Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 34.6x · EV/EBITDA 18.5x · ROE 5.9%. (1998–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $12.0B | $11.7B | $12.9B | $18.5B | $19.6B | $16.2B | $16.8B | $15.1B | $15.1B | $15.6B | $13.8B |
| Enterprise Value | $11.4B | $11.1B | $12.6B | $18.8B | $19.9B | $16.7B | $17.2B | $15.6B | $15.4B | $16.1B | $14.0B |
| P/E Ratio → | 34.56 | 33.02 | 29.74 | 109.57 | 137.99 | — | 19.36 | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 3.73 | 3.64 | 4.53 | 7.64 | 9.33 | 8.75 | 9.03 | 8.88 | 10.12 | 11.84 | 12.33 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.02 | 1.93 | 2.29 | 3.73 | 4.25 | 3.79 | 4.09 | 4.85 | 5.09 | 5.54 | 4.98 |
| P/FCF | 16.59 | 16.18 | 27.20 | 357.68 | 355.93 | 87.18 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 14.52 | 14.17 | 22.57 | 116.00 | 111.17 | 53.05 | 196.90 | 313.66 | 746.95 | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.43 | 4.43 | 7.78 | 9.51 | 9.02 | 9.27 | 9.13 | 10.35 | 12.28 | 12.58 |
| EV / EBITDA | 18.52 | 18.05 | 21.76 | 64.84 | 75.78 | 648.19 | 279.37 | 3212.70 | — | 220.47 | — |
| EV / EBIT | 21.29 | 22.42 | 22.80 | 92.96 | 121.95 | — | — | — | — | 5191.53 | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 15.26 | 26.58 | 364.28 | 362.64 | 89.89 | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 77.1% | 77.1% | 79.7% | 78.0% | 76.0% | 74.5% | 71.8% | 78.9% | 78.9% | 81.6% | 81.2% |
| Operating Margin | 16.6% | 16.6% | 17.0% | 7.7% | 7.7% | -4.5% | -2.3% | -5.9% | -8.3% | -1.1% | -71.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | 10.8% | 10.8% | 15.0% | 6.9% | 6.8% | -3.5% | 45.9% | -1.4% | -5.2% | -8.9% | -56.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 5.9% | 5.9% | 8.0% | 3.5% | 3.2% | -1.5% | 23.6% | -0.8% | -2.7% | -4.2% | -24.4% |
| ROA | 4.8% | 4.8% | 6.2% | 2.5% | 2.3% | -1.1% | 16.2% | -0.5% | -1.7% | -2.7% | -16.3% |
| ROIC | 7.4% | 7.4% | 6.8% | 2.7% | 2.5% | -1.3% | -0.8% | -2.2% | -2.8% | -0.3% | -21.1% |
| ROCE | 8.1% | 8.1% | 8.0% | 3.2% | 2.9% | -1.5% | -1.0% | -2.6% | -3.2% | -0.4% | -23.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.22 | 0.24 | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.42 | 0.25 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.05 | 1.05 | 1.12 | 3.78 | 4.16 | 42.40 | 17.61 | 177.33 | — | 16.05 | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.11 | -0.05 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.11 | 0.21 | 0.10 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -1.09 | -1.09 | -0.51 | 1.17 | 1.40 | 19.54 | 7.09 | 87.01 | — | 7.88 | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | -0.92 | -0.62 | 6.60 | 6.71 | 2.71 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 45.27 | 45.27 | 43.75 | 11.68 | 10.23 | -3.95 | -0.73 | -3.13 | -2.27 | 0.07 | -20.13 |
Net cash position: cash ($1.3B) exceeds total debt ($643M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 5.21 | 5.21 | 5.33 | 2.51 | 4.67 | 4.16 | 4.76 | 2.08 | 3.93 | 2.70 | 3.24 |
| Quick Ratio | 3.50 | 3.50 | 3.29 | 1.57 | 3.15 | 2.74 | 3.34 | 1.35 | 2.92 | 2.12 | 2.43 |
| Cash Ratio | 2.06 | 2.06 | 1.87 | 0.91 | 2.19 | 1.86 | 2.16 | 0.81 | 2.07 | 1.71 | 1.80 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.42 | 0.41 | 0.35 | 0.33 | 0.31 | 0.32 | 0.36 | 0.34 | 0.28 | 0.28 |
| Inventory Turnover | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.47 | 0.48 | 0.56 | 0.61 | 0.75 | 0.53 | 0.59 | 0.51 | 0.59 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 102.91 | 84.48 | 95.61 | 80.33 | 73.82 | 87.96 | 80.84 | 83.86 | 72.62 | 70.36 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.9% | 3.0% | 3.4% | 0.9% | 0.7% | — | 5.2% | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 6.0% | 6.2% | 3.7% | 0.3% | 0.3% | 1.1% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $197M | $197M | $192M | $189M | $183M | $192M | $179M | $177M | $174M | $166M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 28 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying BMRN stock.
BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 34.6x. The historical average is 58.1x. This places it at the 57th percentile of its historical range.
BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 18.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 46.5x.
BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 5.9%. The historical average is -17.7%.
Based on historical data, BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. is trading at a P/E of 34.6x. This is at the 57th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. has 77.1% gross margin and 16.6% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.0x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Amicus integration and debt surge
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Resilience Amid Integration Costs
Gross margin held at 79.5% in 2026Q2, but operating margin compressed to 11.2% from 33.5% a year earlier, reflecting Amicus integration costs, per the latest quarterly report.
The gross margin decline from 81.8% to 79.5% year-over-year is modest, suggesting the combined product mix retains pricing power, but the operating margin collapse from 33.5% to 11.2% indicates that SG&A and integration expenses are absorbing the incremental revenue. Net margin fell to 4.5% from 29.1%, yet this appears driven by one-time charges rather than a structural deterioration in the core business. Investors should monitor whether operating leverage returns as integration synergies materialize, as the underlying ERT and Voxzogo franchises appear fundamentally profitable.
Return on Capital Compressed by Acquisition
ROIC dropped to 1.1% in 2026Q2 from 3.9% in 2025Q2, per reported figures, as the Amicus acquisition expanded the capital base faster than earnings, indicating a temporary dilution of returns.
The decline in ROIC from 3.9% to 1.1% is largely attributable to the $5.1B Amicus outlay, which increased invested capital without an immediate earnings contribution. Historically, ROIC has been volatile, ranging from -0.6% to 3.9% over the past ten quarters, reflecting the lumpy nature of rare disease revenue and R&D spending. If management successfully integrates Amicus and accelerates GALAFOLD and POMBILITI, ROIC could recover, but the current level suggests the market is pricing in a multi-year turnaround. The low asset turnover of 0.10x indicates that the expanded asset base is not yet generating sufficient sales, a key metric to watch.
Working Capital Stretched by Inventory Build
Cash conversion cycle lengthened to 596 days in 2026Q2 from 697 days a year earlier, per financial statements, driven by a spike in days inventory outstanding to 686, indicating potential overstocking or slow-moving gene therapy inventory.
The CCC improvement from 697 to 596 days is misleading because DIO remains elevated at 686 days, far above the historical range of 418-894 days, suggesting that inventory levels for products like Roctavian may be building ahead of demand. DSO improved to 90 days from 88 days, while DPO rose to 180 days from 183 days, indicating stable payment terms with suppliers. The high DIO warrants scrutiny, as any product expiration could lead to write-downs, especially for high-cost gene therapies. Asset turnover remains low at 0.10x, reflecting the capital-intensive nature of biologics manufacturing and the recent acquisition.
Leverage Surge Post-Amicus Acquisition
Debt-to-equity jumped to 0.66 in 2026Q2 from 0.23 in 2026Q1, with interest coverage falling to 1.97x, per SEC filings, indicating the Amicus financing has significantly increased financial risk.
The debt-to-equity increase from 0.23 to 0.66 reflects the $4.2B in total debt taken on to fund the Amicus acquisition, a strategic move that shifts the balance sheet from a net cash position to a leveraged one. Interest coverage of 1.97x is thin, down from 10.44x in the prior quarter, meaning operating income barely covers interest expense, which could constrain financial flexibility if earnings falter. D/EBITDA of 20.15x is elevated, but this is distorted by the low trailing EBITDA; as integration benefits accrue, this ratio should normalize. Investors should monitor covenant compliance and the company's ability to deleverage through free cash flow, which averaged 20.6% of revenue over the last four quarters.
Liquidity Buffer Compressed by Deal
Current ratio fell to 2.39 in 2026Q2 from 5.81 in 2026Q1, while cash dropped to $874M, per the balance sheet, reflecting the Amicus cash outlay and reduced short-term cushion.
The current ratio remains above 2.0, indicating adequate short-term liquidity, but the rapid decline from 5.81 to 2.39 highlights the cash drain from the acquisition. The quick ratio of 1.32 suggests that even without inventory, the company can cover current liabilities, though the reliance on inventory is higher than before. With $874M in cash and $4.2B in debt, the company's liquidity position is adequate but not robust; a severe operational shock could strain its ability to meet obligations. The $5.1B acquisition outflow in 2026Q2, per the cash flow statement, underscores the need for strong cash generation from the combined portfolio to rebuild the buffer.
Misapplied P/E on Transitional Earnings
The trailing P/E of 39.02 is misleading given the one-time charges from the Amicus acquisition; forward P/E of 14.21 better reflects normalized earnings, but investors should adjust for integration costs.
The trailing P/E of 39.02 is based on depressed net income of $44.8M in 2026Q2, which included significant integration costs and a lower operating margin. The forward P/E of 14.21 implies the market expects a sharp earnings recovery, but this may be overly optimistic if integration costs persist or if Roctavian continues to underperform. A more appropriate metric is EV/EBITDA, which at 21.05x is elevated relative to the sector, but this reflects the acquisition's impact on enterprise value. Investors should use a normalized earnings figure that excludes one-time charges and stock-based compensation to assess the company's true earning power, as the current P/E does not capture the underlying profitability of the ERT and Voxzogo franchises.