Insurance - Specialty
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NMIH vs PFSI vs MTG vs RKT vs RDN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Mortgages
Insurance - Specialty
Financial - Mortgages
Insurance - Specialty
NMIH vs PFSI vs MTG vs RKT vs RDN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Specialty | Financial - Mortgages | Insurance - Specialty | Financial - Mortgages | Insurance - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $2.94B | $4.62B | $5.62B | $39.90B | $5.13B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $706M | $4.36B | $1.20B | $6.88B | $1.25B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $389M | $507M | $718M | $-68M | $583M |
| Gross Margin | 91.8% | 91.4% | 93.6% | 91.6% | 92.3% |
| Operating Margin | 70.8% | 34.6% | 75.4% | 8.7% | 61.2% |
| Forward P/E | 7.5x | 7.2x | 8.6x | 19.3x | 7.6x |
| Total Debt | $417M | $23.06B | $646M | $0.00 | $1.13B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $44M | $302M | $376M | $2.70B | $25M |
NMIH vs PFSI vs MTG vs RKT vs RDN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NMI Holdings, Inc. (NMIH) | 100 | 225.0 | +125.0% |
| PennyMac Financial … (PFSI) | 100 | 168.2 | +68.2% |
| MGIC Investment Cor… (MTG) | 100 | 289.9 | +189.9% |
| Rocket Companies, I… (RKT) | 100 | 50.5 | -49.5% |
| Radian Group Inc. (RDN) | 100 | 243.7 | +143.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NMIH vs PFSI vs MTG vs RKT vs RDN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NMIH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.41 vs RDN's 0.49
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 7.6x), PEG 0.41 vs 0.49
PFSI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 173.8%, EPS growth 59.2%
- 6.0% 10Y total return vs MTG's 333.0%
- 173.8% NII/revenue growth vs RDN's -3.4%
MTG has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.
- 59.6% margin vs RKT's -1.0%
- 11.0% ROA vs RKT's -0.2%, ROIC 12.7% vs 2.0%
RKT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +21.6% vs PFSI's -8.0%
RDN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.37, yield 2.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.37, Low D/E 23.7%, current ratio 4.28x
- Beta 0.37, yield 2.8%, current ratio 4.28x
- Beta 0.37 vs RKT's 1.77
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 173.8% NII/revenue growth vs RDN's -3.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 7.6x), PEG 0.41 vs 0.49 | |
| Quality / Margins | 59.6% margin vs RKT's -1.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.37 vs RKT's 1.77 | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs PFSI's 1.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +21.6% vs PFSI's -8.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.0% ROA vs RKT's -0.2%, ROIC 12.7% vs 2.0% |
NMIH vs PFSI vs MTG vs RKT vs RDN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
NMIH vs PFSI vs MTG vs RKT vs RDN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MTG leads in 2 of 6 categories
RDN leads 2 • NMIH leads 0 • PFSI leads 0 • RKT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MTG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RKT is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.9B annually — 9.7x NMIH's $706M. MTG is the more profitable business, keeping 59.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RKT's -1.0%. On growth, NMIH holds the edge at +8.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $706M | $4.4B | $1.2B | $6.9B | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $516M | $1.0B | $913M | $639M | $807M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $389M | $507M | $718M | -$68M | $583M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $413M | -$3.8B | $705M | -$4.1B | $116M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +91.8% | +91.4% | +93.6% | +91.6% | +92.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +70.8% | +34.6% | +75.4% | +8.7% | +61.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +55.1% | +11.5% | +59.6% | -1.0% | +46.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +58.4% | -32.4% | +58.5% | -58.4% | +9.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.4% | — | -3.0% | — | -5.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.1% | +7.7% | +1.3% | -89.6% | +17.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — NMIH and PFSI and RKT each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.8x trailing earnings, NMIH trades at a 18% valuation discount to PFSI's 9.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NMIH offers better value at 0.43x vs RDN's 0.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.9B | $4.6B | $5.6B | $39.9B | $5.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.3B | $27.4B | $5.9B | $37.2B | $6.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.84x | 9.53x | 8.46x | -282.60x | 9.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.52x | 7.17x | 8.64x | 19.30x | 7.63x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.43x | — | 0.43x | — | 0.58x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.27x | 18.11x | 6.30x | 41.81x | 7.73x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.16x | 1.06x | 4.63x | 5.80x | 4.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.18x | 1.11x | 1.17x | 0.82x | 1.09x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.12x | — | 6.60x | — | 15.23x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — NMIH and MTG each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NMIH delivers a 15.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-1 for RKT. MTG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PFSI's 5.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NMIH scores 5/9 vs RKT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.8% | +12.0% | +14.0% | -0.6% | +12.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.6% | +1.8% | +11.0% | -0.2% | +6.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.5% | +4.4% | +12.7% | +2.0% | +8.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.0% | +10.4% | +14.1% | +1.6% | +10.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.16x | 5.35x | 0.13x | — | 0.24x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $373M | $22.8B | $271M | -$2.7B | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $44M | $302M | $376M | $2.7B | $25M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $417M | $23.1B | $646M | $0 | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 18.55x | 1.35x | 27.10x | 0.43x | 12.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MTG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MTG five years ago would be worth $20,097 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,811 for RKT. Over the past 12 months, RKT leads with a +21.6% total return vs PFSI's -8.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MTG at 24.2% vs PFSI's 16.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.0% | -32.4% | -7.8% | -28.9% | +5.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +0.9% | -8.0% | +4.2% | +21.6% | +14.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +60.9% | +59.2% | +91.5% | +77.3% | +63.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +61.4% | +63.7% | +101.0% | -11.9% | +77.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +505.7% | +603.4% | +333.0% | -20.7% | +250.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.2% | +16.8% | +24.2% | +21.0% | +17.7% |
Risk & Volatility
RDN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RDN is the less volatile stock with a 0.37 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RKT's 1.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RDN currently trades 96.9% from its 52-week high vs PFSI's 55.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.45x | 0.93x | 0.43x | 1.77x | 0.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $43.20 | $160.36 | $29.97 | $24.36 | $38.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $34.84 | $82.67 | $24.78 | $11.08 | $31.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.3% | +55.3% | +88.7% | +58.0% | +96.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.2 | 40.4 | 40.4 | 45.8 | 57.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 443K | 604K | 1.9M | 25.0M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
RDN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NMIH as "Buy", PFSI as "Buy", MTG as "Buy", RKT as "Hold", RDN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 61.3% upside for PFSI (target: $143) vs 6.3% for RDN (target: $40). For income investors, RDN offers the higher dividend yield at 2.80% vs PFSI's 1.31%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $43.50 | $143.00 | $30.00 | $21.63 | $40.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 20 | 22 | 25 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.3% | +2.2% | — | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 7 | 1 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.16 | $0.59 | — | $1.06 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.6% | +0.1% | +14.0% | 0.0% | +8.4% |
MTG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). RDN leads in 2 (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
NMIH vs PFSI vs MTG vs RKT vs RDN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NMIH or PFSI or MTG or RKT or RDN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
(PFSI) is the stronger pick with 173. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 4% for Radian Group Inc. (RDN). NMI Holdings, Inc. (NMIH) offers the better valuation at 7. 8x trailing P/E (7. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NMI Holdings, Inc. (NMIH) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NMIH or PFSI or MTG or RKT or RDN?
On trailing P/E, NMI Holdings, Inc.
(NMIH) is the cheapest at 7. 8x versus PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. at 9. 5x. On forward P/E, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NMI Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 41x versus Radian Group Inc. 's 0. 49x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NMIH or PFSI or MTG or RKT or RDN?
Over the past 5 years, MGIC Investment Corporation (MTG) delivered a total return of +101.
0%, compared to -11. 9% for Rocket Companies, Inc. (RKT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PFSI returned +603. 4% versus RKT's -20. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NMIH or PFSI or MTG or RKT or RDN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Radian Group Inc.
(RDN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 37β versus Rocket Companies, Inc. 's 1. 77β — meaning RKT is approximately 374% more volatile than RDN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MGIC Investment Corporation (MTG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 5% for PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NMIH or PFSI or MTG or RKT or RDN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
(PFSI) is pulling ahead at 173. 8% versus -3. 4% for Radian Group Inc. (RDN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. grew EPS 59. 2% year-over-year, compared to -123. 8% for Rocket Companies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NMIH leads at 10. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NMIH or PFSI or MTG or RKT or RDN?
MGIC Investment Corporation (MTG) is the more profitable company, earning 60.
8% net margin versus -1. 0% for Rocket Companies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 60. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MTG leads at 76. 5% versus 8. 7% for RKT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MTG leads at 94. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NMIH or PFSI or MTG or RKT or RDN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NMI Holdings, Inc. (NMIH) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 41x versus Radian Group Inc. 's 0. 49x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. (PFSI) trades at 7. 2x forward P/E versus 19. 3x for Rocket Companies, Inc. — 12. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PFSI: 61. 3% to $143. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NMIH or PFSI or MTG or RKT or RDN?
In this comparison, RDN (2.
8% yield), MTG (2. 2% yield), PFSI (1. 3% yield) pay a dividend. NMIH, RKT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NMIH or PFSI or MTG or RKT or RDN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MGIC Investment Corporation (MTG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
43), 2. 2% yield, +333. 0% 10Y return). Rocket Companies, Inc. (RKT) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MTG: +333. 0%, RKT: -20. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NMIH and PFSI and MTG and RKT and RDN?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NMIH is a small-cap deep-value stock; PFSI is a small-cap high-growth stock; MTG is a small-cap deep-value stock; RKT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; RDN is a small-cap deep-value stock. PFSI, MTG, RDN pay a dividend while NMIH, RKT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.