Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 12.0x · EV/EBITDA 13.1x · ROE 10.2%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $669M | $498M | $340M | $382M | $339M | $273M | $216M | $267M | $276M | $193M | $189M |
| Enterprise Value | $978M | $806M | $567M | $571M | $237M | $-364356115 | $-88030000 | $257M | $353M | $290M | $279M |
| P/E Ratio → | 12.02 | 13.43 | 10.68 | 12.06 | 9.59 | 9.81 | 11.74 | 11.26 | 12.70 | 19.70 | 17.36 |
| P/S Ratio | 4.09 | 3.82 | 3.14 | 3.59 | 3.23 | 2.90 | 2.32 | 3.44 | 3.78 | 3.20 | 3.83 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.61 | 1.18 | 1.12 | 1.38 | 1.38 | 1.00 | 0.84 | 1.41 | 1.64 | 1.26 | 1.58 |
| P/FCF | 8.60 | 9.46 | 8.76 | 9.69 | 9.07 | 6.72 | 8.84 | 10.99 | 9.93 | 12.68 | 19.34 |
| P/OCF | 12.48 | 9.27 | 8.55 | 9.41 | 8.65 | 6.47 | 8.48 | 10.38 | 9.35 | 11.37 | 15.60 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 6.19 | 5.23 | 5.36 | 2.26 | -3.88 | -0.94 | 3.31 | 4.84 | 4.80 | 5.66 |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.14 | 15.15 | 13.04 | 13.21 | 4.86 | -9.47 | -3.34 | 8.01 | 11.95 | 15.52 | 16.98 |
| EV / EBIT | 21.05 | 17.35 | 14.02 | 14.33 | 5.27 | -10.40 | -3.88 | 8.74 | 13.23 | 17.69 | 19.06 |
| EV / FCF | — | 15.33 | 14.60 | 14.48 | 6.34 | -8.99 | -3.60 | 10.56 | 12.71 | 19.04 | 28.54 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 96.4% | 96.4% | 102.6% | 99.2% | 100.0% | 99.9% | 90.2% | 99.2% | 97.8% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Operating Margin | 35.7% | 35.7% | 37.3% | 37.4% | 42.9% | 37.2% | 24.4% | 37.8% | 36.6% | 27.1% | 29.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | 28.4% | 28.4% | 29.4% | 29.8% | 34.1% | 29.6% | 19.7% | 30.6% | 29.8% | 16.2% | 22.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 10.2% | 10.2% | 11.0% | 12.1% | 13.8% | 10.5% | 8.2% | 13.3% | 13.5% | 7.1% | 9.3% |
| ROA | 1.3% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 1.0% | 0.9% | 1.4% | 1.3% | 0.7% | 0.9% |
| ROIC | 5.3% | 5.3% | 5.5% | 7.1% | 10.3% | 7.5% | 5.3% | 7.6% | 7.0% | 4.8% | 4.8% |
| ROCE | 2.5% | 2.5% | 7.4% | 10.2% | 14.7% | 10.7% | 7.5% | 10.9% | 10.2% | 7.1% | 7.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.90 | 0.92 | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0.37 | 0.55 | 0.70 | 0.85 | 0.91 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 6.19 | 6.19 | 6.30 | 5.90 | 1.36 | 1.90 | 3.62 | 3.24 | 4.00 | 7.03 | 6.62 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.68 | -0.42 | -2.34 | -1.18 | -0.05 | 0.46 | 0.63 | 0.75 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 5.80 | 5.80 | 5.22 | 4.37 | -2.09 | -16.56 | -11.54 | -0.32 | 2.61 | 5.19 | 5.47 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 5.87 | 5.84 | 4.79 | -2.73 | -15.71 | -12.45 | -0.43 | 2.78 | 6.37 | 9.20 |
| Interest Coverage | 1.16 | 1.16 | 1.69 | 4.79 | 12.40 | 5.06 | 1.86 | 2.90 | 3.61 | 3.02 | 3.72 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.32 | 0.32 | 0.04 | 0.27 | 0.32 | 0.47 | 0.33 | 0.21 | 0.15 | 0.14 | 0.16 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.32 | 0.32 | 0.04 | 0.27 | 0.32 | 0.47 | 0.33 | 0.21 | 0.15 | 0.14 | 0.16 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.32 | 0.32 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 0.29 | 0.18 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.1% | 2.9% | 3.2% | 2.5% | 2.7% | 3.3% | 4.0% | 2.6% | 2.3% | 2.7% | 2.6% |
| Payout Ratio | 38.8% | 38.8% | 33.6% | 30.6% | 25.5% | 32.2% | 47.2% | 29.2% | 28.8% | 53.5% | 44.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 8.3% | 7.4% | 9.4% | 8.3% | 10.4% | 10.2% | 8.5% | 8.9% | 7.9% | 5.1% | 5.8% |
| FCF Yield | 11.6% | 10.6% | 11.4% | 10.3% | 11.0% | 14.9% | 11.3% | 9.1% | 10.1% | 7.9% | 5.2% |
| Buyback Yield | 1.7% | 2.2% | 0.1% | 0.5% | 2.0% | 0.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 3.8% | 5.1% | 3.2% | 3.1% | 4.7% | 3.8% | 4.0% | 2.6% | 2.3% | 2.7% | 2.6% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $10M | $9M | $9M | $9M | $9M | $9M | $7M | $7M | $7M | $6M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ACNB stock.
ACNB Corporation's current P/E ratio is 12.0x. The historical average is 12.9x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
ACNB Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 13.1x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 14.3x.
ACNB Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 10.2%. The historical average is 11.1%.
Based on historical data, ACNB Corporation is trading at a P/E of 12.0x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
ACNB Corporation's current dividend yield is 2.13% with a payout ratio of 38.8%.
ACNB Corporation has 96.4% gross margin and 35.7% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
ACNB Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 6.2x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Deposit beta and leverage pressure
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Regional Bank Multiple Masks Insurance Premium
At a P/B of 1.61 and forward P/E of 11.46, ACNB trades in line with regional peers, and based on reported figures the market appears to price it as a commodity balance sheet rather than a franchise with a capital-light insurance arm.
The trailing P/E of 18.21 is inflated by the depressed earnings of 2025Q1 and the volatile provision cycle, so the forward P/E of 11.46 is the more informative multiple for near-term earnings power. A P/B of 1.61 against a return on equity that has recovered to 3.7% in 2026Q3 implies the market is capitalizing a return well below peer levels such as FUNC at 12.9% and NKSH at 11.5%. This gap suggests investors should monitor whether sustained ROE expansion, rather than balance sheet growth alone, is required to justify the current multiple.
Thin ROE Driven by Low Leverage Utilization
ACNB's reported ROE of 3.7% in 2026Q3 is decomposed into a net interest margin of 1.1%, an equity-to-assets ratio near 13%, and a fee share of 20.6%, which together indicate a low-return, highly capitalized structure.
The DuPont breakdown shows ROA of 0.5% multiplied by an equity multiplier near 7.7x, so the ROE is constrained more by asset yield than by leverage. A NIM of 1.1% is modest for a community bank, which suggests the Frederick County Bank integration and the recent equity build have diluted returns before the margin has fully re-rated. Investors should monitor whether NIM expansion can lift ROA toward 0.8% to 1.0%, since the current equity base leaves little room for ROE improvement from leverage alone.
Efficiency Gains Offset Margin Compression
According to reported quarterly results, the efficiency ratio improved from 85.6% in 2025Q1 to 53.0% in 2026Q3 while NIM was broadly flat near 1.0%, indicating that operating leverage rather than margin expansion drove recent profitability gains.
Revenue growth outpacing non-interest expense is the primary reason the efficiency ratio fell by roughly 32 points over the period, which is a meaningful operating improvement. The NIM has held in a narrow 0.8% to 1.1% band, which may suggest deposit cost pressure from digital competitors is offsetting asset yield gains. Continued efficiency progress is likely to matter more than NIM movement, though a reversal toward the mid-50s would warrant further investigation.
Equity Build Leaves Room for Capital Return
Based on reported figures, ACNB's equity-to-assets near 13% and tangible book value per share rising from $29.18 in 2025Q2 to $33.11 in 2026Q3 suggest capital generation outpacing consumption.
Tangible book value growth of roughly 13% over five quarters indicates retained earnings are compounding the capital base without requiring external issuance. A capital ratio near 13% equity-to-assets appears comfortably above typical community bank thresholds, which may support continued dividends and selective buybacks. The minimal repurchase activity suggests management is likely prioritizing capacity for acquisitions, which warrants monitoring against actual deployment.
Provision Volatility Obscures Credit Trend
As reported in financial statements, provisions swung from a $5.5M charge in 2025Q1 to zero in 2026Q1 and $903K in 2026Q3, a pattern that limits confidence in the underlying loss trajectory despite apparent normalization.
The provision series is too erratic to establish a reliable run-rate loss estimate, and the zero provision in 2026Q1 may reflect reserve release rather than improved credit conditions. Under CECL, forward-looking macro assumptions can drive quarterly provisions independently of actual charge-offs, which may explain part of the swing. Investors should monitor the reserve-to-loans ratio and agricultural and CRE delinquency trends for signs of true credit stability.
Leverage Ratio Misread as Solvency Risk
Based on the reported Debt-to-Equity of 0.78, the ratio is most often misapplied to banks as a solvency signal, when for a deposit-funded institution it largely reflects borrowings and does not capture the stability of the core deposit base.
Debt-to-equity treats deposits as operating liabilities rather than debt, so a figure of 0.78 may overstate financial risk relative to a bank funded predominantly by sticky local deposits. The more informative measures are the CET1 ratio, the loan-to-deposit ratio, and the share of noninterest-bearing deposits, which together describe funding stability and loss-absorbing capacity. Investors should monitor these alternatives, as the Debt-to-Equity figure alone warrants further investigation rather than a conclusion of excess risk.