Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 41.6x · EV/EBITDA 25.1x · ROE 7.6%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $10.9B | $9.5B | $7.8B | $8.3B | $6.3B | $9.2B | $5.4B | $5.0B | $3.3B | $3.0B | $2.4B |
| Enterprise Value | $12.6B | $11.3B | $9.4B | $10.0B | $8.2B | $10.7B | $6.7B | $6.2B | $4.4B | $4.1B | $3.5B |
| P/E Ratio → | 41.60 | 36.58 | 34.44 | 41.52 | 33.96 | 58.42 | 50.02 | 57.19 | 36.84 | 36.22 | 25.20 |
| P/S Ratio | 15.10 | 13.18 | 12.29 | 14.69 | 12.98 | 22.47 | 14.94 | 15.05 | 10.89 | 10.98 | 9.52 |
| P/B Ratio | 3.09 | 2.72 | 2.38 | 3.19 | 3.24 | 5.85 | 4.27 | 4.14 | 3.60 | 4.01 | 3.75 |
| P/FCF | 26.91 | 23.49 | 21.97 | 28.98 | 22.94 | 41.85 | 33.25 | 31.48 | 25.60 | 23.35 | 20.91 |
| P/OCF | 22.66 | 19.78 | 18.84 | 24.60 | 19.98 | 35.87 | 27.64 | 25.41 | 19.77 | 19.41 | 17.35 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 15.61 | 14.69 | 17.61 | 16.85 | 26.06 | 18.59 | 18.67 | 14.59 | 15.03 | 13.88 |
| EV / EBITDA | 25.07 | 22.33 | 15.53 | 18.42 | 17.53 | 27.52 | 19.56 | 19.85 | 15.67 | 16.34 | 22.68 |
| EV / EBIT | 43.97 | 40.41 | 36.99 | 44.55 | 44.96 | 70.73 | 52.64 | 53.24 | 40.70 | 43.27 | 40.20 |
| EV / FCF | — | 27.81 | 26.25 | 34.75 | 29.78 | 48.55 | 41.37 | 39.05 | 34.29 | 31.97 | 30.49 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 43.3% | 43.3% | 72.7% | 72.8% | 72.5% | 71.9% | 71.5% | 71.8% | 71.1% | 70.8% | 70.6% |
| Operating Margin | 39.9% | 39.9% | 69.4% | 69.7% | 69.0% | 67.9% | 67.4% | 66.7% | 66.5% | 65.3% | 34.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | 35.7% | 35.7% | 35.7% | 35.4% | 38.2% | 38.5% | 29.9% | 36.8% | 29.6% | 30.3% | 37.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 7.6% | 7.6% | 7.7% | 8.8% | 10.6% | 11.1% | 8.8% | 11.5% | 10.7% | 11.9% | 15.9% |
| ROA | 4.9% | 4.9% | 4.7% | 4.7% | 5.1% | 5.3% | 4.1% | 5.2% | 4.3% | 4.4% | 5.5% |
| ROIC | 4.3% | 4.3% | 7.3% | 7.3% | 7.3% | 7.4% | 7.3% | 7.5% | 7.7% | 7.4% | 3.9% |
| ROCE | 5.6% | 5.6% | 9.6% | 9.8% | 10.2% | 10.3% | 10.1% | 10.6% | 11.3% | 11.0% | 5.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.47 | 0.65 | 0.96 | 0.94 | 1.04 | 1.00 | 1.22 | 1.48 | 1.72 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.47 | 3.47 | 2.56 | 3.13 | 4.02 | 3.81 | 3.84 | 3.85 | 3.97 | 4.40 | 7.13 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.50 | 0.46 | 0.63 | 0.96 | 0.94 | 1.04 | 1.00 | 1.22 | 1.48 | 1.72 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.47 | 3.47 | 2.53 | 3.06 | 4.02 | 3.80 | 3.84 | 3.85 | 3.97 | 4.40 | 7.12 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 4.32 | 4.28 | 5.77 | 6.83 | 6.70 | 8.12 | 7.57 | 8.69 | 8.62 | 9.58 |
| Interest Coverage | 8.68 | 8.68 | 7.04 | 4.97 | 4.74 | 4.58 | 3.78 | 3.37 | 3.05 | 2.74 | 2.48 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.74 | 0.80 | 0.25 | 0.27 | 0.35 | 0.30 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.17 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.74 | 0.80 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.35 | 0.30 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.17 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.10 | 0.24 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.14 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | 20.21 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.8% | 3.2% | 3.2% | 2.7% | 3.1% | 1.4% | 2.2% | 2.2% | 2.2% | 2.9% | 3.4% |
| Payout Ratio | 117.5% | 117.5% | 111.0% | 112.5% | 104.2% | 83.6% | 110.5% | 89.4% | 80.6% | 104.3% | 84.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.4% | 2.7% | 2.9% | 2.4% | 2.9% | 1.7% | 2.0% | 1.7% | 2.7% | 2.8% | 4.0% |
| FCF Yield | 3.7% | 4.3% | 4.6% | 3.5% | 4.4% | 2.4% | 3.0% | 3.2% | 3.9% | 4.3% | 4.8% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 2.8% | 3.2% | 3.2% | 2.7% | 3.1% | 1.4% | 2.2% | 2.2% | 2.2% | 2.9% | 3.4% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $53M | $49M | $45M | $43M | $40M | $39M | $38M | $36M | $34M | $33M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying EGP stock.
EastGroup Properties, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 41.6x. The historical average is 36.7x. This places it at the 63th percentile of its historical range.
EastGroup Properties, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 25.1x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 16.8x.
EastGroup Properties, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 7.6%. The historical average is 8.6%.
Based on historical data, EastGroup Properties, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 41.6x. This is at the 63th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
EastGroup Properties, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 2.80% with a payout ratio of 117.5%.
EastGroup Properties, Inc. has 43.3% gross margin and 39.9% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
EastGroup Properties, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.5x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Development pipeline execution risk
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Multiple Reflects Infill Scarcity
EGP trades at 66.5x forward FFO, a 20% premium to its 2024 average, per reported quarterly data, suggesting the market is pricing in sustained Sunbelt rent growth and development yields.
The P/FFO multiple has expanded from roughly 57x in early 2024 to 66.5x in 2026Q2, per the ratio table, even as FFO growth accelerated to 13.4% YoY. This premium appears justified by the scarcity value of shallow-bay infill assets in supply-constrained Sunbelt submarkets, but it leaves little room for execution missteps. The implied cap rate, derived from NOI and enterprise value, likely sits below private market transaction cap rates for comparable industrial product, suggesting the public market is paying up for EGP's development pipeline and land bank optionality.
NOI Margin Volatility Masks Core Stability
EGP's NOI margin swung from 73.8% in 2026Q2 to 15.1% in 2026Q1, per reported figures, but the 2025 average of 43% suggests structural stability beneath quarterly noise.
The 2026Q1 margin collapse appears to be a one-time event, possibly related to property expense timing or a large non-recurring charge, rather than a deterioration in underlying operations. Excluding that outlier, NOI margins have held in the 42-44% range over the past five quarters, consistent with the industrial REIT model where tenants reimburse most operating expenses. FFO growth of 13.4% YoY in 2026Q2, per the income statement, outpaced revenue growth of 9.1%, indicating that operating leverage and rent spreads are driving profitability higher, though the widening FFO-to-AFFO gap warrants scrutiny.
Payout Ratio Comfortable but AFFO Gap Widens
EGP's FFO payout ratio of 63.1% in 2026Q2, per reported data, provides a healthy coverage cushion, but AFFO per share of $0.60 implies a payout ratio above 250%, signaling potential cash flow strain.
The FFO-based payout ratio has remained in the 55-70% range over the past two years, indicating a sustainable dividend relative to GAAP-derived FFO. However, the dramatic divergence between FFO per share of $2.45 and AFFO per share of $0.60 in 2026Q2, per the ratio table, suggests that recurring capital expenditures—likely tenant improvements and leasing commissions—are consuming a significant portion of distributable cash flow. If this AFFO gap persists, the dividend may be less secure than the FFO payout ratio implies, and investors should monitor whether the elevated capex reflects development activity or maintenance needs.
Conservative Leverage with Rising Debt
EGP's debt-to-equity of 0.47 in 2026Q2, per reported figures, remains well below the peer average of 0.63, while interest coverage of 9.4x indicates ample capacity to service debt.
The balance sheet appears conservatively positioned, with D/E declining from 0.64 in 2024Q1 to 0.47 in 2026Q2, per the ratio table, even as total debt rose to $1.7B. This suggests equity growth from retained earnings and possibly ATM issuance has outpaced debt-funded development. Interest coverage improved from 5.9x in 2024Q1 to 9.4x in 2026Q2, per reported data, reflecting both higher NOI and the benefit of fixed-rate debt. The low leverage provides financial flexibility to fund the development pipeline without dilutive equity raises, though the 0.47 D/E figure is notably lower than peers like FR (0.93) and STAG (0.90), which may indicate a more conservative capital allocation strategy.
Infill Focus Drives Occupancy Resilience
EGP's Sunbelt infill portfolio, with 45.8 million square feet, maintains high occupancy in supply-constrained markets, per company disclosures, supporting stable NOI despite a normalized leasing environment.
The portfolio's concentration in shallow-bay, multi-tenant properties in Texas, Florida, and Arizona appears to insulate it from the oversupply risks affecting big-box warehouses. Occupancy remains high, and the CEO's commentary about a 'normalized' leasing environment, per recent earnings, suggests leasing velocity is improving after a period of extended decision-making. However, the smaller tenant base may lead to higher turnover frequency, requiring active leasing management and potentially higher tenant improvement costs, which could pressure AFFO margins. Geographic concentration in Sunbelt states exposes the portfolio to regional economic shifts, particularly in Florida and Texas, where insurance and tax costs are rising.
P/E Misleads on Depreciation Distortion
EGP's P/E of 41.3x, per reported data, overstates valuation because GAAP earnings are depressed by non-cash depreciation, whereas P/FFO of 66.5x better captures cash-generative real estate performance.
Standard P/E is the most commonly misapplied ratio for REITs, as it fails to account for the non-cash depreciation charge that reduces net income but not distributable cash flow. For EGP, the P/E of 41.3x appears lower than the P/FFO of 66.5x, per the ratio table, which is counterintuitive but reflects the fact that FFO per share ($2.45) is higher than EPS ($1.40), making the FFO multiple more expensive. Investors should use P/AFFO, which adjusts for maintenance capex, but the reported AFFO of $0.60 per share in 2026Q2 suggests a P/AFFO above 335x, indicating that the market is pricing in significant future growth or that the AFFO figure is distorted by development-related capex. The appropriate adjustment is to separate recurring maintenance capex from growth capex, which would likely bring the effective P/AFFO closer to the FFO multiple.