Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
LZB vs SNBR vs ETH vs PRPL vs LOVE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Asset Management - Cryptocurrency
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
LZB vs SNBR vs ETH vs PRPL vs LOVE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Asset Management - Cryptocurrency | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances |
| Market Cap | $1.46B | $69M | $554M | $56M | $228M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.13B | $1M | $615M | $505M | $690M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $84M | $-132K | $47M | $-35M | $13M |
| Gross Margin | 43.5% | 59.0% | 60.5% | 40.9% | 57.7% |
| Operating Margin | 5.5% | -3.3% | 10.1% | -6.1% | 6.3% |
| Forward P/E | 13.7x | — | 8.6x | — | 26.2x |
| Total Debt | $491M | $354M | $124M | $204M | $183M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $328M | $2M | $76M | $24M | $84M |
LZB vs SNBR vs ETH vs PRPL vs LOVE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| La-Z-Boy Incorporat… (LZB) | 100 | 80.9 | -19.1% |
| Sleep Number Corpor… (SNBR) | 100 | 24.2 | -75.8% |
| Grayscale Ethereum … (ETH) | 100 | 71.4 | -28.6% |
| Purple Innovation, … (PRPL) | 100 | 36.3 | -63.7% |
| The Lovesac Company (LOVE) | 100 | 58.3 | -41.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LZB vs SNBR vs ETH vs PRPL vs LOVE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LZB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.97, yield 2.3%
- Rev growth 3.0%, EPS growth -17.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -3.6%
- 58.2% 10Y total return vs ETH's -18.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.97, Low D/E 47.6%, current ratio 1.91x
SNBR plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
ETH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.20 vs LZB's 1.91
- Lower P/E (8.6x vs 26.2x)
- 8.4% margin vs SNBR's -9.4%
- +28.9% vs SNBR's -56.8%
PRPL lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, LOVE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.0% revenue growth vs SNBR's -99.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.6x vs 26.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.4% margin vs SNBR's -9.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.97 vs ETH's 2.91 | |
| Dividends | 2.3% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +28.9% vs SNBR's -56.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.4% ROA vs PRPL's -12.1%, ROIC 7.6% vs -15.8% |
LZB vs SNBR vs ETH vs PRPL vs LOVE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LZB vs SNBR vs ETH vs PRPL vs LOVE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ETH leads in 3 of 6 categories
LZB leads 3 • SNBR leads 0 • PRPL leads 0 • LOVE leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ETH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LZB is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.1B annually — 1507.0x SNBR's $1M. ETH is the more profitable business, keeping 8.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SNBR's -9.4%. On growth, PRPL holds the edge at +35.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.1B | $1M | $615M | $505M | $690M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $243M | $72M | $70M | -$12M | $58M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $84M | -$132,000 | $47M | -$35M | $13M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $158M | -$21M | $20M | -$15M | -$11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.5% | +59.0% | +60.5% | +40.9% | +57.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.5% | -3.3% | +10.1% | -6.1% | +6.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.9% | -9.4% | +8.4% | -7.0% | +1.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.4% | -14.6% | +0.0% | -3.0% | -1.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.8% | -3.8% | — | +35.1% | +2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -23.5% | -11.2% | -28.1% | -55.6% | -18.4% |
Valuation Metrics
ETH leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.8x trailing earnings, ETH trades at a 52% valuation discount to LOVE's 22.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ETH offers better value at 0.25x vs LZB's 2.10x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.5B | $69M | $554M | $56M | $228M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.6B | $422M | $602M | $236M | $327M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.13x | -0.53x | 10.84x | -1.07x | 22.64x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.74x | — | 8.62x | — | 26.24x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.10x | — | 0.25x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.23x | — | 9.71x | — | 11.54x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.69x | 49.07x | 0.90x | 0.12x | 0.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.46x | — | 1.16x | — | 1.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.88x | — | 9999.00x | — | 13.06x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ETH leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ETH delivers a 10.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $7 for LOVE. ETH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.26x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LOVE's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LZB scores 7/9 vs SNBR's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.9% | — | +10.0% | — | +6.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.0% | -0.0% | +6.4% | -12.1% | +2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.7% | -0.0% | +7.6% | -15.8% | +3.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.1% | — | +10.5% | -15.8% | +3.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.48x | — | 0.26x | — | 0.85x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $162M | $353M | $47M | $180M | $99M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $328M | $2M | $76M | $24M | $84M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $491M | $354M | $124M | $204M | $183M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 241.20x | -780.16x | 721.00x | -0.32x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LZB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LZB five years ago would be worth $8,846 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $169 for PRPL. Over the past 12 months, ETH leads with a +28.9% total return vs SNBR's -56.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LZB at 10.4% vs SNBR's -49.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.0% | -64.7% | -26.1% | -28.6% | +8.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -9.9% | -56.8% | +28.9% | -37.3% | -23.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +34.7% | -87.2% | -33.4% | -82.8% | -40.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.5% | -97.3% | -30.3% | -98.3% | -78.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +58.2% | -87.6% | -18.8% | -94.8% | -34.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.4% | -49.6% | -12.7% | -44.4% | -15.7% |
Risk & Volatility
LZB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LZB is the less volatile stock with a 0.97 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ETH's 2.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LZB currently trades 79.9% from its 52-week high vs SNBR's 21.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.97x | 2.89x | 2.83x | 1.18x | 1.34x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $44.49 | $13.94 | $45.78 | $1.26 | $21.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $29.03 | $1.07 | $16.85 | $0.47 | $10.33 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.9% | +21.7% | +47.6% | +40.8% | +71.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.7 | 53.4 | 55.8 | 36.7 | 53.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 382K | 2.8M | 4.6M | 322K | 299K |
Analyst Outlook
LZB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LZB as "Buy", SNBR as "Hold", ETH as "Hold", LOVE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 230.0% upside for SNBR (target: $10) vs 44.0% for LOVE (target: $23). LZB is the only dividend payer here at 2.32% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $10.00 | — | — | $22.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 11 | 10 | — | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.3% | — | +0.0% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.83 | — | $0.00 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.4% | +1.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +8.7% |
ETH leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). LZB leads in 3 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
LZB vs SNBR vs ETH vs PRPL vs LOVE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LZB or SNBR or ETH or PRPL or LOVE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, La-Z-Boy Incorporated (LZB) is the stronger pick with 3.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -99. 9% for Sleep Number Corporation (SNBR). Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) offers the better valuation at 10. 8x trailing P/E (8. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate La-Z-Boy Incorporated (LZB) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LZB or SNBR or ETH or PRPL or LOVE?
On trailing P/E, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) is the cheapest at 10.
8x versus The Lovesac Company at 22. 6x. On forward P/E, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust is actually cheaper at 8. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust wins at 0. 20x versus La-Z-Boy Incorporated's 1. 91x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LZB or SNBR or ETH or PRPL or LOVE?
Over the past 5 years, La-Z-Boy Incorporated (LZB) delivered a total return of -11.
5%, compared to -98. 3% for Purple Innovation, Inc. (PRPL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LZB returned +58. 9% versus PRPL's -94. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LZB or SNBR or ETH or PRPL or LOVE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), La-Z-Boy Incorporated (LZB) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
97β versus Sleep Number Corporation's 2. 89β — meaning SNBR is approximately 199% more volatile than LZB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 26% versus 85% for The Lovesac Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LZB or SNBR or ETH or PRPL or LOVE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), La-Z-Boy Incorporated (LZB) is pulling ahead at 3.
0% versus -99. 9% for Sleep Number Corporation (SNBR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Purple Innovation, Inc. grew EPS 47. 3% year-over-year, compared to -541. 1% for Sleep Number Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, LOVE leads at 11. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LZB or SNBR or ETH or PRPL or LOVE?
Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) is the more profitable company, earning 8.
4% net margin versus -11. 0% for Purple Innovation, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ETH leads at 10. 1% versus -6. 8% for PRPL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ETH leads at 60. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LZB or SNBR or ETH or PRPL or LOVE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 20x versus La-Z-Boy Incorporated's 1. 91x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) trades at 8. 6x forward P/E versus 26. 2x for The Lovesac Company — 17. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SNBR: 230. 0% to $10. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — LZB or SNBR or ETH or PRPL or LOVE?
In this comparison, LZB (2.
3% yield) pays a dividend. SNBR, ETH, PRPL, LOVE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LZB or SNBR or ETH or PRPL or LOVE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, La-Z-Boy Incorporated (LZB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
97), 2. 3% yield). Sleep Number Corporation (SNBR) carries a higher beta of 2. 89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LZB: +58. 9%, SNBR: -88. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LZB and SNBR and ETH and PRPL and LOVE?
These companies operate in different sectors (LZB (Consumer Cyclical) and SNBR (Consumer Cyclical) and ETH (Financial Services) and PRPL (Consumer Cyclical) and LOVE (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: LZB is a small-cap deep-value stock; SNBR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ETH is a small-cap deep-value stock; PRPL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LOVE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. LZB pays a dividend while SNBR, ETH, PRPL, LOVE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.