Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 15.3x · EV/EBITDA 14.5x · ROE 10.8%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $10.9B | $11.9B | $11.0B | $8.0B | $13.9B | $9.0B | $5.5B | $5.2B | $4.3B | $4.9B | $4.7B |
| Enterprise Value | $14.5B | $15.5B | $13.1B | $9.3B | $15.5B | $-3338234470 | $-151771080 | $9.7B | $4.5B | $7.9B | $5.2B |
| P/E Ratio → | 15.34 | 12.71 | 14.81 | 9.19 | 16.01 | 9.39 | 6.75 | 12.00 | 7.98 | 30.75 | 21.29 |
| P/S Ratio | 3.59 | 3.47 | 3.54 | 2.52 | 4.44 | 3.01 | 2.16 | 2.88 | 2.28 | 3.75 | 3.80 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.25 | 1.30 | 1.20 | 0.86 | 1.62 | 1.06 | 0.67 | 1.03 | 0.90 | 1.07 | 1.74 |
| P/FCF | 5.06 | 12.41 | 8.96 | 6.30 | 6.13 | 13.40 | 48.55 | 6.69 | 23.13 | — | 40.09 |
| P/OCF | 11.07 | 12.00 | 8.65 | 6.12 | 6.05 | 12.42 | 32.18 | 6.30 | 18.42 | — | 26.16 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 4.52 | 4.24 | 2.95 | 4.98 | -1.12 | -0.06 | 5.33 | 2.39 | 6.08 | 4.21 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.49 | 11.50 | 11.86 | 7.57 | 12.48 | -2.51 | -0.15 | 14.86 | 5.83 | 20.84 | 12.73 |
| EV / EBIT | 11.36 | 12.07 | 13.05 | 8.26 | 13.40 | -2.60 | -0.16 | 16.53 | 6.32 | 25.63 | 15.12 |
| EV / FCF | — | 16.20 | 10.71 | 7.38 | 6.86 | -4.97 | -1.33 | 12.40 | 24.20 | — | 44.45 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 98.1% | 98.1% | 95.2% | 91.8% | 97.0% | 110.4% | 80.4% | 97.5% | 99.6% | 100.0% | 99.1% |
| Operating Margin | 37.4% | 37.4% | 32.5% | 35.8% | 37.1% | 42.9% | 36.4% | 32.2% | 37.8% | 23.7% | 27.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | 28.7% | 28.7% | 25.0% | 28.4% | 28.8% | 33.4% | 32.9% | 24.3% | 28.9% | 12.7% | 18.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 10.8% | 10.8% | 8.4% | 10.1% | 10.6% | 11.9% | 12.6% | 8.9% | 11.6% | 4.5% | 8.5% |
| ROA | 1.2% | 1.2% | 0.9% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 1.2% | 1.3% | 1.0% | 1.3% | 0.5% | 0.8% |
| ROIC | 7.0% | 7.0% | 5.6% | 6.6% | 7.0% | 7.9% | 6.1% | 5.0% | 6.5% | 3.3% | 5.5% |
| ROCE | 10.2% | 10.2% | 7.9% | 8.9% | 9.6% | 11.0% | 10.8% | 9.9% | 11.5% | 5.9% | 7.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.40 | 0.48 | 0.44 | 0.47 | 1.10 | 0.47 | 1.06 | 0.72 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.40 | 3.40 | 4.15 | 3.01 | 3.30 | 2.79 | 3.89 | 8.55 | 2.92 | 12.78 | 4.74 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.40 | 0.24 | 0.15 | 0.19 | -1.45 | -0.68 | 0.88 | 0.04 | 0.66 | 0.19 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.69 | 2.69 | 1.94 | 1.10 | 1.33 | -9.29 | -5.71 | 6.84 | 0.26 | 7.98 | 1.25 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 3.78 | 1.76 | 1.08 | 0.73 | -18.36 | -49.88 | 5.71 | 1.07 | — | 4.36 |
| Interest Coverage | 0.82 | 0.82 | 0.55 | 0.72 | 3.98 | 7.83 | 3.95 | 1.42 | 2.19 | 2.09 | 3.89 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.13 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.32 | 0.24 | 0.15 | 0.19 | 0.20 | 0.22 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.13 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.32 | 0.24 | 0.15 | 0.19 | 0.20 | 0.22 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.21 | 0.13 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.06 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.04 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.7% | 2.6% | 3.0% | 4.2% | 2.3% | 3.7% | 4.0% | 3.3% | 3.2% | 1.6% | 1.3% |
| Payout Ratio | 31.9% | 31.9% | 42.8% | 37.3% | 36.0% | 33.3% | 26.3% | 38.8% | 25.5% | 48.3% | 28.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 6.5% | 7.9% | 6.8% | 10.9% | 6.2% | 10.7% | 14.8% | 8.3% | 12.5% | 3.3% | 4.7% |
| FCF Yield | 19.8% | 8.1% | 11.2% | 15.9% | 16.3% | 7.5% | 2.1% | 14.9% | 4.3% | — | 2.5% |
| Buyback Yield | 8.4% | 7.7% | 5.7% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 4.6% | 0.2% | 2.6% | 2.4% | 0.1% | 2.1% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 11.1% | 10.4% | 8.7% | 4.3% | 2.4% | 8.3% | 4.2% | 5.8% | 5.7% | 1.7% | 3.4% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $496M | $544M | $562M | $566M | $551M | $434M | $316M | $327M | $244M | $235M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying FHN stock.
First Horizon Corporation's current P/E ratio is 15.3x. The historical average is 19.9x. This places it at the 60th percentile of its historical range.
First Horizon Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 14.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 18.1x.
First Horizon Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 10.8%. The historical average is 10.9%.
Based on historical data, First Horizon Corporation is trading at a P/E of 15.3x. This is at the 60th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
First Horizon Corporation's current dividend yield is 2.75% with a payout ratio of 31.9%.
First Horizon Corporation has 98.1% gross margin and 37.4% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
First Horizon Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.4x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Reserve releases flattering earnings
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Discount to Tangible Book Persists
Based on FHN's reported figures, the P/B of 1.25 and price of $23.12 against tangible book of roughly $15.89 per share imply the market values the bank modestly above tangible equity, a discount to many regional peers.
The market appears to price FHN as a commodity regional balance sheet rather than a premium franchise, consistent with its 12.30 trailing P/E and 10.79 forward P/E. Relative to peers such as FITB at 1.65 P/B and CMA at 1.53, the multiple looks undemanding, though the price-to-tangible-book gap should be read alongside the recent swing to negative ROE. Investors should monitor whether earnings normalize after reserve releases, since the trailing P/E may be flattered by provision reversals.
ROE Propped Up by Reserve Releases
According to reported quarterly figures, FHN's ROE fell from 2.8% in 2026Q1 to negative 0.9% in 2026Q3, while ROA hovered near 0.3% through most of the period, indicating thin underlying profitability.
With equity at roughly 11% of assets, the leverage component is modest, so ROE is driven mainly by ROA, which itself is compressed. The decline into negative territory in 2026Q3 coincides with a 130.0% efficiency ratio, suggesting revenue weakness rather than cost control drove the result. Investors should monitor whether the reported 2026Q1 profitability was repeatable once reserve releases normalize.
Flat Margin Masks Revenue Deterioration
Based on reported figures, FHN's net interest margin held near 0.8% across all ten quarters, while the efficiency ratio climbed from about 58% in 2025 to 130.0% in 2026Q3, pointing to a revenue collapse.
The stable NIM suggests funding costs and asset yields have moved in step, so margin compression is not the source of the deterioration. The efficiency spike is better explained by a sharp fall in non-interest income, with fee share turning negative in 2026, rather than cost escalation. This warrants further investigation into the composition of fee revenue before assuming operating leverage will recover.
Equity Ratio Stable but Undisclosed Ratios
As reported in financial statements, FHN's equity-to-assets ratio stayed near 0.11 across the ten quarters, but CET1 and Tier 1 ratios are not present in the supplied dataset, so regulatory capital headroom cannot be verified.
A steady equity-to-assets ratio alongside growing total assets suggests capital has kept pace with balance sheet expansion, which is a constructive but incomplete read. Without regulatory capital ratios, the capacity for buybacks and dividends cannot be sized against minimums. Investors should obtain the CET1 trajectory before concluding on capital return capacity.
P/E Misread from Reserve Releases
The trailing P/E of 12.30 is the ratio most likely to mislead here, since a negative $337.0M provision in 2026Q1 may have inflated reported earnings and compressed the apparent multiple.
Using trailing P/E without adjusting for reserve releases may overstate earnings quality and understate the true multiple on normalized income. A more defensible approach would be to value FHN on price-to-tangible-book against a normalized ROTCE, excluding provision reversals. Investors should monitor whether provisions rebuild, which would reverse the apparent earnings strength.