Apparel - Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RENT vs REAL vs W vs ETSY vs AMZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Luxury Goods
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
RENT vs REAL vs W vs ETSY vs AMZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Retail | Luxury Goods | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $18M | $3.59B | $8.71B | $6.07B | $2.92T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $315M | $723M | $12.66B | $2.86B | $742.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $11M | $-65M | $-305M | $285M | $90.80B |
| Gross Margin | 72.3% | 73.3% | 30.1% | 72.0% | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | -20.3% | -1.9% | 1.1% | 14.3% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 307.7x | 23.6x | 18.5x | 34.8x |
| Total Debt | $381M | $463M | $4.07B | $742M | $152.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $77M | $151M | $1.48B | $1.40B | $86.81B |
RENT vs REAL vs W vs ETSY vs AMZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rent the Runway, In… (RENT) | 100 | 1.4 | -98.6% |
| The RealReal, Inc. (REAL) | 100 | 95.2 | -4.8% |
| Wayfair Inc. (W) | 100 | 26.6 | -73.4% |
| Etsy, Inc. (ETSY) | 100 | 25.5 | -74.5% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 160.8 | +60.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RENT vs REAL vs W vs ETSY vs AMZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, RENT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
REAL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 15.4%, EPS growth 45.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.7%
- 15.4% revenue growth vs ETSY's 2.7%
W is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +117.4% vs RENT's +21.5%
ETSY has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.22
- Lower volatility, beta 1.22, current ratio 1.44x
- Beta 1.22, current ratio 1.44x
- Lower P/E (18.5x vs 34.8x)
AMZN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs ETSY's 6.8%
- 12.2% margin vs REAL's -9.0%
- 11.5% ROA vs REAL's -17.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.4% revenue growth vs ETSY's 2.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.5x vs 34.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs REAL's -9.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.22 vs REAL's 2.95 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +117.4% vs RENT's +21.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs REAL's -17.3% |
RENT vs REAL vs W vs ETSY vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RENT vs REAL vs W vs ETSY vs AMZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AMZN leads in 2 of 6 categories
RENT leads 0 • REAL leads 0 • W leads 0 • ETSY leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — REAL and ETSY each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 2361.8x RENT's $315M. AMZN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to REAL's -9.0%. On growth, REAL holds the edge at +18.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $315M | $723M | $12.7B | $2.9B | $742.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $36M | $11M | $428M | $508M | $155.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $11M | -$65M | -$305M | $285M | $90.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$14M | $13M | $456M | $673M | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.3% | +73.3% | +30.1% | +72.0% | +50.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -20.3% | -1.9% | +1.1% | +14.3% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.4% | -9.0% | -2.4% | +9.9% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.6% | +1.7% | +3.6% | +23.5% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.4% | +18.5% | +7.4% | +3.1% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.8% | -150.0% | +10.1% | +2.2% | +74.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — RENT and ETSY each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 37.8x trailing earnings, AMZN trades at a 18% valuation discount to ETSY's 46.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, RENT's 4.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than REAL's 430.5x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $18M | $3.6B | $8.7B | $6.1B | $2.92T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $321M | $3.9B | $11.3B | $5.4B | $2.98T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.26x | -18.24x | -27.36x | 46.03x | 37.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 307.69x | 23.63x | 18.51x | 34.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 1.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.30x | 430.51x | 35.11x | 11.53x | 20.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.06x | 5.19x | 0.70x | 2.11x | 4.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — | — | — | 7.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 195.62x | 18.78x | 9.51x | 378.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), W scores 7/9 vs ETSY's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | — | — | — | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.6% | -17.3% | -9.6% | +10.6% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -26.3% | — | — | — | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -22.5% | -15.0% | +1.4% | +22.9% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | — | — | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $303M | $312M | $2.6B | -$653M | $66.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $77M | $151M | $1.5B | $1.4B | $86.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $381M | $463M | $4.1B | $742M | $153.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.69x | -5.83x | -0.63x | 27.47x | 39.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMZN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $16,476 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $123 for RENT. Over the past 12 months, W leads with a +117.4% total return vs RENT's +21.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors REAL at 108.4% vs RENT's -53.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -41.5% | -21.5% | -37.9% | +11.7% | +19.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +21.5% | +75.9% | +117.4% | +39.3% | +43.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.2% | +805.1% | +65.6% | -31.0% | +156.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.8% | -45.6% | -78.3% | -61.3% | +64.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.8% | -57.1% | +67.0% | +681.2% | +697.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -53.9% | +108.4% | +18.3% | -11.7% | +36.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ETSY and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ETSY is the less volatile stock with a 1.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than REAL's 2.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs RENT's 46.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.68x | 2.95x | 2.85x | 1.22x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.13 | $17.39 | $119.98 | $76.52 | $278.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.69 | $4.70 | $29.75 | $44.00 | $185.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +46.8% | +71.3% | +55.2% | +83.6% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.7 | 66.3 | 38.6 | 59.1 | 81.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 80K | 3.3M | 3.6M | 2.8M | 45.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RENT as "Hold", REAL as "Buy", W as "Buy", ETSY as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 153.2% upside for RENT (target: $12) vs 9.5% for ETSY (target: $70).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.00 | $18.17 | $100.07 | $70.07 | $306.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 25 | 57 | 45 | 94 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +12.8% | 0.0% |
AMZN leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Profitability & Efficiency and Total Returns. 3 categories are tied.
RENT vs REAL vs W vs ETSY vs AMZN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RENT or REAL or W or ETSY or AMZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The RealReal, Inc.
(REAL) is the stronger pick with 15. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 7% for Etsy, Inc. (ETSY). Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) offers the better valuation at 37. 8x trailing P/E (34. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The RealReal, Inc. (REAL) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RENT or REAL or W or ETSY or AMZN?
On trailing P/E, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the cheapest at 37. 8x versus Etsy, Inc. at 46. 0x. On forward P/E, Etsy, Inc. is actually cheaper at 18. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RENT or REAL or W or ETSY or AMZN?
Over the past 5 years, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +64. 8%, compared to -98. 8% for Rent the Runway, Inc. (RENT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +697. 8% versus RENT's -98. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RENT or REAL or W or ETSY or AMZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Etsy, Inc.
(ETSY) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 22β versus The RealReal, Inc. 's 2. 95β — meaning REAL is approximately 142% more volatile than ETSY relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — RENT or REAL or W or ETSY or AMZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The RealReal, Inc.
(REAL) is pulling ahead at 15. 4% versus 2. 7% for Etsy, Inc. (ETSY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The RealReal, Inc. grew EPS 45. 2% year-over-year, compared to -40. 9% for Etsy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RENT leads at 14. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RENT or REAL or W or ETSY or AMZN?
Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus -22. 8% for Rent the Runway, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ETSY leads at 12. 8% versus -15. 5% for RENT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RENT leads at 73. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RENT or REAL or W or ETSY or AMZN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Etsy, Inc.
(ETSY) trades at 18. 5x forward P/E versus 307. 7x for The RealReal, Inc. — 289. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RENT: 153. 2% to $12. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — RENT or REAL or W or ETSY or AMZN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is RENT or REAL or W or ETSY or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Etsy, Inc.
(ETSY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 22), +681. 2% 10Y return). Rent the Runway, Inc. (RENT) carries a higher beta of 2. 68 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ETSY: +681. 2%, RENT: -98. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RENT and REAL and W and ETSY and AMZN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RENT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; REAL is a small-cap high-growth stock; W is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ETSY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.