Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 37.8x · EV/EBITDA 34.0x · ROE 50.4%. (2014–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $70.2B | $94.6B | $26.9B | $10.6B | $478M | $19.2B | $15.6B | $4.3B | $982M | $291M | — |
| Enterprise Value | $73.3B | $97.8B | $31.2B | $16.8B | $8.9B | $24.6B | $17.1B | $5.9B | $1.5B | $421M | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 37.85 | 49.94 | 127.89 | 70.60 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 3.45 | 4.66 | 1.97 | 0.99 | 0.04 | 1.50 | 2.79 | 1.09 | 0.50 | 0.34 | — |
| P/B Ratio | 17.06 | 22.52 | 19.55 | — | — | 36.56 | 19.42 | 22.47 | 4.32 | 1.04 | — |
| P/FCF | 78.91 | 106.46 | 32.51 | 14.83 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 67.72 | 91.36 | 29.29 | 13.23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 4.81 | 2.28 | 1.56 | 0.65 | 1.92 | 3.07 | 1.49 | 0.79 | 0.49 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 34.02 | 45.38 | 23.88 | 61.75 | — | 24565.20 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 38.99 | — | 29.70 | 20.81 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 110.05 | 37.74 | 23.46 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 20.6% | 20.6% | 19.8% | 16.0% | 7.4% | 14.2% | 12.9% | 11.8% | 8.9% | 6.6% | 4.0% |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | 9.3% | 7.3% | -0.7% | -11.0% | -0.8% | -5.9% | -7.1% | -11.7% | -18.1% | -24.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | 6.9% | 6.9% | 1.5% | 4.2% | -11.7% | -1.1% | -3.1% | -2.9% | -2.8% | -2.1% | -2.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 50.4% | 50.4% | 42.4% | — | — | -20.4% | -34.5% | -54.7% | -21.9% | -8.8% | -10.1% |
| ROA | 13.0% | 13.0% | 2.7% | 5.7% | -20.2% | -2.7% | -6.7% | -7.5% | -6.8% | -3.7% | -4.3% |
| ROIC | 21.5% | 21.5% | 13.1% | -0.9% | -16.9% | -1.9% | -12.2% | -16.7% | -28.8% | -34.5% | -40.6% |
| ROCE | 20.0% | 20.0% | 15.8% | -1.4% | -29.1% | -3.1% | -17.7% | -30.2% | -45.9% | -65.5% | -87.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.31 | 1.31 | 4.40 | — | — | 11.00 | 2.33 | 8.42 | 2.79 | 1.08 | 1.26 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.56 | 2.56 | 4.63 | 24.65 | — | 5774.00 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.76 | 3.15 | — | — | 10.23 | 1.96 | 8.03 | 2.44 | 0.46 | 0.97 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.48 | 1.48 | 3.31 | 22.71 | — | 5371.00 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | 3.59 | 5.24 | 8.63 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -0.76 | -0.76 | 1.61 | 1.28 | -4.95 | -0.63 | -2.52 | -3.52 | -9.18 | -20.45 | -24.96 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 4.31 | 4.31 | 3.64 | 2.16 | 1.77 | 1.69 | 4.12 | 1.57 | 2.01 | 1.60 | 1.40 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.73 | 2.73 | 2.44 | 1.41 | 1.05 | 0.60 | 1.90 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 0.86 | 0.46 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.85 | 1.85 | 1.63 | 0.58 | 0.29 | 0.27 | 0.92 | 0.20 | 0.24 | 0.56 | 0.20 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.54 | 1.61 | 1.52 | 1.56 | 1.83 | 1.84 | 1.91 | 1.97 | 1.34 | 1.09 |
| Inventory Turnover | 6.70 | 6.70 | 6.82 | 7.87 | 6.72 | 3.49 | 4.70 | 4.55 | 4.32 | 3.53 | 1.89 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 4.49 | 8.09 | 9.01 | 6.79 | 5.87 | 5.16 | 3.69 | 6.18 | 5.99 | 5.69 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.5% | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.6% | 2.0% | 0.8% | 1.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 1.3% | 0.9% | 3.1% | 6.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.0% | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $1.1B | $661M | $1.0B | $504M | $414M | $325M | $234M | $150M | $76M | $75M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 12 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CVNA stock.
Carvana Co.'s current P/E ratio is 37.8x. The historical average is 82.8x.
Carvana Co.'s current EV/EBITDA is 34.0x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 43.7x.
Carvana Co.'s return on equity (ROE) is 50.4%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is -21.8%.
Based on historical data, Carvana Co. is trading at a P/E of 37.8x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Carvana Co. has 20.6% gross margin and 9.3% operating margin.
Carvana Co.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.6x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Revenue growth sustainability
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Expansion Drives Profitability
Operating margin expanded from 4.4% in 2024Q1 to 9.2% in 2026Q2, as per financial statements, while gross margin held near 19-21%, indicating strong operating leverage.
The steady gross margin around 19-21% suggests Carvana maintains pricing power despite rapid growth, but the slight decline from 21.2% in 2025Q2 to 18.8% in 2026Q2 warrants monitoring. Operating margin improvement from 4.4% to 9.2% over ten quarters reflects significant operating leverage, as fixed costs are spread over a larger revenue base. Net margin spiked to 15.3% in 2025Q4, likely due to a one-time gain, so the sustainable earning power is better captured by operating margin, which remains in the high single digits.
ROIC Recovery from Depressed Levels
ROIC improved from 1.7% in 2024Q1 to 6.4% in 2026Q2, as reported in financial statements, though still below the cost of capital, indicating ongoing value creation.
ROIC has more than tripled from 1.7% to 6.4% over the period, driven by margin expansion and improved asset turnover, which rose from 0.44 to 0.52. However, ROIC remains below typical cost of capital estimates (8-10%), suggesting that while returns are improving, they have not yet reached a level that would justify the current valuation. The sharp ROE spike to 42.4% in 2024Q3 was likely due to a low equity base, as equity has since grown dramatically, normalizing ROE to around 6-9% in recent quarters.
Working Capital Efficiency Improves
Cash conversion cycle shortened from 49 days in 2024Q4 to 42 days in 2026Q2, as per SEC filings, driven by faster receivables collection and stable inventory days.
The CCC improvement from 49 to 42 days is modest but positive, with DSO dropping from 9 to 10 days (though 2026Q1 showed 4 days, likely a timing artifact) and DIO stable around 40-48 days. DPO has been volatile, swinging from 5 to 14 days, which may indicate changing payment terms with suppliers. Asset turnover improved from 0.44 to 0.52, reflecting better utilization of the asset base, but remains low compared to traditional dealerships, highlighting the capital intensity of the inventory model.
Leverage Normalizes from Peak
Debt-to-equity fell from 53.45 in 2024Q2 to 1.09 in 2026Q2, as reported in financial statements, while interest coverage improved from 1.28 to 6.73.
The dramatic deleveraging is primarily due to equity growth from $289M to $4.0B, as total debt remained stable near $5.6B. Interest coverage improved from 1.28 to 6.73, indicating that debt service is now more comfortable, though the negative coverage in 2025Q4 was due to a one-time gain inflating EBIT. D/EBITDA has declined from 29.66 to 7.50, but remains elevated, suggesting that while leverage is manageable, it is still high relative to EBITDA, and refinancing risk should be monitored given the stable debt level.
Liquidity Buffer Strengthens
Current ratio improved from 2.54 in 2024Q1 to 3.93 in 2026Q2, as per the latest quarterly report, with cash more than doubling to $2.6B.
The current ratio of 3.93 indicates a strong liquidity position, well above the 1.5-2.0 typical for retailers, and the quick ratio of 2.33 suggests that even without inventory, current assets cover current liabilities comfortably. Cash of $2.6B provides a robust buffer against operational shocks, though the large working capital swings (e.g., $823M outflow in 2026Q2) could strain liquidity if they persist. The improvement from 2.54 to 3.93 over ten quarters reflects both equity growth and better working capital management.
Misapplied EV/EBITDA Multiple
EV/EBITDA of 39.23 appears extreme, but forward EV/EBITDA of 339.29 suggests the market expects EBITDA to collapse, as per reported figures, making the metric misleading.
The trailing EV/EBITDA of 39.23 is high, but the forward multiple of 339.29 implies that analysts expect EBITDA to decline sharply, which seems inconsistent with the company's improving operating margins. This discrepancy may be due to the inclusion of one-time gains in trailing EBITDA or a forecast of higher depreciation and interest costs. For a capital-intensive used-car retailer, EV/EBITDA can be distorted by the large amount of inventory financing and securitization debt, which are not captured in EBITDA. A more appropriate metric is EV/EBIT or EV/EBITDAR, which adjusts for the lease-like nature of inventory financing and provides a clearer picture of core operating profitability.