Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PEGA vs CRM vs SAP vs ORCL vs MSFT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Application
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Infrastructure
PEGA vs CRM vs SAP vs ORCL vs MSFT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $6.21B | $179.19B | $203.58B | $559.27B | $3.13T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.70B | $41.52B | $36.80B | $64.08B | $318.27B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $341M | $7.46B | $7.04B | $16.21B | $125.22B |
| Gross Margin | 75.0% | 77.7% | 73.8% | 66.4% | 68.3% |
| Operating Margin | 10.2% | 21.5% | 26.7% | 30.8% | 46.8% |
| Forward P/E | 13.5x | 15.8x | 23.8x | 26.0x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $76M | $6.74B | $8.07B | $104.10B | $112.18B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $212M | $7.33B | $8.22B | $10.79B | $30.24B |
PEGA vs CRM vs SAP vs ORCL vs MSFT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pegasystems Inc. (PEGA) | 100 | 77.2 | -22.8% |
| Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) | 100 | 106.6 | +6.6% |
| SAP SE (SAP) | 100 | 136.4 | +36.4% |
| Oracle Corporation (ORCL) | 100 | 361.8 | +261.8% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | 100 | 229.7 | +129.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PEGA vs CRM vs SAP vs ORCL vs MSFT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PEGA has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 16.6%, EPS growth 287.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.8%
- 16.6% revenue growth vs SAP's 7.7%
- 23.5% ROA vs CRM's 6.6%, ROIC 27.2% vs 10.9%
CRM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.82, yield 0.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.82, Low D/E 11.4%, current ratio 0.76x
- PEG 1.29 vs ORCL's 3.66
- Beta 0.82, yield 0.9%, current ratio 0.76x
SAP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 1.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs MSFT's 0.8%
ORCL is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +31.6% vs SAP's -39.6%
MSFT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 7.9% 10Y total return vs ORCL's 425.1%
- 39.3% margin vs CRM's 18.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.6% revenue growth vs SAP's 7.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.8x vs 25.3x), PEG 1.29 vs 1.35 | |
| Quality / Margins | 39.3% margin vs CRM's 18.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs ORCL's 1.59, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs MSFT's 0.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +31.6% vs SAP's -39.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 23.5% ROA vs CRM's 6.6%, ROIC 27.2% vs 10.9% |
PEGA vs CRM vs SAP vs ORCL vs MSFT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PEGA vs CRM vs SAP vs ORCL vs MSFT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PEGA leads in 2 of 6 categories
ORCL leads 1 • CRM leads 0 • SAP leads 0 • MSFT leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CRM and ORCL and MSFT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSFT is the larger business by revenue, generating $318.3B annually — 187.2x PEGA's $1.7B. MSFT is the more profitable business, keeping 39.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRM's 18.0%. On growth, ORCL holds the edge at +21.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.7B | $41.5B | $36.8B | $64.1B | $318.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $193M | $11.4B | $11.2B | $26.5B | $192.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $341M | $7.5B | $7.0B | $16.2B | $125.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $495M | $14.4B | $8.4B | -$24.7B | $72.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +75.0% | +77.7% | +73.8% | +66.4% | +68.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.2% | +21.5% | +26.7% | +30.8% | +46.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.0% | +18.0% | +19.1% | +25.3% | +39.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +29.1% | +34.7% | +22.8% | -38.6% | +22.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.6% | +12.1% | +3.3% | +21.7% | +18.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -60.0% | +18.3% | +15.4% | +24.5% | +23.4% |
Valuation Metrics
PEGA leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.2x trailing earnings, PEGA trades at a 62% valuation discount to ORCL's 44.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MSFT offers better value at 1.64x vs ORCL's 6.31x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.2B | $179.2B | $203.6B | $559.3B | $3.13T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.1B | $178.6B | $203.4B | $652.6B | $3.21T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.24x | 23.88x | 24.82x | 44.82x | 30.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.52x | 15.82x | 23.79x | 25.99x | 25.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.95x | 3.76x | 6.31x | 1.64x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.01x | 20.03x | 15.54x | 27.36x | 19.72x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.56x | 4.32x | 4.71x | 9.74x | 11.10x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.62x | 3.01x | 3.86x | 26.59x | 9.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.65x | 12.44x | 21.83x | — | 43.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PEGA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ORCL delivers a 56.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $56 in annual profit, vs $13 for CRM. PEGA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ORCL's 4.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SAP scores 9/9 vs MSFT's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +50.2% | +12.6% | +15.7% | +56.3% | +33.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +23.5% | +6.6% | +9.7% | +8.1% | +19.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +27.2% | +10.9% | +16.0% | +12.8% | +24.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +33.4% | +11.9% | +18.2% | +14.4% | +29.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.11x | 0.18x | 4.96x | 0.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$136M | -$590M | -$149M | $93.3B | $81.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $212M | $7.3B | $8.2B | $10.8B | $30.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $76M | $6.7B | $8.1B | $104.1B | $112.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 643.17x | 44.14x | 8.49x | 5.44x | 55.65x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ORCL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ORCL five years ago would be worth $25,183 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,170 for PEGA. Over the past 12 months, ORCL leads with a +31.6% total return vs SAP's -39.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ORCL at 27.3% vs CRM's -1.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -34.4% | -26.4% | -25.4% | -0.1% | -10.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -20.8% | -32.4% | -39.6% | +31.6% | -2.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +68.5% | -4.0% | +35.5% | +106.5% | +39.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -38.3% | -12.3% | +33.3% | +151.8% | +72.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +188.8% | +154.6% | +151.1% | +425.1% | +787.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.0% | -1.4% | +10.7% | +27.3% | +11.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CRM and MSFT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CRM is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ORCL's 1.59 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MSFT currently trades 75.8% from its 52-week high vs PEGA's 53.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.16x | 0.82x | 0.89x | 1.59x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $68.10 | $296.05 | $313.28 | $345.72 | $555.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $34.34 | $163.52 | $160.68 | $134.57 | $356.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +53.9% | +62.9% | +55.8% | +56.3% | +75.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.8 | 48.3 | 48.6 | 68.5 | 54.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.2M | 12.4M | 3.3M | 26.3M | 32.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SAP and MSFT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PEGA as "Buy", CRM as "Buy", SAP as "Buy", ORCL as "Buy", MSFT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 124.2% upside for SAP (target: $392) vs 31.1% for MSFT (target: $552). For income investors, SAP offers the higher dividend yield at 1.51% vs PEGA's 0.23%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $56.60 | $287.00 | $391.67 | $257.19 | $551.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 97 | 43 | 86 | 81 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | +0.9% | +1.5% | +0.9% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 | 2 | 18 | 19 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.08 | $1.66 | $2.24 | $1.65 | $3.23 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +8.3% | +7.0% | +1.1% | +0.3% | +0.6% |
PEGA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). ORCL leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
PEGA vs CRM vs SAP vs ORCL vs MSFT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PEGA or CRM or SAP or ORCL or MSFT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Pegasystems Inc.
(PEGA) is the stronger pick with 16. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 7% for SAP SE (SAP). Pegasystems Inc. (PEGA) offers the better valuation at 17. 2x trailing P/E (13. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Pegasystems Inc. (PEGA) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PEGA or CRM or SAP or ORCL or MSFT?
On trailing P/E, Pegasystems Inc.
(PEGA) is the cheapest at 17. 2x versus Oracle Corporation at 44. 8x. On forward P/E, Pegasystems Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Salesforce, Inc. wins at 1. 29x versus Oracle Corporation's 3. 66x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PEGA or CRM or SAP or ORCL or MSFT?
Over the past 5 years, Oracle Corporation (ORCL) delivered a total return of +151.
8%, compared to -38. 3% for Pegasystems Inc. (PEGA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MSFT returned +787. 7% versus SAP's +151. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PEGA or CRM or SAP or ORCL or MSFT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Salesforce, Inc.
(CRM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus Oracle Corporation's 1. 59β — meaning ORCL is approximately 94% more volatile than CRM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pegasystems Inc. (PEGA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 5% for Oracle Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PEGA or CRM or SAP or ORCL or MSFT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Pegasystems Inc.
(PEGA) is pulling ahead at 16. 6% versus 7. 7% for SAP SE (SAP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Pegasystems Inc. grew EPS 287. 3% year-over-year, compared to 15. 6% for Microsoft Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, MSFT leads at 12. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PEGA or CRM or SAP or ORCL or MSFT?
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the more profitable company, earning 36.
1% net margin versus 18. 0% for Salesforce, Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSFT leads at 45. 6% versus 15. 1% for PEGA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CRM leads at 77. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PEGA or CRM or SAP or ORCL or MSFT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 29x versus Oracle Corporation's 3. 66x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Pegasystems Inc. (PEGA) trades at 13. 5x forward P/E versus 26. 0x for Oracle Corporation — 12. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SAP: 124. 2% to $391. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — PEGA or CRM or SAP or ORCL or MSFT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
SAP SE (SAP) offers the highest yield at 1. 5%, versus 0. 2% for Pegasystems Inc. (PEGA).
09Is PEGA or CRM or SAP or ORCL or MSFT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
89), 0. 8% yield, +787. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSFT: +787. 7%, PEGA: +188. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PEGA and CRM and SAP and ORCL and MSFT?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PEGA is a small-cap high-growth stock; CRM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SAP is a large-cap quality compounder stock; ORCL is a large-cap quality compounder stock; MSFT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. CRM, SAP, ORCL, MSFT pay a dividend while PEGA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.