Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
APPF vs PAYC vs PCTY vs HUBS vs CRM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Application
Software - Application
Software - Application
APPF vs PAYC vs PCTY vs HUBS vs CRM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $6.12B | $7.51B | $5.93B | $12.58B | $179.19B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $995M | $2.09B | $1.73B | $3.30B | $41.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $152M | $470M | $258M | $100M | $7.46B |
| Gross Margin | 63.2% | 81.0% | 69.3% | 83.7% | 77.7% |
| Operating Margin | 17.1% | 28.3% | 21.3% | 1.9% | 21.5% |
| Forward P/E | 25.0x | 13.2x | 14.0x | 19.6x | 15.8x |
| Total Debt | $71M | $152M | $218M | $485M | $6.74B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $107M | $370M | $398M | $882M | $7.33B |
APPF vs PAYC vs PCTY vs HUBS vs CRM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AppFolio, Inc. (APPF) | 100 | 107.3 | +7.3% |
| Paycom Software, In… (PAYC) | 100 | 46.6 | -53.4% |
| Paylocity Holding C… (PCTY) | 100 | 83.9 | -16.1% |
| HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) | 100 | 122.2 | +22.2% |
| Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) | 100 | 106.6 | +6.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: APPF vs PAYC vs PCTY vs HUBS vs CRM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
APPF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 12.8% 10Y total return vs HUBS's 469.1%
- 19.7% revenue growth vs PAYC's 8.9%
- -20.7% vs HUBS's -62.0%
- 24.2% ROA vs HUBS's 2.7%, ROIC 22.4% vs 0.4%
PAYC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.59, yield 1.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.59, Low D/E 8.8%, current ratio 1.09x
- PEG 0.49 vs CRM's 1.29
- Beta 0.59, yield 1.1%, current ratio 1.09x
PCTY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.
- Beta 0.43 vs HUBS's 1.18, lower leverage
HUBS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 19.2%, EPS growth 8.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 21.8%
Among these 5 stocks, CRM doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.7% revenue growth vs PAYC's 8.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.2x vs 19.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.4% margin vs HUBS's 3.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.43 vs HUBS's 1.18, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs CRM's 0.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -20.7% vs HUBS's -62.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 24.2% ROA vs HUBS's 2.7%, ROIC 22.4% vs 0.4% |
APPF vs PAYC vs PCTY vs HUBS vs CRM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
APPF vs PAYC vs PCTY vs HUBS vs CRM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PAYC leads in 3 of 6 categories
HUBS leads 1 • APPF leads 1 • PCTY leads 0 • CRM leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HUBS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CRM is the larger business by revenue, generating $41.5B annually — 41.7x APPF's $995M. PAYC is the more profitable business, keeping 22.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HUBS's 3.0%. On growth, HUBS holds the edge at +23.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $995M | $2.1B | $1.7B | $3.3B | $41.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $192M | $780M | $394M | $166M | $11.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $152M | $470M | $258M | $100M | $7.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $234M | $444M | $470M | $712M | $14.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.2% | +81.0% | +69.3% | +83.7% | +77.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +17.1% | +28.3% | +21.3% | +1.9% | +21.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.3% | +22.4% | +14.9% | +3.0% | +18.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.5% | +21.2% | +27.2% | +21.6% | +34.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.4% | +7.8% | +10.5% | +23.4% | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +37.2% | +22.6% | +26.7% | +2.5% | +18.3% |
Valuation Metrics
PAYC leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.1x trailing earnings, PAYC trades at a 94% valuation discount to HUBS's 284.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PAYC offers better value at 0.64x vs CRM's 1.95x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.1B | $7.5B | $5.9B | $12.6B | $179.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.1B | $7.3B | $5.8B | $12.2B | $178.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 43.83x | 17.13x | 27.14x | 284.08x | 23.88x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 24.99x | 13.18x | 14.05x | 19.61x | 15.82x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.64x | 0.96x | — | 1.95x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 34.66x | 9.81x | 14.25x | 69.24x | 20.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.44x | 3.66x | 3.72x | 4.02x | 4.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 11.39x | 4.49x | 5.00x | 6.29x | 3.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 25.62x | 18.41x | 17.31x | 17.77x | 12.44x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PAYC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PAYC delivers a 31.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $5 for HUBS. PAYC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HUBS's 0.23x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PCTY scores 8/9 vs PAYC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +30.9% | +31.0% | +22.4% | +5.0% | +12.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +24.2% | +9.1% | +4.9% | +2.7% | +6.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +22.4% | +30.7% | +26.2% | +0.4% | +10.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +25.9% | +27.1% | +23.3% | +0.5% | +11.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | 0.09x | 0.18x | 0.23x | 0.11x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$36M | -$218M | -$180M | -$397M | -$590M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $107M | $370M | $398M | $882M | $7.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $71M | $152M | $218M | $485M | $6.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 95.85x | 23.29x | 4753.07x | 44.14x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
APPF leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in APPF five years ago would be worth $13,059 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,375 for PAYC. Over the past 12 months, APPF leads with a -20.7% total return vs HUBS's -62.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors APPF at 7.3% vs PAYC's -19.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -26.2% | -8.9% | -25.1% | -36.1% | -26.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -20.7% | -38.8% | -40.6% | -62.0% | -32.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +23.4% | -47.8% | -37.1% | -45.1% | -4.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +30.6% | -56.3% | -35.2% | -52.1% | -12.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1277.1% | +271.8% | +218.2% | +469.1% | +154.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.3% | -19.5% | -14.3% | -18.1% | -1.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PCTY and CRM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PCTY is the less volatile stock with a 0.43 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HUBS's 1.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CRM currently trades 62.9% from its 52-week high vs HUBS's 35.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.71x | 0.59x | 0.43x | 1.18x | 0.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $326.04 | $267.76 | $201.97 | $682.57 | $296.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $142.72 | $104.90 | $92.99 | $187.45 | $163.52 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +52.2% | +51.7% | +54.0% | +35.8% | +62.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.2 | 49.8 | 45.7 | 51.1 | 48.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 349K | 1.4M | 733K | 1.5M | 12.4M |
Analyst Outlook
PAYC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: APPF as "Buy", PAYC as "Hold", PCTY as "Buy", HUBS as "Buy", CRM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 54.1% upside for CRM (target: $287) vs 7.9% for PAYC (target: $149). For income investors, PAYC offers the higher dividend yield at 1.09% vs CRM's 0.89%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $236.67 | $149.36 | $168.08 | $360.89 | $287.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 36 | 41 | 47 | 97 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.1% | — | — | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 | — | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.51 | — | — | $1.66 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.1% | +4.3% | +2.5% | +4.0% | +7.0% |
PAYC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). HUBS leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
APPF vs PAYC vs PCTY vs HUBS vs CRM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is APPF or PAYC or PCTY or HUBS or CRM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) is the stronger pick with 19. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 9% for Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC). Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC) offers the better valuation at 17. 1x trailing P/E (13. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AppFolio, Inc. (APPF) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — APPF or PAYC or PCTY or HUBS or CRM?
On trailing P/E, Paycom Software, Inc.
(PAYC) is the cheapest at 17. 1x versus HubSpot, Inc. at 284. 1x. On forward P/E, Paycom Software, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Paycom Software, Inc. wins at 0. 49x versus Salesforce, Inc. 's 1. 29x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — APPF or PAYC or PCTY or HUBS or CRM?
Over the past 5 years, AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) delivered a total return of +30. 6%, compared to -56. 3% for Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: APPF returned +1277% versus CRM's +154. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — APPF or PAYC or PCTY or HUBS or CRM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Paylocity Holding Corporation (PCTY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
43β versus HubSpot, Inc. 's 1. 18β — meaning HUBS is approximately 177% more volatile than PCTY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 23% for HubSpot, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — APPF or PAYC or PCTY or HUBS or CRM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) is pulling ahead at 19. 7% versus 8. 9% for Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HubSpot, Inc. grew EPS 863. 0% year-over-year, compared to -30. 1% for AppFolio, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, APPF leads at 26. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — APPF or PAYC or PCTY or HUBS or CRM?
Paycom Software, Inc.
(PAYC) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 1% net margin versus 1. 5% for HubSpot, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PAYC leads at 27. 6% versus 0. 4% for HUBS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HUBS leads at 83. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is APPF or PAYC or PCTY or HUBS or CRM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 49x versus Salesforce, Inc. 's 1. 29x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC) trades at 13. 2x forward P/E versus 25. 0x for AppFolio, Inc. — 11. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CRM: 54. 1% to $287. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — APPF or PAYC or PCTY or HUBS or CRM?
In this comparison, PAYC (1.
1% yield), CRM (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. APPF, PCTY, HUBS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is APPF or PAYC or PCTY or HUBS or CRM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 71), +1277% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (APPF: +1277%, HUBS: +469. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between APPF and PAYC and PCTY and HUBS and CRM?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: APPF is a small-cap high-growth stock; PAYC is a small-cap deep-value stock; PCTY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HUBS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CRM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. PAYC, CRM pay a dividend while APPF, PCTY, HUBS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.