Insurance - Property & Casualty
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MCY vs HCI vs HRTG vs KMPR vs ERIE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Brokers
MCY vs HCI vs HRTG vs KMPR vs ERIE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Brokers |
| Market Cap | $5.42B | $1.99B | $861M | $1.73B | $10.01B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.14B | $927M | $847M | $4.71B | $4.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $840M | $314M | $196M | $39M | $571M |
| Gross Margin | 43.9% | 66.5% | 47.2% | 8.1% | 18.1% |
| Operating Margin | 17.0% | 47.9% | 31.7% | 0.7% | 17.0% |
| Forward P/E | 10.9x | 9.2x | 6.1x | 7.8x | 17.1x |
| Total Debt | $594M | $68M | $100M | $1.00B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.32B | $1.21B | $559M | $126M | $346M |
MCY vs HCI vs HRTG vs KMPR vs ERIE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury General Cor… (MCY) | 100 | 243.4 | +143.4% |
| HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) | 100 | 340.8 | +240.8% |
| Heritage Insurance … (HRTG) | 100 | 223.5 | +123.5% |
| Kemper Corporation (KMPR) | 100 | 46.3 | -53.7% |
| Erie Indemnity Comp… (ERIE) | 100 | 120.3 | +20.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MCY vs HCI vs HRTG vs KMPR vs ERIE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MCY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +74.1% vs KMPR's -50.2%
HCI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 20.2%, EPS growth 179.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.3%
- 436.8% 10Y total return vs HRTG's 119.4%
- PEG 0.19 vs MCY's 1.43
- 20.2% revenue growth vs KMPR's 3.6%
HRTG is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 19.8%, current ratio 152.87x
KMPR is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 4.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs ERIE's 2.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
ERIE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.16, yield 2.2%
- Beta 0.16, yield 2.2%, current ratio 1.27x
- Beta 0.16 vs KMPR's 0.58
- 17.3% ROA vs KMPR's 0.4%, ROIC 29.5% vs 3.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.2% revenue growth vs KMPR's 3.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.2x vs 17.1x), PEG 0.19 vs 1.26 | |
| Quality / Margins | Combined ratio 0.5 vs KMPR's 1.0 (lower = better underwriting) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.16 vs KMPR's 0.58 | |
| Dividends | 4.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs ERIE's 2.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +74.1% vs KMPR's -50.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.3% ROA vs KMPR's 0.4%, ROIC 29.5% vs 3.1% |
MCY vs HCI vs HRTG vs KMPR vs ERIE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MCY vs HCI vs HRTG vs KMPR vs ERIE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HCI leads in 2 of 6 categories
HRTG leads 2 • MCY leads 0 • KMPR leads 0 • ERIE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HCI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MCY is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.1B annually — 7.2x HRTG's $847M. HCI is the more profitable business, keeping 33.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KMPR's 0.8%. On growth, HCI holds the edge at +11.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.1B | $927M | $847M | $4.7B | $4.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.1B | $454M | $281M | $21M | $786M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $840M | $314M | $196M | $39M | $571M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.4B | $431M | $177M | $382M | $537M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.9% | +66.5% | +47.2% | +8.1% | +18.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +17.0% | +47.9% | +31.7% | +0.7% | +17.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.7% | +33.9% | +23.1% | +0.8% | +13.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.1% | +46.4% | +20.8% | +8.1% | +12.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.5% | +11.9% | +2.4% | -7.0% | +2.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.8% | +23.4% | +2.3% | -104.9% | +7.9% |
Valuation Metrics
HRTG leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.4x trailing earnings, HRTG trades at a 78% valuation discount to ERIE's 20.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HRTG offers better value at 0.06x vs ERIE's 1.50x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.4B | $2.0B | $861M | $1.7B | $10.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.7B | $844M | $402M | $2.6B | $9.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.02x | 6.15x | 4.44x | 12.83x | 20.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.88x | 9.19x | 6.07x | 7.82x | 17.15x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.32x | 0.13x | 0.06x | — | 1.50x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.37x | 1.92x | 1.48x | 11.08x | 12.14x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.91x | 2.20x | 1.02x | 0.36x | 2.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.24x | 1.77x | 1.72x | 0.69x | 5.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.27x | 4.47x | 4.94x | 3.11x | 17.53x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HCI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HRTG delivers a 47.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $47 in annual profit, vs $1 for KMPR. HCI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KMPR's 0.38x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HCI scores 8/9 vs ERIE's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +36.5% | +32.0% | +47.3% | +1.4% | +25.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.9% | +13.2% | +8.4% | +0.4% | +17.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +28.4% | +6.8% | +15.4% | +3.1% | +29.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.4% | +40.6% | +11.1% | +1.3% | +32.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.25x | 0.06x | 0.20x | 0.38x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$721M | -$1.1B | -$459M | $879M | -$346M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.3B | $1.2B | $559M | $126M | $346M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $594M | $68M | $100M | $1.0B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 37.63x | 67.24x | 33.88x | 0.59x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HRTG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HRTG five years ago would be worth $30,138 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,483 for KMPR. Over the past 12 months, MCY leads with a +74.1% total return vs KMPR's -50.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HRTG at 89.9% vs KMPR's -10.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.0% | -16.7% | +2.7% | -24.9% | -20.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +74.1% | +2.4% | +15.3% | -50.2% | -38.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +243.2% | +209.6% | +585.3% | -29.0% | -0.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +58.8% | +105.3% | +201.4% | -55.2% | +14.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +127.5% | +436.8% | +119.4% | +31.6% | +171.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +50.8% | +45.7% | +89.9% | -10.8% | -0.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MCY and ERIE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ERIE is the less volatile stock with a 0.16 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KMPR's 0.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MCY currently trades 97.2% from its 52-week high vs KMPR's 44.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.54x | 0.39x | 0.50x | 0.58x | 0.16x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $100.69 | $210.50 | $31.98 | $66.13 | $380.67 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $54.00 | $136.37 | $16.83 | $27.74 | $210.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.2% | +72.6% | +87.6% | +44.4% | +56.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.6 | 48.7 | 55.7 | 51.1 | 33.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 208K | 167K | 282K | 813K | 231K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HCI and KMPR and ERIE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MCY as "Hold", HCI as "Buy", HRTG as "Buy", KMPR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 63.4% upside for KMPR (target: $48) vs -17.2% for HCI (target: $127). For income investors, KMPR offers the higher dividend yield at 4.33% vs HCI's 0.98%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $90.00 | $126.50 | $39.00 | $48.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 14 | 9 | 12 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.3% | +1.0% | — | +4.3% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.27 | $1.50 | — | $1.27 | $4.83 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% | +0.3% | +17.5% | 0.0% |
HCI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HRTG leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.
MCY vs HCI vs HRTG vs KMPR vs ERIE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MCY or HCI or HRTG or KMPR or ERIE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, HCI Group, Inc.
(HCI) is the stronger pick with 20. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 6% for Kemper Corporation (KMPR). Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG) offers the better valuation at 4. 4x trailing P/E (6. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MCY or HCI or HRTG or KMPR or ERIE?
On trailing P/E, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.
(HRTG) is the cheapest at 4. 4x versus Erie Indemnity Company at 20. 4x. On forward P/E, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: HCI Group, Inc. wins at 0. 19x versus Mercury General Corporation's 1. 43x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MCY or HCI or HRTG or KMPR or ERIE?
Over the past 5 years, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.
(HRTG) delivered a total return of +201. 4%, compared to -55. 2% for Kemper Corporation (KMPR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HCI returned +436. 8% versus KMPR's +31. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MCY or HCI or HRTG or KMPR or ERIE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Erie Indemnity Company (ERIE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
16β versus Kemper Corporation's 0. 58β — meaning KMPR is approximately 256% more volatile than ERIE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 38% for Kemper Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MCY or HCI or HRTG or KMPR or ERIE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), HCI Group, Inc.
(HCI) is pulling ahead at 20. 2% versus 3. 6% for Kemper Corporation (KMPR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 214. 4% year-over-year, compared to -53. 4% for Kemper Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, HCI leads at 22. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MCY or HCI or HRTG or KMPR or ERIE?
HCI Group, Inc.
(HCI) is the more profitable company, earning 33. 2% net margin versus 3. 0% for Kemper Corporation — meaning it keeps 33. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HCI leads at 47. 7% versus 3. 3% for KMPR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HCI leads at 73. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MCY or HCI or HRTG or KMPR or ERIE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 19x versus Mercury General Corporation's 1. 43x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG) trades at 6. 1x forward P/E versus 17. 1x for Erie Indemnity Company — 11. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KMPR: 63. 4% to $48. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MCY or HCI or HRTG or KMPR or ERIE?
In this comparison, KMPR (4.
3% yield), ERIE (2. 2% yield), MCY (1. 3% yield), HCI (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. HRTG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MCY or HCI or HRTG or KMPR or ERIE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Erie Indemnity Company (ERIE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
16), 2. 2% yield, +171. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ERIE: +171. 6%, HRTG: +119. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MCY and HCI and HRTG and KMPR and ERIE?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MCY is a small-cap deep-value stock; HCI is a small-cap high-growth stock; HRTG is a small-cap deep-value stock; KMPR is a small-cap deep-value stock; ERIE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. MCY, HCI, KMPR, ERIE pay a dividend while HRTG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.