Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SOWG vs HIMS vs SMPL vs NXRT vs NOMD

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SOWG
Sow Good Inc.

Packaged Foods

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1M
5Y Perf.-98.1%
HIMS
Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

Medical - Equipment & Services

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$6.63B
5Y Perf.+158.4%
SMPL
The Simply Good Foods Company

Packaged Foods

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.24B
5Y Perf.-27.0%
NXRT
NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.

REIT - Residential

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$756M
5Y Perf.-6.8%
NOMD
Nomad Foods Limited

Packaged Foods

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • GB
Market Cap$1.44B
5Y Perf.-52.2%

SOWG vs HIMS vs SMPL vs NXRT vs NOMD — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SOWG logoSOWG
HIMS logoHIMS
SMPL logoSMPL
NXRT logoNXRT
NOMD logoNOMD
IndustryPackaged FoodsMedical - Equipment & ServicesPackaged FoodsREIT - ResidentialPackaged Foods
Market Cap$1M$6.63B$1.24B$756M$1.44B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$2.35B$1.45B$252M$3.03B
Net Income (TTM)$-41M$128M$91M$-32M$137M
Gross Margin69.7%34.0%91.1%27.1%
Operating Margin4.6%14.4%11.5%10.7%
Forward P/E51.5x7.5x6.9x
Total Debt$2M$1.12B$304M$1.56B$2.29B
Cash & Equiv.$1M$229M$98M$14M$325M

SOWG vs HIMS vs SMPL vs NXRT vs NOMDLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SOWG
HIMS
SMPL
NXRT
NOMD
StockMay 20May 26Return
Sow Good Inc. (SOWG)1001.9-98.1%
Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS)100258.4+158.4%
The Simply Good Foo… (SMPL)10073.0-27.0%
NexPoint Residentia… (NXRT)10093.2-6.8%
Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD)10047.8-52.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SOWG vs HIMS vs SMPL vs NXRT vs NOMD

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: HIMS and NXRT are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns and recent price momentum and sentiment. NOMD and SMPL also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
SOWG
Sow Good Inc.
The Consumer Defensive Pick

Among these 5 stocks, SOWG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: consumer defensive exposure
HIMS
Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
The Growth Play

HIMS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 59.0%, EPS growth -3.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 64.5%
  • 59.0% revenue growth vs SOWG's -100.0%
  • 6.0% ROA vs SOWG's -123.1%, ROIC 10.7% vs -21.5%
Best for: growth exposure
SMPL
The Simply Good Foods Company
The Defensive Pick

SMPL is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.38, Low D/E 16.8%, current ratio 3.64x
  • 6.3% margin vs NXRT's -12.7%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
NXRT
NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

NXRT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.62, yield 7.1%
  • 211.1% 10Y total return vs HIMS's 161.9%
  • 7.1% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs NOMD's 7.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
  • -15.2% vs SOWG's -87.0%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
NOMD
Nomad Foods Limited
The Defensive Pick

NOMD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for defensive.

  • Beta 0.07, yield 7.1%, current ratio 1.07x
  • Better valuation composite
  • Beta 0.07 vs HIMS's 2.40, lower leverage
Best for: defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthHIMS logoHIMS59.0% revenue growth vs SOWG's -100.0%
ValueNOMD logoNOMDBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsSMPL logoSMPL6.3% margin vs NXRT's -12.7%
Stability / SafetyNOMD logoNOMDBeta 0.07 vs HIMS's 2.40, lower leverage
DividendsNXRT logoNXRT7.1% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs NOMD's 7.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)NXRT logoNXRT-15.2% vs SOWG's -87.0%
Efficiency (ROA)HIMS logoHIMS6.0% ROA vs SOWG's -123.1%, ROIC 10.7% vs -21.5%

SOWG vs HIMS vs SMPL vs NXRT vs NOMD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SOWGSow Good Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

HIMSHims & Hers Health, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

SMPLThe Simply Good Foods Company
FY 2025
Shipping and Handling
100.0%$103M
NXRTNexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

NOMDNomad Foods Limited

Segment breakdown not available.

SOWG vs HIMS vs SMPL vs NXRT vs NOMD — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNXRTLAGGINGSMPL

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

NXRT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

NOMD and SOWG operate at a comparable scale, with $3.0B and $0 in trailing revenue. SMPL is the more profitable business, keeping 6.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NXRT's -12.7%. On growth, HIMS holds the edge at +28.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSOWG logoSOWGSow Good Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…SMPL logoSMPLThe Simply Good F…NXRT logoNXRTNexPoint Resident…NOMD logoNOMDNomad Foods Limit…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$2.3B$1.4B$252M$3.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$5M$164M$231M$125M$435M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$41M$128M$91M-$32M$137M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$5M$73M$174M$79M$252M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+69.7%+34.0%+91.1%+27.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+4.6%+14.4%+11.5%+10.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+5.5%+6.3%-12.7%+4.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+3.1%+12.0%+31.2%+8.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-5.3%+28.4%-0.3%+0.5%-2.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-3.9%-27.3%-31.6%0.0%-123.1%
NXRT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

NOMD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 9.5x trailing earnings, NOMD trades at a 81% valuation discount to HIMS's 50.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SMPL's 6.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HIMS's 42.7x.

MetricSOWG logoSOWGSow Good Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…SMPL logoSMPLThe Simply Good F…NXRT logoNXRTNexPoint Resident…NOMD logoNOMDNomad Foods Limit…
Market CapShares × price$1M$6.6B$1.2B$756M$1.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1M$7.5B$1.4B$2.3B$3.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.02x50.32x12.20x-23.65x9.46x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.51.51x7.45x6.86x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.51x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple42.68x5.97x18.60x7.34x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.82x0.86x3.01x0.40x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share12.25x0.70x2.52x0.52x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF89.61x7.86x9.05x4.85x
NOMD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

HIMS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

HIMS delivers a 23.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-2 for SOWG. SMPL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NXRT's 5.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SMPL scores 5/9 vs SOWG's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricSOWG logoSOWGSow Good Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…SMPL logoSMPLThe Simply Good F…NXRT logoNXRTNexPoint Resident…NOMD logoNOMDNomad Foods Limit…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-2.1%+23.7%+5.2%-10.1%+5.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-123.1%+6.0%+3.7%-1.7%+2.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-21.5%+10.7%+8.1%+1.1%+5.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-29.4%+10.9%+9.4%+1.5%+6.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–914544
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage2.07x0.17x5.18x0.92x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$95,146$892M$206M$1.5B$2.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1M$229M$98M$14M$325M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2M$1.1B$304M$1.6B$2.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-33.23x6.77x0.47x2.52x
HIMS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — HIMS and NXRT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in HIMS five years ago would be worth $23,764 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $151 for SOWG. Over the past 12 months, NXRT leads with a -15.2% total return vs SOWG's -87.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HIMS at 29.4% vs SOWG's -73.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSOWG logoSOWGSow Good Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…SMPL logoSMPLThe Simply Good F…NXRT logoNXRTNexPoint Resident…NOMD logoNOMDNomad Foods Limit…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-76.6%-23.2%-36.4%+2.6%-15.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-87.0%-51.0%-64.8%-15.2%-43.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.1%+116.6%-67.8%-15.5%-40.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.5%+137.6%-64.3%-23.0%-59.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.6%+161.9%+3.7%+211.1%+40.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-73.3%+29.4%-31.5%-5.5%-15.8%
Evenly matched — HIMS and NXRT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NXRT and NOMD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

NOMD is the less volatile stock with a 0.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIMS's 2.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NXRT currently trades 77.8% from its 52-week high vs SOWG's 3.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSOWG logoSOWGSow Good Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…SMPL logoSMPLThe Simply Good F…NXRT logoNXRTNexPoint Resident…NOMD logoNOMDNomad Foods Limit…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.34x2.40x0.38x0.62x0.07x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$31.80$70.43$36.92$38.30$19.71
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.70$13.74$10.21$23.79$9.17
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+3.8%+36.4%+33.7%+77.8%+51.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10021.254.542.971.058.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded374K34.9M2.8M216K1.6M
Evenly matched — NXRT and NOMD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

NXRT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: HIMS as "Hold", SMPL as "Buy", NXRT as "Hold", NOMD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 62.1% upside for SMPL (target: $20) vs -9.4% for NXRT (target: $27). For income investors, NXRT offers the higher dividend yield at 7.07% vs NOMD's 7.06%.

MetricSOWG logoSOWGSow Good Inc.HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…SMPL logoSMPLThe Simply Good F…NXRT logoNXRTNexPoint Resident…NOMD logoNOMDNomad Foods Limit…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$29.67$20.17$27.00$13.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts19241013
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+7.1%+7.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises122
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.11$0.61
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.4%+4.1%+1.0%+16.5%
NXRT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

NXRT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). NOMD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallNexPoint Residential Trust,… (NXRT)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SOWG vs HIMS vs SMPL vs NXRT vs NOMD: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SOWG or HIMS or SMPL or NXRT or NOMD a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

(HIMS) is the stronger pick with 59. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Sow Good Inc. (SOWG). Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) offers the better valuation at 9. 5x trailing P/E (6. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SOWG or HIMS or SMPL or NXRT or NOMD?

On trailing P/E, Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) is the cheapest at 9.

5x versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. at 50. 3x. On forward P/E, Nomad Foods Limited is actually cheaper at 6. 9x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SOWG or HIMS or SMPL or NXRT or NOMD?

Over the past 5 years, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

(HIMS) delivered a total return of +137. 6%, compared to -98. 5% for Sow Good Inc. (SOWG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NXRT returned +211. 1% versus SOWG's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SOWG or HIMS or SMPL or NXRT or NOMD?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

07β versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. 's 2. 40β — meaning HIMS is approximately 3269% more volatile than NOMD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 5% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SOWG or HIMS or SMPL or NXRT or NOMD?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

(HIMS) is pulling ahead at 59. 0% versus -100. 0% for Sow Good Inc. (SOWG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hims & Hers Health, Inc. grew EPS -3. 8% year-over-year, compared to -30. 8% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HIMS leads at 64. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SOWG or HIMS or SMPL or NXRT or NOMD?

The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the more profitable company, earning 7.

1% net margin versus -12. 7% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SMPL leads at 15. 1% versus 0. 0% for SOWG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NXRT leads at 84. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SOWG or HIMS or SMPL or NXRT or NOMD more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) trades at 6.

9x forward P/E versus 51. 5x for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — 44. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SMPL: 62. 1% to $20. 17.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SOWG or HIMS or SMPL or NXRT or NOMD?

In this comparison, NXRT (7.

1% yield), NOMD (7. 1% yield) pay a dividend. SOWG, HIMS, SMPL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is SOWG or HIMS or SMPL or NXRT or NOMD better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

07), 7. 1% yield). Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) carries a higher beta of 2. 40 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NOMD: +40. 1%, HIMS: +161. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SOWG and HIMS and SMPL and NXRT and NOMD?

These companies operate in different sectors (SOWG (Consumer Defensive) and HIMS (Healthcare) and SMPL (Consumer Defensive) and NXRT (Real Estate) and NOMD (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: SOWG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock; SMPL is a small-cap deep-value stock; NXRT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NOMD is a small-cap deep-value stock. NXRT, NOMD pay a dividend while SOWG, HIMS, SMPL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SOWG

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HIMS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SMPL

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NXRT

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 54%
  • Dividend Yield > 2.8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NOMD

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 16%
  • Dividend Yield > 2.8%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SOWG and HIMS and SMPL and NXRT and NOMD on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SOWG: -525.3% · HIMS: 28.4%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.