Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SOWG vs USFD vs PFGC vs UNFI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Food Distribution
Food Distribution
Food Distribution
SOWG vs USFD vs PFGC vs UNFI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Food Distribution | Food Distribution | Food Distribution |
| Market Cap | $1M | $19.16B | $14.57B | $3.20B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $39.68B | $66.75B | $31.54B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-41M | $677M | $329M | $-78M |
| Gross Margin | — | 17.4% | 11.9% | 13.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | 3.1% | 1.2% | 0.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 18.2x | 19.9x | 19.5x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $5.72B | $8.00B | $3.45B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $41M | $79M | $44M |
SOWG vs USFD vs PFGC vs UNFI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sow Good Inc. (SOWG) | 100 | 1.9 | -98.1% |
| US Foods Holding Co… (USFD) | 100 | 453.9 | +353.9% |
| Performance Food Gr… (PFGC) | 100 | 347.9 | +247.9% |
| United Natural Food… (UNFI) | 100 | 255.2 | +155.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SOWG vs USFD vs PFGC vs UNFI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SOWG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
USFD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, current ratio 1.16x
- Lower P/E (18.2x vs 19.9x)
- 1.7% margin vs SOWG's -4.2%
- Beta 0.50 vs SOWG's 1.34
PFGC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.60
- Rev growth 8.6%, EPS growth -21.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.5%
- 249.2% 10Y total return vs USFD's 248.8%
- Beta 0.60, current ratio 1.58x
UNFI is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +88.7% vs SOWG's -87.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.6% revenue growth vs SOWG's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.2x vs 19.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.7% margin vs SOWG's -4.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs SOWG's 1.34 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +88.7% vs SOWG's -87.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.8% ROA vs SOWG's -123.1%, ROIC 9.3% vs -21.5% |
SOWG vs USFD vs PFGC vs UNFI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SOWG vs USFD vs PFGC vs UNFI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
USFD leads in 3 of 6 categories
UNFI leads 1 • SOWG leads 0 • PFGC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
USFD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PFGC and SOWG operate at a comparable scale, with $66.7B and $0 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 1.7% (USFD) to -0.2% (UNFI). On growth, PFGC holds the edge at +6.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $39.7B | $66.7B | $31.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | $1.6B | $1.0B | $417M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$41M | $677M | $329M | -$78M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | $848M | $1.0B | $395M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +17.4% | +11.9% | +13.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +3.1% | +1.2% | +0.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +1.7% | +0.5% | -0.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +2.1% | +1.5% | +1.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.3% | +2.8% | +6.4% | -2.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.9% | +6.1% | -27.0% | +7.4% |
Valuation Metrics
UNFI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 29.6x trailing earnings, USFD trades at a 31% valuation discount to PFGC's 42.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PFGC's 14.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than UNFI's 22.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1M | $19.2B | $14.6B | $3.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1M | $24.8B | $22.5B | $6.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.02x | 29.55x | 42.53x | -25.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 18.20x | 19.88x | 19.53x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 14.67x | 14.65x | 22.79x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.49x | 0.23x | 0.10x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 4.64x | 3.24x | 1.94x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 19.98x | 20.69x | 13.39x |
Profitability & Efficiency
USFD leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
USFD delivers a 15.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-2 for SOWG. USFD carries lower financial leverage with a 1.33x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UNFI's 2.22x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), USFD scores 7/9 vs SOWG's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.1% | +15.3% | +7.1% | -5.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -123.1% | +4.8% | +1.8% | -1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -21.5% | +9.3% | +5.7% | -0.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -29.4% | +12.0% | +7.1% | -0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.33x | 1.79x | 2.22x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $95,146 | $5.7B | $7.9B | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $41M | $79M | $44M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $5.7B | $8.0B | $3.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -33.23x | 3.94x | 1.69x | 0.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
USFD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in USFD five years ago would be worth $21,415 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $151 for SOWG. Over the past 12 months, UNFI leads with a +88.7% total return vs SOWG's -87.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors USFD at 31.2% vs SOWG's -73.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -76.6% | +16.4% | +5.3% | +49.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -87.0% | +25.7% | +11.8% | +88.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.1% | +125.7% | +51.6% | +86.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.5% | +114.1% | +69.7% | +36.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | +248.8% | +249.2% | +43.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -73.3% | +31.2% | +14.9% | +23.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — USFD and UNFI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
USFD is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SOWG's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UNFI currently trades 95.0% from its 52-week high vs SOWG's 3.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.34x | 0.50x | 0.60x | 0.97x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.80 | $102.13 | $109.05 | $52.68 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.70 | $66.89 | $77.44 | $20.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +3.8% | +85.1% | +85.0% | +95.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 21.2 | 51.0 | 59.3 | 70.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 374K | 2.2M | 1.7M | 696K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PFGC and UNFI each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: USFD as "Buy", PFGC as "Buy", UNFI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 24.7% upside for USFD (target: $108) vs -20.7% for UNFI (target: $40).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $108.33 | $111.75 | $39.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 25 | 25 | 43 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.1% | +0.5% | 0.0% |
USFD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). UNFI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
SOWG vs USFD vs PFGC vs UNFI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SOWG or USFD or PFGC or UNFI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Performance Food Group Company (PFGC) is the stronger pick with 8.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Sow Good Inc. (SOWG). US Foods Holding Corp. (USFD) offers the better valuation at 29. 6x trailing P/E (18. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate US Foods Holding Corp. (USFD) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SOWG or USFD or PFGC or UNFI?
On trailing P/E, US Foods Holding Corp.
(USFD) is the cheapest at 29. 6x versus Performance Food Group Company at 42. 5x. On forward P/E, US Foods Holding Corp. is actually cheaper at 18. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SOWG or USFD or PFGC or UNFI?
Over the past 5 years, US Foods Holding Corp.
(USFD) delivered a total return of +114. 1%, compared to -98. 5% for Sow Good Inc. (SOWG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PFGC returned +249. 2% versus SOWG's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SOWG or USFD or PFGC or UNFI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), US Foods Holding Corp.
(USFD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 50β versus Sow Good Inc. 's 1. 34β — meaning SOWG is approximately 167% more volatile than USFD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, US Foods Holding Corp. (USFD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 133% versus 2% for United Natural Foods, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SOWG or USFD or PFGC or UNFI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Performance Food Group Company (PFGC) is pulling ahead at 8.
6% versus -100. 0% for Sow Good Inc. (SOWG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: US Foods Holding Corp. grew EPS 45. 5% year-over-year, compared to -760. 0% for Sow Good Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PFGC leads at 7. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SOWG or USFD or PFGC or UNFI?
US Foods Holding Corp.
(USFD) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 7% net margin versus -0. 4% for United Natural Foods, Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: USFD leads at 3. 1% versus -0. 1% for UNFI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — USFD leads at 17. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SOWG or USFD or PFGC or UNFI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, US Foods Holding Corp.
(USFD) trades at 18. 2x forward P/E versus 19. 9x for Performance Food Group Company — 1. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for USFD: 24. 7% to $108. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — SOWG or USFD or PFGC or UNFI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is SOWG or USFD or PFGC or UNFI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, US Foods Holding Corp.
(USFD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 50), +248. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (USFD: +248. 8%, SOWG: -99. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SOWG and USFD and PFGC and UNFI?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.