Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MYSZ vs FIGS vs REAL vs CURV vs XERS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MYSZ
My Size, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$528K
5Y Perf.-99.8%
FIGS
FIGS, Inc.

Apparel - Manufacturers

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.57B
5Y Perf.-57.8%
REAL
The RealReal, Inc.

Luxury Goods

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.59B
5Y Perf.-24.9%
CURV
Torrid Holdings Inc.

Apparel - Retail

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$160M
5Y Perf.-93.4%
XERS
Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.14B
5Y Perf.+116.0%

MYSZ vs FIGS vs REAL vs CURV vs XERS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MYSZ logoMYSZ
FIGS logoFIGS
REAL logoREAL
CURV logoCURV
XERS logoXERS
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationApparel - ManufacturersLuxury GoodsApparel - RetailBiotechnology
Market Cap$528K$2.57B$3.59B$160M$1.14B
Revenue (TTM)$8M$666M$723M$1.00B$315M
Net Income (TTM)$-4M$41M$-65M$-7M$12M
Gross Margin38.7%66.6%73.3%34.8%59.4%
Operating Margin-49.1%6.4%-1.9%2.1%11.4%
Forward P/E65.0x307.7x55.3x
Total Debt$276K$60M$463M$149M$38M
Cash & Equiv.$5M$82M$151M$20M$111M

MYSZ vs FIGS vs REAL vs CURV vs XERSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MYSZ
FIGS
REAL
CURV
XERS
StockJul 21May 26Return
My Size, Inc. (MYSZ)1000.2-99.8%
FIGS, Inc. (FIGS)10042.2-57.8%
The RealReal, Inc. (REAL)10075.1-24.9%
Torrid Holdings Inc. (CURV)1006.6-93.4%
Xeris Biopharma Hol… (XERS)100216.0+116.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MYSZ vs FIGS vs REAL vs CURV vs XERS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FIGS leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. CURV also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
MYSZ
My Size, Inc.
The Technology Pick

MYSZ lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
FIGS
FIGS, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

FIGS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • -48.8% 10Y total return vs REAL's -57.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.15, Low D/E 13.7%, current ratio 4.94x
  • Beta 1.15, current ratio 4.94x
  • 6.1% margin vs MYSZ's -47.4%
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
REAL
The RealReal, Inc.
The Consumer Cyclical Pick

Among these 5 stocks, REAL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
CURV
Torrid Holdings Inc.
The Income Pick

CURV ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.46
  • Beta 0.46 vs REAL's 2.95
Best for: income & stability
XERS
Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc.
The Growth Play

XERS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 43.7%, EPS growth 100.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 38.3%
  • 43.7% revenue growth vs CURV's -9.4%
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthXERS logoXERS43.7% revenue growth vs CURV's -9.4%
ValueXERS logoXERSBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsFIGS logoFIGS6.1% margin vs MYSZ's -47.4%
Stability / SafetyCURV logoCURVBeta 0.46 vs REAL's 2.95
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)FIGS logoFIGS+214.3% vs CURV's -70.9%
Efficiency (ROA)FIGS logoFIGS7.4% ROA vs MYSZ's -30.5%, ROIC 7.5% vs -106.7%

MYSZ vs FIGS vs REAL vs CURV vs XERS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MYSZMy Size, Inc.
FY 2024
Fashion and Equipment ECommerce Platform
91.2%$8M
Saas Solutions
8.8%$729,000
FIGSFIGS, Inc.
FY 2025
Scrubwear
80.6%$509M
Non-scrubwear/Lifestyle
19.4%$122M
REALThe RealReal, Inc.
FY 2025
Service
77.3%$536M
Product
13.1%$91M
Shipping and Handling
9.5%$66M
CURVTorrid Holdings Inc.
FY 2024
Apparel
89.6%$989M
Non-apparel
7.5%$83M
Other Products And Services
2.9%$32M
XERSXeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
85.1%$283M
Keveyis
14.3%$48M
Product, Other
0.6%$2M

MYSZ vs FIGS vs REAL vs CURV vs XERS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLXERSLAGGINGCURV

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

XERS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

CURV is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.0B annually — 133.1x MYSZ's $8M. FIGS is the more profitable business, keeping 6.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MYSZ's -47.4%. On growth, MYSZ holds the edge at +39.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMYSZ logoMYSZMy Size, Inc.FIGS logoFIGSFIGS, Inc.REAL logoREALThe RealReal, Inc.CURV logoCURVTorrid Holdings I…XERS logoXERSXeris Biopharma H…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$8M$666M$723M$1.0B$315M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$3M$50M$11M$75M$45M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$4M$41M-$65M-$7M$12M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$4M$39M$13M-$22M$57M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+38.7%+66.6%+73.3%+34.8%+59.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-49.1%+6.4%-1.9%+2.1%+11.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-47.4%+6.1%-9.0%-0.7%+3.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-46.9%+5.9%+1.7%-2.2%+18.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+39.9%+28.0%+18.5%-14.3%+38.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+68.0%-150.0%-185.7%+116.5%
XERS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — MYSZ and CURV and XERS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 80.9x trailing earnings, FIGS trades at a 96% valuation discount to XERS's 2071.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CURV's 13.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than REAL's 430.5x.

MetricMYSZ logoMYSZMy Size, Inc.FIGS logoFIGSFIGS, Inc.REAL logoREALThe RealReal, Inc.CURV logoCURVTorrid Holdings I…XERS logoXERSXeris Biopharma H…
Market CapShares × price$528,240$2.6B$3.6B$160M$1.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$4M$2.5B$3.9B$290M$1.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.13x80.89x-18.24x-21.86x2071.88x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.65.04x307.69x55.25x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple53.95x430.51x13.53x28.88x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.06x4.07x5.19x0.16x3.92x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.08x6.31x83.66x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF48.44x195.62x40.93x
Evenly matched — MYSZ and CURV and XERS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

XERS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

XERS delivers a 7.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-49 for MYSZ. MYSZ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to XERS's 2.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FIGS scores 7/9 vs CURV's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricMYSZ logoMYSZMy Size, Inc.FIGS logoFIGSFIGS, Inc.REAL logoREALThe RealReal, Inc.CURV logoCURVTorrid Holdings I…XERS logoXERSXeris Biopharma H…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-48.8%+9.7%+7.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-30.5%+7.4%-17.3%-1.7%+3.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-106.7%+7.5%+22.5%+33.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-64.8%+8.4%-15.0%+11.4%+10.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–967537
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.04x0.14x2.76x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$5M-$22M$312M$129M-$73M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$5M$82M$151M$20M$111M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$276,000$60M$463M$149M$38M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-123.93x-5.83x0.84x1.12x
XERS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — FIGS and REAL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in XERS five years ago would be worth $20,400 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $25 for MYSZ. Over the past 12 months, FIGS leads with a +214.3% total return vs CURV's -70.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors REAL at 108.4% vs MYSZ's -60.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMYSZ logoMYSZMy Size, Inc.FIGS logoFIGSFIGS, Inc.REAL logoREALThe RealReal, Inc.CURV logoCURVTorrid Holdings I…XERS logoXERSXeris Biopharma H…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-28.5%+34.9%-21.5%+44.3%-9.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-55.0%+214.3%+75.9%-70.9%+48.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-93.9%+92.1%+805.1%-60.1%+176.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.8%-48.8%-45.6%-93.7%+104.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-48.8%-57.1%-93.7%-67.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-60.7%+24.3%+108.4%-26.4%+40.3%
Evenly matched — FIGS and REAL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — FIGS and CURV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CURV is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than REAL's 2.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FIGS currently trades 87.9% from its 52-week high vs CURV's 25.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMYSZ logoMYSZMy Size, Inc.FIGS logoFIGSFIGS, Inc.REAL logoREALThe RealReal, Inc.CURV logoCURVTorrid Holdings I…XERS logoXERSXeris Biopharma H…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.17x1.15x2.95x0.46x1.04x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$1.65$17.48$17.39$6.08$10.08
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.50$4.25$4.70$0.94$4.30
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+35.2%+87.9%+71.3%+25.2%+65.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10042.546.066.335.258.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded46K3.8M3.3M852K1.8M
Evenly matched — FIGS and CURV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: FIGS as "Buy", REAL as "Buy", CURV as "Hold", XERS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 46.5% upside for REAL (target: $18) vs -15.9% for FIGS (target: $13).

MetricMYSZ logoMYSZMy Size, Inc.FIGS logoFIGSFIGS, Inc.REAL logoREALThe RealReal, Inc.CURV logoCURVTorrid Holdings I…XERS logoXERSXeris Biopharma H…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$12.92$18.17$1.51$9.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts15251010
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.1%0.0%0.0%+1.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

XERS leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.

Best OverallXeris Biopharma Holdings, I… (XERS)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MYSZ vs FIGS vs REAL vs CURV vs XERS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MYSZ or FIGS or REAL or CURV or XERS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc.

(XERS) is the stronger pick with 43. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Torrid Holdings Inc. (CURV). FIGS, Inc. (FIGS) offers the better valuation at 80. 9x trailing P/E (65. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate FIGS, Inc. (FIGS) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MYSZ or FIGS or REAL or CURV or XERS?

On trailing P/E, FIGS, Inc.

(FIGS) is the cheapest at 80. 9x versus Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. at 2071. 9x. On forward P/E, Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 55. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MYSZ or FIGS or REAL or CURV or XERS?

Over the past 5 years, Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc.

(XERS) delivered a total return of +104. 0%, compared to -99. 8% for My Size, Inc. (MYSZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FIGS returned -48. 8% versus MYSZ's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MYSZ or FIGS or REAL or CURV or XERS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Torrid Holdings Inc.

(CURV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 46β versus The RealReal, Inc. 's 2. 95β — meaning REAL is approximately 547% more volatile than CURV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, My Size, Inc. (MYSZ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 3% for Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MYSZ or FIGS or REAL or CURV or XERS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc.

(XERS) is pulling ahead at 43. 7% versus -9. 4% for Torrid Holdings Inc. (CURV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FIGS, Inc. grew EPS 1158% year-over-year, compared to -146. 7% for Torrid Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MYSZ leads at 298. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MYSZ or FIGS or REAL or CURV or XERS?

FIGS, Inc.

(FIGS) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 4% net margin versus -48. 4% for My Size, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: XERS leads at 8. 5% versus -47. 8% for MYSZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — XERS leads at 81. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MYSZ or FIGS or REAL or CURV or XERS more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc.

(XERS) trades at 55. 3x forward P/E versus 307. 7x for The RealReal, Inc. — 252. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for REAL: 46. 5% to $18. 17.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MYSZ or FIGS or REAL or CURV or XERS?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is MYSZ or FIGS or REAL or CURV or XERS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Torrid Holdings Inc.

(CURV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46)). The RealReal, Inc. (REAL) carries a higher beta of 2. 95 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CURV: -93. 7%, REAL: -57. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MYSZ and FIGS and REAL and CURV and XERS?

These companies operate in different sectors (MYSZ (Technology) and FIGS (Consumer Cyclical) and REAL (Consumer Cyclical) and CURV (Consumer Cyclical) and XERS (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: MYSZ is a small-cap high-growth stock; FIGS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; REAL is a small-cap high-growth stock; CURV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; XERS is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

MYSZ

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 19%
  • Gross Margin > 23%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FIGS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

REAL

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Gross Margin > 44%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CURV

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 20%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

XERS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 19%
  • Gross Margin > 35%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform MYSZ and FIGS and REAL and CURV and XERS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(MYSZ: 39.9% · FIGS: 28.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.