Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 23.1x · EV/EBITDA 16.8x · ROE 35.5%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $24.1B | $20.3B | $15.7B | $19.1B | $17.1B | $23.0B | $16.3B | $13.6B | $12.1B | $11.8B | $9.7B |
| Enterprise Value | $23.4B | $19.6B | $15.1B | $18.1B | $15.6B | $21.7B | $15.2B | $12.8B | $12.1B | $11.8B | $9.7B |
| P/E Ratio → | 23.06 | 25.04 | 19.37 | 25.39 | 12.58 | 16.24 | 23.37 | 23.01 | 19.57 | 24.05 | 22.44 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.82 | 1.83 | 1.48 | 2.05 | 1.00 | 1.39 | 1.70 | 1.71 | 1.49 | 1.70 | 1.59 |
| P/B Ratio | 10.67 | 8.61 | 7.05 | 7.99 | 5.49 | 6.57 | 6.10 | 6.19 | 6.09 | 5.89 | 5.24 |
| P/FCF | 26.02 | 21.29 | 22.99 | 18.84 | 8.36 | 27.63 | 26.76 | 18.75 | 23.05 | 29.86 | 20.60 |
| P/OCF | 23.99 | 20.17 | 21.70 | 18.14 | 8.02 | 26.48 | 24.81 | 17.61 | 21.14 | 24.05 | 18.29 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.77 | 1.43 | 1.95 | 0.91 | 1.32 | 1.58 | 1.61 | 1.49 | 1.70 | 1.59 |
| EV / EBITDA | 16.77 | 17.63 | 13.71 | 17.98 | 8.28 | 11.09 | 15.20 | 15.60 | 14.24 | 15.68 | 13.50 |
| EV / EBIT | 22.23 | 17.88 | 13.81 | 17.77 | 8.38 | 11.29 | 15.85 | 16.63 | 15.20 | 16.78 | 14.44 |
| EV / FCF | — | 20.51 | 22.14 | 17.87 | 7.62 | 26.12 | 24.96 | 17.59 | 23.05 | 29.86 | 20.60 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 15.3% | 15.3% | 12.7% | 13.4% | 12.7% | 13.1% | 12.1% | 12.6% | 12.5% | 12.8% | 14.0% |
| Operating Margin | 9.5% | 9.5% | 9.8% | 10.1% | 10.7% | 11.6% | 9.8% | 9.7% | 9.8% | 10.1% | 11.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | 7.4% | 7.4% | 7.6% | 8.1% | 8.0% | 8.6% | 7.3% | 7.4% | 7.6% | 7.1% | 7.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 35.5% | 35.5% | 35.1% | 27.4% | 41.1% | 45.9% | 28.6% | 28.2% | 31.0% | 25.5% | 24.3% |
| ROA | 16.9% | 16.9% | 17.5% | 14.9% | 20.6% | 22.6% | 16.2% | 16.9% | 19.2% | 16.6% | 16.1% |
| ROIC | 48.4% | 48.4% | 51.2% | 46.9% | 71.4% | 75.2% | 48.1% | 47.5% | 59.5% | 57.8% | 57.1% |
| ROCE | 38.2% | 38.2% | 37.8% | 29.6% | 49.2% | 55.2% | 33.8% | 34.0% | 39.7% | 36.1% | 37.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.26 | 0.22 | 0.17 | 0.13 | 0.16 | 0.18 | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.28 | 0.24 | 0.44 | 0.48 | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.32 | -0.26 | -0.41 | -0.49 | -0.36 | -0.41 | -0.38 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.67 | -0.67 | -0.53 | -0.98 | -0.81 | -0.64 | -1.09 | -1.03 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -0.78 | -0.85 | -0.97 | -0.74 | -1.52 | -1.79 | -1.16 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | 212.46 | 79.87 | 4683.76 | 4368.87 | — | — | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($1.3B) exceeds total debt ($571M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.81 | 1.81 | 1.77 | 2.02 | 2.20 | 1.78 | 2.09 | 2.37 | 2.06 | 2.32 | 2.39 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.81 | 1.81 | 1.77 | 2.02 | 2.20 | 1.78 | 2.09 | 2.37 | 2.06 | 2.32 | 2.39 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.56 | 0.89 | 0.99 | 0.46 | 0.81 | 1.05 | 0.70 | 0.96 | 1.05 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 2.26 | 2.23 | 2.06 | 3.05 | 2.17 | 1.95 | 2.15 | 2.46 | 2.22 | 2.18 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 66.67 | 68.79 | 60.15 | 45.06 | 84.17 | 76.09 | 60.44 | 70.93 | 74.61 | 71.24 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.8% | 1.0% | 1.3% | 1.1% | 1.3% | 0.9% | 1.1% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 1.5% |
| Payout Ratio | 25.5% | 25.5% | 25.2% | 26.8% | 15.8% | 13.8% | 25.1% | 28.9% | 25.4% | 30.8% | 33.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 4.3% | 4.0% | 5.2% | 3.9% | 7.9% | 6.2% | 4.3% | 4.3% | 5.1% | 4.2% | 4.5% |
| FCF Yield | 3.8% | 4.7% | 4.4% | 5.3% | 12.0% | 3.6% | 3.7% | 5.3% | 4.3% | 3.3% | 4.9% |
| Buyback Yield | 2.8% | 3.3% | 5.4% | 7.3% | 9.3% | 2.2% | 2.0% | 2.9% | 5.4% | 4.1% | 3.5% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 3.6% | 4.3% | 6.7% | 8.3% | 10.5% | 3.1% | 3.1% | 4.1% | 6.6% | 5.4% | 5.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $136M | $142M | $150M | $164M | $171M | $171M | $174M | $178M | $182M | $183M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying EXPD stock.
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 23.1x. The historical average is 31.7x. This places it at the 28th percentile of its historical range.
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 16.8x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 16.6x.
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 35.5%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 25.0%.
Based on historical data, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 23.1x. This is at the 28th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 0.82% with a payout ratio of 25.5%.
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. has 15.3% gross margin and 9.5% operating margin.
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.5x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Freight rate normalization compressing spreads
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Multiples Price in Sustained Quality
Based on reported figures, EXPD trades at 31.74 times trailing earnings and 23.82 times forward earnings, a premium that suggests investors are capitalizing its debt-free balance sheet and cyclical resilience rather than near-term growth alone.
The forward P/E compression from 31.74 to 23.82 implies the market expects earnings to rise meaningfully, consistent with the recent volume-led rebound. A PEG of 4.02, however, indicates the price already embeds growth well beyond what the trailing trajectory alone would support, leaving limited margin for error if spreads normalize further. Relative to CHRW at 26.57 times earnings, EXPD commands a premium that appears justified only if its quality advantages persist through the cycle.
Spread-Driven Margins Oscillate Widely
As reported in financial statements, EXPD's gross margin swung from 12.6% in 2024Q3 to 34.9% in 2026Q1 before settling at 29.5% in 2026Q3, suggesting earnings power is tightly linked to freight spread dynamics rather than stable overhead economics.
Operating margin has been comparatively steadier, holding between roughly 8.8% and 10.8% across the ten quarters, which may indicate that the profit-sharing mechanism is absorbing much of the gross margin volatility. Net margin at 8.4% in 2026Q3 sits near the upper end of its historical range, so current profitability appears to reflect a favorable spread environment that investors should monitor for durability. Gross margin, not operating margin, is the more informative lens for true earning power in this model.
Returns Recovering From Cyclical Trough
Based on EXPD's reported figures, ROIC climbed from 11.5% in 2025Q4 to 19.2% in 2026Q3 and ROE rose to 15.4%, indicating returns are rebounding toward the mid-teens after a visible trough in late 2025.
The ROIC recovery appears driven primarily by margin expansion rather than capital efficiency, since asset turnover remained in a narrow band near 0.56 to 0.75. Given the company holds negligible debt, ROE and ROIC are closely aligned, which suggests equity returns are reflecting operating performance rather than financial engineering. Sustained returns above 15% would warrant confirmation that the recovery is not simply a function of favorable spread timing.
Liquidity Ample but Cash Timing-Sensitive
According to the supplied balance sheets, EXPD's current ratio moved between 1.56 and 1.83 over the period, with the lowest reading in the most recent quarter, indicating a liquidity cushion that remains strong but is sensitive to working capital movements.
A current ratio above 1.5 combined with a quick ratio equal to the current ratio, reflecting the absence of meaningful inventory, implies that liquidity is not dependent on asset conversion. Under severe stress, the primary risk would be a rapid reversal in receivables collection rather than a shortfall in cash, which may be the more relevant scenario to model. Investors should monitor whether the decline toward 1.56 represents a trend or a temporary timing effect.
Misapplied Gross Revenue Multiples Obscure Economics
Based on the supplied data, EV/Sales of roughly 2.2 times appears to be the most commonly misapplied metric for EXPD, since reported revenue includes large pass-through carrier costs that the company does not control or earn a margin on.
Using price-to-sales or revenue growth to compare EXPD with asset-heavy or differently structured peers may overstate scale and understate spread economics. Gross profit or net revenue, which better reflects what the company retains, would provide a more accurate basis for valuation comparisons. Investors should weight EV/Gross Profit and margin trajectory more heavily when assessing whether the current premium is warranted.