3% to $14. 29.

In this comparison, EXPI (2.

9% yield), SCHW (1. 4% yield) pay a dividend. FTHM, HOOD, COMP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Charles Schwab Corporation (SCHW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

72), 1. 4% yield, +255. 2% 10Y return). Fathom Holdings Inc. (FTHM) carries a higher beta of 2. 42 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SCHW: +255. 2%, FTHM: -91. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (FTHM (Real Estate) and HOOD (Financial Services) and SCHW (Financial Services) and EXPI (Real Estate) and COMP (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: FTHM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HOOD is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SCHW is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; EXPI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; COMP is a small-cap high-growth stock. SCHW, EXPI pay a dividend while FTHM, HOOD, COMP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.