Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NRDS vs TREE vs BFIN vs QNST vs UPST
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Conglomerates
Banks - Regional
Advertising Agencies
Financial - Credit Services
NRDS vs TREE vs BFIN vs QNST vs UPST — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Conglomerates | Banks - Regional | Advertising Agencies | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $726M | $552M | $150M | $761M | $2.78B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $837M | $1.12B | $74M | $1.18B | $1.08B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $69M | $181M | $2M | $-30M | $49M |
| Gross Margin | 92.4% | 94.3% | 66.2% | 10.5% | 95.2% |
| Operating Margin | 8.3% | 7.3% | 6.8% | 1.7% | 5.1% |
| Forward P/E | 10.0x | 7.1x | 15.2x | 10.5x | 14.7x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $435M | $39M | $10M | $1.85B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $98M | $81M | $119M | $101M | $657M |
NRDS vs TREE vs BFIN vs QNST vs UPST — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NerdWallet, Inc. (NRDS) | 100 | 54.0 | -46.0% |
| LendingTree, Inc. (TREE) | 100 | 35.1 | -64.9% |
| BankFinancial Corpo… (BFIN) | 100 | 113.0 | +13.0% |
| QuinStreet, Inc. (QNST) | 100 | 87.3 | -12.7% |
| Upstart Holdings, I… (UPST) | 100 | 14.2 | -85.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NRDS vs TREE vs BFIN vs QNST vs UPST
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NRDS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency and defensive.
- PEG 0.19 vs UPST's 1.02
- Beta 1.39, current ratio 3.45x
- Lower P/E (10.0x vs 14.7x), PEG 0.19 vs 1.02
TREE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and momentum.
- 13.5% margin vs QNST's -2.6%
- +6.1% vs UPST's -37.6%
- 21.8% ROA vs QNST's -5.9%, ROIC 9.0% vs 2.8%
BFIN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.60, yield 3.3%
- Beta 0.60 vs UPST's 2.96, lower leverage
- 3.3% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
QNST is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 78.3%, EPS growth 114.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 23.4%
- 288.4% 10Y total return vs BFIN's 24.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.23, Low D/E 4.2%, current ratio 1.51x
- 78.3% revenue growth vs BFIN's 4.5%
UPST is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 5.1% vs NRDS's 0.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 78.3% revenue growth vs BFIN's 4.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.0x vs 14.7x), PEG 0.19 vs 1.02 | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.5% margin vs QNST's -2.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.60 vs UPST's 2.96, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.3% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.1% vs UPST's -37.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.8% ROA vs QNST's -5.9%, ROIC 9.0% vs 2.8% |
NRDS vs TREE vs BFIN vs QNST vs UPST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NRDS vs TREE vs BFIN vs QNST vs UPST — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NRDS leads in 1 of 6 categories
BFIN leads 1 • TREE leads 0 • QNST leads 0 • UPST leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NRDS and TREE each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QNST is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.2B annually — 15.9x BFIN's $74M. TREE is the more profitable business, keeping 13.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to QNST's -2.6%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $837M | $1.1B | $74M | $1.2B | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $130M | $120M | -$8M | $26M | $68M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $69M | $181M | $2M | -$30M | $49M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $135M | $73M | $3M | $99M | -$146M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +92.4% | +94.3% | +66.2% | +10.5% | +95.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.3% | +7.3% | +6.8% | +1.7% | +5.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.8% | +13.5% | +5.5% | -2.6% | +5.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.6% | +5.4% | +7.4% | +8.4% | -15.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | +28.3% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +2.3% | +18.8% | +59.4% | -169.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — NRDS and TREE each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.7x trailing earnings, TREE trades at a 98% valuation discount to QNST's 165.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NRDS offers better value at 0.30x vs UPST's 4.49x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $726M | $552M | $150M | $761M | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $628M | $906M | $69M | $671M | $4.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.27x | 3.69x | 36.36x | 165.55x | 64.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.99x | 7.11x | 15.19x | 10.47x | 14.69x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.30x | — | — | — | 4.49x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.41x | 8.73x | 13.36x | 21.84x | 50.13x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.87x | 0.49x | 2.01x | 0.70x | 2.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.98x | 1.95x | 0.96x | 3.19x | 3.90x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.57x | 9.09x | 27.34x | 9.18x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NRDS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TREE delivers a 86.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $86 in annual profit, vs $-11 for QNST. QNST carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UPST's 2.32x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NRDS scores 8/9 vs UPST's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +18.3% | +86.0% | +1.5% | -11.1% | +6.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +14.8% | +21.8% | +0.2% | -5.9% | +1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +14.0% | +9.0% | +1.9% | +2.8% | +1.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +18.1% | +13.2% | +2.3% | +2.4% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.52x | 0.25x | 0.04x | 2.32x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$98M | $354M | -$80M | -$91M | $1.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $98M | $81M | $119M | $101M | $657M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $435M | $39M | $10M | $1.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 315.67x | 4.45x | 0.09x | 4.64x | 1.66x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — BFIN and UPST each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BFIN five years ago would be worth $13,188 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,126 for TREE. Over the past 12 months, TREE leads with a +6.1% total return vs UPST's -37.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UPST at 29.4% vs NRDS's 3.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -24.4% | -22.7% | 0.0% | -5.1% | -36.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -10.4% | +6.1% | -0.2% | -26.9% | -37.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.3% | +112.0% | +75.6% | +81.0% | +116.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -65.5% | -78.7% | +31.9% | -28.4% | -69.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -65.5% | -45.7% | +24.6% | +288.4% | -1.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.3% | +28.5% | +20.6% | +21.9% | +29.4% |
Risk & Volatility
BFIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BFIN is the less volatile stock with a 0.60 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UPST's 2.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BFIN currently trades 92.6% from its 52-week high vs UPST's 33.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.39x | 1.55x | 0.60x | 1.23x | 2.96x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.24 | $77.35 | $12.96 | $18.41 | $87.30 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.42 | $32.65 | $10.69 | $10.29 | $23.96 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +60.2% | +51.5% | +92.6% | +72.6% | +33.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.1 | 39.3 | 42.3 | 53.3 | 42.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 830K | 326K | 0 | 673K | 4.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NRDS as "Buy", TREE as "Buy", BFIN as "Hold", QNST as "Buy", UPST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 73.2% upside for TREE (target: $69) vs 12.3% for QNST (target: $15). BFIN is the only dividend payer here at 3.33% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $16.00 | $69.00 | — | $15.00 | $45.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 23 | 2 | 13 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +3.3% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 0 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.40 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +9.7% | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
NRDS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). BFIN leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 3 tied.
NRDS vs TREE vs BFIN vs QNST vs UPST: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NRDS or TREE or BFIN or QNST or UPST a better buy right now?
For growth investors, QuinStreet, Inc.
(QNST) is the stronger pick with 78. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 5% for BankFinancial Corporation (BFIN). LendingTree, Inc. (TREE) offers the better valuation at 3. 7x trailing P/E (7. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NerdWallet, Inc. (NRDS) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NRDS or TREE or BFIN or QNST or UPST?
On trailing P/E, LendingTree, Inc.
(TREE) is the cheapest at 3. 7x versus QuinStreet, Inc. at 165. 6x. On forward P/E, LendingTree, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NerdWallet, Inc. wins at 0. 19x versus Upstart Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 02x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NRDS or TREE or BFIN or QNST or UPST?
Over the past 5 years, BankFinancial Corporation (BFIN) delivered a total return of +31.
9%, compared to -78. 7% for LendingTree, Inc. (TREE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: QNST returned +288. 4% versus NRDS's -65. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NRDS or TREE or BFIN or QNST or UPST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), BankFinancial Corporation (BFIN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
60β versus Upstart Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 96β — meaning UPST is approximately 390% more volatile than BFIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, QuinStreet, Inc. (QNST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 2% for Upstart Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NRDS or TREE or BFIN or QNST or UPST?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), QuinStreet, Inc.
(QNST) is pulling ahead at 78. 3% versus 4. 5% for BankFinancial Corporation (BFIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LendingTree, Inc. grew EPS 443. 3% year-over-year, compared to -55. 4% for BankFinancial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NRDS or TREE or BFIN or QNST or UPST?
LendingTree, Inc.
(TREE) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 5% net margin versus 0. 4% for QuinStreet, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NRDS leads at 8. 3% versus 0. 6% for QNST. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UPST leads at 95. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NRDS or TREE or BFIN or QNST or UPST more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NerdWallet, Inc. (NRDS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 19x versus Upstart Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 02x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, LendingTree, Inc. (TREE) trades at 7. 1x forward P/E versus 15. 2x for BankFinancial Corporation — 8. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TREE: 73. 2% to $69. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NRDS or TREE or BFIN or QNST or UPST?
In this comparison, BFIN (3.
3% yield) pays a dividend. NRDS, TREE, QNST, UPST do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NRDS or TREE or BFIN or QNST or UPST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, BankFinancial Corporation (BFIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
60), 3. 3% yield). Upstart Holdings, Inc. (UPST) carries a higher beta of 2. 96 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BFIN: +24. 6%, UPST: -1. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NRDS and TREE and BFIN and QNST and UPST?
These companies operate in different sectors (NRDS (Financial Services) and TREE (Financial Services) and BFIN (Financial Services) and QNST (Communication Services) and UPST (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NRDS is a small-cap high-growth stock; TREE is a small-cap high-growth stock; BFIN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; QNST is a small-cap high-growth stock; UPST is a small-cap high-growth stock. BFIN pays a dividend while NRDS, TREE, QNST, UPST do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.