Insurance - Property & Casualty
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
KMPB vs ERIE vs PGR vs KMPR vs ALL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Brokers
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Property & Casualty
KMPB vs ERIE vs PGR vs KMPR vs ALL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Brokers | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty |
| Market Cap | $1.39B | $10.01B | $114.73B | $1.73B | $55.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.71B | $4.33B | $85.18B | $4.71B | $67.14B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $39M | $571M | $10.71B | $39M | $12.14B |
| Gross Margin | 8.1% | 18.1% | 26.3% | 8.1% | 39.8% |
| Operating Margin | 0.7% | 17.0% | 15.9% | 0.7% | 23.3% |
| Forward P/E | 6.3x | 17.1x | 12.0x | 7.8x | 7.9x |
| Total Debt | $1.00B | $0.00 | $6.89B | $1.00B | $7.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $126M | $346M | $143M | $126M | $678M |
KMPB vs ERIE vs PGR vs KMPR vs ALL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kemper Corporation … (KMPB) | 100 | 95.5 | -4.5% |
| Erie Indemnity Comp… (ERIE) | 100 | 123.1 | +23.1% |
| The Progressive Cor… (PGR) | 100 | 171.7 | +71.7% |
| Kemper Corporation (KMPR) | 100 | 52.0 | -48.0% |
| The Allstate Corpor… (ALL) | 100 | 154.3 | +54.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KMPB vs ERIE vs PGR vs KMPR vs ALL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KMPB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (6.3x vs 7.8x)
- 5.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs ALL's 1.8%
- +12.8% vs KMPR's -50.2%
ERIE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for defensive.
- Beta 0.16, yield 2.2%, current ratio 1.27x
- 17.3% ROA vs KMPR's 0.4%, ROIC 29.5% vs 3.1%
PGR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 21.4%, EPS growth 118.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.5%
- 5.9% 10Y total return vs ALL's 258.7%
- 21.4% revenue growth vs KMPR's 3.6%
Among these 5 stocks, KMPR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ALL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 1.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.12, Low D/E 24.5%, current ratio 0.37x
- PEG 0.46 vs ERIE's 1.26
- Combined ratio 0.8 vs KMPR's 1.0 (lower = better underwriting)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.4% revenue growth vs KMPR's 3.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.3x vs 7.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Combined ratio 0.8 vs KMPR's 1.0 (lower = better underwriting) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs KMPR's 0.58, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs ALL's 1.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +12.8% vs KMPR's -50.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.3% ROA vs KMPR's 0.4%, ROIC 29.5% vs 3.1% |
KMPB vs ERIE vs PGR vs KMPR vs ALL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
KMPB vs ERIE vs PGR vs KMPR vs ALL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ALL leads in 2 of 6 categories
KMPB leads 1 • ERIE leads 0 • PGR leads 0 • KMPR leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PGR is the larger business by revenue, generating $85.2B annually — 19.7x ERIE's $4.3B. ALL is the more profitable business, keeping 18.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KMPR's 0.8%. On growth, PGR holds the edge at +14.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.7B | $4.3B | $85.2B | $4.7B | $67.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $21M | $786M | $13.8B | $21M | $16.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $39M | $571M | $10.7B | $39M | $12.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $382M | $537M | $17.0B | $382M | $11.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +8.1% | +18.1% | +26.3% | +8.1% | +39.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.7% | +17.0% | +15.9% | +0.7% | +23.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.8% | +13.2% | +12.6% | +0.8% | +18.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.1% | +12.4% | +20.0% | +8.1% | +17.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.0% | +2.3% | +14.2% | -7.0% | +4.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -104.9% | +7.9% | +12.1% | -104.9% | +3.4% |
Valuation Metrics
KMPB leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.6x trailing earnings, ALL trades at a 73% valuation discount to ERIE's 20.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ALL offers better value at 0.33x vs ERIE's 1.50x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $10.0B | $114.7B | $1.7B | $55.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.3B | $9.7B | $121.5B | $2.6B | $61.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.36x | 20.41x | 13.59x | 12.83x | 5.59x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.26x | 17.15x | 12.00x | 7.82x | 7.87x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.50x | 0.83x | — | 0.33x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.67x | 12.14x | 11.05x | 11.08x | 4.53x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.29x | 2.46x | 1.52x | 0.36x | 0.83x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.56x | 5.00x | 4.50x | 0.69x | 1.85x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.51x | 17.53x | 7.73x | 3.11x | 5.57x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — ERIE and ALL each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALL delivers a 42.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $43 in annual profit, vs $1 for KMPR. ALL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KMPR's 0.38x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KMPB scores 7/9 vs ERIE's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.4% | +25.0% | +30.2% | +1.4% | +42.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +17.3% | +8.8% | +0.4% | +10.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.1% | +29.5% | +27.0% | +3.1% | +29.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.3% | +32.0% | +11.0% | +1.3% | +29.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.38x | — | 0.27x | 0.38x | 0.24x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $879M | -$346M | $6.8B | $879M | $6.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $126M | $346M | $143M | $126M | $678M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.0B | $0 | $6.9B | $1.0B | $7.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.59x | — | 49.44x | 0.59x | 40.22x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ALL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PGR five years ago would be worth $20,726 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,483 for KMPR. Over the past 12 months, KMPB leads with a +12.8% total return vs KMPR's -50.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ALL at 24.7% vs KMPR's -10.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.7% | -20.9% | -1.3% | -24.9% | +5.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +12.8% | -38.7% | -26.8% | -50.2% | +6.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +56.6% | -0.2% | +60.9% | -29.0% | +93.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +23.5% | +14.8% | +107.3% | -55.2% | +75.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +23.5% | +171.6% | +593.7% | +31.6% | +258.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.1% | -0.1% | +17.2% | -10.8% | +24.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KMPB and PGR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PGR is the less volatile stock with a -0.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KMPR's 0.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KMPB currently trades 98.1% from its 52-week high vs KMPR's 44.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.20x | 0.16x | -0.07x | 0.58x | 0.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.18 | $380.67 | $289.96 | $66.13 | $222.22 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $21.72 | $210.06 | $192.02 | $27.74 | $188.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.1% | +56.9% | +67.5% | +44.4% | +96.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.4 | 33.6 | 42.3 | 51.1 | 56.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 24K | 231K | 2.6M | 813K | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KMPB and ALL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PGR as "Hold", KMPR as "Buy", ALL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 63.4% upside for KMPR (target: $48) vs 14.4% for ALL (target: $244). For income investors, KMPB offers the higher dividend yield at 5.36% vs PGR's 0.59%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $230.27 | $48.00 | $244.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 41 | 12 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.4% | +2.2% | +0.6% | +4.3% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.27 | $4.83 | $1.15 | $1.27 | $3.91 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +21.7% | 0.0% | +0.6% | +17.5% | +2.2% |
ALL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). KMPB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
KMPB vs ERIE vs PGR vs KMPR vs ALL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KMPB or ERIE or PGR or KMPR or ALL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Progressive Corporation (PGR) is the stronger pick with 21.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 6% for Kemper Corporation (KMPR). The Allstate Corporation (ALL) offers the better valuation at 5. 6x trailing P/E (7. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kemper Corporation (KMPR) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KMPB or ERIE or PGR or KMPR or ALL?
On trailing P/E, The Allstate Corporation (ALL) is the cheapest at 5.
6x versus Erie Indemnity Company at 20. 4x. On forward P/E, Kemper Corporation 5. 875% Fixed is actually cheaper at 6. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Allstate Corporation wins at 0. 46x versus Erie Indemnity Company's 1. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KMPB or ERIE or PGR or KMPR or ALL?
Over the past 5 years, The Progressive Corporation (PGR) delivered a total return of +107.
3%, compared to -55. 2% for Kemper Corporation (KMPR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PGR returned +593. 7% versus KMPB's +23. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KMPB or ERIE or PGR or KMPR or ALL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Progressive Corporation (PGR) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
07β versus Kemper Corporation's 0. 58β — meaning KMPR is approximately -929% more volatile than PGR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Allstate Corporation (ALL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 38% for Kemper Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KMPB or ERIE or PGR or KMPR or ALL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Progressive Corporation (PGR) is pulling ahead at 21.
4% versus 3. 6% for Kemper Corporation (KMPR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Allstate Corporation grew EPS 124. 8% year-over-year, compared to -53. 4% for Kemper Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, PGR leads at 16. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KMPB or ERIE or PGR or KMPR or ALL?
The Allstate Corporation (ALL) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
5% net margin versus 3. 0% for Kemper Corporation — meaning it keeps 15. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALL leads at 19. 8% versus 3. 3% for KMPR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALL leads at 33. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KMPB or ERIE or PGR or KMPR or ALL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, The Allstate Corporation (ALL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 46x versus Erie Indemnity Company's 1. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Kemper Corporation 5. 875% Fixed (KMPB) trades at 6. 3x forward P/E versus 17. 1x for Erie Indemnity Company — 10. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KMPR: 63. 4% to $48. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — KMPB or ERIE or PGR or KMPR or ALL?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Kemper Corporation 5. 875% Fixed (KMPB) offers the highest yield at 5. 4%, versus 0. 6% for The Progressive Corporation (PGR).
09Is KMPB or ERIE or PGR or KMPR or ALL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Progressive Corporation (PGR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
07), 0. 6% yield, +593. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PGR: +593. 7%, KMPR: +31. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KMPB and ERIE and PGR and KMPR and ALL?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KMPB is a small-cap deep-value stock; ERIE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PGR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; KMPR is a small-cap deep-value stock; ALL is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.