Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MYSZ vs FIGS vs REAL vs CURV vs XERS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Apparel - Manufacturers
Luxury Goods
Apparel - Retail
Biotechnology
MYSZ vs FIGS vs REAL vs CURV vs XERS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Apparel - Manufacturers | Luxury Goods | Apparel - Retail | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $528K | $2.57B | $3.59B | $160M | $1.14B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8M | $666M | $723M | $1.00B | $315M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $41M | $-65M | $-7M | $12M |
| Gross Margin | 38.7% | 66.6% | 73.3% | 34.8% | 59.4% |
| Operating Margin | -49.1% | 6.4% | -1.9% | 2.1% | 11.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 65.0x | 307.7x | — | 55.3x |
| Total Debt | $276K | $60M | $463M | $149M | $38M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $82M | $151M | $20M | $111M |
MYSZ vs FIGS vs REAL vs CURV vs XERS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| My Size, Inc. (MYSZ) | 100 | 0.2 | -99.8% |
| FIGS, Inc. (FIGS) | 100 | 42.2 | -57.8% |
| The RealReal, Inc. (REAL) | 100 | 75.1 | -24.9% |
| Torrid Holdings Inc. (CURV) | 100 | 6.6 | -93.4% |
| Xeris Biopharma Hol… (XERS) | 100 | 216.0 | +116.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MYSZ vs FIGS vs REAL vs CURV vs XERS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MYSZ lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
FIGS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- -48.8% 10Y total return vs REAL's -57.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.15, Low D/E 13.7%, current ratio 4.94x
- Beta 1.15, current ratio 4.94x
- 6.1% margin vs MYSZ's -47.4%
Among these 5 stocks, REAL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
CURV ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.46
- Beta 0.46 vs REAL's 2.95
XERS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 43.7%, EPS growth 100.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 38.3%
- 43.7% revenue growth vs CURV's -9.4%
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 43.7% revenue growth vs CURV's -9.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.1% margin vs MYSZ's -47.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs REAL's 2.95 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +214.3% vs CURV's -70.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.4% ROA vs MYSZ's -30.5%, ROIC 7.5% vs -106.7% |
MYSZ vs FIGS vs REAL vs CURV vs XERS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MYSZ vs FIGS vs REAL vs CURV vs XERS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
XERS leads in 2 of 6 categories
MYSZ leads 0 • FIGS leads 0 • REAL leads 0 • CURV leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XERS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CURV is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.0B annually — 133.1x MYSZ's $8M. FIGS is the more profitable business, keeping 6.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MYSZ's -47.4%. On growth, MYSZ holds the edge at +39.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8M | $666M | $723M | $1.0B | $315M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | $50M | $11M | $75M | $45M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | $41M | -$65M | -$7M | $12M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | $39M | $13M | -$22M | $57M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.7% | +66.6% | +73.3% | +34.8% | +59.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -49.1% | +6.4% | -1.9% | +2.1% | +11.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -47.4% | +6.1% | -9.0% | -0.7% | +3.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -46.9% | +5.9% | +1.7% | -2.2% | +18.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +39.9% | +28.0% | +18.5% | -14.3% | +38.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +68.0% | — | -150.0% | -185.7% | +116.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MYSZ and CURV and XERS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 80.9x trailing earnings, FIGS trades at a 96% valuation discount to XERS's 2071.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CURV's 13.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than REAL's 430.5x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $528,240 | $2.6B | $3.6B | $160M | $1.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$4M | $2.5B | $3.9B | $290M | $1.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.13x | 80.89x | -18.24x | -21.86x | 2071.88x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 65.04x | 307.69x | — | 55.25x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 53.95x | 430.51x | 13.53x | 28.88x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.06x | 4.07x | 5.19x | 0.16x | 3.92x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.08x | 6.31x | — | — | 83.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 48.44x | 195.62x | — | 40.93x |
Profitability & Efficiency
XERS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
XERS delivers a 7.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-49 for MYSZ. MYSZ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to XERS's 2.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FIGS scores 7/9 vs CURV's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -48.8% | +9.7% | — | — | +7.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -30.5% | +7.4% | -17.3% | -1.7% | +3.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -106.7% | +7.5% | — | +22.5% | +33.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -64.8% | +8.4% | -15.0% | +11.4% | +10.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.14x | — | — | 2.76x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | -$22M | $312M | $129M | -$73M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $82M | $151M | $20M | $111M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $276,000 | $60M | $463M | $149M | $38M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -123.93x | — | -5.83x | 0.84x | 1.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — FIGS and REAL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in XERS five years ago would be worth $20,400 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $25 for MYSZ. Over the past 12 months, FIGS leads with a +214.3% total return vs CURV's -70.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors REAL at 108.4% vs MYSZ's -60.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -28.5% | +34.9% | -21.5% | +44.3% | -9.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -55.0% | +214.3% | +75.9% | -70.9% | +48.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.9% | +92.1% | +805.1% | -60.1% | +176.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | -48.8% | -45.6% | -93.7% | +104.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -48.8% | -57.1% | -93.7% | -67.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -60.7% | +24.3% | +108.4% | -26.4% | +40.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FIGS and CURV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CURV is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than REAL's 2.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FIGS currently trades 87.9% from its 52-week high vs CURV's 25.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.17x | 1.15x | 2.95x | 0.46x | 1.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.65 | $17.48 | $17.39 | $6.08 | $10.08 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.50 | $4.25 | $4.70 | $0.94 | $4.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +35.2% | +87.9% | +71.3% | +25.2% | +65.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.5 | 46.0 | 66.3 | 35.2 | 58.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 46K | 3.8M | 3.3M | 852K | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FIGS as "Buy", REAL as "Buy", CURV as "Hold", XERS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 46.5% upside for REAL (target: $18) vs -15.9% for FIGS (target: $13).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $12.92 | $18.17 | $1.51 | $9.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 | 25 | 10 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.0% |
XERS leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
MYSZ vs FIGS vs REAL vs CURV vs XERS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MYSZ or FIGS or REAL or CURV or XERS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc.
(XERS) is the stronger pick with 43. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Torrid Holdings Inc. (CURV). FIGS, Inc. (FIGS) offers the better valuation at 80. 9x trailing P/E (65. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate FIGS, Inc. (FIGS) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MYSZ or FIGS or REAL or CURV or XERS?
On trailing P/E, FIGS, Inc.
(FIGS) is the cheapest at 80. 9x versus Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. at 2071. 9x. On forward P/E, Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 55. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MYSZ or FIGS or REAL or CURV or XERS?
Over the past 5 years, Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc.
(XERS) delivered a total return of +104. 0%, compared to -99. 8% for My Size, Inc. (MYSZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FIGS returned -48. 8% versus MYSZ's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MYSZ or FIGS or REAL or CURV or XERS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Torrid Holdings Inc.
(CURV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 46β versus The RealReal, Inc. 's 2. 95β — meaning REAL is approximately 547% more volatile than CURV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, My Size, Inc. (MYSZ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 3% for Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MYSZ or FIGS or REAL or CURV or XERS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc.
(XERS) is pulling ahead at 43. 7% versus -9. 4% for Torrid Holdings Inc. (CURV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FIGS, Inc. grew EPS 1158% year-over-year, compared to -146. 7% for Torrid Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MYSZ leads at 298. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MYSZ or FIGS or REAL or CURV or XERS?
FIGS, Inc.
(FIGS) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 4% net margin versus -48. 4% for My Size, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: XERS leads at 8. 5% versus -47. 8% for MYSZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — XERS leads at 81. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MYSZ or FIGS or REAL or CURV or XERS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc.
(XERS) trades at 55. 3x forward P/E versus 307. 7x for The RealReal, Inc. — 252. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for REAL: 46. 5% to $18. 17.
08Which pays a better dividend — MYSZ or FIGS or REAL or CURV or XERS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is MYSZ or FIGS or REAL or CURV or XERS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Torrid Holdings Inc.
(CURV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46)). The RealReal, Inc. (REAL) carries a higher beta of 2. 95 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CURV: -93. 7%, REAL: -57. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MYSZ and FIGS and REAL and CURV and XERS?
These companies operate in different sectors (MYSZ (Technology) and FIGS (Consumer Cyclical) and REAL (Consumer Cyclical) and CURV (Consumer Cyclical) and XERS (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MYSZ is a small-cap high-growth stock; FIGS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; REAL is a small-cap high-growth stock; CURV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; XERS is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.