Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 8.2x · EV/EBITDA 9.0x · ROE 11.2%. (1997–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.1B | $5.0B | $5.6B | $4.2B | $2.8B | $3.5B | $2.3B | $1.8B | $1.0B | $1.5B | $1.6B |
| Enterprise Value | $9.0B | $10.8B | $10.8B | $8.0B | $6.1B | $6.3B | $4.9B | $5.1B | $4.1B | $4.4B | $4.4B |
| P/E Ratio → | 8.20 | 15.66 | 11.48 | 7.13 | 3.83 | 6.48 | 8.46 | 10.71 | 6.73 | 7.21 | 11.69 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.14 | 0.22 | 0.28 | 0.23 | 0.17 | 0.26 | 0.22 | 0.15 | 0.09 | 0.13 | 0.15 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.19 | 1.80 | 1.88 | 1.57 | 1.25 | 1.90 | 1.61 | 1.43 | 0.94 | 1.32 | 1.77 |
| P/FCF | 12.90 | 13.36 | 25.26 | — | 6.61 | 2.87 | 2.80 | 12.80 | 11.33 | — | 6.85 |
| P/OCF | 4.83 | 7.77 | 11.99 | 65.91 | 4.83 | 2.56 | 2.49 | 5.40 | 4.43 | 7.16 | 4.15 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.48 | 0.54 | 0.45 | 0.38 | 0.47 | 0.46 | 0.44 | 0.35 | 0.39 | 0.40 |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.01 | 10.14 | 10.57 | 7.56 | 5.16 | 6.53 | 8.60 | 11.86 | 9.95 | 10.95 | 11.13 |
| EV / EBIT | 9.44 | 14.26 | 11.89 | 8.32 | 5.59 | 7.12 | 10.20 | 14.23 | 11.91 | 12.81 | 12.81 |
| EV / FCF | — | 28.93 | 48.73 | — | 14.41 | 5.22 | 5.89 | 36.41 | 44.86 | — | 18.09 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 15.5% | 15.5% | 16.3% | 16.9% | 18.3% | 18.1% | 16.4% | 15.2% | 14.9% | 14.8% | 14.7% |
| Operating Margin | 4.2% | 4.2% | 4.6% | 5.4% | 6.7% | 6.6% | 4.7% | 3.1% | 2.9% | 3.1% | 3.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | 1.4% | 1.4% | 2.5% | 3.4% | 4.6% | 4.1% | 2.7% | 1.5% | 1.4% | 1.9% | 1.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 11.2% | 11.2% | 17.6% | 24.5% | 37.0% | 33.7% | 21.2% | 14.8% | 14.2% | 20.8% | 15.9% |
| ROA | 3.2% | 3.2% | 5.7% | 8.3% | 12.1% | 10.2% | 5.4% | 3.3% | 3.2% | 4.6% | 3.3% |
| ROIC | 8.5% | 8.5% | 9.3% | 12.1% | 16.1% | 15.3% | 8.7% | 6.2% | 6.3% | 6.7% | 7.0% |
| ROCE | 14.2% | 14.2% | 15.5% | 19.2% | 24.2% | 23.7% | 15.5% | 12.4% | 12.9% | 13.5% | 14.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 2.10 | 2.10 | 1.76 | 1.46 | 1.50 | 1.56 | 1.83 | 2.65 | 2.78 | 2.60 | 2.93 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 5.49 | 5.49 | 5.12 | 3.67 | 2.84 | 2.96 | 4.64 | 7.75 | 7.47 | 7.32 | 6.97 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 2.09 | 1.75 | 1.43 | 1.47 | 1.55 | 1.78 | 2.63 | 2.77 | 2.58 | 2.91 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 5.46 | 5.46 | 5.09 | 3.62 | 2.79 | 2.94 | 4.52 | 7.69 | 7.44 | 7.24 | 6.92 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 15.57 | 23.48 | — | 7.80 | 2.35 | 3.09 | 23.60 | 33.52 | — | 11.24 |
| Interest Coverage | 2.45 | 2.45 | 3.64 | 5.88 | 10.40 | 10.60 | 4.77 | 2.64 | 2.51 | 2.78 | 3.01 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.08 | 1.08 | 1.03 | 1.11 | 1.03 | 1.08 | 1.09 | 1.04 | 1.01 | 1.06 | 1.05 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0.25 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.38 | 0.30 | 0.25 | 0.23 | 0.26 | 0.24 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 2.18 | 2.03 | 2.30 | 2.41 | 2.34 | 2.08 | 2.08 | 2.32 | 2.28 | 2.44 |
| Inventory Turnover | 6.96 | 6.96 | 6.33 | 7.57 | 9.77 | 10.29 | 6.13 | 5.17 | 5.36 | 5.38 | 5.63 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 10.27 | 12.14 | 12.41 | 10.75 | 10.74 | 13.87 | 15.07 | 14.46 | 16.24 | 14.85 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.8% | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.6% | 0.8% | 0.7% | 0.5% | 1.1% | 2.0% | 1.4% | 1.2% |
| Payout Ratio | 7.9% | 7.9% | 5.1% | 4.2% | 3.2% | 4.3% | 3.8% | 11.7% | 13.2% | 9.6% | 13.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 12.2% | 6.4% | 8.7% | 14.0% | 26.1% | 15.4% | 11.8% | 9.3% | 14.9% | 13.9% | 8.6% |
| FCF Yield | 7.8% | 7.5% | 4.0% | — | 15.1% | 34.9% | 35.7% | 7.8% | 8.8% | — | 14.6% |
| Buyback Yield | 17.8% | 11.1% | 2.9% | 4.1% | 18.7% | 6.1% | 3.4% | 0.1% | 17.9% | 2.7% | 7.7% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 18.6% | 11.6% | 3.3% | 4.7% | 19.5% | 6.8% | 3.9% | 1.2% | 20.0% | 4.1% | 8.9% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $13M | $13M | $14M | $15M | $18M | $18M | $18M | $19M | $21M | $21M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 29 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying GPI stock.
Group 1 Automotive, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 8.2x. The historical average is 12.9x. This places it at the 25th percentile of its historical range.
Group 1 Automotive, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 9.0x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 9.9x.
Group 1 Automotive, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 11.2%. The historical average is 14.3%.
Based on historical data, Group 1 Automotive, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 8.2x. This is at the 25th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Group 1 Automotive, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 0.77% with a payout ratio of 7.9%.
Group 1 Automotive, Inc. has 15.5% gross margin and 4.2% operating margin.
Group 1 Automotive, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 5.5x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Affordability-driven demand softness with leverage
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Low Multiples Reflect Cyclical Earnings Discount
Based on reported figures, GPI trades at a 10.40 trailing P/E and 8.37 EV/EBITDA, below most franchised dealer peers, a discount that appears to reflect skepticism about sustaining recent earnings levels.
The forward P/E of 7.18 sits below the trailing multiple, implying the market expects earnings to decline further after the Q2 2026 miss. Compared with PAG at 15.03 and SAH at 18.04, GPI's discount is wide, but it sits close to AN and ABG, suggesting the peer group as a whole is pricing in cyclical pressure rather than a company-specific anomaly. The PEG of 1.03 indicates the market is not paying a growth premium, which appears consistent with decelerating revenue.
Debt Growth Outpacing Earnings Coverage
According to reported quarterly figures, GPI's debt-to-equity rose from 1.67 to 2.03 over ten quarters while D/EBITDA climbed to 26.07, suggesting leverage has built faster than the earnings base supporting it.
The rise in leverage has occurred while net margin compressed to 1.9%, so debt service is consuming a growing share of thin operating profit. Interest coverage swung widely between 1.46 and 9.23, which points to volatile earnings rather than a stable coverage cushion. Investors should monitor whether floorplan and acquisition debt can be refinanced comfortably if demand softness persists.
Working Capital Stable but Inventory Carries Risk
Based on GPI's reported data, the cash conversion cycle has held in a narrow 47 to 52 day band, with inventory days near 50 to 55 representing the dominant component of working capital.
Stable receivable and payable days indicate that working capital management has not been the source of recent cash volatility. The inventory position, however, is the sensitive variable, since rising days supply would typically precede margin-eroding discounts in a weakening demand environment. The asset turnover of roughly 0.5 to 0.6 is consistent with a capital-intensive dealership model rather than a sign of inefficiency.
Returns Compressing as Margins Narrow
As reported in GPI's quarterly filings, ROE fell from 4.9 percent in Q2 2024 to 3.4 percent in Q3 2026 while ROIC held near 1.8 to 2.5 percent, indicating compression driven mainly by margins.
ROIC remaining in a narrow range while ROE declines suggests that the drop in equity returns is partly a function of higher leverage offset by weaker operating margins. The ROIC level itself is modest relative to the ABG and PAG figures in the peer set, which signals limited value creation on invested capital. Investors should watch whether ROIC can recover toward the 2.5 percent level seen in mid-2024.
Low Multiple May Mask Leverage Sensitivity
The most commonly misapplied metric here is the trailing P/E, which can appear cheap for a dealership group whose reported earnings swing sharply with a few quarters of OEM incentives and used-car pricing.
Using P/E on volatile dealership earnings can understate risk, because EPS ranged from $1.02 to $10.85 in recent quarters while operating income moved far less. An EV/EBITDA or normalized earnings approach that adjusts for the leverage-driven interest burden would give a more reliable read on value. The low headline multiple should therefore be weighed against a D/E of 2.03 before concluding the stock is undervalued.