Marine Shipping
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
VNTG vs LOVE vs RH vs WSM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
VNTG vs LOVE vs RH vs WSM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $15M | $233M | $2.51B | $22.42B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $19M | $690M | $3.41B | $7.81B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $13M | $110M | $1.09B |
| Gross Margin | 46.2% | 57.7% | 44.5% | 46.2% |
| Operating Margin | 23.7% | 6.3% | 10.6% | 18.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 26.2x | 19.4x | 20.9x |
| Total Debt | $146K | $183M | $3.94B | $1.46B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $84M | $30M | $1.02B |
VNTG vs LOVE vs RH vs WSM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vantage Corp (VNTG) | 100 | 19.6 | -80.4% |
| The Lovesac Company (LOVE) | 100 | 87.7 | -12.3% |
| Rh (RH) | 100 | 70.8 | -29.2% |
| Williams-Sonoma, In… (WSM) | 100 | 111.5 | +11.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VNTG vs LOVE vs RH vs WSM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VNTG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and dividends.
- 20.6% margin vs LOVE's 1.9%
- 74.6% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs WSM's 1.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
- 23.1% ROA vs RH's 2.3%
LOVE is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.34, Low D/E 84.6%, current ratio 1.59x
- Beta 1.34, current ratio 1.59x
- Beta 1.34 vs RH's 2.33
RH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and value is your priority.
- 5.0% revenue growth vs VNTG's -6.7%
- Lower P/E (19.4x vs 20.9x)
WSM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 20 yrs, beta 1.49, yield 1.4%
- Rev growth 1.2%, EPS growth 0.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -3.5%
- 5.8% 10Y total return vs RH's 258.0%
- +14.9% vs VNTG's -81.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.0% revenue growth vs VNTG's -6.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (19.4x vs 20.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.6% margin vs LOVE's 1.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.34 vs RH's 2.33 | |
| Dividends | 74.6% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs WSM's 1.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +14.9% vs VNTG's -81.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 23.1% ROA vs RH's 2.3% |
VNTG vs LOVE vs RH vs WSM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
VNTG vs LOVE vs RH vs WSM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
VNTG leads in 1 of 6 categories
WSM leads 1 • LOVE leads 0 • RH leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — VNTG and RH each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WSM is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.8B annually — 418.4x VNTG's $19M. VNTG is the more profitable business, keeping 20.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LOVE's 1.9%. On growth, RH holds the edge at +8.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $19M | $690M | $3.4B | $7.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $58M | $465M | $1.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $13M | $110M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$11M | $128M | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +46.2% | +57.7% | +44.5% | +46.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.7% | +6.3% | +10.6% | +18.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.6% | +1.9% | +3.2% | +13.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.5% | -1.5% | +3.8% | +13.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +2.5% | +8.9% | -4.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -18.4% | +10.2% | -1.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — VNTG and LOVE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.6x trailing earnings, WSM trades at a 44% valuation discount to RH's 37.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, VNTG's 2.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RH's 14.2x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $15M | $233M | $2.5B | $22.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10M | $332M | $6.4B | $22.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | 23.13x | 36.99x | 20.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 26.24x | 19.37x | 20.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.33x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.03x | 11.72x | 14.17x | 13.88x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.82x | 0.34x | 0.79x | 2.87x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.24x | — | 10.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.66x | 13.35x | — | 21.24x |
Profitability & Efficiency
VNTG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RH delivers a 32.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $7 for LOVE. WSM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.70x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LOVE's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VNTG scores 5/9 vs WSM's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +105.7% | +6.5% | +32.9% | +51.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +23.1% | +2.6% | +2.3% | +20.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +3.3% | +6.9% | +44.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +99.5% | +3.6% | +9.3% | +41.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.85x | — | 0.70x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$6M | $99M | $3.9B | $437M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $84M | $30M | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $145,728 | $183M | $3.9B | $1.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 358.07x | — | 1.12x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WSM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WSM five years ago would be worth $20,545 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,879 for VNTG. Over the past 12 months, WSM leads with a +14.9% total return vs VNTG's -81.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WSM at 48.1% vs VNTG's -42.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.7% | +10.5% | -30.8% | -2.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -81.2% | -23.7% | -31.9% | +14.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.2% | -38.8% | -48.0% | +224.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.2% | -77.2% | -80.3% | +105.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.2% | -33.5% | +258.0% | +582.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -42.7% | -15.1% | -19.6% | +48.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — VNTG and WSM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VNTG is the less volatile stock with a -0.36 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RH's 2.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WSM currently trades 82.1% from its 52-week high vs VNTG's 9.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.36x | 1.34x | 2.33x | 1.49x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.66 | $21.90 | $257.00 | $221.81 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.70 | $10.33 | $106.31 | $147.39 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +9.8% | +72.9% | +52.1% | +82.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.8 | 51.9 | 50.6 | 45.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 52K | 299K | 1.2M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — VNTG and WSM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LOVE as "Buy", RH as "Buy", WSM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 55.4% upside for RH (target: $208) vs 10.0% for WSM (target: $200). For income investors, VNTG offers the higher dividend yield at 74.62% vs WSM's 1.41%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $22.50 | $208.00 | $200.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 | 37 | 56 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +74.6% | — | — | +1.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | 20 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.56 | — | — | $2.57 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +8.6% | +0.5% | +3.8% |
VNTG leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). WSM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.
VNTG vs LOVE vs RH vs WSM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VNTG or LOVE or RH or WSM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Rh (RH) is the stronger pick with 5.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 7% for Vantage Corp (VNTG). Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) offers the better valuation at 20. 6x trailing P/E (20. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Lovesac Company (LOVE) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VNTG or LOVE or RH or WSM?
On trailing P/E, Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
(WSM) is the cheapest at 20. 6x versus Rh at 37. 0x. On forward P/E, Rh is actually cheaper at 19. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VNTG or LOVE or RH or WSM?
Over the past 5 years, Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
(WSM) delivered a total return of +105. 5%, compared to -81. 2% for Vantage Corp (VNTG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WSM returned +582. 9% versus VNTG's -81. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VNTG or LOVE or RH or WSM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Vantage Corp (VNTG) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
36β versus Rh's 2. 33β — meaning RH is approximately -750% more volatile than VNTG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 70% versus 85% for The Lovesac Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VNTG or LOVE or RH or WSM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Rh (RH) is pulling ahead at 5.
0% versus -6. 7% for Vantage Corp (VNTG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Williams-Sonoma, Inc. grew EPS 0. 6% year-over-year, compared to -52. 4% for The Lovesac Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, LOVE leads at 11. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VNTG or LOVE or RH or WSM?
Vantage Corp (VNTG) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
6% net margin versus 1. 7% for The Lovesac Company — meaning it keeps 20. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VNTG leads at 23. 7% versus 2. 0% for LOVE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LOVE leads at 58. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VNTG or LOVE or RH or WSM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Rh (RH) trades at 19.
4x forward P/E versus 26. 2x for The Lovesac Company — 6. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RH: 55. 4% to $208. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — VNTG or LOVE or RH or WSM?
In this comparison, VNTG (74.
6% yield), WSM (1. 4% yield) pay a dividend. LOVE, RH do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is VNTG or LOVE or RH or WSM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Vantage Corp (VNTG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
36), 74. 6% yield). Rh (RH) carries a higher beta of 2. 33 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (VNTG: -81. 2%, RH: +258. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VNTG and LOVE and RH and WSM?
These companies operate in different sectors (VNTG (Industrials) and LOVE (Consumer Cyclical) and RH (Consumer Cyclical) and WSM (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: VNTG is a small-cap income-oriented stock; LOVE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WSM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. VNTG, WSM pay a dividend while LOVE, RH do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.