Insurance - Property & Casualty
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SIGI vs ERIE vs CINF vs HCI vs KMPR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Brokers
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Property & Casualty
SIGI vs ERIE vs CINF vs HCI vs KMPR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Brokers | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty |
| Market Cap | $5.09B | $10.01B | $25.23B | $1.99B | $1.73B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.41B | $4.33B | $12.92B | $927M | $4.71B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $454M | $571M | $2.76B | $314M | $39M |
| Gross Margin | 40.7% | 18.1% | 50.3% | 66.5% | 8.1% |
| Operating Margin | 9.9% | 17.0% | 26.7% | 47.9% | 0.7% |
| Forward P/E | 10.9x | 17.1x | 18.7x | 9.2x | 7.8x |
| Total Debt | $898M | $0.00 | $886M | $68M | $1.00B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $346K | $346M | $1.43B | $1.21B | $126M |
SIGI vs ERIE vs CINF vs HCI vs KMPR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Selective Insurance… (SIGI) | 100 | 161.5 | +61.5% |
| Erie Indemnity Comp… (ERIE) | 100 | 120.3 | +20.3% |
| Cincinnati Financia… (CINF) | 100 | 274.9 | +174.9% |
| HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) | 100 | 340.8 | +240.8% |
| Kemper Corporation (KMPR) | 100 | 46.3 | -53.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SIGI vs ERIE vs CINF vs HCI vs KMPR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SIGI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.30, Low D/E 24.9%, current ratio 650.38x
- 1.8% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs KMPR's 4.3%
ERIE has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.16, yield 2.2%
- Beta 0.16, yield 2.2%, current ratio 1.27x
- Beta 0.16 vs KMPR's 0.58
- 17.3% ROA vs KMPR's 0.4%, ROIC 29.5% vs 3.1%
CINF is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +14.0% vs KMPR's -50.2%
HCI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 20.2%, EPS growth 179.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.3%
- 436.8% 10Y total return vs CINF's 180.5%
- PEG 0.19 vs ERIE's 1.26
- 20.2% revenue growth vs KMPR's 3.6%
KMPR is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (7.8x vs 18.7x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.2% revenue growth vs KMPR's 3.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.8x vs 18.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Combined ratio 0.5 vs KMPR's 1.0 (lower = better underwriting) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.16 vs KMPR's 0.58 | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs KMPR's 4.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +14.0% vs KMPR's -50.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.3% ROA vs KMPR's 0.4%, ROIC 29.5% vs 3.1% |
SIGI vs ERIE vs CINF vs HCI vs KMPR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SIGI vs ERIE vs CINF vs HCI vs KMPR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HCI leads in 3 of 6 categories
KMPR leads 1 • SIGI leads 0 • ERIE leads 0 • CINF leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HCI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CINF is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.9B annually — 13.9x HCI's $927M. HCI is the more profitable business, keeping 33.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KMPR's 0.8%. On growth, HCI holds the edge at +11.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.4B | $4.3B | $12.9B | $927M | $4.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $817M | $786M | $3.6B | $454M | $21M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $454M | $571M | $2.8B | $314M | $39M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.1B | $537M | $3.4B | $431M | $382M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.7% | +18.1% | +50.3% | +66.5% | +8.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.9% | +17.0% | +26.7% | +47.9% | +0.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.4% | +13.2% | +21.3% | +33.9% | +0.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.2% | +12.4% | +26.7% | +46.4% | +8.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.7% | +2.3% | +11.6% | +11.9% | -7.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -10.2% | +7.9% | +4.0% | +23.4% | -104.9% |
Valuation Metrics
KMPR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.1x trailing earnings, HCI trades at a 70% valuation discount to ERIE's 20.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HCI offers better value at 0.13x vs ERIE's 1.50x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.1B | $10.0B | $25.2B | $2.0B | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.0B | $9.7B | $24.7B | $844M | $2.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.32x | 20.41x | 10.68x | 6.15x | 12.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.95x | 17.15x | 18.69x | 9.19x | 7.82x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.88x | 1.50x | 0.70x | 0.13x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.62x | 12.14x | 7.84x | 1.92x | 11.08x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.95x | 2.46x | 2.00x | 2.20x | 0.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.43x | 5.00x | 1.61x | 1.77x | 0.69x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.12x | 17.53x | 8.16x | 4.47x | 3.11x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HCI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HCI delivers a 32.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $1 for KMPR. CINF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KMPR's 0.38x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HCI scores 8/9 vs ERIE's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.9% | +25.0% | +18.0% | +32.0% | +1.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.0% | +17.3% | +6.8% | +13.2% | +0.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.9% | +29.5% | +15.3% | +6.8% | +3.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.1% | +32.0% | +14.0% | +40.6% | +1.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.25x | — | 0.06x | 0.06x | 0.38x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $898M | -$346M | -$545M | -$1.1B | $879M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $346,000 | $346M | $1.4B | $1.2B | $126M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $898M | $0 | $886M | $68M | $1.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.73x | — | 46.68x | 67.24x | 0.59x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HCI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HCI five years ago would be worth $20,530 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,483 for KMPR. Over the past 12 months, CINF leads with a +14.0% total return vs KMPR's -50.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HCI at 45.7% vs KMPR's -10.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.9% | -20.9% | +0.9% | -16.7% | -24.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -3.8% | -38.7% | +14.0% | +2.4% | -50.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -14.1% | -0.2% | +62.2% | +209.6% | -29.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +17.9% | +14.8% | +47.4% | +105.3% | -55.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +167.3% | +171.6% | +180.5% | +436.8% | +31.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -5.0% | -0.1% | +17.5% | +45.7% | -10.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ERIE and CINF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ERIE is the less volatile stock with a 0.16 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KMPR's 0.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CINF currently trades 93.0% from its 52-week high vs KMPR's 44.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.30x | 0.16x | 0.43x | 0.39x | 0.58x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $91.63 | $380.67 | $174.27 | $210.50 | $66.13 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $71.75 | $210.06 | $143.37 | $136.37 | $27.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.4% | +56.9% | +93.0% | +72.6% | +44.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.4 | 33.6 | 43.6 | 48.7 | 51.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 534K | 231K | 684K | 167K | 813K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SIGI and KMPR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SIGI as "Hold", CINF as "Buy", HCI as "Buy", KMPR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 63.4% upside for KMPR (target: $48) vs -17.2% for HCI (target: $127). For income investors, KMPR offers the higher dividend yield at 4.33% vs HCI's 0.98%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $90.50 | — | $173.50 | $126.50 | $48.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | — | 17 | 14 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.8% | +2.2% | +2.1% | +1.0% | +4.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 15 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.52 | $4.83 | $3.33 | $1.50 | $1.27 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.8% | 0.0% | +0.8% | +0.1% | +17.5% |
HCI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KMPR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
SIGI vs ERIE vs CINF vs HCI vs KMPR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SIGI or ERIE or CINF or HCI or KMPR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, HCI Group, Inc.
(HCI) is the stronger pick with 20. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 6% for Kemper Corporation (KMPR). HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) offers the better valuation at 6. 1x trailing P/E (9. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SIGI or ERIE or CINF or HCI or KMPR?
On trailing P/E, HCI Group, Inc.
(HCI) is the cheapest at 6. 1x versus Erie Indemnity Company at 20. 4x. On forward P/E, Kemper Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: HCI Group, Inc. wins at 0. 19x versus Erie Indemnity Company's 1. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SIGI or ERIE or CINF or HCI or KMPR?
Over the past 5 years, HCI Group, Inc.
(HCI) delivered a total return of +105. 3%, compared to -55. 2% for Kemper Corporation (KMPR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HCI returned +436. 8% versus KMPR's +31. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SIGI or ERIE or CINF or HCI or KMPR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Erie Indemnity Company (ERIE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
16β versus Kemper Corporation's 0. 58β — meaning KMPR is approximately 256% more volatile than ERIE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 38% for Kemper Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SIGI or ERIE or CINF or HCI or KMPR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), HCI Group, Inc.
(HCI) is pulling ahead at 20. 2% versus 3. 6% for Kemper Corporation (KMPR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HCI Group, Inc. grew EPS 179. 8% year-over-year, compared to -53. 4% for Kemper Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CINF leads at 24. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SIGI or ERIE or CINF or HCI or KMPR?
HCI Group, Inc.
(HCI) is the more profitable company, earning 33. 2% net margin versus 3. 0% for Kemper Corporation — meaning it keeps 33. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HCI leads at 47. 7% versus 3. 3% for KMPR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HCI leads at 73. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SIGI or ERIE or CINF or HCI or KMPR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 19x versus Erie Indemnity Company's 1. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Kemper Corporation (KMPR) trades at 7. 8x forward P/E versus 18. 7x for Cincinnati Financial Corporation — 10. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KMPR: 63. 4% to $48. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SIGI or ERIE or CINF or HCI or KMPR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Kemper Corporation (KMPR) offers the highest yield at 4. 3%, versus 1. 0% for HCI Group, Inc. (HCI).
09Is SIGI or ERIE or CINF or HCI or KMPR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Erie Indemnity Company (ERIE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
16), 2. 2% yield, +171. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ERIE: +171. 6%, KMPR: +31. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SIGI and ERIE and CINF and HCI and KMPR?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SIGI is a small-cap deep-value stock; ERIE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CINF is a mid-cap deep-value stock; HCI is a small-cap high-growth stock; KMPR is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.