UGP vs XOM vs MPC vs PSX

For growth investors, Ultrapar Participações S.

A. (UGP) is the stronger pick with 4. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 6% for Phillips 66 (PSX). Ultrapar Participações S. A. (UGP) offers the better valuation at 13. 3x trailing P/E (2. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ultrapar Participações S. A. (UGP) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Ultrapar Participações S.

A. (UGP) is the cheapest at 13. 3x versus Exxon Mobil Corporation at 21. 9x. On forward P/E, Ultrapar Participações S. A. is actually cheaper at 2. 5x.

Over the past 5 years, Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) delivered a total return of +329.

5%, compared to +67. 9% for Ultrapar Participações S. A. (UGP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MPC returned +664. 3% versus UGP's -24. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

15β versus Ultrapar Participações S. A. 's 0. 94β — meaning UGP is approximately -745% more volatile than XOM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 143% for Marathon Petroleum Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ultrapar Participações S.

A. (UGP) is pulling ahead at 4. 5% versus -7. 6% for Phillips 66 (PSX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Phillips 66 grew EPS 116. 2% year-over-year, compared to -14. 5% for Exxon Mobil Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, UGP leads at -1. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the more profitable company, earning 8.

9% net margin versus 1. 7% for Ultrapar Participações S. A. — meaning it keeps 8. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: XOM leads at 10. 5% versus 2. 7% for PSX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — XOM leads at 21. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Ultrapar Participações S.

A. (UGP) trades at 2. 5x forward P/E versus 14. 8x for Exxon Mobil Corporation — 12. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for XOM: 9. 5% to $160. 43.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Ultrapar Participações S. A. (UGP) offers the highest yield at 6. 7%, versus 1. 5% for Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

15), 2. 7% yield, +105. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (XOM: +105. 0%, UGP: -24. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: UGP is a small-cap deep-value stock; XOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock; MPC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PSX is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.