Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

KVYO vs TWLO vs HUBS vs BRZE vs DDOG

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
KVYO
Klaviyo, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.77B
5Y Perf.-54.3%
TWLO
Twilio Inc.

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$29.86B
5Y Perf.+236.7%
HUBS
HubSpot, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$12.58B
5Y Perf.-50.4%
BRZE
Braze, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.31B
5Y Perf.-51.6%
DDOG
Datadog, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$67.18B
5Y Perf.+107.2%

KVYO vs TWLO vs HUBS vs BRZE vs DDOG — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
KVYO logoKVYO
TWLO logoTWLO
HUBS logoHUBS
BRZE logoBRZE
DDOG logoDDOG
IndustrySoftware - InfrastructureInternet Content & InformationSoftware - ApplicationSoftware - ApplicationSoftware - Application
Market Cap$4.77B$29.86B$12.58B$2.31B$67.18B
Revenue (TTM)$1.31B$5.30B$3.30B$738M$3.67B
Net Income (TTM)$-9M$104M$100M$-131M$136M
Gross Margin74.6%48.8%83.7%67.1%79.9%
Operating Margin-3.2%4.7%1.9%-19.6%-0.7%
Forward P/E19.1x36.3x19.6x35.7x88.0x
Total Debt$121M$1.08B$485M$83M$1.54B
Cash & Equiv.$1.06B$682M$882M$124M$401M

KVYO vs TWLO vs HUBS vs BRZE vs DDOGLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

KVYO
TWLO
HUBS
BRZE
DDOG
StockSep 23May 26Return
Klaviyo, Inc. (KVYO)10045.7-54.3%
Twilio Inc. (TWLO)100336.7+236.7%
HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS)10049.6-50.4%
Braze, Inc. (BRZE)10048.4-51.6%
Datadog, Inc. (DDOG)100207.2+107.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: KVYO vs TWLO vs HUBS vs BRZE vs DDOG

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: KVYO and HUBS are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. HubSpot, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and operational efficiency and capital deployment. TWLO and DDOG also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
KVYO
Klaviyo, Inc.
The Growth Play

KVYO has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 31.6%, EPS growth 35.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 37.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.30, Low D/E 10.1%, current ratio 4.27x
  • Beta 1.30, current ratio 4.27x
  • 31.6% revenue growth vs TWLO's 13.7%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
TWLO
Twilio Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

TWLO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.

  • 5.8% 10Y total return vs DDOG's 402.6%
  • +90.3% vs HUBS's -62.0%
Best for: long-term compounding
HUBS
HubSpot, Inc.
The Income Pick

HUBS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • beta 1.18
  • Beta 1.18 vs TWLO's 1.51
  • 2.7% ROA vs BRZE's -12.9%, ROIC 0.4% vs -20.5%
Best for: income & stability
BRZE
Braze, Inc.
The Growth Angle

Among these 5 stocks, BRZE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
DDOG
Datadog, Inc.
The Quality Compounder

DDOG is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.

  • 3.7% margin vs BRZE's -17.8%
Best for: quality
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthKVYO logoKVYO31.6% revenue growth vs TWLO's 13.7%
ValueKVYO logoKVYOLower P/E (19.1x vs 88.0x)
Quality / MarginsDDOG logoDDOG3.7% margin vs BRZE's -17.8%
Stability / SafetyHUBS logoHUBSBeta 1.18 vs TWLO's 1.51
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)TWLO logoTWLO+90.3% vs HUBS's -62.0%
Efficiency (ROA)HUBS logoHUBS2.7% ROA vs BRZE's -12.9%, ROIC 0.4% vs -20.5%

KVYO vs TWLO vs HUBS vs BRZE vs DDOG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

KVYOKlaviyo, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

TWLOTwilio Inc.
FY 2025
Messaging
73.3%$2.9B
Other Communications
19.0%$747M
Segment
7.7%$303M
HUBSHubSpot, Inc.
FY 2025
Subscription and Circulation
97.8%$3.1B
Service
2.2%$67M
BRZEBraze, Inc.
FY 2025
Subscription Revenue
96.1%$570M
Professional Services Revenue
3.9%$23M
DDOGDatadog, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

KVYO vs TWLO vs HUBS vs BRZE vs DDOG — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKVYOLAGGINGBRZE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

DDOG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

TWLO is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.3B annually — 7.2x BRZE's $738M. DDOG is the more profitable business, keeping 3.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BRZE's -17.8%. On growth, DDOG holds the edge at +32.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricKVYO logoKVYOKlaviyo, Inc.TWLO logoTWLOTwilio Inc.HUBS logoHUBSHubSpot, Inc.BRZE logoBRZEBraze, Inc.DDOG logoDDOGDatadog, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.3B$5.3B$3.3B$738M$3.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$28M$415M$166M-$131M$73M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$9M$104M$100M-$131M$136M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$224M$1.0B$712M$61M$1.1B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+74.6%+48.8%+83.7%+67.1%+79.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-3.2%+4.7%+1.9%-19.6%-0.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-0.7%+2.0%+3.0%-17.8%+3.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+17.0%+19.0%+21.6%+8.2%+29.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+27.9%+20.0%+23.4%+27.9%+32.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+160.0%+3.8%+2.5%-70.6%+120.9%
DDOG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

KVYO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 284.1x trailing earnings, HUBS trades at a 70% valuation discount to TWLO's 938.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HUBS's 69.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DDOG's 874.0x.

MetricKVYO logoKVYOKlaviyo, Inc.TWLO logoTWLOTwilio Inc.HUBS logoHUBSHubSpot, Inc.BRZE logoBRZEBraze, Inc.DDOG logoDDOGDatadog, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$4.8B$29.9B$12.6B$2.3B$67.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3.8B$30.3B$12.2B$2.3B$68.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-143.32x938.43x284.08x-18.52x629.10x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.19.06x36.33x19.61x35.72x87.97x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple77.16x69.24x874.03x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.87x5.89x4.02x3.13x19.60x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.83x4.03x6.29x3.91x18.38x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF25.17x28.91x17.77x37.34x67.14x
KVYO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — TWLO and HUBS each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

HUBS delivers a 5.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-23 for BRZE. KVYO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DDOG's 0.41x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TWLO scores 7/9 vs BRZE's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricKVYO logoKVYOKlaviyo, Inc.TWLO logoTWLOTwilio Inc.HUBS logoHUBSHubSpot, Inc.BRZE logoBRZEBraze, Inc.DDOG logoDDOGDatadog, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-0.8%+1.3%+5.0%-22.8%+3.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-0.6%+1.1%+2.7%-12.9%+2.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-22.2%+1.6%+0.4%-20.5%-0.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-5.7%+1.9%+0.5%-23.4%-1.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–947636
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.10x0.14x0.23x0.13x0.41x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$944M$399M-$397M-$42M$1.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1.1B$682M$882M$124M$401M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$121M$1.1B$485M$83M$1.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense4753.07x4.03x
Evenly matched — TWLO and HUBS each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

TWLO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in DDOG five years ago would be worth $24,418 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,420 for BRZE. Over the past 12 months, TWLO leads with a +90.3% total return vs HUBS's -62.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TWLO at 53.2% vs KVYO's -21.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricKVYO logoKVYOKlaviyo, Inc.TWLO logoTWLOTwilio Inc.HUBS logoHUBSHubSpot, Inc.BRZE logoBRZEBraze, Inc.DDOG logoDDOGDatadog, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-46.2%+42.4%-36.1%-30.6%+41.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-53.1%+90.3%-62.0%-30.7%+78.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-51.9%+259.4%-45.1%-20.7%+140.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-51.9%-35.8%-52.1%-75.8%+144.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-51.9%+584.5%+469.1%-75.8%+402.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-21.6%+53.2%-18.1%-7.4%+33.9%
TWLO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — TWLO and HUBS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

HUBS is the less volatile stock with a 1.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TWLO's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TWLO currently trades 97.9% from its 52-week high vs HUBS's 35.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricKVYO logoKVYOKlaviyo, Inc.TWLO logoTWLOTwilio Inc.HUBS logoHUBSHubSpot, Inc.BRZE logoBRZEBraze, Inc.DDOG logoDDOGDatadog, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.30x1.51x1.18x1.27x1.40x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$37.79$201.39$682.57$37.67$201.69
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$15.31$91.84$187.45$15.26$98.01
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+41.7%+97.9%+35.8%+60.0%+93.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10037.078.451.147.666.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded4.2M2.2M1.5M3.0M5.0M
Evenly matched — TWLO and HUBS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: KVYO as "Buy", TWLO as "Buy", HUBS as "Buy", BRZE as "Buy", DDOG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 110.1% upside for KVYO (target: $33) vs -7.5% for DDOG (target: $175).

MetricKVYO logoKVYOKlaviyo, Inc.TWLO logoTWLOTwilio Inc.HUBS logoHUBSHubSpot, Inc.BRZE logoBRZEBraze, Inc.DDOG logoDDOGDatadog, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$33.13$185.17$360.89$42.44$174.63
# AnalystsCovering analysts2252472547
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+2.9%+4.0%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

DDOG leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). KVYO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallKlaviyo, Inc. (KVYO)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

KVYO vs TWLO vs HUBS vs BRZE vs DDOG: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is KVYO or TWLO or HUBS or BRZE or DDOG a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Klaviyo, Inc.

(KVYO) is the stronger pick with 31. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 13. 7% for Twilio Inc. (TWLO). HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) offers the better valuation at 284. 1x trailing P/E (19. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Klaviyo, Inc. (KVYO) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — KVYO or TWLO or HUBS or BRZE or DDOG?

On trailing P/E, HubSpot, Inc.

(HUBS) is the cheapest at 284. 1x versus Twilio Inc. at 938. 4x. On forward P/E, Klaviyo, Inc. is actually cheaper at 19. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — KVYO or TWLO or HUBS or BRZE or DDOG?

Over the past 5 years, Datadog, Inc.

(DDOG) delivered a total return of +144. 2%, compared to -75. 8% for Braze, Inc. (BRZE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TWLO returned +584. 5% versus BRZE's -75. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — KVYO or TWLO or HUBS or BRZE or DDOG?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), HubSpot, Inc.

(HUBS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 18β versus Twilio Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning TWLO is approximately 27% more volatile than HUBS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Klaviyo, Inc. (KVYO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 41% for Datadog, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — KVYO or TWLO or HUBS or BRZE or DDOG?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Klaviyo, Inc.

(KVYO) is pulling ahead at 31. 6% versus 13. 7% for Twilio Inc. (TWLO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HubSpot, Inc. grew EPS 863. 0% year-over-year, compared to -41. 2% for Datadog, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KVYO leads at 37. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — KVYO or TWLO or HUBS or BRZE or DDOG?

Datadog, Inc.

(DDOG) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 1% net margin versus -17. 8% for Braze, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TWLO leads at 3. 4% versus -19. 6% for BRZE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HUBS leads at 83. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is KVYO or TWLO or HUBS or BRZE or DDOG more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Klaviyo, Inc.

(KVYO) trades at 19. 1x forward P/E versus 88. 0x for Datadog, Inc. — 68. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KVYO: 110. 1% to $33. 13.

08

Which pays a better dividend — KVYO or TWLO or HUBS or BRZE or DDOG?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is KVYO or TWLO or HUBS or BRZE or DDOG better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, HubSpot, Inc.

(HUBS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 18), +469. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HUBS: +469. 1%, KVYO: -51. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between KVYO and TWLO and HUBS and BRZE and DDOG?

These companies operate in different sectors (KVYO (Technology) and TWLO (Communication Services) and HUBS (Technology) and BRZE (Technology) and DDOG (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: KVYO is a small-cap high-growth stock; TWLO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; HUBS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; BRZE is a small-cap high-growth stock; DDOG is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

KVYO

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 13%
  • Gross Margin > 44%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TWLO

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Gross Margin > 29%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HUBS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Gross Margin > 50%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BRZE

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 13%
  • Gross Margin > 40%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

DDOG

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 16%
  • Gross Margin > 47%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform KVYO and TWLO and HUBS and BRZE and DDOG on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(KVYO: 27.9% · TWLO: 20.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.