Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -2.6x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -25.2%. (2018–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $6M | $5M | $5M | $12M | $5M | $17M | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $7M | $7M | $4M | $10M | $924474 | $7M | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -2.56 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 84.27 | 76.94 | 47.23 | 81.09 | 28.28 | 7.61 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.74 | 0.67 | 0.50 | 0.97 | 0.32 | 1.02 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 95.24 | 36.89 | 66.14 | 5.73 | 2.93 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | -225.0% | -225.0% | 92.5% | 91.4% | 88.9% | 98.5% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Operating Margin | -3301.3% | -3301.3% | -1615.2% | -1203.3% | -1593.2% | -34.4% | 60.6% | 61.5% | 24.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | -3305.2% | -3305.2% | -1864.8% | -1298.7% | -1587.6% | -48.3% | 44.2% | 46.3% | 18.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -25.2% | -25.2% | -17.9% | -14.4% | -16.5% | -12.4% | 4043.4% | — | — |
| ROA | -21.1% | -21.1% | -16.3% | -13.8% | -16.0% | -10.9% | 68.8% | 91.3% | 52.8% |
| ROIC | -17.0% | -17.0% | -11.3% | -9.8% | -12.3% | -6.1% | 120.0% | 418.5% | — |
| ROCE | -21.5% | -21.5% | -14.5% | -13.1% | -16.5% | -8.1% | 160.0% | 558.0% | — |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 1.69 | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.64 | 0.48 | 0.53 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.16 | -0.11 | -0.18 | -0.26 | -0.63 | 1.55 | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.59 | 0.39 | 0.45 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2.84 | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6159.41 | — | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 9.36 | 9.36 | 7.45 | 34.90 | 35.43 | 44.95 | 5.07 | 0.67 | 0.12 |
| Quick Ratio | 9.36 | 9.36 | 7.45 | 34.90 | 35.43 | 44.95 | 5.07 | 0.67 | 0.12 |
| Cash Ratio | 7.67 | 7.67 | 4.00 | 6.75 | 9.40 | 28.10 | 0.24 | 0.16 | 0.03 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.13 | 1.29 | 2.16 | 2.92 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $3M | $3M | $2M | $2M | $3M | $3M | $3M | $3M |
Imminent Liquidity Exhaustion
According to recent market data, SNTG trades at a price-to-sales ratio of 82.24, which appears disconnected from its fundamental decline, suggesting that investors are pricing the equity as a speculative shell rather than a functional credit services provider with viable growth prospects.
The elevated P/S multiple is likely a byproduct of the near-total collapse in revenue rather than an indicator of future growth potential. Investors should monitor whether this valuation is supported by the company's remaining cash position or if it represents a mispricing of the firm's terminal value.
As reported in financial statements, the company's gross margin has deteriorated to -133.5%, a trend that suggests the direct costs of maintaining its service infrastructure now significantly exceed the revenue generated, rendering the current business model fundamentally unsustainable in its present form.
The persistent negative operating margins indicate that the company lacks the scale to absorb its fixed corporate overhead. This structural imbalance warrants further investigation into whether the firm can pivot to a lower-cost operating model or if it is destined for continued value destruction.
Based on reported figures, the ROIC has consistently trended into negative territory, reaching -10.8% in the most recent quarter, which confirms that the company is failing to generate adequate returns on its invested capital compared to its historical performance and broader sector benchmarks.
The decay in ROIC suggests that the company's capital allocation has been ineffective at preserving shareholder value. This trend implies that the firm is not compounding returns but rather consuming its remaining asset base to fund ongoing operational deficits.
As indicated by recent SEC filings, the company's cash reserves have fallen to approximately $503,374, a level that appears insufficient to sustain operations given the current quarterly burn rate and the lack of a clear path toward revenue stabilization or profitability.
The current liquidity position leaves the firm highly vulnerable to any unexpected regulatory or operational shocks. Investors should monitor the cash runway closely, as the company may soon face a liquidity event that necessitates external financing or a fundamental restructuring of its balance sheet.
While the price-to-book ratio of 0.72 might suggest an undervalued asset, this metric is commonly misapplied to SNTG because it fails to account for the rapid depletion of cash and the lack of intangible assets that could support future earnings in a distressed environment.
The P/B ratio obscures the reality that the company's book value is largely composed of assets that may not be realizable in a liquidation scenario. Analysts should instead focus on the net cash burn rate and the potential for a going concern qualification to better assess the firm's true financial health.
Includes 30+ ratios · 8 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying SNTG stock.
Sentage Holdings Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -2.6x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Sentage Holdings Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -25.2%. The historical average is -17.3%.
Based on historical data, Sentage Holdings Inc. is trading at a P/E of -2.6x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Sentage Holdings Inc. has -225.0% gross margin and -3301.3% operating margin.